The power of beliefs: Lay theories and their influence on the implementation of CLIL programmes

International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 267-284

  Hüttner, Julia ^a   Dalton Puffer, Christiane ^b   Smit, Ute ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

educational success; language management; language policy; lay theories; vocational schooling

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878532093     PISSN: 13670050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13670050.2013.777385     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Admiraal, W., Westhoff, G. and De Bot, K. 2006. Evaluation of Bilingual Secondary Education in the Netherlands: Students' Language Proficiency in English. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12 (1): 75 - 93. doi: 10.1080/13803610500392160
2. Airey, J. 2009. Estimating Undergraduate Bilingual Scientific Literacy in Sweden. International CLIL Research Journal, 1 (2): 26 - 35. http://www.icrj.eu/12/article3.html
3. Amuzie, G. L. and Winke, P. 2009. Changes in Language Learning Beliefs as A Result of Study Abroad. System, 37 (3): 366 - 379. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2009.02.011
4. Badertscher, H. and Bieri, T. 2009. Wissenserwerb im Content and Language Integrated Learning, Bern and Wien: Haupt.
5. Barcelos, A. M. F. 2003a. " Researching Beliefs about SLA: A Critical Review ". In Beliefs about SLA. New Research Approaches, Edited by: Kalaja, P. and Barcelos, A. M. F. 7 - 33. New York: Springer.
6. Barcelos, A. M. F. 2003b. " Conflict and Influence ". In Beliefs about SLA. New Research Approaches, Edited by: Kalaja, P. and Barcelos, A. M. F. 171 - 199. New York: Springer.
7. Borg, S. 2003. Teacher Cognition in Language Teaching: A Review of Research on What Language Teachers Think, Know, Believe, and Do. Language Teaching, 36 (2): 81 - 109. doi: 10.1017/S0261444803001903
8. Borg, S. 2006. Teacher Cognition and Language Education: Research and Practice, London: Continuum.
9. Brown, A. V. 2009. Students' and Teachers' Perceptions of Effective Foreign Language Teaching: A Comparison of Ideals. The Modern Language Journal, 93 (1): 46 - 60. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00827.x
10. Bruton, A. 2011. Are the Differences between CLIL and Non-CLIL Groups in Andalusia Due to CLIL? A Reply to Lorenzo, Casal and Moore (2010). Applied Linguistics, 32 (2): 236 - 241. doi: 10.1093/applin/amr007
11. Coyle, D., Hood, P. and Marsh, D. 2010. CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning, New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Csizér, K. and Lukács, G. 2010. The Comparative Analysis of Motivation, Attitudes and Selves: The Case of English and German in Hungary. System, 38 (1): 1 - 13. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2009.12.001
13. Dalton-Puffer, C. 2007. Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14. Dalton-Puffer, C. 2011. Content and Language Integrated Learning: From Practice to Principles. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31: 182 - 204. doi: 10.1017/S0267190511000092
15. Dalton-Puffer, C., J. Hüttner, S. Jexenflicker, V. Schindelegger, and U. Smit. 2008. Content and Language Integrated Learning an Österreichs Höheren Technischen Lehranstalten. Vienna: Bundesministerium für Unterricht, Kultur und Kunst, Abt. II/2 (Austrian Ministery of Education, Culture and Art, Section II/2).
16. Donaghue, H. 2003. An Instrument to Elicit Teachers' Beliefs and Assumptions. ELT Journal, 57 (4): 344 - 351. doi: 10.1093/elt/57.4.344
17. Dörnyei, Z., and E. Ushioda 2009. Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
18. Dufva, H. 2003. " Beliefs in Dialogue: A Bakhtinian View ". In Beliefs about SLA. New Research Approaches, Edited by: Kalaja, P. and Barcelos, A. M. F. 131 - 151. New York: Springer.
19. European Commission. 2008. Languages and Europe: Language Learning. http://europa.eu/languages/en/chapter/14.
20. European Commission. 2009. EU Language Policy. http://ec.europa.eu/education/languages/eu-language-policy/index_en.htm.
