Consumer stated purchasing preferences and corporate social responsibility in the wood products industry: A conjoint analysis in the U.S. and China

Ecological Economics

Volumn 95, Issue , 2013, Pages 118-127

  Cai, Zhen ^a   Aguilar, Francisco X ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

China; Conjoint analysis; Consumer purchasing preferences; Corporate social responsibility; Hierarchical Bayesian models; U.S.; Wood products industry

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; COMPOSITE; DATA SET; INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT; MAGNITUDE; MANUFACTURING; NUMERICAL MODEL; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; WOOD;

CHINA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84884346429     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.08.017     Document Type: Short Survey

References (87)

1. Adamowicz W., Louviere J., Swait J. Introduction to attribute-based stated choice methods. Final report to Resource Valuation Branch, Damage Assessment Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Advanis, Edmonton, Canada 1998, (44 pp.).
2. Aguilar F.X., Cai Z. Conjoint effect of environmental labeling, disclosure of forest of origin and price on consumer preferences for wood products in the US and UK. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 70(2):308-316.
3. Aguilar F.X., Vlosky R.P. Consumer willingness to pay price premiums for environmentally certified wood products in the U.S. For. Policy Econ. 2007, 9:1100-1112.
4. Aguilar F.X., Cernusca M.M., Gold M.A., Barbieri C. Frequency of consumption, familiarity and preferences for chestnuts in Missouri. Agroforest. Syst. 2010, 79:19-29.
5. Allenby G.M., Ginter J.L. Using extremes to design products and segment markets. For. Policy Econ. 1995, 32(4):392-403.
6. Allenby G.M., Rossi P.E., McCulloch R.E. Hierarchical Bayes Models: A Practitioners Guide Available at SSRN:, (Last accessed: April 29, 2012). http://ssrn.com/abstract=655541, 10.2139/ssrn.655541.
7. Anderson R.C., Hansen E.N. The impact of environmental certification on preferences for wood furniture: a conjoint analysis approach. For. Prod. J. 2004, 54(3):42-51.
8. Anderson R.C., Laband D.N., Hansen E.N., Knowles C.D. Price premiums in the mist. For. Prod. J. 2005, 55(6):19-22.
9. Andrews R.L., Ansari A., Currim I.S. Hierarchical Bayes versus finite mixture conjoint analysis models: a comparison of fit, prediction, and partworth recovery. J. Mark. Res. 2002, 39(1):87-98.
10. Balabanis G., Diamantopoulos A. Domestic country bias, country-of-origin effects, and consumer ethnocentrism: a multidimensional unfolding approach. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2004, 32(1):80-95.
11. Bowe S.A., Bumgardner M.S. Species selection in secondary wood products: implications for product design and promotion. Wood Fiber Sci. 2004, 34(3):408-418.
12. Bowen H.R. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman 1953, Harper&Row, NewYork.
13. Boyle K.J., Holmes T.P., Teisl M.F., Roe B. A comparison of conjoint analysis response formats. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2001, 83(2):441-454.
14. Breffle W.S., Rowe R.D. Comparing choice question formats for evaluating natural resource tradeoffs. Land Econ. 2002, 87(2):298-314.
15. Brooks S.P., Gelman A. General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 1997, 7:434-455.
16. Brouwer R., Langford I.H., Bateman I.J., Turner R.K. A meta-analysis of wetland contingent valuation studies. Reg. Environ. Change 1999, 1(1):47-57.
17. Brown T.J., Dacin P.A. The company and the product: corporate associations and consumer product responses. J. Mark. 1997, 61:68-84.
18. Buehlmann U., Bumgardner M., Schuler A., Rich C. Enterprise Integration, a Production Perspective, Electronic Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Production Research; 2003 August 3-7; Blacksburg, VA 2003, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg, VA. M.P. Deisenroth (Ed.).
