Accuracy study of a robotic system for MRI-guided prostate needle placement

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 305-316

  Seifabadi, Reza ^a   Cho, Nathan B J ^b   Song, Sang Eun ^c   Tokuda, Junichi ^c   Hata, Nobuhiko ^c   Tempany, Clare M ^c   Fichtinger, Gabor ^a   Iordachita, Iulian ^b  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Accuracy assessment; MRI compatible robot; Phantom study; Prostate biopsy; Transperineal access

Indexed keywords

BIOPSY; CALIBRATION; MANIPULATORS; NEEDLES; PHANTOMS; ROBOTS; STERILIZATION (CLEANING); TISSUE; UROLOGY;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; INSERTION ERRORS; MRI COMPATIBLE; MRI-COMPATIBLE ROBOT; NEEDLE PLACEMENT; PHANTOM STUDIES; PHANTOMS; PROSTATE BIOPSY; ROBOTIC SYSTEMS; TRANSPERINEAL ACCESS;

ERRORS;

ACCURACY; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; IMAGE GUIDED BIOPSY; INSTRUMENT STERILIZATION; JOINT CAVITY; KINEMATICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING GUIDED PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSY; PHANTOM; PROSTATE BIOPSY; ROBOTICS;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; MRI-COMPATIBLE ROBOT; PHANTOM STUDY; PROSTATE BIOPSY; TRANSPERINEAL ACCESS;

BIOPSY, NEEDLE; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; HUMANS; IMAGE-GUIDED BIOPSY; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MOVEMENT; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ROBOTICS;

EID: 84883748825     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1440     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures2011: http://www.cancer.org
2. Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, et al. Cancer Statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61: 212-236.
3. Eichler K, Hempel S, Wilby J, et al. Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: a systematic review. J Urol 2006; 175: 1605-1612.
4. Yu KK, Hricak H. Imaging prostate cancer. Radiol Clin N Amer 2000; 38(1): 59-85.
5. D'Amico AV, Tempany CM, Cormack R, et al. Transperineal magnetic resonance image guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 2000; 164(2): 385-387.
6. Hata N, Jinzaki M, Kacher D, et al. MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with surgical navigation software: device validation and feasibility. J Radiol 2001; 220(1): 263-268.
7. Susil R, Camphausen K, Choyke P, et al. System for prostate brachytherapy and biopsy in a standard 1.5T MRI scanner. Magnet Reson Med 2004; 52(3): 683-687.
8. Chinzei K, Hata N, Jolesz FA, et al. MR-compatible surgical assist robot: system integration and preliminary feasibility study. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), 2000; 1935: 921-930.
9. DiMaio SP, Pieper S, Chinzei K, et al. Robot-assisted needle placement in open MRI: system architecture, integration and validation. Comput Aided Surg 2007; 12(1): 15-24.
10. Tadakuma K, DeVita LM, Plante JS, et al. The experimental study of a precision parallel manipulator with binary actuation: with application to MRI cancer treatment. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Pasadena, USA, 2008; 2503-2508.
11. Stoianovici D, Song D, Petrisor D, et al. MRI stealth robot for prostate interventions. Minim Invas Ther Allied Technol 2007; 16(4): 241-248.
12. Fischer GS, Iordachita I, Csoma C, et al. MRI-compatible pneumatic robot for transperineal prostate needle placement. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 2008; 13(3): 295-305.
13. Goldenberg AA, Trachtenberg J, Kucharczyk W, et al. Robotic system for closed bore MRI-guided prostatic interventions. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 2008; 13(3): 374-379.
14. van den Bosch MR, Moman MR, van Vulpen M, et al. MRI-guided robotic system for transperineal prostate interventions: proof of principle. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55(5): 133-140.
15. Su H, Shang W, Cole G, et al. Design of a haptic device for mri-guided prostate needle brachytherapy. In IEEE Haptics Symposium, Boston, MA, USA, 2010; 483-488.
16. Su H, Zervas M, Cole G, et al. Real-time MRI-guided needle placement robot with integrated fiber optic force sensing. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Beijing, China, 2011; 1583-1588.
17. Bak JB, Landas SK, Haas GP. Characterization of prostate cancer missed by sextant biopsy. Clin Prostate Cancer 2003; 2(2): 115-118.
18. Blumenfeld P, Hata N, DiMaio S, et al. Transperineal prostate biopsy under magnetic resonance image guidance: a needle placement accuracy study. J Magnet Reson Imag 2007; 26(3): 688-694.
19. Tokuda J, Fischer GS, DiMaio SP, et al. Integrated navigation and control software system for MRI-guided robotic prostate interventions. Comput Med Imag Graphics 2010; 34(1): 3-8.
20. Song S, Cho N, Fischer G, et al. Development of a pneumatic robot for MRI-guided transperineal prostate biopsy and brachytherapy: new approaches. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Anchorage, USA, 2010; 2580-2585.
21. Seifabadi R, Song SE, Krieger A, et al. Robotic system for MRI-guided prostate biopsy: feasibility of teleoperated needle insertion and ex vivo phantom study. Int J Comput Aided Radiol Surg 2012; 7(2): 181-190; doi: 10.1007/s11548-011-0598-9; published online April 2011.
22. Song S, Hata N, Iordachita I, et al. A workspace-orientated needle guiding robot for 3T MRI-guided transperineal prostate intervention: evaluation of in-bore workspace and MRI compatibility. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 2012 DOI:10.1002/rcs.1430. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rcs.1430/abstract; published online 10 April 2012.
23. Patriciu A, Petrisor D, Muntener M, et al. Automatic brachytherapy seed placement under MRI guidance. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2007; 54(8): 1499-1506.
24. Dehghan E, Salcudean SE. Needle insertion parameter optimization for brachytherapy. IEEE Trans Robotics 2009; 25(2): 303-315.
25. Abolhassani N, Patel R, Ayazi F. Effects of different insertion methods on reducing needle deflection. In International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, Lyon, France, 2007; 491-494.
26. Lagerburg V, Moerland MA, van Vulpen M, et al. A new robotic needle insertion method to minimize attendant prostate motion. Radother Oncol 2006; 80(1): 73-77.
27. Xu H, Lasso A, Vikal S, et al. MRI-guided robotic prostate biopsy: a clinical accuracy validation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), 2010; 6363; 383-391.
28. Hu Y, Carter T, Uddin H, et al. Modeling prostate motion for data fusion during image-guided interventions. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2011; 30(11): 1887-1900. [manuscript ID, TMI-2011-0093.R1, published online 2011].
29. Masamune K, Fichtinger G, Patriciu A, et al. System for robotically assisted percutaneous procedures with computed tomography guidance. J Comput Aided Surg 2001; 6: 370-383.
30. Peters T, Cleary K. Image-Guided Interventions: Technology and Applications. Springer: Berlin, 2008; 447.
31. Song SE, Cho NB, Iordachita I, et al. A study of needle image artifact localization in confirmation imaging of MRI-guided robotic prostate biopsy. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Beijing, China, 2011; 4834-4839.
32. Bebek O, Hwang MJ, Cavusoglu MC. Design of a parallel robot for needle-based interventions on small animals. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 2011. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5991962 [published online 18 August 2011].
33. Sirouspour MR, DiMaio SP, Salcudean SE, et al. Haptic interface control: design issues and experiments with a planar device. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, USA, 2000; 24-28.