Semantic transparency in the processing of compounds: Consequences for representation, processing, and impairment

Brain and Language

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 30-44

  Libben, Gary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LINGUISTICS; MODEL; SEMANTICS; SPEECH;

EID: 0031778460     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/brln.1997.1876     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Aronoff M. Word formation in generative grammar. 1976;MIT Press, Cambridge.
2. Butterworth B. Lexical representation. Language production. 1983;Academic Press, San Diego. p. 257-294.
3. Kaplan E., Goodglass H., Weintraub S. Boston naming test. 1983;Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia.
4. Laudanna A., Burani C. Distributional properties of derivational affixes: implications for processing. Feldman L. B. Morphological aspects of language processing. 1995;345-364 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
5. Libben G. A case of obligatory access to morphological constituents. Nordic Journal of Linguistics. 16:1993;111-121.
6. Libben G. How is morphological decomposition achieved? Language and Cognitive Processes. 9:1994;369-391.
7. Marslen-Wilson W. Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition. 25:1987;71-102.
8. Marslen-Wilson W., Tyler L. K., Waksler R., Older L. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review. 101:1994;3-33.
9. Monsell S. Repetition and the lexicon. Ellis A. W. Progress in the psychology of language, 1984;Erlbaum, Hove.
10. Ross D. G. Ross information processing assessment. 1986;PRO-ED Inc. Austin.
11. Sandra D. On the representation and processing of compound words: Automatic access to constituent morphemes does not occur. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A. 42:1990;529-567.
12. Schreuder R., Baayen H. Modeling morphological processing. Feldman L. B. Morphological aspects of language processing. 1995;345-364 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
13. Shillcock R. Lexical hypotheses in continuous speech. Altmann G. Cognitive models of speech processing. 1990;MIT Press, Cambridge.
14. Taft M. Prefix stripping revisited. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 20:1981;289-297.
15. Zwitserlood P. The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes. 9:1994;341-368.