19. Cai Z., Aguilar F.X. Meta-analysis of consumer's willingness-to-pay estimates for certified wood products. J. For. Econ. 2013, 19:15-31.
20. Carlsson F., Frykblom P., Lagerkvist C.J. Using cheap-talk as a test of validity in choice experiments. Econ. Lett. 2005, 89:147-152.
21. Caruso E.M. Using conjoint analysis to detect discrimination: revealing covert preferences from overt choices. Soc. Cogn. 2009, 27(1):128-137.
22. Cattin P., Gelfand A.E., Danes J. A simple Bayesian procedure for estimation in a conjoint model. J. Mark. Res. 1983, 20(1):29-35.
23. Chen X., Wu J. Sustainable landscape architecture: implications of the Chinese philosophy of "unity of man with nature" and beyond. Landscape Ecol. 2009, 24(8):1015-1026.
24. China Commodity Market Place Pine furniture market analysis report and predictions for 2010-2013 Available online at:, (Last accessed: March, 21, 2013. In Chinese). http://baogao.chinaccm.com/48/4810/481003/news/20091224/121538.asp#dinggou.
25. Creyer E.H., Ross W.T. The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: do consumers really care about business ethics. J. Consum. Mark. 1997, 14(6):421-432.
26. Cummings R.G., Taylor L.O. Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: a cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method. Am. Econ. Rev. 1999, 89(3):649-665.
27. Ding Q.J., Mack R.N., Lu P., Ren M.X., Huang W.H. China's booming economy is sparking and accelerating biological invasions. Bioscience 2008, 58(4):317-324.
28. Dmitrovic T., Vida I., Reardon J. Purchase behavior in favor of domestic products in the West Balkans. Int. Bus. Rev. 2009, 18(5):523-535.
29. Dollinger J. Confucian ethics and Japanese management practices. J. Bus. Ethics 1988, 7:575-584.
30. Donovan G.H., Nicholls D.L. Estimating consumer willingness to pay a price premium for Alaska secondary wood products. Res. Pap. PNWRP- 553 2003, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR, (7 pp.).
31. Evanschitzky H., Wangenheim F., Woisetschläger D., Blut M. Consumer ethnocentrism in the German market. Int. Mark. Rev. 2008, 25(1):7-32.
32. Financial Management Service Treasury reporting rates of exchange Available online at:, (Last accessed: April. 25, 2012). http://www.fms.treas.gov/intn_09-30-2011.pdf.
33. Green P.E., Krieger A.M., Wind Y. Thirty years of conjoint analysis: reflections and prospects. Interfaces 2001, 31:56-73.
34. Hong X., Yang X.H. Review of corporate social responsibility in China. China Bus. Trade 2011, 12:255-256. (In Chinese).
35. International Organization for Standardization Strategic advisory group on corporate social responsibility: preliminary working definition of organizational social responsibility. ISO/TBM AGCSR N4 2002, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
36. Jonsson O., Lindberg S., Roos A., Hugosson M., Lindstrom M. Consumer perceptions and preferences on solid wood, wood-based panels, and composites: a repertory grid study. Wood Fiber Sci. 2008, 40(4):663-678.
37. Kuhfeld W.F. Marketing research methods in SAS Available online at, (Last accessed: April 21, 2012). http://support.sas.com/techsup/technote/ts689.pdf.
38. Kuhfeld W.F., Tobias R.D., Garratt M. Efficient experimental design with marketing research applications. J. Mark. Res. 1994, 31:545-557.
39. Lotz S.L., Hu M.Y. Diluting negative country of origin stereotypes: a social stereotype approach. J. Mark. Manag. 2001, 17:105-135.
40. Louviere J.J., Hensher D.A., Swatt J.D. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application 2000, Cambridge University Press.
41. Luce R.D., Tukey J.W. Simultaneous conjoint measurement. J. Math. Psychol. 1964, 1:1-27.
42. Lunn D.J., Thomas A., Best N., Spiegelhalter D. WinBUGS - a Bayesian modeling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat. Comput. 2000, 10:325-337.
