Investigation of Binding Phenomenon of NSP3 and p130Cas Mutants and Their Effect on Cell Signalling

Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 623-633

  Balu, K ^a   Rajendran, Vidya ^a   Sethumadhavan, Rao ^a   Purohit, Rituraj ^a,b  

^a VIT UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b Human Genetics Foundation   (Italy)

Author keywords

Binding affinity; Cell signalling; Flexibility; Hydrogen bonds; Interactions; Molecular dynamics

Indexed keywords

CRK ASSOCIATED SUBSTRATE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; HYDROGEN BOND; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MUTATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

CRK-ASSOCIATED SUBSTRATE PROTEIN; HYDROGEN BONDING; MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; MUTATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84887212608     PISSN: 10859195     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12013-013-9551-6     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Kholodenko, B. N. (2006). Cell signalling dynamics in time and space. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 7, 165-176.
2. Mace, P. D., Wallez, Y., Dobaczewska, M. K., et al. (2011). NSP-Cas protein structures reveal a promiscuous interaction module in cell signaling. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 18, 1381-1387.
3. Bargon, S. D., Gunning, P. W., & O'Neill, G. M. (2005). The Cas family docking protein, HEF1, promotes the formation of neurite-like membrane extensions. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1746, 143-154.
4. Hauck, C. R., Hsia, D. A., Puente, X. S., Cheresh, D. A., & Schlaepfer, D. D. (2002). FRNK blocks v-Src-stimulated invasion and experimental metastases without effects on cell motility or growth. The EMBO Journal, 21, 6289-6302.
5. Brábek, J., Constancio, S. S., Siesser, P. F., et al. (2005). Crk-associated substrate tyrosine phosphorylation sites are critical for invasion and metastasis of SRC-transformed cells. Molecular Cancer Research, 3, 307-315.
6. Sakakibara, A., Ohba, Y., Kurokawa, K., Matsuda, M., & Hattori, S. (2002). Novel function of chat in controlling cell adhesion via Cas-Crk-C3G-pathway-mediated Rap1 activation. Journal of Cell Science, 115, 4915-4924.
7. Honda, H., Nakamoto, T., Sakai, R., & Hirai, R. (1999). p130(Cas), an assembling molecule of actin filaments, promotes cell movement, cell migration, and cell spreading in fibroblasts. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 262, 25-30.
8. Garron, M. L., Arsenieva, D., Zhong, J., et al. (2009). Structural insights into the association between BCAR3 and Cas family members, an atypical complex implicated in anti-oestrogen resistance. Journal of Molecular Biology, 386, 190-203.
9. Al-Shami, A., Wilkins, C., Crisostomo, J., Seshasayee, D., Martin, F., Xu, N., et al. (2010). The adaptor protein sh2d3c is critical for marginal zone B cell development and function. Journal of Immunology, 185, 327-334.
10. Tikhmyanova, N., Little, J. L., & Golemis, E. A. (2010). CAS proteins in normal and pathological cell growth control. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 67, 1025-1048.
11. Browne, C. D., Hoefer, M. M., Chintalapati, S. K., et al. (2010). SHEP1 partners with CasL to promote marginal zone B-cell maturation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 18944-18949.
12. Borre, P. V., Near, R. I., Makkinje, A., Mostoslavsky, G., & Lerner, A. (2011). BCAR3/AND-34 can signal independent of complex formation with CAS family members of the presence of p130Cas. Cell Signalling, 23, 1030-1040.
13. Klemke, R. L., Leng, J., Molander, R., et al. (1998). CAS/Crk coupling serves as a 'molecular switch" for induction of cell migration. Journal of Cell Biology, 140, 961-972.
14. Rajendran, V., Purohit, R., & Sethumadhavan, R. (2012). In silico investigation of molecular mechanism of laminopathy cause by a point mutation (R482 W) in lamin A/C protein. Amino Acids, 43, 603-615.
15. Purohit, R., Rajendran, V., & Sethumadhavan, R. (2011). Studies on adaptability of binding residues and flap region of TMC-114 resistance HIV-1 protease mutants. Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics, 29, 137-152.
16. Purohit, R., & Sethumadhavan, R. (2009). Structural basis for the resilience of Darunavir (TMC114) resistance major flap mutations of HIV-1 protease. Interdisciplinary Reviews, 1, 320-328.
17. Purohit, R., Rajendran, V., & Sethumadhavan, R. (2011). Relationship between mutation of serine residue at 315th position in M. tuberculosis catalase-peroxidase enzyme and isoniazid susceptibility: An in silico analysis. Journal of Molecular Modelling, 17, 869-877.
18. Purohit, R., Rajasekaran, R., Sudandiradoss, C., et al. (2008). Studies on flexibility and binding affinity of Asp25 of HIV-1 protease mutants. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 42, 386-391.
19. Kumar, A., & Purohit, R. (2012). Computational investigation of pathogenic nsSNPs in CEP63 protein. Gene, 503, 75-82.
