Patterns of control over the teaching-studying-learning process and classrooms as complex dynamic environments: a theoretical framework

European Journal of Teacher Education

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 139-161

  Harjunen, Elina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

classroom communication; classroom management; reflective practice; teacher student relationship

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859573761     PISSN: 02619768     EISSN: 14695928     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02619768.2011.643465     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Bakhtin, M. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics. Ed. and trans. Caryl Emerson. First published in 1929. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
2. Barraclough, R.A. and Stewart, R.A. 1992. "Power and control: social science perspective". In Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern, Edited by: Richmond, V.P. and McCroskey, J.C. 1-18. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Bochenski, J. 1974. Was ist Autorität? Einführung in die Logik der Autorität, Freiburg: Verlag Herder KG.
4. Bourdieu, P. and Passeron, J.C. 1977. Reproduction in education, society and culture, London: Sage.
5. Butland, M.J., and S.A. Beebe. 1992. Teacher immediacy and power in the classroom: The application of implicit communication theory. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, May 20-25, in Miami, FL. www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED371421&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED371421.
6. Byman, R. and Kansanen, P. 2008. Pedagogical thinking in a student's mind: A conceptual clarification on the basis of self-determination and volition theories. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(6): 603-21.
7. Campbell, J., Flynn, J.D. and Hay, J. 2003. The group development process seen through the lens of complexity theory. International Scientific Journal of Methods and Models of Complexity, 6(1): 1-33. http://www.fss.uu.nl/ms/cvd/isj/pdflyn.pdf
8. Conrad, I. 2006. Education reform at the 'edge of chaos': Constructing ETCH (an education theory complexity hybrid) for an optimal learning education environment. Unpublished PhD diss., University of Pittsburgh. http://etd.library.pitt.edu/ETD/available/etd-12122006-093659/unrestricted/ConradDissertation10-4-06.pdf.
9. Côtè, J. and Levine, C. 2002. Identity formation, agency, and culture: A social psychological synthesis, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M. 2000. The what and why of goal pursuits: Human needs and self-determination behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, 11: 227-68.
11. Eidelson, R.J. 1997. Complex adaptive systems in the behavioural and social sciences. Review of General Psychology, 1(1): 42-71.
12. Eve, R.A., Horsfall, S. and Lee, M.E. 1997. Chaos, complexity and sociology, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and power, London: Longman.
14. Finch, A. 2001. Complexity in the language classroom. Secondary Education Research, 47: 105-40. http://www.finchpark.com/arts/complex/index.htm
15. Finch, A. 2003. A systems view of TEFL: Mapping complexity. English Linguistic Science, 11: 15-26. http://www.finchpark.com/arts/systems.htm
16. Foucault, M. 1978. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison, New York: Vantage Books.
17. Gallagher, M. 2008. Foucault, power and participation. International Journal of Children's Rights, 16: 395-406.
18. Gleick, J. 1987. Chaos: Making a new science, New York: Penguin.
19. Goodson, I. 2003. "Developing life and work histories of teachers". In Professional knowledge, professional lives. Studies in education and change, Edited by: Goodson, I. and Hargreaves, A. 49-62. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
20. Harjunen, E. 2002. Miten opettaja rakentaa pedagogisen auktoriteetin? Otteita opettajan arjesta. [How does a teacher construct pedagogical authority? Extracts from a teacher's everyday life], Turku: Suomen Kasvatustieteellinen Seura.
21. Harjunen, E. 2009. How do teachers view their own pedagogical authority?. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and practice, 15(1): 109-29.
22. Harjunen, E. 2011. Students' consent to a teacher's pedagogical authority. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 55(4): 403-24.
23. Herbart, J.F. 1835. Pädagogische Vorlesungen, Leipzig: Hermann Wendt.
