Triple helix, Quadruple helix and Quintuple helix and how do Knowledge, Innovation and the Environment relate to Each other? a proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology

International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 41-69

  Carayannis, Elias G ^a   Campbell, David F J ^b  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KLAGENFURT   (Austria)

Author keywords

Eco Entrepreneurship; Eco Innovation; Mode 3; Quadruple Helix; Quintuple Helix; Social Ecology; Sustainable Development

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864553399     PISSN: 19478402     EISSN: 19478410     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jsesd.2010010105     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Adams, W. M. (2006, January 29-21). The Future of Sustainability: Re-thinking Environment and Development in the Twenty-first Century. In Proceedings of the IUCN Renowned Thinkers Meeting. Madrid: The World Conservation Union (IUCN). Retrieved from http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/ iucn-future-of-sustainability.pdf
2. Baum, S., & Payea, K. (2005). Education Pays 2005 Update. Washington, DC: College Board. Retrieved from http://www.collegeboard.com/prod-downloads/ press/cost05/education-pays-05.pdf
3. Baum, S., Payea, K., & Steele, P. (2006). Education Pays 2006 Second Update. Washington, DC: College Board. Retrieved from http://www.collegeboard. com/prod-downloads/press/cost06/education-pays-06.pdf
4. Bomberg, E., & Stubb, A. (2003). Introduction . In Bomberg, E., & Stubb, A. (Eds.), The European Union: How Does it Work? (pp. 3-18). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5. Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. (1997). Co- Opetition. New York: Doubleday.
6. Bush, V. (1945). Science the Endless Frontier. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
7. Campbell, D. F. J. (2006). The University/Business Research Networks in Science and Technology: Knowledge Production Trends in the United States, European Union and Japan . In Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (Eds.), Knowledge Creation, Diffusion, and Use in Innovation Networks and Knowledge Clusters. A Comparative Systems Approach across the United States, Europe and Asia (pp. 67-100). Westport, CT: Praeger.
8. Campbell, D. F. J. (2008). The Basic Concept for the Democracy Ranking of the Quality of Democracy. Vienna, Austria: Democracy Ranking.
9. Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). "Externe Umwelten". Außensichten auf das iff . In Arnold, M. (Ed.), iff. Interdisziplinä re Wissenschaft im Wandel (pp. 101-134). Vienna, Austria: LIT.
10. Campbell, D. F. J., & Barth, T. D. (2009). Wie können Demokratie und Demokratiequalität gemessen werden? Modelle, Demokratie-Indices und Länderbeispiele im globalen Vergleich. SWS-Rundschau, 49(2), 208-233.
11. Campbell, D. F. J., & Güttel, W. H. (2005). Knowledge Production of Firms: Research Networks and the "Scientification" of Business R & D. InternationalJournal of Technology Management, 31(1/2), 152-175. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2005.006629
12. Campbell, D. F. J., & Pölzlbauer, G. (2009). The Democracy Ranking 2008/2009 of the Quality of Democracy: Method and Ranking Outcome. Vienna,Austria: Democracy Ranking.
13. Campbell, D. F. J., & Sükösd, M. (Eds.). (2002). Feasibility Study for a Quality Ranking of Democracies. Vienna, Austria: Global Democracy Award.
14. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2006). "Mode 3": Meaning and Implications from a Knowledge Systems Perspective . In Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (Eds.), Knowledge Creation, Diffusion, and Use in Innovation Networks and Knowledge Clusters. A Comparative Systems Approach across the United States, Europe and Asia (pp. 1-25). Westport, CT: Praeger.
15. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2007). A "Mode 3" Systems Approach for Knowledge Creation, Diffusion, and Use: Towards a Twenty- First-Century Fractal Innovation Ecosystem . In Carayannis, E. G., & Ziemnowicz, C. (Eds.), Rediscovering Schumpeter. Creative Destruction Evolving into "Mode 3" (pp. 717-111). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
16. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). "Mode 3" and "Quadruple Helix": Toward a 21st Century Fractal Innovation Ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3/4), 201-234. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
17. Carayannis, E. G., & Ziemnowicz, C. (Eds.). (2007). Re-Discovering Schumpeter: Creative Destruction Evolving into "Mode 3". London: Palgrave Macmillan.
18. Carmines, E. G., & Stimson, J. A. (1980). The Two Faces of Issue Voting. The American Political Science Review, 74(1), 78-91. doi:10.2307/1955648
