Learning to use ERP technology: A causal model

Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages

  Boudreau, M C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAUSAL MODEL; ERP IMPLEMENTATION; ERP TECHNOLOGIES; PUBLIC ORGANIZATIONS;

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING;

EID: 84969523588     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174611     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Agarwal, R. "Individual Acceptance of Information Technologies," in Framing the Domains of IT Management. Projecting the Future... Through the Past, R. W. Zmud (Ed.), Cincinnati: Pinnaflex Education Resources, 2000: 85-104.
2. Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1980.
3. Ajzen, I., and T. J. Madden. "Prediction of Goal-Directed Behavior: Attitudes, Intentions and Perceived Behavioral Control," Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 22, 5 (1986): 453-474.
4. Attewell, P. "Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing," Organization Science 3, no.1 (1992): 1-19.
5. Auer, T. "Quality of IS Use," European Journal of Information Systems 7, no.3 (1998): 192-201.
6. Davis, F. D. "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly 13, no.3 (1989): 319-340.
7. DeLone, W. H., and E. R. McLean, "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research 3, no.1 (1992): 60-95.
8. Eveland, J. D., and L. G. Tornatsky. "The Deployment of Technology" In The Processes of Technological Innovation, L.G. Tornatzky and M. Fleischer (Ed.), Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1990: 117-148.
9. Fichman, R. G. "The Diffusion and Assimilation of Information Technology Innovations," in Framing the Domains of IT Management. Projecting the Future... Through the Past, R. W. Zmud (Ed.), Cincinnati: Pinnaflex Education Resources, 2000: 105-127.
10. Fichman, R. G., and C. F. Kemerer. "The Assimilation of Software Process Innovations: An Organizational Learning Perspective," Management Science 43, no.10 (1997): 1345-1363.
11. Gill, P. J. "ERP: Keep it Simple," InformationWeek, August 9 1999: 87-92.
12. Johnson, B. M. and R. E. Rice. "Reinvention in the Innovation Process: The Case of Word Processing," In The New Media: Communications, Research, and Technology, Rice (Ed.), Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1984: 157-184.
13. Karahanna, E., D. W. Straub, and N. L. Chervany. "Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs," MIS Quarterly 23, no.2 (1999): 183-213.
14. Kling, R., and S. Iacono. "The Institutional Character of Computerized Information Systems," Office: Technology and People 5, no.1 (1989): 7-28.
15. Kraut, R., S. Dumais, and S. Koch. "Computerization, Productivity, and Quality of Work-life," Communications of the ACM 32, (1989): 220-238.
16. Lassila, K. S., and J. C. Brancheau. "Adoption and Utilization of Commercial Software Packages: Exploring Utilization Equilibria, Transitions, Triggers, and Tracks", Journal of Management Information Systems 16, no.2 (1999): 63-90.
17. Locke, K. "Rewriting The Discovery of Grounded Theory After 25 Years?," Journal of Management Inquiry 5, no.3 (1996): 239-245.
18. Lucas, H. C. Jr, and V. K. Spitler. "Technology Use and Performance: A Field Study of Broker Workstations," Decision Sciences 30, no.2 (1999): 291-311.
19. Maney, K. "Software So Huge and Complex - ERP!" USA Today, June 23, 1999: 03B.
20. Markus, M. L., and C. Tanis. "The Enterprise System Experience - From Adoption to Success," in Framing the Domains of IT Management. Projecting the Future... Through the Past, R. W. Zmud (Ed.), Cincinnati: Pinnaflex Education Resources, 2000: 173-207.
21. Nambisan, S., R. Agarwal, and M. Tanniru. "Organizational Mechanisms for Enhancing User Innovation in Information Technology," MIS Quarterly 23, no.3 (1999): 365-395.
22. Orlikowski, W. J., "Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations," Organization Science; (2000): 404-428.
23. Robey, D., and M.-C. Boudreau. "Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications," Information Systems Research 10, no.2 (1999): 167-185.
24. Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press, 1962.
25. th ed. New York: Free Press, 1995.
26. Saga, V., and R. W. Zmud. "The Nature and Determinants of IT Acceptance, Routinization, and Infusion," In Diffusion, Transfer, and Implementation of Information Technology, L. Levine (Ed.) New York: North-Holland, 1994: 67-86.
27. Schwandt, T. A. Qualitative Inquiry: A Dictionary of Terms, Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1997.
28. Seddon, P. B. "A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success," Information Systems Research, Vol. 8, Iss. 3, Sep 1997: pg. 240-253.
29. Strauss, A. L., and J. Corbin. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1990.
30. Strauss, A. L., and J. Corbin. "Grounded Theory Methodology: An Overview" In Handbook of Qualitative Research, N. K. Denzin and Lincoln (Ed.), Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1994.
31. Tornatzky, L. G., and M. Fleischer. The Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1990.
32. Trice, A. W., and M. E. Treacy. "Utilization as a Dependent Variable in MIS Research," Data Base, 1988: 33-41.