43. Maignan I., Ralston D.A. Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the US: insights from businesses self-presentations. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2002, 33(3):497-514.
44. Malhotra N. Completion time and response order effects in web surveys. Public Opin. Q. 2008, 72(5):914-934.
45. Manski C. The structure of random utility models. Theory Decis. 1977, 8:229-254.
46. Michael J.H., Wiedenbeck J.K. Safety in the wood products industry Available online at:, (last accessed: May, 12, 2012). http://www.fs.fed.us/ne/newtown_square/publications/other_publishers/OCR/ne_2004_michael001.pdf.
47. Mohr L.A., Webb D. The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. J. Consum. Aff. 2005, 39(1):121-147.
48. Murphy J.J., Allen P.G., Stevens T.H., Weatherhead D. A meta-analysis of hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2005, 30:313-325.
49. Nagashima A. A comparison of Japanese and U.S. attitudes towards foreign products. J. Mark. 1970, 34:68-74.
50. National Bureau of Statistics of China Forest Resource Distribution in China 2008, Available online at: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/qtsj/hjtjzl/hjtjsj2010/t20111228_402788786.htm, (Last accessed: February 21, 2013. In Chinese).
51. O'Briant W.H. Man, nature, and the history of philosophy. Philosophy and Environmental Crisis 1974, 79-89. University of Georgia Press, Athens. W.T. Blackstone (Ed.).
52. Orme B. Hierarchical Bayes: Why all the attention? Quirk's Marketing Research Review March 2000. Available online at:, (Last accessed: March, 21, 2013). http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/hbwhy.pdf.
53. Ozanne L.K., Vlosky R.P. Certification from the US consumer perspective: a comparison of 1995 and 2000. For. Prod. J. 2003, 53(3):13-21.
54. Panwar R., Hansen E. CSR in the forest sector. UNSYLVA: An International Journal 2008, 230(59):45-48. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations.
55. Pivato S., Misani N., Tencati A. The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer trust: the case of organic food. Bus. Ethics 2008, 17:3-12.
56. Portney P.R. Corporate social responsibility: an economic and policy perspective. Environmental Protection and the Social Responsibility of Firms 2005, 107-131. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC. B.L. Hay, R.N. Stavins, R.K. Vietor (Eds.).
57. Pratt J.W. The origin of "Manifest Destiny". Am. Hist. Rev. 1927, 32:795-798.
58. Raditya D.A. Case studies of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in forest products companies - and customer's perspectives. Second Cycle, A1E 2009, SLU, Dept. of Forest Products, Uppsala.
59. Ralston D.A., Gustafson D.J., Cheung F., Terpstra R.H. Differences in managerial values: a study of U.S., Hong Kong and PRC managers. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 1993, 24(2):249-275.
60. Ridoutt B.G., Ball R.D., Killerby S.K. Wood in the interior office environment: effects on interpersonal perception. For. Prod. J. 2002, 52(9):23-30.
61. Sawtooth Software, Inc. Software for hierarchical Bayes estimation for CBC data Available online at:, (Last accessed: April 29, 2012). http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com.
62. Schnettler B., Ruiz D., Sepulveda O., Sepulveda N. Importance of the country of origin in food consumption in a developing country. Food Qual. Preference 2008, 19(4):372-382.
63. Scholz S.W., Decker R. Measuring the impact of wood species on consumer preferences for wooden furniture by means of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. For. Prod. J. 2007, 57(3):23-28.
64. Sen S., Bhattacharya C.B. Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. J. Mark. Res. 2001, 38(2):225-243.
65. Shafer W.E., Fukukawa K., Lee G.M. Values and the perceived importance of ethics and social responsibility: the US versus China. J. Bus. Ethics 2007, 70(3):265-284.
