Modeling Eye Movements in Reading. Extensions of the E-Z Reader Model.

The Mind's Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 361-390

  Pollatsek, Alexander ^a   Reichle, Erik D ^b   Rayner, Keith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1142274445     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-044451020-4/50021-9     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Altarriba J., Kambe G., Pollatsek A., Rayner K. Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations: Evidence from fluent Spanish-English bilinguals. Perception and Psychophysics 2001, 63:875-891.
2. Becker W., Jürgens R. An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli. Vision Research 1979, 19:967-983.
3. Bouma H. Visual interfernece in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. Vision Research 1973, 13:767-782.
4. Carroll P., Slowiaczek M.L. Constraints on semantic priming in reading: A fixation time analysis. Memory & Cognition 1986, 14:509-522.
5. Clark J.J., O'Regan J.K. Word ambiguity and the optimal viewing position in reading. Vision Research 1999, 39:843-857.
6. Coltheart M., Rastle K., Perry C., Langdon R., Ziegler J. DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review 2001, 108:204-256.
7. Ehrlich K., Rayner K Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading: Eye movements and immediacy of processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1983, 22:75-87.
8. Frazier L., Rayner K. Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology 1982, 14:178-210.
9. Hyönä J., Pollatsek A. Reading Finnish compound words: Eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:1612-1627.
10. Inhoff A.W., Starr M., Shindler K.L. Is the processing of words during eye fixations in reading strictly serial?. Perception & Psychophysics 2000, 62:1474-1484.
11. Just M.A., Carpenter P.A. A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review 1980, 87:329-354.
12. Kennedy A. The inluence of parafoveal words on foveal inspection time: Evidence for a processing trade-off. Yee Guidance in Reading and Scene Perception 1998, 149-179. Elsevier, Oxford. G. Underwood (Ed.).
13. Kennedy A. Parafoveal processing in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2000, 53A:429-455.
14. Kolers P. Experiments in reading. Scientific American 1972, 227:84-91.
15. Legge G.E., Klitz T.S., Tjan B.S. Mr Chips: An ideal-observer model of reading. Psychological Review 1997, 104:524-553.
16. McConkie G.W., Kerr P.W., Reddix M.D., Zola D. Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words. Vision Research 1988, 28:1107-1118.
17. McConkie G.W., Rayner K. The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics 1975, 17:578-586.
18. McConkie G.W., Zola D., Grimes J., Kerr P.W., Bryant N.R., Wolff P.M. Children's eye movements during reading. Vision and Visual Dyslexia 1991, 251-262. Macmillan Press, London. J.F. Stein (Ed.).
19. Morris R.K. Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20:92-103.
20. Morrison R.E. Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel Performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1984, 10:667-682.
21. Murray W.S., Rowan M. Early, mandatory, pragmatic processing. Journal of Psycholinguisitic Research 1998, 27:1-22.
22. Myers J.L., O'Brien E.J. Accessing the discourse representation while reading. Discourse Processes 1998, 26:131-157.
23. Niswander E, Pollatsek A., Rayner K. The processing of derived and inflected suffixed words during reading. Language and Cognitive Processes 2000, 15:389-420.
24. Pollatsek A., Hyönä J. The role of morphological constitutents in reading Finnish compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 26:820-833.
25. Pollatsek A., Hyönä J., Bertram R. The roles of first morpheme frequency and semantic transparency in processing Finnish compound words in reading. Paper presented at the morphology workshop 2001.
26. Pollatsek A., Rayner K., Balota D.A. Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading. Perception & Psychophysics 1986, 40:123-130.
27. Radach R., Heller D. Relations between spatial and temporal aspects of eye movement control. Reading as a Perceptual Process 2000, 165-192. Elsevier, Oxford. A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, J. Pynte (Eds.).
28. Rayner K. The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology 1975, 7:65-81.
29. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 124:372-422.
30. Rayner K., Bertera J.H. Reading without a fovea. Science 1979, 206:468-469.
31. Rayner K., Clifton C. Language comprehension. Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology 2002, Volume X:261-316. Wiley, New York. D.L. Medin (Ed.).
32. Rayner K., Sereno S.C., Raney G.E. Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1996, 22:1188-1200.
33. Rayner K., Slowiaczek M.L., Clifton C., Bertera J.H. Latency of sequential eye movements: Implications for reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1983, 9:912-922.
34. Rayner K., Well A.D., Pollatsek A., Bertera J.H. The availability of useful information to the right of fixation during reading. Perception and Psychophysics 1982, 31:537-550.
35. Reichle E.D., Pollatsek A., Fisher D.L., Rayner K. Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review 1998, 105:125-157.
36. Reichle E.D., Rayner K. Cognitive processing and models of reading. Models of the Visual System 2002, Plenum, New York. G.K. Hung, K.J. Ciuffreda (Eds.).
37. Reichle E.D., Rayner K., Pollatsek A. Eye movement control in reading: Accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z reader model. Vision Research 1999, 39:4403-4411.
38. Reichle E.D., Rayner K., Pollatsek A. The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2002, (in press).
39. Schilling H.E.H., Rayner K., Chumbley J.I. Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory & Cognition 1998, 26:1270-1281.
40. Seidenberg M.S., McClelland J.L. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review 1989, 96:523-568.
41. Sereno S.C., Rayner K., Posner M.I. Establishing a time-line of processing during reading: Evidence from eye movements and event-related potentials. NeuroReport 1998, 9:2195-2200.
42. Vergilino D., Beauvillain C. The planning of refixation saccades in reading. Vision Research 2000, 40:3527-3538.