Conversation analysis and electronic interactions: Methodological, analytic and technical considerations

Innovative Methods and Technologies for Electronic Discourse Analysis

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 370-392

  Meredith, Joanne ^a   Potter, Jonathan ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONVERSATION ANALYSIS; ELECTRONIC INTERACTIONS; ETHICAL ISSUES; INSTANT MESSAGING; ON-LINE INTERACTIONS; QUASI-SYNCHRONOUS; SCREEN CAPTURE;

EID: 84882753205     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4426-7.ch017     Document Type: Chapter

References (127)

1. Androutsopoulos, J., Beisswenger, M. (2008). Introduction: Data and methods in computermediated discourse analysis. Language@Internet, 5, Article 9. Retrieved October 14, 2012, from www.languageatinternet.de
2. Antaki, C. (1994). Explaining and arguing: The social organization of accounts. London: Sage.
3. Antaki, C., Ardévol, E., Núñez, F., Vayreda, A. (2005). "For she who knows who she is": Managing accountability in online forum messages. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(1). Retrieved November 2, 2010, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue1/antaki.html
4. Arminen, I., Leinonen, M. (2006). Mobile phone call openings: Tailoring answers to personalized summonses. Discourse Studies, 8(3), 339-368. doi:10.1177/1461445606061791.
5. Bassett, E. H., O'Riordan, K. (2002). Ethics of internet research: Contesting the human subjects research model. Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 233-247. doi:10.1023/A:1021319125207.
6. Bechar-Israeli, H. (1995). From to : Nicknames, play and identity on internet relay chat. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 1(2). Retrieved December 3, 2010, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol1/issue2/bechar.html
7. Benwell, B., Stokoe, E. (2006). Discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Berglund, T. ö. (2009). Disrupted turn adjacency and coherence maintenance in instant messaging conversations. Language@Internet, 6(2). Retrieved December 3, 2010, from www. languageatinternet.de/articles/2009/2106/Berglund. pdf/
8. Berglund, T. ö. (2009). Disrupted turn adjacency and coherence maintenance in instant messaging conversations. Language@Internet, 6(2). Retrieved December 3, 2010, from www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2009/2106/Berglund.pdf/
9. British Psychological Society. (2007). Report of the working party on conducting research on the internet: Guidelines for ethical practice in psychological research online. (No. 62/06.2007). Retrieved July 30, 2012, from http://www.bps.org.uk/publications/policy-guidelines/researchguidelines-policy-documents/research-guidelines-policy-docum:BPS
10. Brown, C. (2009). White supremacist discourse on the internet and the construction of whiteness ideology. The Howard Journal of Communications, 20(2), 189-208. WWW.HATE.COM doi:10.1080/10646170902869544.
11. Brunet, P. M., Schmidt, L. A. (2007). Is shyness context specific? Relation between shyness and online self-disclosure with and without a live webcam in young adults. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(4), 938-945. doi:10.1016/j. jrp.2006.09.001.
12. Chen, G., Chiu, M. M., Wang, Z. (2012). Social metacognition and the creation of correct, new ideas: A statistical discourse analysis of online mathematics discussions. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 868-880. doi:10.1016/j. chb.2011.12.006.
13. Collister, L. B. (2008). Virtual discourse structure: An analysis of conversation in World of Warcraft. (Unpublished MA thesis). University of Pittsburgh.
14. Collister, L. B. (2011). *-Repair in online discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 23(3), 918-921. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.025.
15. Connor, S. M., Wesolowski, K. (2009). Posts to online news message boards and public discourse surrounding DUI enforcement. Traffic Injury Prevention, 10(6), 546-551. doi:10.1080/15389580903261105 PMID:19916124.
16. Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139164771.
17. Derks, D., Bos, A. E. R., von Grumbkow, J. (2007). Emoticons and social interaction on the internet: The importance of social context. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 842-849. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.11.013.
18. Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.
19. Edwards, D. (2004a). Discursive psychology. In Fitch, K. L., Sanders, R. E. (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 257-273). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Edwards, D. (2004b). Shared knowledge as a performative category in conversation. Rivista Di Psicololinguistica Applicata, 4(2-3), 41-53.
21. Edwards, D., Hepburn, A., Potter, J. (2009). Psychology, sociology and interaction: Disciplinary allegiance or analytic quality? - A response to Housley and Fitzgerald. Qualitative Research, 9(1), 119-128. doi:10.1177/1468794108095078.
22. Edwards, D., Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
23. Elsner, M., Charniak, E. (2010). Disentangling chat. Computational Linguistics, 36(3), 389-409. doi:10.1162/coli_a_00003.
24. Eysenbach, G., Till, J. E. (2001). Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. British Medical Journal, 323, 1103-1105. doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1103 PMID:11701577.
25. Fitze, M. (2006). Discourse and participation in ESL face-to-face and written electronic conferences. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 67-86.