21. European Commission Communication. 2003. Promoting Language Learning and Linguistic Diversity: An Action Plan 2004-2006. http://ec.europa.eu/education/doc/official/keydoc/actlang/act_lang_en.pdf.
22. Eurydice. 2006. Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at School in Europe. Brussels: Eurydice.
23. Farrell, T. S. C. and Ng, J. 2003. " Do Teachers' Beliefs of Grammar Teaching Match Their Classroom Practices? A Singapore Case Study ". In English in Singapore: Research on Grammar, Edited by: Brown, A. V. and Low, E. L. 128 - 137. Singapore: McGraw Hill.
24. Farrell, T. S. C. and Kun, S. T. K. 2008. Language Policy, Language Teachers' Beliefs, and Classroom Practices. Applied Linguistics, 29 (3): 381 - 403. doi: 10.1093/applin/amm050
25. Ferguson, G. 2006. Language Planning and Education, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
26. Gierlinger, E., C. Carré-Karlinger, E. Fuchs, and C. Lechner. 2010. Die CLIL-Matrix in der Unterrichtspraxis. Innovative Impulse aus dem Europäischen Fremdsprachenzentrum des Europarates [The CLIL-Matrix in Classroom Practice: Innovative Impulses from the Council of Europe's European Centre for Modern Languages]. Praxisreihe 13. Graz: ÖSZ-Österreichisches Sprachenzentrum. http://www.oesz.at/download/diss/Praxisreihe_13.pdf
27. Goodwin, C. and Duranti, A. 1992. " Rethinking Context: An Introduction ". In Rethining Context: Language As An Interactive Phenomenon, Edited by: Duranti, A. and Goodwin, C. 1 - 42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Hüttner, J., and C. Dalton-Puffer. Forthcoming. " Der Einfluß subjektiver Sprachlerntheorien auf den Erfolg der Implementierung von CLIL-Programmen [The influence of subjective theories of language learning on the success of CLIL programmes]." In Content and Language Integrated Learning: Research, Policy and Practice, J. Viebrock and S. Breidbach. Frankfurt (Main): Peter Lang.
29. Hüttner, J. and Rieder-Bünemann, A. 2010. " A Cross-sectional Analysis of Oral Narratives by Children with CLIL and Non-CLIL Instruction ". In Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms, Edited by: Dalton-Puffer, C., Nikula, T. and Smit, U. 61 - 80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
30. Jäppinen, A.-K. 2005. Thinking and Content Learning of Mathematics and Science as Cognitional Development in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Teaching Through A Foreign Language in Finland. Language and Education, 19 (2): 147 - 168. doi: 10.1080/09500780508668671
31. Jexenflicker, S. and Dalton-Puffer, C. 2010. " The CLIL Differential: Comparing the Writing of CLIL and Non-CLIL Students in Higher Colleges of Technology ". In Language Use and Language Learning, Edited by: Dalton-Puffer, C., Nikula, T. and Smit, U. 169 - 190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
32. Johnson, K. E. 1994. The Emerging Beliefs and Instructional Practices of Preservice English As A Second Language Teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10 (4): 439 - 452. doi: 10.1016/0742-051X(94)90024-8
33. Kalaja, P. 1995. Student Beliefs (or Metacognitive Knowledge) about SLA Reconsidered. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5 (2): 191 - 204. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-4192.1995.tb00080.x
34. Kalaja, P. 2003. " Research on Student Beliefs about SLA Within A Discursive Approach ". In Beliefs about SLA: New Research Approaches, Edited by: Kalaja, P. and Barcelos, A. M. F. 87 - 108. New York: Springer.
35. Kiraz, A., Güneyli, A., Baysen, E., Gündüz, S. and Baysen, F. 2010. Effect of Science and Technology Learning with Foreign Language on the Attitude and Success of Students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2 (2): 4130 - 4136. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.652
36. Kramsch, C. 2003. " Metaphor and the Subjective Construction of Beliefs ". In Beliefs about SLA: New Research Approaches, Edited by: Kalaja, P. and Barcelos, A. M. F. 109 - 128. New York: Springer.
