Investigating links from teacher knowledge, to classroom practice, to student learning in the instructional system of the middle-school mathematics classroom

Cognition and Instruction

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 317-359

  Shechtman, Nicole ^a   Roschelle, Jeremy ^a   Haertel, Geneva ^a   Knudsen, Jennifer ^a  

^a SRI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954249160     PISSN: 07370008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07370008.2010.487961     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Almond, R. G., Steinberg, L. S., & Mislevy, R. J. (2002). Enhancing the design and delivery of assessment systems: A four-process architecture. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 1(5).
2. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
3. Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 90(4), 449-466.
4. Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching. American Educator, 29(3), 14.
5. Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S., & Mewborn, D. S. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers' mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 433-456). New York: Macmillan.
6. Ball, D. L., Simons, J., Wu, H.-H., Simon, R., Whitehurst, G., & Yun, J. (2008). Report of the task group on teachers and teacher education. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education.
7. Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world's best-performing school systems come out on top. San Francisco: McKinsey and Company.
8. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 57, 289-300.
9. Brophy, J., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. Handbook of Research on Teaching, 3, 328-375.
10. Buddin, R., & Zamarro, G. (2009). Teacher qualifications and middle school student achievement. Santa Monica CA: RAND.
11. Bush, W. S. (2005, April). The reliability and validity of diagnostic assessments for middle school teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
12. Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2007). Teacher credentials and student achievement: Longitudinal analysis with student fixed effects. Economics of Education Review, 26(6), 673-682.
13. Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 1-24.
14. Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
15. Darling-Hammond, L., & Sykes, G. (1999). Teaching as the learning profession: A handbook of policy and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
17. Duncan, M. J., & Biddle, B. J. (1974). The study of teaching. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
18. Dunn, M. (2009). Investigating variation in teaching with technology-rich intervention: What matters in teaching and teacher training at scale? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Rutgers University, Rutgers, NJ.
19. Empson, S., Greenstein, S., Maldonado, L., & Roschelle, J. (2009). Scaling Up SimCalc: Case studies of enactment. Manuscript submitted for publication.
20. Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., Jacobs, V. R., & Empson, S. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children's thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 403-434.
21. Floden, R., McCrory, R., Ferrini-Mundy, J., Reckase, M. D., & Senk, S. (2009). Knowledge of algebra for teaching: Validity studies of a new measure. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
22. Garet, M. S., Birman, B. F., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Herman, R., & Yoon, K. S. (1999, October). Designing effective professional development: Lessons from the Eisenhower Program. Report to the U. S. Department of Education, Office of the Under Secretary on Contract No. EA97001001 to the American Institutes for Research.
23. Goldhaber, D. (2007). Everyone's doing it, but what does teacher testing tell us about teacher effectiveness? Journal of Human Resources, XLII(4), 765-794.
24. Good, T., & Grouws, D. (1977). Teaching effects: A process-product study in fourth-grade mathematics classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 28(3), 49.
25. Hanushek, E. A. (1986). The economics of schooling: Production and efficiency in public schools. Journal of Economic Literature, 24(3), 1141-1177.
26. Harbison, R., & Hanushek, E. (1992). Educational performance of the poor: Lessons from rural Northeast Brazil. Washington, DC: World Bank.
27. Harel, G., & Confrey, J. (1994). The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
28. Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics research and teaching (pp. 65-100). New York: MacMillan.
29. Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students' learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371-404). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
30. Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., et al. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4),430-511.
31. Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371-406.
32. Hill, H. C., Schilling, S. G., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Developing measures of teachers' mathematics knowledge for teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 11-30.
33. Kaput, J. (1994). Democratizing access to calculus: New routes using old roots. In A. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking and problem solving (pp. 77-155). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Kaput, J. (1997). Rethinking calculus: Learning and thinking.The American Mathematical Monthly, 104(8), 731-737.