19. Cullell, J. V. (2004). Democracy and the Quality of Democracy. Empirical Findings and Methodological and Theoretical Issues Drawn from the Citizen Audit of the Quality of Democracy in Costa Rica . In O'Donnell, G., Cullell, J. V., & Iazzetta, O. M. (Eds.), The Quality of Democracy. Theory and Applications (pp. 93-162). South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
20. Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy. Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21. Diamond, L., & Morlino, L. (2004). The Quality of Democracy. An Overview. Journal of Democracy, 15(4), 20-31. doi:10.1353/jod.2004.0060
22. Dubina, I. N. (2005). Managing Creativity: Theoretical Approaches to Employees' Creativity Development and Regulation. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 1(4), 334-349. doi:10.1504/IJMCP.2005.008532
23. Dubina, I. N. (2007). Optimally Managing Creativity in Organisations . In Carayannis, E. G. (Ed.), Managing Creative and Innovative People: The Art, Science and Craft of Fostering Creativity, Triggering Invention and Catalyzing Innovation (pp. 143-170). Westport, CT: Praeger.
24. Dubina, I. N. (2009).[Creativity Management in the Innovation Economy]. Moscow, Russia: Academia.
25. Esty, D. C., Levy, M., Kim, C. H., de Sherbinin, A., Srebotnjak, T., & Mara, V. (2008). 2008 Environmental Performance Index. New Haven, CT: Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy.
26. Esty, D. C., Levy, M., Srebotnjak, T., & de Sherbinin, A. (2005). 2005 Environmental Sustainability Index: Benchmarking National Environmental Stewardship. New Haven, CT: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy.
27. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research Groups as "Quasi- Firms": The Invention of the Entrepreneurial University. Research Policy, 32, 109-121. doi:10.1016/ S0048-7333(02)00009-4
28. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Research Policy, 29, 109-123. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
29. Fischer-Kowalski, M. (1998). Society's Metabolism. The Intellectual History of Materials Flow Analysis, Part I, 1860-1970. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(1), 61-78. doi:10.1162/jiec.1998.2.1.61
30. Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Haberl, H. (Eds.). (2007). Socioecological Transitions and Global Change. Trajectories of Social Metabolism and Land Use. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
31. Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Hüttler, W. (1999). Society's Metabolism. The Intellectual History of Materials Flow Analysis, Part II, 1970-1998. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(4), 107-136. doi:10.1162/ jiec.1998.2.4.107
32. Florida, R. (2004). The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community, and Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA: Basic Books.
33. Freedom House. (2008). Methodology. Washington, DC: Author.
34. Freedom House. (2009a). Freedom in the World Comparative and Historical Data. Country Ratings and Status, FIW (Freedom in the World) 1973-2009. Washington, DC: Author.
35. Freedom House. (2009b). Map of Freedom in the World. 2009 Edition. Washington, DC: Author. Gibbons, M., Limoge, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman
36. S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
37. Haberl, H., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., Martinez-Alier, J., & Winiwarter, V. (2009). A Socio-metabolic Transition towards Sustainability? Challenges for Another Great Transformation. Sustainable Development, 17.
38. Haberl, H., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., Weisz, H., & Winiwarter, V. (2004). Progress towards Sustainability? What the Conceptual Framework of Material and Energy Flow Accounting (MEFA) Can Offer. Land Use Policy, 21(3), 199-213. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.013
39. Harding, S., Phillips, D., & Fogarty, M. (1986). Contrasting Values in Western Europe. Unity, Diversity and Change. Studies in the Contemporary Values of Modern Society. Houndmills, UK: MacMillan.
40. Hemlin, S., Allwood, C. M., & Martin, B. R. (Eds.). (2004). Creative Knowledge Environments: The Influences on Creativity in Research and Innovation. Camberley, UK: Edward Elgar.
41. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
42. Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., & O'Brien, G. (2005). Sustainable Development: Mapping Different Approaches. Sustainable Development, 13, 38-52. doi:10.1002/sd.244
43. Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44. Kaiser, R., & Prange, H. (2004). The Reconfiguration of National Innovation Systems - The Example of German Biotechnology. Research Policy, 33, 395-408. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.001
45. Kates, R. W. (2001). Environment and Development: Sustainability Science. Science, 292(5517), 641-642. doi:10.1126/science.1059386
46. Kline, S. J., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An Overview of Innovation . In Landau, R., & Rosenburg, N. (Eds.), The Positive Sum Strategy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
