Motivational differences across post-acceptance information system usage behaviors: An investigation in the business intelligence systems context

Information Systems Research

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 659-682

  Li, Xixi ^a   Po An Hsieh, J J ^b   Rai, Arun ^c  

^a Tsinghua University   (China)

^b HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

^c GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Business intelligence systems; Innovative use; Intrinsic motivation; Motivation theory; Post acceptance behaviors; Post acceptance stage; Routine use

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

ACCEPTANCE BEHAVIOR; BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS; INNOVATIVE USE; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; MOTIVATION THEORIES; ROUTINE USE;

MOTIVATION;

EID: 84885161075     PISSN: 10477047     EISSN: 15265536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/isre.1120.0456     Document Type: Article

References (162)

1. Agarwal R (2000) Individual acceptance of information technologies. Zmud RW, ed. Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future 0 0 0 Through the Past (Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Cincinnati), 85-104.
2. Agarwal R and Karahanna E (2000) Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quart. 24(4):665-694.
3. Agarwal R, Prasad J (1998) A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Inform. Systems Res. 9(2):204-215.
4. Agarwal R, Prasad J (1999) Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies. Decision Sci 30(2):361-391.
5. Ahuja MK, Thatcher JB (2005) Moving beyond intentions and toward the theory of trying: Effects of work environment and gender on post-adoption information technology use. MIS Quart. 29(3):427-459.
6. Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).
7. Amabile TM (1985) Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 48(2):393-399.
8. Amabile TM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Staw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 10. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 123-167.
9. Amabile TM (1996) Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity (Westview, Boulder, CO).
10. Amabile TM, Hennessey BA, Grossman BS (1986) Social influences on creativity: The effects of contracted-for-reward. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 50(1):14-23.
11. Anand P, Sternthal B (1990) Ease of message processing as a moderator of repetition effects in advertising. J. Marketing Res. 27(3):345-353.
12. Argote L (1999) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (Kluwer, Norwell, MA).
13. Atuahene-Gima K, Murray JY (2007) Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development: A social capital perspective on new technology ventures in China. J. Internat. Marketing 15(2):1-29.
14. Bandura A (1984) Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Amer. Psychologist 37(2):122-147.
15. Bandura A (1997) Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control (Freeman, New York).
16. Bass BM (1998) Transformational Leadership: Industrial, Military, and Educational Impact (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).
17. Belsley D, Kuh E, Welsch R (1980) Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity (John Wiley & Sons, New York).
18. Benner MJ, Tushman ML (2002) Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(4):676-706.
19. Benner MJ, Tushman ML (2003) Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Management J. 28(2):238-256.
20. Bentham J (1988) An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislations (Prometheus Books, New York).
21. Berlyne DE (1971) Aesthetics and Psychology (Appleton-Centry- Crofts, New York).
22. Bhattacherjee A (2001) Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quart. 25(3):351-370.
23. Blau PM (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life (John Wiley & Sons, New York).
24. Bollen KA, Stine RA (1992) Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. Sociol. Methods Res. 21(2):205-229.
25. Bommer M, Jalajas DS (1999) The threat of organizational downsizing on the innovative propensity of R&D professionals. R & D Management 29(1):27-34.
26. Boudreau MC (2003) Learning to use ERP technology: A causal model. Proc. 36th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. http://www .computer.org/csdl/proceedings/hicss/2003/1874/03/index .html
27. Boudreau MC, Seligman L (2005) Quality of use of a complex technology: A learning-based model. J. Organ. End User Comput. 17(4):1-22.
28. Brislin RW, Lonner W, Thorndike RM (1973) Cross-Culture Research Method (John Wiley & Sons, New York).
29. Brophy J (1987) Socializing students' motivation to learn. Maher ML, Kleiber DA, eds. Advances in Motivation and Achievements, Vol. 5. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 181-210.
30. Brown SA, Venkatesh V (2005) Model of adoption of technology in households: A baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS Quart. 29(3):399-426.