20. Kumar, A., & Purohit, R. (2012). Computational screening and molecular dynamics simulation of disease associated nsSNPs in CENP-E. Mutation Research, 738-739, 28-37.
21. Balu, K., & Rituraj, P. (2013). Mutational analysis of TYR gene and its structural consequences in OCA1A. Gene, 513, 184-195.
22. Kumar, A., Rajendran, V., Sethumadhavan, R., & Purohit, R. (2012). In silico prediction of a disease-associated STIL mutant and its affect on the recruitment of centromere protein J (CENPJ). FEBS Open Biology, 2, 285-293.
23. Kumar, A., & Purohit, R. (2012). Computational centrosomics: An approach to understand the dynamic behaviour of centrosome. Gene, 511, 125-126.
24. Berman, H. M., Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., et al. (2000). The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Research, 28, 235-242.
25. Kaplan, W., & Littlejohn, T. G. (2001). Swiss-PDB viewer (deep view). Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2, 195-197.
26. Hess, B., Kutzner, C., Spoel, D. V. D., & Lindahl, E. (2008). GROMACS 4: Algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 4, 435-447.
27. Dominguez, C., Boelens, R., & Bonvin, A. M. (2003). HADDOCK: A protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 125, 1731-1737.
28. de Vries, S. J., van Dijk, M., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2010). The HADDOCK web server for data driven biomolecular docking. Nature Protocols, 5, 883-897.
29. Nilges, M. (1995). Calculation of protein structures with ambiguous distance restraints. Automated assignment of ambiguous NOE crosspeaks and disulphide connectivities. Journal of Molecular Biology, 245, 645-660.
30. Nilges, M., Macias, M. J., O'Donoghue, S. I., & Oschkinat, H. (1997). Automated NOESY interpretation with ambiguous distance restraints: The refined NMR solution structure of the pleckstrin homology domain from beta-spectrin. Journal of Molecular Biology, 269, 408-422.
31. Brunger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., et al. (1998). Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography, 54, 905-921.
32. Wallace, A. C., Laskowski, R. A., & Thornton, J. M. (1995). LIGPLOT: A program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions. Protein Engineering, 8, 127-134.
33. McDonald, I. K., & Thornton, J. M. (1994). Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology, 238, 777-793.
34. Berendsen, H. J. C., Postma, J. P. M., van Gunsteren, W. F., et al. (1984). Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 8, 3684-3690.
35. Cheatham, T. E, I. I. I., Miller, J. L., Fox, T., et al. (1995). Molecular dynamics simulations on solvated biomolecular systems: The particle mesh Ewald method leads to stable trajectories of DNA, RNA, and proteins. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 14, 4193-4194.
36. Turner, P. J. (2005). XMGRACE, version 5. 1. 19. Beaverton, OR: Center for Coastal and Land-Margin Research, Oregon Graduate Institute of Science and Technology.
37. Amadei, A., Linssen, A. B., & Berendsen, H. J. C. (1993). Essential dynamics of proteins. Proteins, 17, 412-425.
38. Halperin, I., Ma, B., Wolfson, H., & Nussinov, R. (2002). Principle of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins, 47, 409-443.
39. Janin, J., Henrick, K., Moult, J., et al. (2003). CAPRI: A critical assessment of predicted interactions. Proteins, 52, 2-9.
40. Dijk, M. V., Dijk, A. D. V., Hsu, V., et al. (2006). Information-driven protein-DNA docking using HADDOCK: It is a matter of flexibility. Nucleic Acids Research, 34, 3317-3325.
41. Teng, S., Madej, T., Panchenko, A., & Alexov, E. (2009). Modelling effects of human single nucleotide polymorphisms on protein-protein interactions. Biophysical Journal, 96, 2178-2188.
42. Zhang, Z., Norris, J., Schwartz, C., & Alexov, E. (2011). In silico and in vitro investigations of the mutability of disease-causing missense mutation sites in spermine synthase. PLoS ONE, 6(5), e20373.
43. Fersht, A. R. (1984). Basis of biological specificity. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 9, 145-147.
44. Honig, B., & Yang, A. S. (1995). Free energy balance in protein folding. Advances in Protein Chemistry, 46, 27-58.
45. Bartlett, P. A., & Marlowe, C. K. (1987). Evaluation of the intrinsic binding energy from hydrogen bonding group in an enzyme inhibitor. Science, 235, 569-571.
46. Gao, J., Mammen, M., & Whitesides, G. M. (1996). Evaluating electrostatic contributions to binding with the use of protein charge ladders. Science, 272, 535-537.
47. Kumar, A., Rajendran, V., Sethumadhavan, R., & Purohit, R. (2013). Computational investigation of cancer-associated molecular mechanism in Aurora A (S155R) mutation. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics,. doi: 10. 1007/s12013-013-9524-9.
48. Rajendran, V., & Sethumadhavan, R. (2013). Drug resistance mechanism of PncA in mycobacterium tuberculosis. Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics,. doi: 10. 1080/07391102. 2012. 759885.