66. Snider J., Hill R.P., Martin D. Corporate social responsibility in the 21st century: a view from the world's most successful firms. J. Bus. Ethics 2003, 48(2):175-187.
67. Solgaard H.S., Hansen T. A hierarchical Bayes model of choice between supermarket formats. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2003, 10(3):169-180.
68. Spiegelhalter D., Thomas A., Best N., Lunn D. WinBUGS User Manual, Version 1.4 2003, MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK.
69. Sternquist B., Zhou X.Q. China: the planned to face market paradigm. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 1995, 23:21-28.
70. Suliman M.O. China's Transition to a Socialist Market Economy 1998, Quorum Books, Westport, CN.
71. Thompson M.E., Fong G.T., Hammond D., Boudreau C., Driezen P., Hyland A., Borland R., Cummings K.M., Hastings G.B., Siahpush M., Mackintosh A.M., Laux F.L. Methods of the international tobacco control (ITC) four country survey. Tob. Control. 2006, 15:12-18.
72. Train K. A comparison of hierarchical Bayes and maximum simulated likelihood for mixed logit. Paper Presented at the Asilomar Invitational Choice Symposium, California, June 2001.
73. USDA Forest Service Criteria and indicators for forest sustainability Available online at:, (Last accessed: March 6, 2013). http://www.fs.fed.us/research/sustain/criteria-indicators/indicators/indicator-632.php.
74. USDA Forest Service National Report on Sustainable Forests - 2010 Available online at:, (Last accessed: April 1, 2013). http://www.fs.fed.us/research/sustain/docs/national-reports/2010/2010-sustainability-report.pdf.
75. USDA Forest Service Wood supply and demand Available online at:, (Last accessed: April 1, 2013). http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/pdf2011/fpl_2011_ince001.pdf.
76. Verlegh P.W.J., Steenkamp B.E.M. A review and meta-analysis of country-of-origin research. J. Econ. Psychol. 1999, 20(5):521-546.
77. Verlegh P.W.J., Steenkamp B.E.M., Meulenberg M. Country-of-origin effects in consumer processing of advertising claims. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2005, 22:127-139.
78. Vidal N., Kozak R. From forest certification to corporate responsibility: factors influencing adoption and implementation of responsible practices. XIII World Forestry Congress. Bueno Aires, Argentina, 18-23. October, 2009 2009, (Available online at: http://www.forestry.ubc.ca/sbml/pdfs/SFM,%20CSR%20and%20Forest%20Certification/From_forest_FD[1].pdf. Last accessed: April 29, 2012).
79. Vriens M., Wedel M., Wilms T. Metric conjoint segmentation methods: a Monte Carlo comparison. J. Mark. Res. 1996, 33(1):73-85.
80. Waddock S.A., Graves S.B. The corporate social performance financial performance link. Strateg. Manag. J. 1997, 18(4):303-319.
81. Wan Z.F., Geng Y.D. The barriers of Chinese state owned forest enterprises reforms. China For. Bus. 2004, 64:13-15. (In Chinese).
82. Wang L., Juslin H. Corporate social responsibility in the Chinese forest industry: understanding multiple stakeholder perceptions. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2011, 20(3):129-145.
83. Welford R.J. Corporate social responsibility in Europe and Asia: critical elements and best practice. J. Corp. Citizenship 2003, 13:31-47.
84. Wilson N.L.W. How the cookie crumbles: a case study of gluten-free cookies and random utility. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2012, 94(2):576-582.
85. Woodall C.W., Ince P.J., Skog K.E., Aguilar F.X., Keegan C.E., Sorenson C.B., Hodges D.G., Smith W.B. An overview of the forest products sector downturn in the United States. For. Prod. J. 2012, 61:595-603.
86. Xiang C.M. Comparison of different survey methods. Shanghai Stat. 2001, 12:19-20. (In Chinese).
87. Zhang J., Gan J. Who will meet China's import demand for forest products?. World Dev. 2007, 35:2150-2160.