31. Brown SA, Massey AP, Montoya-Weiss MM, Burkman JR (2002) Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 11(4):283-295.
32. Chin W (1998a) Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quart. 22(1):vii-xvi.
33. Chin W (1998b) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Marcoulides GA, ed. Modern Methods for Business Research (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahway, NJ), 295-336.
34. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128-152.
35. Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/ Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London).
36. Compeau DR, Higgins CA (1995) Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quart. 19(2):189-211.
37. Cooper RB, Zmud RW (1990) Information technology implementation research: A technology diffusion approach. Management Sci. 36(2):123-139.
38. Csikszentmihalyi M (1978) Intrinsic rewards and emergent motivation. Lepper MR, Greene D, eds. The Hidden Costs of Reward (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 205-216.
39. Davenport TH (2005) Thinking for a Living: How to Get Better Performance and Results from Knowledge Workers (Harvard Business School Press, Watertown, MA)
40. Davenport TH, Harris JG, Morison R (2010) Analytics at Work: Smarter Decisions, Better Results (Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation, Boston).
41. Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. 13(3):319-340.
42. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sci. 35(8):982-1003.
43. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1992) Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 22(14):1111-1132.
44. DeCharms R (1968) Personal Causation: The Internal Affective Determinants of Behavior (Academic Press, New York).
45. Deci E, Ryan RM (2002) Handbook of Self-Determination (Research University of Rochester Press, Rochester, NY).
46. DeLone WH, McLean ER (1992) Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inform. Systems Res. 3(1):60-95.
47. Deng L, Poole MS (2010) Affect in Web interfaces: A study of the impacts of Web page visual complexity and order. MIS Quart. 34(4):711-730.
48. Diamantopoulos A, Siguaw JA (2006) Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British J. Management 17(4):263-282.
49. Dukerich J, Golden B, Shortell S (2002) Beauty is in the eye of beholder: The impact of organizational identification, identity, and image on the cooperative behavior of physicians. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(3):507-533.
50. Durcikova A, Fadel KJ, Butler BS, Galletta DF (2011) Knowledge exploration and exploitation: The impact of psychological climate and knowledge management system access. Inform. Systems Res. 22(4):855-866.
51. Dutton J, Penner W (1993) The importance of organizational identity for strategic agenda building. Hendry G, Newton J, eds. Strategic Thinking: Leadership and the Management of Change (John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, England), 89-113.
52. Eisenberger R (1992) Learned industriousness. Psych. Rev. 99(2):248-267.
53. Eisenberger R, Cameron J (1996) Detrimental effects of reward: Reality or myth? Amer. Psychologist 51(11):1153-1166.
54. Evans GW, Lepore SJ (1997) Moderating and mediating processes in environment-behavior research. Moore GT, Marans RW, eds. Advances in Environment, Behavior, and Design, Vol. 4. (Plenum Press, New York), 250-285.
55. Fang X, Chan S, Brzezinski J, Xu S (2006) Moderating effects of task type on wireless technology acceptance. J. Management Inform. Systems 22(3):123-157.
56. Fichman RG, Kemerer CF (1999) The illusory diffusion of innovation: An examination of assimilation gaps. Inform. Systems Res. 10(3):255-275.
57. Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with observable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. 18(1):39-50.
58. Gallivan MJ, Spitler VK, Koufaris M (2005) Does information technology training really matter? A social information processing analysis of coworkers' influence on IT usage in the workplace. J. Management Inform. Systems 22(1):153-192.
59. Gartner (2009) Gartner identifies the top 10 strategic technologies for 2010. Report, http://www.gartner.com/it/ page.jsp?idD1210613.
60. Gattiker TF, Goodhue DL (2005) What happens after ERP implementation: understanding the impact of inter-dependence and differentiation on plant-level outcomes. MIS Quart. 29(3):559-585.
61. Gefen D, Straub D (2005) A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-graph: Tutorial and annotated example. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 16:91-109.
62. Gefen D, Karahanna E, Straub D (2003) Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated mode. MIS Quart. 27(1):51-90.
63. Gist ME, Mitchell TR (1992) Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Acad. Management Rev. 17(2):183-211.