35. Kaput, J., Hegedus, S., & Lesh, R. (2007). Technology becoming infrastructural in mathematics education. In R. Lesh, E. Hamilton, & J. Kaput (Eds.), Foundations for the future in mathematics education (pp. 173-192). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Kaput, J., & Roschelle, J. (1998). The mathematics of change and variation from a millennial perspective: New content, new context. In C. Hoyles, C. Morgan, & G. Woodhouse (Eds.), Rethinking the mathematics curriculum (pp. 155-170). London: Falmer Press.
37. Kersting, N., Givvin, K. B., Santagata, R., Sotelo, F., & Stigler, J. W. (2009). Teachers' analysis of classroom video as a predictor of students' mathematics learning: Further explorations of a novel measure of teacher knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
38. Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning, and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60, 1-64.
39. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers' understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States: Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Messick,S.(1994).Theinterplayofevidenceandconsequencesinthevalidationofperformanceassessments.Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13-23.
41. Mislevy, R. J., Almond, R. G., & Lukas, J. F. (2003). A brief introduction to evidence-centered design. CRESST Technical Paper Series. Los Angeles: Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
42. Mislevy, R. J., & Haertel, G. (2007). Implications of evidence-centered design for educational testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 25, 6-20.
43. Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., & Almond, R. G. (2002). On the structure of educational assessments. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1, 3-67.
44. Monk, D. H. (1994). Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 13, 125-125.
45. Mullens, J., Murnane, R., & Willett, J. (1996). The contribution of training and subject matter knowledge to teaching effec- tiveness: A multilevel analysis of longitudinal evidence from Belize. Comparative Education Review, 40(2),139-157.
46. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA:Author.
47. National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education.
48. No Child Left Behind Act. (2001). United States Congress.
49. Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. (2004). How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(3), 237-257.
50. Pierson, J. (2008). The relationship between patterns of classroom discourse and mathematics learning. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Texas at Austin.
51. Porter, A. C. (2002). Measuring the content of instruction: Uses in research and practice. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 3-14.
52. Post, T. R., Cramer, K. A., Behr, M., Lesh, R., & Harel, G. (1993). Curriculum implications of research on the learning, teaching, and assessing of rational number concepts. In T. A. Romberg, E. Fennema, & T. P. Carpenter (Eds.), Rational numbers: An integration of research (pp. 327-362). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
53. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
54. Roschelle, J., Knudsen, J., & Hegedus, S. (2009). From new technological infrastructures to curricular activity systems: Advanced designs for teaching and learning. In M.J.Jacobson&P.Reimann(Eds.),Designsforlearningenvironments of the future: International perspectives from the learning sciences (pp. 233-262). New York: Springer.
55. Roschelle, J., Shechtman, N., Tatar, D., Hegedus, S., Hopkins, B., Empson, S., Knudsen, J., & Gallagher, L. (in press). Integration of technology, curriculum, and professional development for advancingmiddle school mathematics: Three large-scale studies. American Educational Research Journal.
56. Roschelle, J., Singleton, C., Sabelli, N., Pea, R., & Bransford, J. (2008). Mathematics worth knowing, resources worth growing, and research worth nothing: A response to the National Mathematics Advisory Panel report. Educational Researcher, 37(9), 610-617.
57. Shechtman, N., Haertel, G., Roschelle, J., & Knudsen, J. (2010). Design and development of the student and teacher mathematical content assessment instruments for the Scaling Up SimCalc Project (Scaling Up SimCalc Project Technical Report No. 05). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
58. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
59. Sowder, J., Philipp, R., Armstrong, B., & Schappelle, B. (1998). Middle-grade teachers' mathematical knowledge and its relationship to instruction. Albany, NY: State University of New York.
60. Tatar, D., Roschelle, J., Knudsen, J., Shechtman, N., Kaput, J., & Hopkins, B. (2008). Scaling up innovative technology- based mathematics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(2), 248-286.
61. U. S. Department of Education. (1996). Pursuing excellence: A study of U.S. eight grade mathematics and science teaching, learning, curriculum, and achievement in an international context. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
62. Vergnaud, G. (1988). Multiplicative structures. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 141-161). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.