47. Krausmann, F., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Schandl, H., & Eisenmenger, N. (2008). The Global Sociometabolic Transition: Past and Present Metabolic Profilesand Their Future Trajectories. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 12(5), 637-656. doi:10.1111/j.1530- 9290.2008.00065.x
48. Kuhlmann, S. (2001). Future Governance of Innovation Policy in Europe - Three Scenarios. Research Policy, 30, 953-976. doi:10.1016/S0048- 7333(00)00167-0
49. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
50. Lundvall, B.-A. (Ed.). (1992). National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
51. Meglic, J., Kern, T., Urh, B., Balkovec, J., & Roblek, M. (2009). Influence of Polyvalence Professionals on Product Development Process Efficiency. Strojarstvo, 51(2), 105-121.
52. Milbergs, E. (2004). Measuring Innovation for National Prosperity. Washington, DC: Center for Accelerating Innovation.
53. Milbergs, E. (2005a). Innovation Ecosystems and Prosperity. Washington, DC: Center for Accelerating Innovation.
54. Milbergs, E. (2005b). Setting the Stage for Innovation. Accelerating Innovation 2005 Conference. Washington, DC: Center for Accelerating Innovation.
55. Miyata, Y. (2003). An Analysis of Research and Innovative Activities of Universities in the United States . In Shavinina, L. V. (Ed.), The International Handbook on Innovation (pp. 715-738). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Pergamon. doi:10.1016/B978- 008044198-6/50049-8
56. Monfreda, C., Wackernagel, M., & Deumling, D. (2004). Establishing National Natural Capital Accounts Based on Detailed Ecological Footprint and Biological Capacity Assessments. Land Use Policy, 21(3), 231-246. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol. 2003.10.009
57. Narin, F., Hamilton, K. S., & Olivastro, D. (1997). The Increasing Linkage between U.S. Technology and Public Science. Research Policy, 26, 317-330. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00013-9
58. National Science Board. (2008). Science and Engineering Indicators 2008. Volumes 1 and 2. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
59. Nelson, R. R. (1990). Capitalism as an Engine of Progress. Research Policy, 19, 193-214. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(90)90036-6
60. Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
61. Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Rethinking science. Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
62. Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2003). Mode 2 Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge. Minerva, 41, 179-194. doi:10.1023/A:1025505528250
63. Palmberg, C., & Luukkonen, Y. (2006). The Different Dynamics of the Biotechnology and ICT Sectors in Finland . In Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (Eds.), Knowledge Creation, Diffusion and Use in Innovation Networks and Knowledge Clusters (pp. 158-182). Westport, CT: Praeger.
64. Plasser, F., & Plasser, G. (2002). Global Political Campaigning. A Worldwide Analysis of Campaign Professionals and Their Practices. Westport, CT: Praeger.
65. Rapport, D. J. (2006). Sustainability Science: An Ecohealth Perspective. Sustainability Science, 2, 77-84. doi:10.1007/s11625-006-0016-3
66. Saint-Paul, G., & Verdier, T. (1993). Education, Democracy and Growth. Journal of Development Economics, 42, 399-407. doi:10.1016/0304- 3878(93)90027-K
67. Schafer, K. E. (2008). Have We Succeeded? Political Leadership Lessons from the United States . In Zimmer, A., & Jankowitsch, R. M. (Eds.), Political Leadership. Annäherungen aus Wissenschaft und Praxis (pp. 263-278). Berlin: Polisphere.
68. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
69. Schumpeter, J. A. (1976). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper Perennial.
70. Shavinina, L. V. (Ed.). (2003). The International Handbook on Innovation. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Pergamon Elsevier Science.
71. Tassey, G. (2001). R&D Policy Models and Data Needs . In Feldman, M. P., & Link, A. N. (Eds.), Innovation Policy in the Knowledge-Based Economy (pp. 37-71). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
72. Umpleby, S. A. (2005). What I Learned from Heinz von Foerster About the Construction of Science. Kybernetes, 34(1/2), 278-294. doi:10.1108/ 03684920510575843
73. UNDP. (2007). Human Development Report 2007/2008. Fighting Climate Change: Human Solidarity in a Divided World. New York: United Nations Development Program.
74. Vadrot, A. (2008). "Der Wille zur Wahrheit als der Wille zur Macht". Die theoretischen Implikationen der Schnittstelle zwischen Politik und Wissenschaft in der Biodiversitätspolitik. (Magisterarbeit.). Vienna: University of Vienna.
75. Von Hippel, E. (1988). The Sources of Innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
76. Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Winiwarter, V., & Knoll, M. (2007). Umweltgeschichte. Köln, Germany: Böhlau.