64. Goodhue DL, Thompson RL (1995) Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quart. 19(3):213-236.
65. Goodhue D, Lewis W, Thompson R (2007) Statistical power in analyzing interaction effects: Questioning the advantage of PLS with product indicators. Inform. Systems Res. 18(2):211-227.
66. Greif S, Keller H (1990) Innovation and the design of work and learning environments: The concept of exploration in humancomputer interaction. West MA, Farr JL, eds. Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK), 231-249.
67. Grewal R, Cote JA, Baumgartner H (2004) Multicollinearity and measurement error in structural equation models: Implications for theory testing. Marketing Sci. 23(4):519-529.
68. Gupta AK, Smith KG, Shalley CE (2006) The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad. Management J. 49(4):693-706.
69. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).
70. Hartwick J, Barki H (1994) Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Sci. 40(4):440-465.
71. Hirschman EC (1980) Innovativeness, novelty seeking, and consumer creativity. J. Consumer Res. 7(3):283-295.
72. Hong SJ, Thong JYL, Tam KY (2006) Understanding continued information technology usage behavior: A comparison of three models in the context of mobile internet. Decision Support Systems 42(3):1819-1834.
73. Hsieh J, Wang W (2007) Explaining employees' extended use of complex information systems. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 16(3):216-227.
74. Hsieh J, Zmud RW (2006) Understanding post-adoptive usage behaviors: A two-dimensional view. DIGIT 2006 Proc. Paper 3, http://aisel.aisnet.org/digit2006/3
75. Hsieh J, Rai A, Keil M (2008) Understanding digital inequality: Comparing continued use behavioral models of the socio-economically advantaged and disadvantaged. MIS Quart. 32(1):97-126.
76. Im G, Rai A (2008) Knowledge sharing ambidexterity in long-term interorganiational relationships. Management Sci. 54(7):1281-1296.
77. Janssen O (2001) Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job satisfaction. Acad. Management J. 44(5):1039-1050.
78. Jasperson J, Carter PE, Zmud RW (2005) A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Quart. 29(3):525-557.
79. Johns G (2006) The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Acad. Management Rev. 31(2):386-408.
80. Kamis A, Koufaris M, Stern T (2008) Using an attribute-based decision support systems for user-customized products online: An experimental investigation. MIS Quart. 32(1):159-177.
81. Karahanna E, Agarwal R (2011) When the spirit is willing: Symbolic adoption and technology exploration. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
82. Katz D, Kahn RL (1966) The Social Psychology of Organizations (Wiley, New York).
83. Kelman HC (1958) Compliance, identification and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. J. Conflict Resolution 2(1):51-60.
84. Kim DH (1993) The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management Rev. 35(1):37-50.
85. Ko DG, Kirsch LJ, King WR (2005) Antecedents of knowledge transformer from consultants to clients in enterprise system implementations. MIS Quart. 29(1):59-85.
86. Kolb DA (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
87. Kowal J, Fortier MS (2000) Testing relationships from the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation using flow as a motivational consequence. Res. Quart. Exercise and Sport 71(2):171-181.
88. Kurtzberg TR, Amabile TM (2001) From Guilford to creative synergy: Opening the black box of team-level creativity. Creativity Res. J. 13(3):285-294.
89. Kwon TH, Zmud RW (1987) Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation. Boland RJ, Hirschheim RA, eds. Critical Issues in Information Systems Research (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 227-251.
90. Lee MKO, Cheung CMK, Chen Z (2005) Acceptance of Internetbased learning medium: The role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Inform. Management 42(8):1095-1104.
91. Legris P, Ingham J, Collerette P (2003) Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inform. Management 40(3):191-204.
92. Luthans F, Kreitner R (1985) Organizational Behavior Modification and Beyond (Scott, Foresman, Glenview, IL).
93. MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff PM, Rich GA (2001) Transformational and transactional leadership and salesperson performance. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 29(2):115-134.
94. Malone TW (1981) Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Sci. 5(4):333-369.
95. March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71-87.
96. Maslow AH (1970) Motivation and Personality (Harper & Row, New York).
97. McGraw KO (1978) The detrimental effects of reward on performance: A literature review and a prediction model. Lepper MR, Greene D, eds. The Hidden Costs of Reward (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 255-294.
