The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations at the country level and its dynamic evolution under the pressures of globalization

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 64, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 2317-2325

  Ye, Fred Y ^a   Yu, Susan S ^b   Leydesdorff, Loet ^c  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

measurement

Indexed keywords

COAUTHORSHIP; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; DEVELOPING NATIONS; DYNAMIC EVOLUTION; MUTUAL INFORMATIONS; PUBLIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE; TRIPLE HELIXES; WEB OF SCIENCE;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; MEASUREMENTS;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 84885622801     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.22931     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Attneave, F., (1959). Applications of information theory to psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
2. Benner, M., &, Sandström, U., (2000). Institutionalizing the triple helix: research funding and norms in the academic system. Research Policy, 29 (2), 291-301.
3. Carayannis, E.G., &, Campbell, D.F.J., (2009). "Mode 3" and "Quadruple Helix": Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46 (3), 201-234.
4. Carayannis, E.G., &, Campbell, D.F.J., (2010). Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation, and environment relate to each other? International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1 (1), 41-69.
5. Doranov, N., &, Leydesdorff, L., (in preparation). A bibliometric instrument for the automatic attribution of institutional sectors to affiliations in WoS publications.
6. Durrani, T., Tjakraatmadja, J.H., &, Dhewanto, W., (Eds.). (2012). 10th Triple Helix Conference, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 52). Elsevier: Amsterdam. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ journal/18770428/52
7. Etzkowitz, H., (2003). Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Social Science Information, 42 (3), 293-337.
8. Etzkowitz, H., (2008). The triple helix: University-industry-government innovation in action. London: Routledge.
9. Etzkowitz, H., &, Leydesdorff, L., (1995). The triple helix-university-industry-government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review, 14 (1) 11-19.
10. Etzkowitz, H., &, Leydesdorff, L., (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and "mode 2" to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29 (2), 109-123.
11. Glänzel, W., &, Schubert, A., (2005). Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. In, H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel, &, U. Schmoch, (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 257-276). Dordrecht, etc.: Kluwer.
12. Halffman, W., &, Leydesdorff, L., (2010). Is inequality among universities increasing? Gini coefficients and the elusive rise of elite universities. Minerva, 48 (1), 55-72.
13. Ivanova, I.A., &, Leydesdorff, L., (in preparation). Rotational symmetry and the transformation of innovation systems in a triple helix of university-industry-government relations.
14. Jacob, M., (2006). Utilization of social science knowledge in science policy: Systems of Innovation, Triple Helix and VINNOVA. Social Science Information, 45 (3), 431-462.
15. Jin, B., &, Rousseau, R., (2004). Evaluation of research performance and scientometric indicators in China. In, H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel, &, U. Schmoch, (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 497-514). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
16. Krippendorff, K., (2009a). W. Ross Ashby's information theory: A bit of history, some solutions to problems, and what we face today. International Journal of General Systems, 38 (2), 189-212.
17. Krippendorff, K., (2009b). Information of interactions in complex systems. International Journal of General Systems, 38 (6), 669-680.
18. Kwon, K.S., Park, H.W., So, M., &, Leydesdorff, L., (2012). Has globalization strengthened South Korea's national research system? National and international dynamics of the triple helix of scientific co-authorship relationships in South Korea. Scientometrics, 90 (1), 163-175.
19. Leydesdorff, L., (2003). The mutual information of university-industry- government relations: An indicator of the triple helix dynamics. Scientometrics, 58 (2), 445-467.
20. Leydesdorff, L., (2006). The knowledge-based economy: Modeled, measured, simulated. Boca Raton, FL: Universal Publishers.
21. Leydesdorff, L., (2008). Configurational information as potentially negative entropy: The triple helix model. Entropy, 12, 391-410.
22. Leydesdorff, L., (2010). The knowledge-based economy and the triple helix model. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Blaise Cronin (Ed.); 44, 367-417.
23. Leydesdorff, L., (2011). "Meaning" as a sociological concept: A review of the modeling, mapping, and simulation of the communication of knowledge and meaning. Social Science Information, 50 (3-4), 1-23.
24. Leydesdorff, L., (2012). The triple helix, quadruple helix,., and an N-tuple of helices: Explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3 (1), 25-35.
25. Leydesdorff, L., (in press). An evaluation of impacts in "Nanoscience & nanotechnology:" Steps towards standards for citation analysis. Scientometrics; Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.2306
26. Leydesdorff, L., &, Daekin, M., (2011). The triple helix model and the meta-stabilization of urban technologies in smart cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 18 (2), 53-63.
27. Leydesdorff, L., &, Etzkowitz, H., (1996). Emergence of a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Science and Public Policy, 23 (3), 279-286.
28. Leydesdorff, L., &, Etzkowitz, H., (1998). The triple helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy, 25 (3), 195-203.
29. Leydesdorff, L., &, Jin, B., (2005). Mapping the Chinese Science Citation Database in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56 (14), 1469-1479.
30. Leydesdorff, L., &, Meyer, M., (2003). The triple helix of university-industry-government relations: Introduction to the topical issue. Scientometrics, 58 (2), 191-203.
31. Leydesdorff, L., &, Meyer, M., (2010). The decline of university patenting and the end of the Bayh-Dole effect. Scientometrics, 83 (2), 355-362.
32. Leydesdorff, L., &, Sun, Y., (2009). National and international dimensions of the triple helix in Japan: University-industry-government versus international co-authorship relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (4), 778-788.
33. Lowe, C.U., (1982). The triple helix-NIH, industry, and the academic world. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 55 (3-4), 239-246.
34. McGill, W.J., (1954). Multivariate information transmission. Psychometrika, 19 (2), 97-116.
35. Mirowski, P., &, Sent, E.M., (2007). The commercialization of science, and the response of STS. In, E.J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, &, J. Wajcman, (Eds.), Handbook of science, technology and society studies (pp. 635-689). Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.
36. Moed, H.F., (2002). Measuring China's research performance using the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 53 (3), 281-296.
37. Park, H.W., &, Leydesdorff, L., (2010). Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives. Research Policy, 39 (5), 640-649.
38. Park, H.W., Hong, H.D., &, Leydesdorff, L., (2005). a comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and the Netherlands using Triple Helix indicators. Scientometrics, 65 (1), 3-27.
39. Plume, A., (2011). Tipping the balance: The rise of China as a science superpower. Research Trends (22). Retrieved from http://www.researchtrends.com/ issue22-march-2011/tipping-the-balance-the-rise-of-china-as-a-science- superpower/
40. Shannon, C.E., (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27 (3), 379-423.
41. Shannon, C.E., &, Weaver, W., (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
42. Shinn, T., (2002). The triple helix and new production of knowledge prepackaged thinking on science and technology. Social Studies of Science, 32 (4), 599-614.
43. Strand, O., &, Leydesdorff, L., (in press). Where is synergy in the Norwegian innovation system indicated? Triple helix relations among technology, organization, and geography. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
44. Wagner, C.S., &, Leydesdorff, L., (2005). Network structure, self-organization and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34 (10), 1608-1618.
45. Yeung, R.W., (2008). Information theory and network coding. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
46. Zhou, P., &, Leydesdorff, L., (2006). The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy, 35 (1), 83-104.
47. Zitt, M., Bassecoulard, E., &, Okubo, Y., (2000). Shadows of the past in international cooperation: Collaboration profiles of the top five producers of science. Scientometrics, 47 (3), 627-657.