24. Hopmann, S. and Riquarts, K. 2000. "Starting a dialogue: A beginning conversation between didaktik and the curriculum tradition". In Teaching as a reflective practice. The German didaktik tradition, Edited by: Westbury, I., Hopmann, S. and Riquarts, K. 3-11. Manhaw, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Kansanen, P. 1999. Teaching as teaching-studying-learning interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 43(1): 81-9.
26. Kansanen, P. 2002. Didactics and its relation to educational psychology: Problems in translating a key concept across research communities. International Review of Education, 48(6): 427-41.
27. Kansanen, P. 2003. Studying-the realistic bridge between instruction and learning. An attempt to a conceptual whole of the teaching-studying-learning process. Educational Studies, 29(2): 221-32.
28. Kansanen, P. and Meri, M. 1999. The didactic relation in the teaching-studying-learning process. TNTEE Publications, 2(1): 107-16.
29. Kearney, P. and Plax, T.G. 1992a. "Teacher power in the classroom: Defining and advising a program of research". In Power in the classroom: Communication, control and concern, Edited by: Richmond, V.P. and McCroskey, J.C. 67-84. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Kearney, P. and Plax, T.G. 1992b. "Student resistance to control". In Power in the classroom: Communication, control and concern, Edited by: Richmond, V.P. and McCroskey, J.C. 85-100. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Klein, S.R. 2008. Holistic reflection in teacher education: Issues and strategies. Reflective Practice, 9(2): 111-21.
32. Korthagen, F. 2004. In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20: 77-97.
33. Korthagen, F. and Vasalos, A. 2005. Levels in reflection: Core reflection as a means to enhance professional growth. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 11(1): 47-71.
34. Krzywacki, H. 2009. Becoming a teacher: Emerging teacher identity in mathematics teacher education. Helsinki: Helsingin yliopisto. Research report 308. http://www.doria.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/50274/becoming.pdf?sequence=1.
35. Larsen-Freeman, D. 1997. Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied linguistics, 18(2): 141-65.
36. Lissack, M.R. and Gunz, H. 1999. Managing complexity in organizations: A view in many directions, Westport, CN: Quorum Books.
37. Lunsford, A.A. 1999. "Refiguring classroom authority". In The ethics of writing instruction: Issues in theory and practice, Edited by: Pemberton, M.A. 65-78. Stamford, CT: Ablex Publishing.
38. van Lier, L. 1996. Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy, and authenticity, London: Longman.
39. Maaranen, K. 2009. Widening perspective of teacher education. Studies on theory-practice relationship, reflection, research and professional development. Research report 305. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. http://www.doria.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/45140/widening.pdf?sequence=1.
40. van Manen, M. 1994. Pedagogy, virtue, and narrative identity in teaching. Curriculum Inquiry, 24(2): 135-70.
41. Mennin, S. 2007. Small-group problem-based learning as a complex adaptive system. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(3): 303-13.
42. Opdenakker, M.-C. and van Damme, J. 2006. Teacher characteristics and teaching style as effectiveness enhancing factors of classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22: 1-21.
43. Oyler, C. 1996. Sharing authority: Student initiations during teacher-led read-alouds of information books. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(2): 149-60.
44. Peterßen, W.H. 1989. Lehrbuch Allgemeine Didaktik, 2, München: Ehrenwirth.
45. Richmond, V.P. and McCroskey, J.C. 1984. Power in the classroom II: Power and learning. Communication Education, 33: 123-84.
46. Sawyer, K. 2004. Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2): 12-20.
47. Sawyer, K. 2006. Educating for innovation. Thinking Skill and Creativity, 1: 41-8.
48. Schön, D.A. 1987. Educationg the reflective practitioner. Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
49. Stadius, G. 1967. Synpunkten på Herman Nohls bildningteori [Viewpoints in Herman Nohl's educational theory], Åbo: Åbo Akademi. Acta Academicae Aboensis, ser. A Humaniora 34(1)
50. Stenberg, K. 2011. Working with identities-promoting student teachers' professional development. Research report 321. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/24379/Workingw.pdf?sequence=1.
51. Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K.M. and Deci, E.L. 2004. Motivating, learning, performance, and persistence. The synergetic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2): 246-60.