37. Kvale, S. 1996. Interviews. An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing, London: Sage Publications.
38. Lasagabaster, D. 2008. Foreign Language Competence in Content and Language Integrated Learning. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 1 (1): 30 - 41. doi: 10.2174/1874913500801010030
39. Lasagabaster, D., and Y. Ruiz De Zarobe 2010. CLIL in Spain: Implementation, Results and Teacher Training. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
40. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. 1991. Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Li, D. C. S. 2002. " Hong Kong Parents' Preference for English-medium Education: Passive Victims of Imperialism or Active Agents of Pragmatism ". In Englishes in Asia: Communication, Identity, Power and Education, Edited by: Kirkpatrick, A. 29 - 62. Melbourne: Language Australia.
42. Li, L. and Walsh, S. 2011. 'Seeing is believing': Looking at EFL Teachers' Beliefs Through Classroom Interaction. Classroom Discourse, 2 (1): 39 - 57. doi: 10.1080/19463014.2011.562657
43. Lim Falk, M. 2008. Svenska i engelskspråkig skolmiljö. Ämnesrelaterat språkbruk i två gymnasieklasser [Swedish in an English-speaking school environment. Subject-related language use in two high school classes]. Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis. Stockholm Studies in Scandinavian Philology 46. Stockholm: Eddy.
44. Llinares, A. and Whittaker, R. 2010. " Writing and Speaking in the History Class: A Comparative Analysis of CLIL and First Language Contexts ". In Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms, Edited by: Dalton-Puffer, C., Nikula, T. and Smit, U. 125 - 144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
45. Lorenzo, F., Casal, S. and Moore, P. 2005. Orientaciones para la elaboracion del curriculo integrado de las lenguas en los centros bilingües [Orientations for the elaboration of the integrated language curriculum in the bilingual centres], Sevilla: Consejería de Educación.
46. Maillat, D. 2010. " The Pragmatics of L2 in CLIL ". In Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms, Edited by: Dalton-Puffer, C., Nikula, T. and Smit, U. 39 - 58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
47. Maljers, A., D. Marsh, and D. Wolff 2007. Windows on CLIL. Content and Language Integrated Learning in the spotlight. The Hague: European Platform for Dutch Education.
48. Mansour, N. 2009. Science Teachers' Beliefs and Practices: Issues, Implications and Research Agenda. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4 (1): 25 - 48. http://ijese.com/IJESE_v4n1_Mansour.pdf
49. Meehisto, P., Frigols, M. J. and Marsh, D. 2008. Uncovering CLIL, London: Macmillan.
50. Mercer, S. 2011. Dispelling the Myth of the Natural-born Linguist. ELT Journal, 66 (1): 22 - 29. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccr022
51. Mercer, S. and Ryan, S. 2010. A Mindset for EFL: Learners' Beliefs about the Role of Natural Talent. ELT Journal, 64 (4): 436 - 444. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccp083
52. Mewald, C. 2007. " A Comparison of Oral Language Performance of Learners in CLIL and Mainstream Classes at Lower Secondary Level in Lower Austria ". In Empirical Perspectives on CLIL Classroom Discourse, Edited by: Dalton-Puffer, C., Nikula, T. and Smit, U. 139 - 178. Frankfurt a.M: Peter Lang.
53. Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd edn, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54. Moate, J. M. 2011. The Impact of Foreign Language Mediated Teaching on Teachers' Sense of Professional Integrity in the CLIL Classroom. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34 (3): 333 - 346. doi: 10.1080/02619768.2011.585023
55. Mori, Y. 1999. Epistemological Beliefs and Language Learning Beliefs: What Do Language Learners Believe about Their Learning?. Language Learning, 49 (3): 377 - 415. doi: 10.1111/0023-8333.00094
56. Nezbeda, M. 2005. Überblicksdaten und Wissenswertes zu Fremdsprache als Arbeitssprache [Foreign languages as media of instruction: Basic statistics and points of interest]. EAA Serviceheft 6. Graz: Österreichisches Sprachenkompetenzzentrum.
