Computational models of location-invariant orthographic processing

Connection Science

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-26

  Dandurand, Frédéric ^a   Hannagan, Thomas ^b   Grainger, Jonathan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

artificial neural networks; network coding analysis; orthographic processing; reading; supervised learning

Indexed keywords

BACK PROPAGATION NEURAL NETWORKS; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; CONNECTION WEIGHTS; INTERMEDIATE REPRESENTATIONS; INTERNAL REPRESENTATION; LINEAR COMBINATIONS; READING; STACKED NEURAL NETWORKS;

HOLOGRAPHY; NEURAL NETWORKS; SUPERVISED LEARNING;

TOPOLOGY;

EID: 84883489335     PISSN: 09540091     EISSN: 13600494     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09540091.2013.801934     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Binder, J. R., Medler, D. A., Westbury, C. F., Liebenthal, E. and Buchanan, L. 2006. Tuning of the human left fusiform gyrus to sublexical orthographic structure. NeuroImage, 33: 739 - 748. (doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.053)
2. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R. and Ziegler, J. 2001. DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108: 204 - 256. (doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204)
3. Dandurand, F. and Grainger, J. Compact representations of word location independence in connectionist models. Proceedings of the second French conference on computational neuroscience, pp. 163 - 166. France: Marseille.
4. Dandurand, F., Grainger, J. and Dufau, S. 2010. Learning location invariant orthographic representations for printed words. Connection Science, 22 (1): 25 - 42. doi:10.1080/09540090903085768 (doi:10.1080/09540090903085768)
5. Dandurand, F., Hannagan, T. and Grainger, J. Neural networks for word recognition: Is a hidden layer necessary?. Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the cognitive science society, Edited by: Ohlsson, S. and Catrambone, R. pp. 688 - 693. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. Presented at the CogSci 2010.
6. Davis, C. J. 2010. The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117 (3): 713 - 758. (doi:10.1037/a0019738)
7. Davis, C. J. and Lupker, S. J. 2006. Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32: 668 - 687. (doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.668)
8. Dehaene, S. and Cohen, L. 2007. Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron, 56 (2): 384 - 398. (doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.004)
9. Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M. and Vinckier, F. 2005. The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9 (7): 335 - 341. (doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.004)
10. Dehaene, S., Jobert, A., Naccache, L., Ciuciu, P., Poline, J., Le Bihan, D. and Cohen, L. 2004. Letter binding and invariant recognition of masked words: Behavioral and neuroimaging evidence. Psychological Science, 15: 307 - 313. (doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00674.x)
11. Dehaene, S., Le Clec'h, G., Poline, J. B., Le Bihan, D. and Cohen, L. 2002. The visual word form area: A prelexical representation of visual words in the fusiform gyrus. Neuroreport, 13 (3): 321 - 325. (doi:10.1097/00001756-200203040-00015)
12. Diependaele, K., Ziegler, J. and Grainger, J. 2010. Fast phonology and the bi-modal interactive activation model. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22 (5): 764 - 778. (doi:10.1080/09541440902834782)
13. Dufau, S., Grainger, J. and Ziegler, J. C. 2012. How to say 'no' to a nonword: A leaky competing accumulator model of lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38 (4): 1117 - 1128. (doi:10.1037/a0026948)
14. Dufau, S., Lété, B., Touzet, C., Glotin, H., Ziegler, J. C. and Grainger, J. 2010. A developmental perspective on visual word recognition: New evidence and a self-organising model. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22 (5): 669 - 694. (doi:10.1080/09541440903031230)
15. Elman, J. L. 1991. Distributed representations, simple recurrent networks, and grammatical structure. Machine Learning, 7 (2): 195 - 225.
16. Frankish, C. and Turner, E. 2007. SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 56: 189 - 211. (doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.002)
17. Glotin, H., Warnier, P., Dandurand, F., Dufau, S., Lété, B., Touzet, C. and Grainger, J. 2010. An adaptive resonance theory account of the implicit learning of orthographic word forms. Journal of Physiology, Paris, 104 (1-2): 19 - 26. doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2009.11.003 (doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2009.11.003)
18. Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R. and Perea, M. 2008. The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115: 577 - 601. (doi:10.1037/a0012667)
19. Grainger, J. 2008. Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23 (1): 1 - 35. (doi:10.1080/01690960701578013)
20. Grainger, J. and Ferrand, L. 1996. Masked orthographic and phonological priming in visual word recognition and naming: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Memory and Language, 35 (5): 623 - 647. (doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.0033)
21. Grainger, J., Granier, J. P., Farioli, F., Van Assche, E. and Van Heuven, W. J. B. 2006. Letter position information and printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32 (4): 865 - 884. (doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.865)
