What matters for student learning outcomes: A meta-analysis ofstudies exploring factors of effective teaching

Teaching and Teacher Education

Volumn 36, Issue , 2013, Pages 143-152

  Kyriakides, Leonidas ^a   Christoforou, Christiana ^a   Charalambous, Charalambos Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS   (Cyprus)

Author keywords

Educational effectiveness; Meta analysis; Quality of teaching; Teaching factors; Theory testing and development

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883634847     PISSN: 0742051X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Antoniou P., Kyriakides L. A dynamic integrated approach to teacher professional development: impact and sustainability of the effects on improving teacher behavior and student outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education 2013, 29(1):1-12.
2. Aparicio J.J., Moneo M.R. Constructivism, the so-called semantic learning theories, and situated cognition versus the psychological learning theories. Spanish Journal of Psychology 2005, 8(2):180-198.
3. Ball D.L., Sleep L., Boerst T.A., Bass H. Combining the development of practice and the practice of development in teacher education. The Elementary School Journal 2009, 109(5):458-474.
4. Borich G.D. Effective teaching methods 1992, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. 2nd ed.
5. Brekelmans M., Sleegers P., Fraser B. Teaching for active learning. New learning 2000, 227-242. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. P.R.J. Simons, J.L. van der Linden, T. Duffy (Eds.).
6. Brophy J., Good T.L. Teacher behavior and student achievement. Handbook of research on teaching 1986, 328-375. MacMillan, New York. 3rd ed. M.C. Wittrock (Ed.).
7. Campbell R.J., Kyriakides L., Muijs R.D., Robinson W. Differential teacher effectiveness: towards a model for research and teacher appraisal. Oxford Review of Education 2003, 29(3):347-362.
8. Cazden C.B. Classroom discourse. Handbook of research on teaching 1986, 432-463. MacMillan, New York. M.C. Wittrock (Ed.).
9. Chen W., Hendricks K., Archibald K. Assessing pre-service teachers' quality teaching practices. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice 2011, 17(1):13-32.
10. Choi J.I., Hannafin M. Situated cognition and learning environments: roles, structures, and implications for design. Educational Technology Research and Development 1995, 43(2):53-69.
11. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis of the behavioral sciences 1988, Academic Press, New York. 2nd ed.
12. Creemers B.P.M., Reezigt G.J. School level conditions affecting the effectiveness of instruction. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 1996, 7(3):197-228.
13. Creemers B.P.M., Kyriakides L. Critical analysis of the current approaches to modeling educational effectiveness: the importance of establishing a dynamic model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2006, 17(3):347-366.
14. Creemers B.P.M., Kyriakides L. The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools 2008, Routledge, London and New York.
15. Creemers B.P.M., Kyriakides L., Antoniou P. Teacher professional development for improving quality in teaching 2013, Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
16. Creemers B.P.M., Kyriakides L., Sammons P. Methodological advances in educational effectiveness research 2010, Routledge, London and New York.
17. De Corte E. Marrying theory building and the improvement of school practice: a permanent challenge for instructional psychology. Learning and Instruction 2000, 10(3):249-266.
18. De Jong R., Westerhof K.J., Kruiter J.H. Empirical evidence of a comprehensive model of school effectiveness: a multilevel study in mathematics in the 1st year of junior general education in the Netherlands. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2004, 15(1):3-31.
19. Den Brok P., Brekelmans M., Wubbels T. Interpersonal teacher behaviour and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2004, 15(3/4):407-442.
20. Frazer B.J., Walberg H.J., Welch W.W., Hattie J.A. Syntheses of educational productivity research. International Journal of Educational Research 1987, 11:145-252.
21. Gijbels D., Van de Watering G., Dochy F., Van den Bossche P. New learning environments and constructivism: the students' perspective. Instructional Science 2006, 34(3):213-226.
22. Goldstein H., Rasbash J., Plewis I., Draper D., Browne W., Yang M., et al. Auser's guide to MLwiN 1998, Institute of Education, London.
23. Grieve A.M. Exploring the characteristics of "teachers for excellence": teachers' own perceptions. European Journal of Teacher Education 2010, 33(3):265-277.
24. Grossman P., Hammerness K., McDonald M. Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 2009, 15(2):273-289.
25. Grossman P., McDonald M. Back to the future: directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal 2008, 45(1):184-205.