26. Flinkfeldt, M. (2011). 'Filling one's days': Managing sick leave legitimacy in an online forum. Sociology of Health & Illness, 33(5), 761-776. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01330.x PMID:21561459.
27. Fox, A. B., Rosen, J., Crawford, M. (2009). Distractions, distractions: Does instant messaging affect college students' performance on a concurrent reading comprehension task? Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(1), 51-53. doi:10.1089/ cpb.2008.0107 PMID:19006461.
28. Frohlich, D., Drew, P., Monk, A. (1994). The management of repair in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 9(3-4), 385-426. doi:10.1207/s15327051hci0903&4_5.
29. Garcia, A. C., Jacobs, J. B. (1999). The eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32(4), 337-367. doi:10.1207/ S15327973rls3204_2.
30. Gibson, W. (2009a). Intercultural communication online: Conversation analysis and the investigation of asynchronous written discourse. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(1). Retrieved November 2, 2010, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1253
31. Gibson, W. (2009b). Negotiating textual talk: Conversation analysis, pedagogy and the organisation of online asynchronous discourse. British Educational Research Journal, 35(5), 705-721. doi:10.1080/01411920802688754.
32. Gleason, J. S. (2011). Electronic discourse in language learning and language teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(1), 135-137. doi:10.1017/S0272263110000616.
33. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
34. Goodwin, C., Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 283- 307. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435.
35. Greenfield, P. M., Subrahmanyam, K. (2003). Online discourse in a teen chatroom: New codes and new modes of coherence in a visual medium. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24(6), 713-738. doi:10.1016/j.appdev. 2003.09.005.
36. Hepburn, A., Bolden, G. B. (2013). Transcription. In Stivers, T., Sidnell, J. (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 57-76). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
37. Hepburn, A., Potter, J. (2003). Discourse analytic practice. In Seale, C., Silverman, D., Gubrium, J. F., Gobo, G. (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 180-196). London: Sage.
38. Heritage, J. (1995). Conversation analysis: Methodological aspects. In Quasthoff, U. M. (Ed.), Aspects of oral communication (pp. 391-418). Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110879032.391.
39. Herring, S. C. (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4). Retrieved November 2, 2010, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue4/herring.html
40. Herring, S. C. (2007). A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Language@ Internet, 1. Retrieved November 2, 2010, from www.languageatinternet.de
41. Hinduja, S., Patchin, J. W. (2008). Social networking and identity construction: Personal information of adolescents on the internet: A quantitative content analysis of MySpace. Journal of Adolescence, 31(1), 125-146. doi:10.1016/j. adolescence.2007.05.004 PMID:17604833.
42. Horne, J., Wiggins, S. (2009). Doing being 'on the edge': Managing the dilemma of being authentically suicidal in an online forum. Sociology of Health & Illness, 31(2), 170-184. doi:10.1111/ j.1467-9566.2008.01130.x PMID:18983421.
43. Hutchby, I. (2001). Conversation and technology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
44. Hutchby, I. (2003). Affordances and the analysis of technologically-mediated interaction. Sociology, 37, 581-589. doi:10.1177/00380385030373011.
45. Jefferson, G. (1984). Notes on some orderliness of overlap onset. In V. d'Urso & P. Leonardi (Eds.), Discourse analysis and natural rhetorics (pp. 11- 38). Cleup Editore: Padua.
46. Jefferson, G. (1989). Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a 'standard maximum' silence of approximately one second in conversation. In Roger, D., Bull, P. (Eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 166-196). Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
47. Jefferson, G. (2004a). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Lerner, G. H. (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13-23). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
48. Jefferson, G. (2004b). A sketch of some orderly aspects of overlap in natural conversation. In Lerner, G. H. (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 43-59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
49. Keating, E., Sunakawa, C. (2010). Participation cues: Coordinating activity and collaboration in complex online gaming worlds. Language in Society, 39(3), 331-356. doi:10.1017/ S0047404510000217.
50. Lamerichs, J., te Molder, H. F. M. (2003). Computer-mediated communication: From a cognitive to a discursive model. New Media & Society, 5(4), 451-473. doi:10.1177/146144480354001.
51. Laurier, E. (2000). Why people say where they are during mobile phone calls. Environment and Planning. D, Society & Space, 19, 485-504. doi:10.1068/d228t.
52. Liddicoat, A. J. (2007). An introduction to conversation analysis. London: Continuum.
53. Lim, H. L., Sudweeks, F. (2008). Constructing learning conversations: Discourse and social network analyses of educational chat exchanges. In Kelsey, S., St. Amant, K. (Eds.), Handbook of research on computer-mediated communication (pp. 451-476). London: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-59904-863-5.ch034.