22. Grainger, J. and Holcomb, P. J. 2009. Watching the word go by: On the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3 (1): 128 - 156. (doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00121.x)
23. Grainger, J., Kiyonaga, K. and Holcomb, P. J. 2006. The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation. Psychological Science, 17 (12): 1021 - 1026. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01821.x (doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01821.x)
24. Grainger, J., Lété, B., Bertrand, D., Dufau, S. and Ziegler, J. C. 2012. Evidence for multiple routes in learning to read. Cognition, 123 (2): 280 - 292. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.01.003 (doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.01.003)
25. Grainger, J., Tydgat, I. and Isselé, J. 2010. Crowding affects letters and symbols differently. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36 (3): 673 - 688. (doi:10.1037/a0016888)
26. Grainger, J. and Van Heuven, W. J. B. 2003. " Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception ". In The mental lexicon, Edited by: Bonin, P. 1 - 23. New York: Nova Science.
27. Hannagan, T., Dandurand, F. and Grainger, J. 2011. Broken symmetries in a location invariant word recognition network. Neural Computation, 23 (1): 251 - 283. (doi:10.1162/NECO_a_00064)
28. Harm, M. W. and Seidenberg, M. S. 2004. Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111 (3): 662 - 720. (doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.662)
29. Hinton, G. E. 1989. Connectionist learning procedures. Artificial Intelligence, 40 (1-3): 185 - 234. (doi:10.1016/0004-3702(89)90049-0)
30. Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., Welling, M. and Teh, Y. W. 2010. Unsupervised discovery of nonlinear structure using contrastive backpropagation. Cognitive science, 30 (4): 725 - 731. (doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_76)
31. Marchman, V. A. 1993. Constraints on plasticity in a connectionist model of the English past tense. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5 (2): 215 - 234. (doi:10.1162/jocn.1993.5.2.215)
32. McClelland, J. L. and Rumelhart, D. E. 1988. Explorations in parallel distributed processing, Boston, MA: MIT Press.
33. New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M. and Ferrand, L. 2004. Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36 (3): 516 - 524. (doi:10.3758/BF03195598)
34. Perea, M. and Lupker, S. J. 2004. Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory & Language, 51 (2): 231 - 246. (doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.005)
35. Peressotti, F. and Grainger, J. 1999. The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 61: 691 - 706. (doi:10.3758/BF03205539)
36. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C. and Zorzi, M. 2007. Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114: 273 - 315. (doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.273)
37. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S. and Patterson, K. 1996. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103: 56 - 115. (doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.1.56)
38. Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L. and PDP research group. 1986. Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Vol. 1, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Schoonbaert, S. and Grainger, J. 2004. Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19: 333 - 367. (doi:10.1080/01690960344000198)
40. Segui, J. and Grainger, J. 1990. Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbours: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16: 65 - 76. (doi:10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.65)
41. Seidenberg, M. S. and McClelland, J. L. 1989. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96 (4): 523 - 568. (doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523)
42. Sejnowski, T. J. and Rosenberg, C. R. 1987. Parallel networks that learn to pronounce English text. Complex Systems, 1 (1): 145 - 168.
43. Shillcock, R. and Monaghan, P. 2001. The computational exploration of visual word recognition in a split model. Neural Computation, 13: 1171 - 1198. (doi:10.1162/08997660151134370)
44. Stevens, M. and Grainger, J. 2003. Letter visibility and the viewing position effect in visual word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 65 (1): 133 - 151. (doi:10.3758/BF03194790)
45. Tydgat, I. and Grainger, J. 2009. Serial position effects in the identification of letters, digits, and symbols. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35 (2): 480 - 498. (doi:10.1037/a0013027)
46. Vinckier, F., Dehaene, S., Jobert, A., Dubus, J. P., Sigman, M. and Cohen, L. 2007. Hierarchical coding of letter strings in the ventral stream: Dissecting the inner organization of the visual word-form system. Neuron, 55 (1): 143 - 156. (doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.05.031)
47. Vinckier, F., Qiao, E., Pallier, C., Dehaene, S. and Cohen, L. 2011. The impact of letter spacing on reading: A test of the bigram coding hypothesis. Journal of Vision, 11 (6): 1 - 21. Retrieved from http://www.journalofvision.org www.journalofvision.org/content/11/6/8.short (doi:10.1167/11.6.8)
48. Whitney, C. 2001. How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8: 221 - 243. (doi:10.3758/BF03196158)