The influence of semantic transparency on eye movements during English compound word recognition

Eye Movements

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 373-389

  Juhasz, Barbara J ^a  

^a WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884849660     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-008044980-7/50018-5     Document Type: Chapter

References (38)

1. Andrews S. Morphological influences on lexical access: Lexical or nonlexical effects?. Journal of Memory and Language 1986, 25:726-740.
2. Andrews S., Miller B., Rayner K. Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2004, 16:285-311.
3. Baayen R.H., Piepenbrock R., Gulikers L. The CELEX Lexical Database. [CD-ROM] 1995, Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
4. Bertram R., Hyönä J. The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when reading short and long Finnish compounds. Journal of Memory and Language 2003, 48:615-634.
5. Bertram R., Pollatsek A., Hyönä J. Morphological parsing and the use of segmentation cues in reading Finnish compounds. Journal of Memory and Language 2004, 51:325-345.
6. Christianson K., Johnson R.L., Rayner K. Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 2005, 31:1327-1339.
7. Deutsch A., Frost R., Pelleg S., Pollatsek A., Rayner K. Early morphological effects in reading: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2003, 10:415-422.
8. Frisson S., Niswander-Klement E., Pollatsek A. The role of semantic transparency in the processing of English compound words 2006, Manuscript submitted for publication.
9. Hyönä J., Bertram R., Pollatsek A. Are long compound words identified serially via their constituents? Evidence from an eye-movement-contingent display change study. Memory & Cognition 2004, 32:523-532.
10. Hyönä J., Pollatsek A. Reading Finnish compound words: Eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:1612-1627.
11. Inhoff A.W., Radach R., Heller D. Complex compounds in German: Interword spaces facilitate segmentation but hinder assignment of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language 2000, 42:23-50.
12. Jarema G., Busson C., Niklova R., Tsapkini K., Libben G. Processing compounds: A cross-linguistics study. Brain and Language 1999, 68:362-369.
13. Juhasz B.J., Inhoff A.W., Rayner K. The role of interword spaces in the processing of English compound words. Language & Cognitive Processes 2005, 20:291-316.
14. Juhasz B.J., Rayner K. The role of age-of-acquisition and word frequency in reading: Evidence from eye fixation durations. Visual Cognition 2006, 13:846-863.
15. Juhasz B.J., Rayner K. Investigating the effects of a set of inter-correlated variables on eye fixation durations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 2003, 29:1312-1318.
16. Juhasz B.J., Starr M., Inhoff A.W., Placke L. The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: Evidence from naming, lexical decisions, and eye fixations. British Journal of Psychology 2003, 94:223-244.
17. Kambe G. Parafoveal processing of prefixed words during eye fixations in reading: Evidence against morphological influences on parafoveal processing. Perception & Psychophysics 2004, 66:279-292.
18. Libben G. How is morphological decomposition achieved?. Language and Cognitive Processes 1994, 9:369-391.
19. Libben G. Semantic transparency in the processing of compounds: Consequences for representation, processing, and impairment. Brain and Language 1998, 61:30-44.
20. Libben G., Derwing B.L., de Almeida R.G. Ambiguous novel compounds and models of morphological parsing. Brain and Language 1999, 68:378-386.
21. Libben G., Gibson M., Yoom Y.B., Sandra D. Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and Language 2003, 84:50-64.
22. Lima S.D. Morphological analysis in sentence reading. Journal of Memory and Language 1987, 26:84-99.
23. Marslen-Wilson W.D., Tyler L.K., Waksler R., Older L. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review 1994, 101:3-33.
24. Monsell S. Repetition and the lexicon. Progress in the psychology of language 1985, Vol. 1. Erlbaum, Hove, UK. A.W. Ellis (Ed.).
25. Pollatsek A., Hyönä J. The role of semantic transparency in the processing of Finnish compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes 2005, 20:261-290.
26. Pollatsek A., Hyönä J., Bertram R. The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26:820-833.
27. Pollatsek A., Reichle E., Rayner K. Modeling eye movements in reading. The mind's eyes: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research 2003, 361-390. Elsevier, Amsterdam. J. Hyönä, R. Radach, H. Deubel (Eds.).
28. Raaijmakers J.G.W., Schrijnemakers J.M.C., Gremmen F. How to deal with "the language-as-fixed effect fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory and Language 1999, 41:416-426.
29. Rastle K., Davis M.H., New B. The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004, 11:1090-1098.
30. Rayner K., Duffy S.A. Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition 1986, 14:191-201.
31. Rayner K., Sereno S.C., Raney G.E. Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 1996, 22:1188-1200.
32. Reichle E.D., Pollatsek A., Fisher D.L., Rayner K. Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review 1998, 105:125-157.
33. Sandra D. On the representation and processing of compound words. Automatic access to constituent morphemes does not occur. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1990, 42a:529-567.
34. Schilling H.E., Rayner K., Chumbley J.I. Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory & Cognition 1998, 26:1270-1281.
35. Seidenberg M.S. Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographics redundancy?. Attention and performance 12: The psychology of reading 1987, 245-263. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. M. Coltheart (Ed.).
36. Underwood G., Petley K., Clews S. Searching for information during sentence comprehension. From eye to mind: Information acquisition in perception, search, and reading 1990, 191-203. North-Holland, Oxford, England. R. Groner, G. d'Ydewalle (Eds.).
37. Williams R.S., Morris R.K. Eye movements, word familiarity, and vocabulary acquisition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2004, 16:312-339.
38. Zwitserlood P. The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes 1994, 9:341-368.