98. McGraw KO, McCullers JC (1979) Evidence of a detrimental effect of extrinsic incentives on breaking a mental set. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 15(3):633-650.
99. Meyers-Levy J, Peracchio LA (1995) Understanding the effects of color: How the correspondence between available and required resources affect attitudes. J. Consumer Res. 22(2):121-138.
100. Morris MG, Venkatesh V (2010) Job characteristics and job satisfaction: Understanding the role of enterprise resource planning system implementation. MIS Quart. 34(1):143-161.
101. Nambisan S, Agarwal R, Tanniru M (1999) Organizational mechanisms for enhancing user innovation in information technology. MIS Quart. 23(3):365-395.
102. Negash S, Gray P (2008) Business intelligence. Frada B, Holsapple CW, eds. Handbook on Decision Support Systems 2: Variations (Springer, Berlin), 175-194.
103. Nicholls JG (1984) Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psych. Rev. 91(3):328-346.
104. Nunnally JC (1994) Psychometric Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).
105. Ouchi WG (1979) Conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Sci. 25(9):833-848.
106. Pelletier LG, Fortier MS, Vallerand RJ, Tuson KM, Briere NM (1995) Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The sport motivation scale (SMS). J. Sport and Exercise Psych. 17(1):35-53.
107. Petter S, Straub D, Rai A (2007) Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quart. 31(4):623-656.
108. Piccolo RF, Colquitt JA (2006) Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Acad. Management J. 49(2):327-340.
109. Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Management 12(4):531-544.
110. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879-903.
111. Rai A, Lang SS, Welker RB (2002) Assessing the validity of IS success models: An empirical test and theoretical analysis. Inform. Systems Res. 13(1):50-69.
112. Ridgeway NM, Price LL (1994) Exploration in product usage: A model of use innovativeness. Psych. Marketing 11(1):69-85.
113. Ringle CM, Wende S, Will A (2005) Smart PLS. Accessed November 20, 2010, http://www.smartpls.de. Hamburg, Germany.
114. Robey D, Ross JW, Boudreau M (2002) Learning to implement enterprise systems: An exploratory study of the dialectics of change. J. Management Inform. Systems 19(1):17-46.
115. Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of Innovation (Free Press, New York).
116. Ryan RM, Deci E (2000) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psych. 25(1):54-67.
117. Ryan RM, Mims V, Koestner R (1983) Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation: A review and test using cognitive evaluation theory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 45(4):736-750.
118. Saga VL, Zmud RW (1994) The nature and determinants of IT acceptance, routinization, and infusion. Levine L, ed. Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology (North- Holland, Amsterdam), 67-86.
119. Schaefers KG, Epperson DL, Nauta MM (1997) Women's career development: Can theoretically derived variables predict persistence in engineering majors? J. Counseling Psych. 44(2):173-183.
120. Schwarz A (2003) Defining information technology acceptance: A human-centered, management-oriented perspective. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Houston, Houston, TX.
121. Scott WE, Podsakoff PM (1982) Leadership, supervision and behavioral control: Perspectives from an experimental analysis. Frederickson L, ed. Handbook of Organizational Behavior Management (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 91-121.
122. Seddon PB (1997) A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Inform. Systems Res. 8(3): 240-253.
123. Segars AH (1997) Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement: A paradigm and illustration within the context of information systems research. Omega 25(1):107-121.
124. Shah SK (2006) Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Sci. 52(7):1000-1014.
125. Shin SJ, Zhou J (2003) Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Acad. Management J. 46(6):703-714.
126. Silver MS (1991) Decisional guidance for computer-based decision support. MIS Quart. 15(1):105-122.
127. Starbuck WH (1982) Congealing oil: Inventing ideologies to justify acting ideologies out. J. Management Stud. 19(1):4-27.
128. Starbuck WH, Webster J (1991) When is play productive? Accounting, Management, Inform. Tech. 1(1):71-90.
129. Steenkamp J-BEM, Burgess SM (2002) Optimum stimulation level and exploratory consumer behavior in an emerging consumer market. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 19(2):131-150.
130. Sun H, Zhang P (2006) The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 64(2): 53-78.
131. Sun H, Zhang P (2008) Adaptive system use: An investigation at the system feature level. Proc. 29th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Paris, France, http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2008/170.
