Are long compound words identified serially via their constituents? Evidence from an eye-movement-contingent display change study

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 523-532

  Hyönä, Jukka ^a   Bertram, Raymond ^a   Pollatsek, Alexander ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; GAZE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; READING; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 4644342542     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195844     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. ALTARRIBA, J., KAMBE, G., POLLATSEK, A., & RAYNER, K. (2001). Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: Evidence from fluent Spanish-English bilinguals. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 875-890.
2. ANDREWS, S., MILLER, B., & RAYNER, K. (2004). Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 285-311.
3. BALOTA, D. A., POLLATSEK, A., & RAYNER, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 364-390.
4. BERTRAM, R., & HYÖNÄ, J. (2003). The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from reading short and long Finnish compounds. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 615-634.
5. BRIIHL, D., & INHOFF, A. W. (1995). Integrating information across fixations during reading: The use of orthographic bodies and exterior letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 55-67.
6. DE JONG, N. H., FELDMAN, L. B., SCHREUDER, R., PASTIZZO, M., & BAAYEN, R. H. (2002). The processing and representation of Dutch and English compounds: Peripheral morphological and central orthographic effects. Brain & Language, 81, 555-567.
7. DEUTSCH, A., FROST, R., PELLEG, S., POLLATSEK, A., & RAYNER, K. (2003). Early morphological effects in reading: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 415-422.
8. EHRLICH, S. F., & RAYNER, K. (1981). Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 20, 641-655.
9. HENDERSON, J. M., & FERREIRA, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 417-429.
10. HYÖNÄ, J. (2003). Morphological preprocessing of first constituents of long compounds. Manuscript in preparation.
11. HYÖNÄ, J., & POLLATSEK, A. (1998). Reading Finnish compound words: Eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1612-1627.
12. HYÖNÄ, J., & POLLATSEK, A. (2000). Morphological processing of Finnish compound words in reading. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 65-87). Oxford: Elsevier.
13. INHOFF, A. W. (1989a). Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: Are word access codes used to integrate lexical information across interword fixations? Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 444-461.
14. INHOFF, A. W. (1989b). Parafoveal processing of words and saccade computation during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 544-555.
15. INHOFF, A. W., BRIIHL, D., & SCHWARTZ, J. (1996). Compound word effects differ in reading, on-line naming, and delayed naming tasks. Memory & Cognition, 24, 466-476.
16. INHOFF, A. W., RADACH, R., & HELLER, D. (2000). Complex compounds in German: Interword spaces facilitate segmentation but hinder assignment of meaning. Journal of Memory & Language, 42, 23-50.
17. INHOFF, A. W., STARR, M., & SHINDLER, K. L. (2000). Is the processing of words during eye fixations in reading strictly serial? Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1474-1484.
18. JUHASZ, B. J., STARR, M. S., INHOFF, A. W., & PLACKE, L. (2003). The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: Evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 223-244.
19. KENNEDY, A., PYNTE, J., & DUCROT, S. (2002). Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 1307-1337.
20. KENNISON, S. M., & CLIFTON. C. (1995). Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: Implications for eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 68-81.
21. LAINE, M., & VIRTANEN, P. (1999). WordMill Lexical Search Program. Turku, Finland: University of Turku, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience.
22. LIMA, S. D. (1987). Morphological analysis in sentence reading. Journal of Memory & Language, 26, 84-99.
23. MOSCOSO DEL PRADO MARTÍN, F., BERTRAM, R., HÄIKIÖ, T., SCHREUDER, R., & BAAYEN, R. H. (in press). Morphological family size in a morphologically rich language: The case of Finnish compared to Dutch and Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition.
24. POLLATSEK, A., & HYONÄ, J. (in press). The role of semantic transparency in the processing of Finnish compound words. Language & Cognitive Processes.
25. POLLATSEK, A. HYÖNÄ, J., & BERTRAM, R. (2000). The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 820-833.
26. POLLATSEK, A., LESCH, M., MORRIS, R. K., & RAYNER, K. (1992). Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 148-162.
27. RAYNER, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65-81.
28. RAYNER, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
29. RAYNER, K., BALOTA, D. A., & POLLATSEK, A. (1986). Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 473-483.
30. RAYNER, K., & POLLATSEK, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
31. RAYNER, K., & WELL, A. D. (1996). Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 504-509.
32. RAYNER, K., WHITE, S. J., KAMBE, G., MILLER, B., & LIVERSEDGE, S. P. (2003). On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 213-234). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
33. REICHLE, E. D., POLLATSEK, A., FISHER, D. L., & RAYNER, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125-157.
34. REICHLE, E. D., RAYNER, K., & POLLATSEK, A. (2003). The E-Z reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 26, 445-526.