26. Harjunen E. Patterns of control over the teaching-studying-learning process and classrooms as complex dynamic environments: a theoretical framework. European Journal of Teacher Education 2012, 35(2):139-161.
27. Hattie J. Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement 2009, Routledge, New York.
28. Hill H.C., Blunk M., Charalambous C.Y., Lewis J., Phelps G.C., Sleep L., et al. Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: an exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction 2008, 26:430-511.
29. Hunter J.E., Schmidt F.L. Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings 2004, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 2nd ed.
30. Joyce B., Weil M., Calhoun E. Models of teaching 2000, Allyn & Bacon, Boston.
31. Kyriakides L. Extending the comprehensive model of educational effectiveness by an empirical investigation. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2005, 16(2):103-152.
32. Kyriakides L. Testing the validity of the comprehensive model of educational effectiveness: a step towards the development of a dynamic model of effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2008, 19(4):429-446.
33. Kyriakides L., Campbell R.J., Gagatsis A. The significance of the classroom effect in primary schools: an application of Creemers' comprehensive model of educational effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2000, 11(4):501-529.
34. Kyriakides L., Creemers B.P.M. The effects of teacher factors on different outcomes: two studies testing the validity of the dynamic model. Effective Education 2009, 1(1):61-85.
35. Kyriakides L., Creemers B., Antoniou P., Demetriou D. A synthesis of studies searching for school factors: implications for theory and research. British Educational Research Journal 2010, 36(5):807-830.
36. Kyriakides L., Tsangaridou N. Towards the development of generic and differentiated models of educational effectiveness: a study on school and teacher Effectiveness in Physical Education. British Educational Research Journal 2008, 34(6):807-838.
37. Lamberts P.C., Abrams K.R. Meta-analysis using multilevel models. Multilevel Modeling Newsletter 1995, 7(2):17-19.
38. Leinhardt G. On teaching. Advances in instructional psychology 1993, Vol. 4:1-54. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
39. Lipsey M.W., Wilson D.B. Practical meta-analysis 2001, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
40. Muijs D., Reynolds D. School effectiveness and teacher effectiveness: some preliminary findings from the evaluation of the mathematics enhancement programme. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2000, 11(3):247-263.
41. Muijs D., Reynolds D. Effective teaching. Evidence and practice 2010, Sage, London.
42. Paris S.G., Paris A.H. Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist 2001, 36(2):89-101.
43. Rosenshine B., Stevens R. Teaching functions. Handbook of research on teaching 1986, 85-107. Macmillan, New York. 3rd ed. M.C. Wittrock (Ed.).
44. Rosenthal R. Parametric measures of effect size. The handbook of research synthesis 1994, 231-245. Russell Sage, New York. H. Cooper, L.V. Hedges (Eds.).
45. Savery J.R., Duffy T.M. Problem based learning: an instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology 1995, 35(5):31-38.
46. Schechtman N., Roschelle J., Haertel G., Knudsen J. Investigating links from teacher knowledge, to classroom practice, to student learning in the instructional system of the middle-school mathematics classroom. Cognition and Instruction 2010, 28(3):317-359.
47. Scheerens J., Bosker R.J. The foundations of educational effectiveness 1997, Pergamon, Oxford.
48. Seidel T., Shavelson R.J. Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: the role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research 2007, 77(4):454-499.
49. Shepard L.A. Why we need better assessment. Educational Leadership 1989, 46(2):4-8.
50. Snijders T., Bosker R. Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling 1999, Sage, London.
51. Stenmark J.K. Mathematics assessment: Myths, models, good questions and practical suggestions 1992, NCTM, Reston, VA.
52. Teddlie C., Reynolds D. The international handbook of school effectiveness research 2000, Falmer Press, London.
53. Townsend T. International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement 2007, Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
54. Tynjälä P. Towards expert knowledge? A comparison between a constructivist and a traditional learning environment in the university. International Journal of Educational Research 1999, 31(5):357-416.
55. Vermunt J., Vershaffel L. Process-oriented teaching. New learning 2000, 209-225. Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. R.J. Simons, J. van der Linden, T. Duffy (Eds.).
56. Walberg H.J. Synthesis of research on teaching. Handbook of research on teaching 1986, 214-229. Macmillan, New York. 3rd ed. M.C. Wittrock (Ed.).
57. Witziers B., Bosker R.J., Krüger M.L. Educational leadership and student achievement: the elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly 2003, 39(3):398-423.