Certification from the U.S. consumer perspective: A comparison from 1995 and 2000

Forest Products Journal

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 13-21

  Ozanne, Lucie K ^a   Vlosky, Richard P ^b  

^a LINCOLN UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FORESTRY;

CONSUMER CERTIFICATION;

WOOD PRODUCTS;

CERTIFICATION; ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS; FORESTRY; WOOD PRODUCTS;

EID: 0037350180     PISSN: 00157473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Anonymous. 1996a. How we're changing. Demographic state of the Nation: 1996. Special Studies. Series P23-191. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Washington, DC.
2. Anonymous. 1996b. The environmental two-step. Forum Section. Environmental Health Perspectives (104):4.
3. Armstrong, J.S. and T.S. Overton. 1977. Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. J. of Marketing Research 14(3):396-402.
4. Bush, R. and S. Sinclair. 1991. A multivariate model and analysis of competitive strategy in the U.S. hardwood lumber industry. Forest Sci. 37(2):481-499.
5. Carlson, L., S. Grove, and N. Kangon. 1993. A content analysis of environmental advertising: A matrix method approach. J. of Advertising (Sept.):27-39.
6. Churchill, G.A. 1987. Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations. 4th ed. The Dryden Press, New York.
7. Coddington, W. 1993. Environmental Marketing: Positive Strategies for Reaching the Green Consumer. McGraw Hill, New York.
8. Cude, B. 1991. Comments prepared for the July 1991 FTC public hearings on environmental marketing and advertising claims. Univ.of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
9. Dess, G.G. and P.S. Davis. 1984. Porter's generic strategies as determinants of strategic group membership and organizational performance. Acad. Management J. 27(3):467-487.
10. Dillman, D.A. 1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys - The Total Design Method. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
11. Forsyth, K., D. Haley, and R. Kozak. 1997. Customer attitudes towards environmentally sound wood products in the British Columbian home improvement market. Dept. of Forest Resources Management, Univ. of British Columbia, Canada.
12. Hair, J.F., R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham, and W.C. Black 1992. Multivariate Data Analysis. 3rd ed. MacMillan Publishing Co., New York.
13. Hansen, E. 1997. Forest certification and its role in marketing strategy. Forest Prod. J. 47(3):16-22.
14. Kim, P. 1991. The meaning of green: How environmental advertising works. JWT Greenwatch (3):3.
15. Klein, E. 1990. The selling of the green. D&B Reports 38(5):30-35.
16. McCormack, T. W. 2000. The American Demand for Household Furniture and Trends. 5th ed. AKTRIN Furniture Information Center, Highpoint, NC.
17. Ottman, J.A. 1998. Green Marketing: Opportunity for Innovation,. 2nd ed. NTC Business Books, Chicago, IL.
18. Ozanne, L.K. and R.P. Vlosky. 1997. Willingness to pay for environmentally certified wood products: The consumer perspective. Forest Prod. J. 47(6)39-48.
19. _ and P.M. Smith. 1998. Segmenting the market for environmentally certified wood products, Forest Sci. 44(3):379-389.
20. _, H. Bigsby, and C. Gan. 2000. A conjoint analysis of New Zealand consumer preference for environmentally certified forest products. Presentation at the XXI IUFRO World Congress, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. IUFRO, Vienna, Austria.
21. _, H. Bigsby, and R.P. Vlosky. 1999. New Zealand consumer perceptions and willingness to pay for environmentally certified forest products. New Zealand Forestry 43(4):17-23.
22. Punj, F. and D.W. Stewart. 1983. Cluster analysis in marketing research: Review and suggestions for application. J. of Marketing Research 20(5):131-148.
23. Rametsteiner, E. 2000. Sustainable forest management certification: Frame conditions, system designs and impact assessment. European Commission, Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe. IUFRO, Vienna, Austria.