132. Sundaram S, Schwarz A, Jones E, Chin W (2007) Technology use on the front line: How information technology enhances individual performance. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 35(1):101-112.
133. Tanriverdi H (2006) Performance effects of information technology synergies in multibusiness firms. MIS Quart. 30(1):57-77.
134. Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509-533.
135. Thatcher JB, Perrewe PL (2002) An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. MIS Quart. 26(4):381-396.
136. Thomas KW, Velthouse BA (1990) Cognitive elements of empowerment: An "interpretive" model of intrinsic task motivation. Acad. Management Rev. 15(4):666-681.
137. Thompson RL, Higgins CA, Howell JM (1994) Influence of experience on personal computer utilization: Testing a conceptual model. J. Management Inform. Systems 11(1):167-187.
138. Thong JYL (1999) An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses. J. Management Inform. Systems 15(4):187-214.
139. Thong JYL, Hong SJ, Tam KY (2006) The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation-confirmation model for information technology continuance. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 64(9):799-810.
140. Vallerand RJ (1997) Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Zanna MP, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Academic Press, New York), 271-360.
141. Vallerand RJ, Briere NM (1990) Validation of the French form of the sports motivation scale. Final report presented to the Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute, Research Laboratory on Social Behavior, Université du Québec a Montréal. Montréal.
142. Vallerand RJ, Fortier MS (1998) Measures of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport and physical activity: A review and critique. Duda JL, ed. Advances in Sport and Exercise Psychology Measurement (Fitness Information Technology, Inc, Morgantown, WV), 81-101.
143. Vallerand RJ, Fortier MS, Guay F (1997) Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 72(5):1161-1176.
144. Vallerand RJ, Blais MR, Briere NM, Pelletier LG (1989) Construction and validation of the academic motivation scale. Canadian J. Behav. Sci. 21(3):323-349.
145. Vallerand RJ, Pelletier LG, Blais MR, Briere NM, Senecal C, Vallieres EF (1992) The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Ed. Psych. Measurement 52(4):1003-1009.
146. Vallerand RJ, Pelletier LG, Blais MR, Briere NM, Senecal C, Vallieres EF (1993) On the assessment of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education: Evidence on the concurrent and construct validity of the academic motivation scale. Ed. Psych. Measurement 53(1):159-172.
147. Van der Heijden H (2004) User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quart. 28(4):695-704.
148. Van Yperen NW, Hagedoorn M (2003) Do high job demands increase intrinsic motivation or fatigue or both? The role of job control and job social support. Acad. Management J. 46(3):339-348.
149. Venkatesh V (1999) Creating favorable user perceptions: Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quart. 23(2):239-260.
150. Venkatesh V, Bala H (2008) Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sci. 39(2):273-315.
151. Venkatesh V, Speier C (1999) Computer technology training in the work-place: A longitudinal investigation of the effect of mood. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 79(1):1-28.
152. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 27(3):425-478.
153. Vodanovich S, Sundaram D, Myers M (2010) Digital natives and ubiquitous information systems. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):711-723.
154. Wang W, Hsieh J (2006) Beyond routine: Symbolic adoption, extended use, and emergent use of complex information systems in the mandatory organizational context. ICIS 2006 Proc. Paper 48, http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2006/48.
155. Wasko MM, Faraj S (2005) Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quart. 29(1):35-57.
156. Webster J, Martocchio JJ (1992) Microcomputer playfulness: Development of a measure with workplace implications. MIS Quart. 16(2):201-226.
157. Webster J, Trevino LK, Ryan L (1993) The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Comput. Human Behav. 9(4):411-426.
158. Wegner E, McDermott R, Snyder W (2002) Cultivating Communities of Practice. A Guide to Managing Knowledge (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
159. Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (2005) Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organ. Sci. 16(4):409-421.
160. White RW (1959) Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psych. Rev. 66(2):297-333.
161. Wohlwill J, Heft H (1987) The physical environment and the development of the child. Stokols D, Altman I, eds. Handbook of Environmental Psychology (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 281-328.
162. Zuckerman M (1979) Sensation-Seeking: Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousal (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).