57. Nikula, T. 2010. " Effects of CLIL on One Teacher's Classroom Language Use ". In Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms, Edited by: Dalton-Puffer, C., Nikula, T. and Smit, U. 105 - 124. Amsterdam etc: Benjamins.
58. Olson, K. and Jimenez-Silva, M. 2008. The Campfire Effect: A Preliminary Analysis of Preservice Teachers' Beliefs about Teaching English Language Learners after State-mandated Endorsement Courses. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 22 (3): 246 - 260. doi: 10.1080/02568540809594625
59. Pajares, M. F. 1992. Teachers' Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning Up A Messy Construct. Review of Educational Research, 62 (2): 307 - 332. doi: 10.3102/00346543062003307
60. Phipps, S. and Borg, S. 2009. Exploring Tensions between Teachers' Grammar Teaching Beliefs and Practices. System, 37 (3): 380 - 390. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2009.03.002
61. Potter, J. 1996. Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction, London: Sage.
62. Ruiz De Zarobe, Y. 2008. CLIL and Foreign Language Learning: A Longitudinal Study in the Basque Country. International CLIL Research Journal, 1 (1): 60 - 73. http://www.icrj.eu/11/article5.html
63. Shohamy, E. 2006. Language Policy. Hidden Agendas and New Approaches, London: Routledge.
64. Smit, U. 2010. English as A Lingua Franca in Higher Education. A Longitudinal Study of Classroom Discourse, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
65. Spolsky, B. 2004. Language Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66. Spolsky, B. 2009. Language management, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67. Swain, M. 1995. " Three Functions of Output in Second Language Learning ". In Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics, Edited by: Cook, G. and Seidlhofer, B. 125 - 144. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
68. Tanaka, K. and Ellis, R. 2003. Study Abroad, Language Proficiency and Learner Beliefs about Language Learning. JALT Journal, 25: 63 - 85. http://jalt-publications.org/jj/articles/2635-study-abroad-language-proficiency-and-learner-beliefs-about-language-learning
69. Van de Craen, P., Ceuleers, E., Lochtman, K., Allain, L. and Mondt, K. 2007. " An Interdisciplinary Research Approach to CLIL Learning in Primary Schools in Brussels ". In Empirical Perspectives on CLIL Classroom Discourse, Edited by: Dalton-Puffer, C. and Smit, U. 253 - 275. Frankfurt: Lang.
70. Viebrock, B. 2007. Bilingualer Erdkundeunterricht. Subjektive didaktische Theorien von Lehrerinnen und Lehrern [Bilingual geography. Teachers' subjective didactic theories], Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.
71. Walker, E. 2010. Evaluation of A Support Intervention for Senior Secondary School English Immersion. System, 38 (1): 50 - 62. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2009.12.005
72. Wenden, A. L. 1998. Metacognitive Knowledge and Language Learning. Applied Linguistics, 19 (4): 515 - 537. doi: 10.1093/applin/19.4.515
73. Wenden, A. L. 1999. An Introduction to Metacognitive Knowledge and Beliefs in Language Learning: Beyond the Basics. System, 27 (4): 435 - 441. doi: 10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00043-3
74. Woods, D. 2003. " The Social Construction of Beliefs in the Language Classroom ". In Beliefs in SLA: New Research Approaches, Edited by: Kalaja, P. and Barcelos, A. M. F. 201 - 232. New York: Springer Science + Business Media, LLC.
75. Zydatiß, W. 2012. Linguistic Thresholds in the CLIL Classroom? The Threshold Hypothesis Revisited. International CLIL Research Journal, 1 (4): 17 - 28. http://www.icrj.eu/14/article2.html