Innovation in innovation: The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations

Social Science Information

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 293-337

  Etzkowitz, Henry ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Entrepreneurial university; Innovation; Interdisciplinarity; Triple Helix

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041325264     PISSN: 05390184     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/05390184030423002     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Ben David, J. (1991) Scientific Growth: Essays on the Social Organization of Science and the Ethos of Science. Berkeley: University of California Press.
2. Benner, M. (2001) Kontrovers ochs consensus: Veleskap och politik I svenskt 1990-Tal [Controversy and Consensus: Science and Politics in Sweden: 1900 to the Present], SISTER Report [Institute for Studies on Research and Education]. Stockholm and Nora: SISTER and Nya Doxa.
3. Blumenthal, D. et al. (1986a) "Industrial Support of University Research in Biotechnology", Science 231: 242-6.
4. Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M., Louis, K. and Wise, D. (1986b) "University-Industry Research Relationships in Biotechnology, Implications for the University", Science 232: 1361-6.
5. Braczyk, H. J., Cooke, P. and Heidenreich, M., eds (1998) Regional Innovation Systems. London: UCL Press.
6. Bush, V. (1945) Science: The Endless Frontier. Washington. DC: US Government Printing Office.
7. Clark, B. (1999) Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. New York: Pergamon.
8. Dos Santos, M. R. and Fracasso, E. M. (2000) "Sabato's Triangle and Triple Helix: Expressions of the Same Concept?", in J. Mello and H. Etzkowitz (eds) The Endless Transition: Book of Abstracts: Third Triple Helix International Conference. Rio de Janeiro: COPPE [Graduate School and Research in Engineering, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro].
9. Etzkowitz, H. (1983) "Entrepreneurial Scientists and Entrepreneurial Universities in American Academic Science". Minerva 21: 198-233.
10. Etzkowitz, H. (2002a) "Incubation of Incubators: Innovation as a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Networks", Science and Public Policy April 28(2): 115-28.
11. Etzkowitz, H. (2002b) MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science. London: Routledge.
12. Etzkowitz, H. (2003) Triple Helix: A Manifesto for Innovation, Incubation and Growth. Stockholm: SNS Press.
13. Etzkowitz, H. and Kemelgor, C. (1998) "The Role of Centres in the Collectivisation of Academic Science", Minerva 36(3): 231-68.
14. Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L., eds (1997) The University in the Global Knowledge Economy. London: Pinter.
15. Etzkowitz, H. and Stevens, A. (1995) "Inching Toward Industrial Policy: The University's Role in Government Initiatives to Assist Small Innovative Companies in the US", Science Studies 8(2): 13-31.
16. Etzkowitz, H., Carvalho de Mello, J. M. and Almeida, M. C. (under review) "Evolution of the Incubator: The Emergence of Civil Society and Transformation of Science and Technology Policy in Brazil", Research Policy.
17. Etzkowitz, H., Gulbrandsen, M. and Levitt, J. (2001) Public Venture Capital: Sources of Government Funding for Technology Entrepreneurs, 2nd edn. New York: Aspen/ Kluwer.
18. Feingold, M. (2002) "Science as a Calling: The Early Modern Dilemma", Science in Context 15(1): 79-120.
19. Geiger, R. (1998) "The Ten Generations of American Higher Education", in P. Altbach, R. Berdahl and P. Gumport (eds) American Higher Education in the Twenty-first Century, pp. 38-69. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
20. Gibbons, M., Nowotny, H., Limonges, C., Trow, M., Schwartzman, S. and Scott, P. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21. Goncharoff, K. (2002) "Tiny Technologies, Big Risk", The Daily Deal Thursday 15 August: 9.
22. Heller, A. (1999) A Theory of Modernity. London: Blackwell.
23. Hollinger, D. (1995) "Science as a Weapon in the United States during and after World War II", ISIS 86: 440-54.
24. Jencks, C. and Reisman, D. (1966) The Academic Revolution. New York: Doubleday.
25. Kenney, M., ed. (2000) Understanding Silicon Valley: The Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial Region. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
26. Kevles, D. (1978) The Physicists: The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America. New York: Knopf.
27. Kohler, R. (1991) Partners in Science: Foundations and Natural Scientists 1900-1945. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28. Kornberg, A. (1996) The Golden Helix: Inside Biotech Ventures. Sausalito, CA: University Science Books.
29. Lee, Chong-Moo et al., eds (2000) The Silicon Valley Edge: A Habitat for Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
30. Leydesdorff, L. and Etzkowitz, H. (2002) "The Transformation of University-Industry-Government Networks", Electronic Journal of Sociology April. (Available at: www.sociology.org/content/voll005.004/th.html)
31. Machlup, F. (1962) The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32. Melman, S. (1970) Pentagon Capitalism. New York: McGraw-Hill.
33. Merton, R. K. (1970) Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth-Century England. New York: Harper and Row. (Orig. published 1938.)
34. Merton, R. K. (1973) "The Normative Structure of Science", in N. Storer (ed.) The Sociology of Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Orig, published 1942.)
35. Mills, C. W. (1958) The Power Eilte. New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Mingers, J. (2002) "Can Social Systems be Autopoietic?", The Sociological Review 50(2): 278-99.
37. Mustar, P. and Laredo, P. (2002) "Innovation and Research Policy in France (1980-2000) or the Disappearance of the Colbertist State", Research Policy 31(1): 55-72.
38. National Science Foundation (NSF) (1999) Science Indicators. (Available at: www.nsf.gov)
39. Nauwelaers, C. and Wintjes, R. (2002) "Innovating SMEs and Regions: The Need for Policy Intelligence and Interactive Policies", Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 14(2); 201-15.
40. Niosi, J. (2002) "National Systems of Innovation are 'X-effident' (and X Effective). Why Some are Slow Learners", Research Policy 31(2): 291-302.
41. Pavitt, K. (2000) "Why European Union Funding of Academic Research Should Be Increased: A Radical Proposal", Science and Public Policy 27(6): 445-60.
42. Rivette, K. and Kline, E. (1999) Rembrandts in the Attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents. Boston. MA: Harvard Business School Press.
43. Roberts, E. (1991) Entrepreneurs in High Technology. New York: Oxford University Press.
44. Saxenian, A. (1994) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45. Servos, J. (1990) Physical Chemistry from Ostwald to Pauling: The Making of a Science in America. Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press.
46. Sorlin, S. (2002) "Cultivating the Place of Knowledge", SISTER Working Paper no. 9. (Available at: www.sister.nu)
47. Storr, R. J. (1953) The Beginnings of Graduate Education in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48. Storr, R. J. (1968) Harper's University. Chicago. IL: University of Chicago Press.
49. "US Universities and Research Institutions Ranked by Adjusted Income per 100 Faculty" (2000) Technology Access Report 13(2): 11.
50. Waldrop, M. M. (2001) The Dream Machine: J.C.R. Licklider and the Revolution that Made Computing Personal. New York: Viking.
51. Wang, J. (1999) "Merton's Shadow: Perspectives on Science and Democracy", Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 30: 280-306.
52. Weber, M. (1946) "Science As a Vocation", in H. Gerth and C.W. Mills (eds) From Max Weher. New York: Oxford University Press. (Orig. published 1921.)
53. Wilson, J.(1985) The New Venturers: Inside the High-Stakes World of Venture Capital. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
54. Ziman, J. (1986) Science in a "Steady State", London: Science Policy Support Group.