54. Lynch, M. (2002). Capital punishment as moral imperative: Pro-death-penalty discourse on the internet. Punishment and Society, 4(2), 213-236. doi:10.1177/14624740222228554.
55. Mallen, M. J., Day, S. X., Green, M. A. (2003). Online versus face-to-face conversations: An examination of relational and discourse variables. Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.), 40(1-2), 155-163. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.40.1-2.155.
56. Marcoccia, M., Atifi, H., Gauducheau, N. (2008). Text-centered versus multimodal analysis of instant messaging conversation. Language@ Internet, 5, Article 7. Retrieved October 14, 2012, from www.languageatinternet.de
57. Martey, R. M., Stromer-Galley, J. (2007). The digital dollhouse: Context and social norms in The Sims online. Games and Culture: A Journal of Interactive Media, 2(4), 314-334.
58. McWilliams, E. M. (2001). Social and organizational frames in e-mail: A discourse analysis of e-mail sent at work. (Unpublished MA thesis). Georgetown University.
59. Mondada, L. (2013). The conversation analytic approach to data collection. In Stivers, T., Sidnell, J. (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 32-56). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
60. Murray, D. E. (1989). When the medium determines turns: Turn-taking in computer conversation. In Coleman, H. (Ed.), Working with language: A multidisciplinary consideration of language use in work contexts (pp. 319-338). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
61. Paine, C. B., Joinson, A. N. (2008). Privacy, trust and disclosure online. In A. Barak (Ed.), Psychological aspects of cyberspace: Theory, research, applications (pp. 13-31). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
62. Panyametheekul, S., Herring, S. C. (2003). Gender and turn allocation in a Thai chat room. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 9(1). Retrieved 2 November, 2010, from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00362.x/full
63. Pojanapunya, P., Jaroenkitboworn, K. (2011). How to say "good-bye" in second life. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 3591-3602. doi:10.1016/j. pragma.2011.08.010.
64. Pomerantz, A. M. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/ dispreferred turn shapes. In Atkinson, J. M., Heritage, J. (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57-101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65. Pomerantz, A. M., Fehr, B. J. (1997). Conversation analysis: An approach to the study of social action as sense making practices. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction, volume 2. Discourse as social interaction (pp. 64-91). London: Sage Publications.
66. Pomerantz, A. M., Heritage, J. (2013). Preference. In Stivers, T., Sidnell, J. (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 210-228). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
67. Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.
68. Potter, J. (2004). Discourse analysis as a way of analysing naturally occurring talk. In Silverman, D. (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 200-221). London: Sage.
69. Potter, J. (2010). Contemporary discursive psychology: Issues, prospects, and Corcoran's awkward ontology. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 691-701. doi:10.1348/014466610X535946 PMID:20178684.
70. Potter, J. (2011a). Discursive psychology and discourse analysis. In Gee, J. P., Handford, M. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 104-119). London: Routledge.
71. Potter, J. (2012a). Re-reading Discourse and Social Psychology: Transforming social psychology. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(3), 436-455. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02085.x PMID:22168901.
72. Potter, J. (2012b). Discourse analysis and discursive psychology. In Cooper, H. (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Vol2. Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological and biological (pp. 111-130). Washington: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/13620- 008.
73. Potter, J., Edwards, D. (2001). Discursive social psychology. In Robinson, P. W., Giles, H. (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 103-118). Chichester: Wiley.
74. Potter, J., Edwards, D. (2013). Conversation analysis and psychology. In Stivers, T., Sidnell, J. (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 701-725). London: Routledge.
75. Potter, J., Hepburn, A. (2008). Discursive constructionism. In Holstein, J. A., Gubrium, J. F. (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 275-293). New York: Guildford.
76. Potter, J., Hepburn, A. (2012). Eight challenges for interview researchers. In Gubrium, J. F., Holstein, J. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interview research (2nd ed., pp. 555-570). London: Sage.
77. Rapley, T. J. (2001). The art(fulness) of openended interviewing: Some considerations on analysing interviews. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 303-323. doi:10.1177/146879410100100303.
78. Richardson, E., Stokoe, E. (Forthcoming). The order of ordering: Requests, objects and embodied conduct in a public bar.
79. Rintel, E. S., Mulholland, J., Pittam, J. (2001). First things first: Internet relay chat openings. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(3). Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00125.x/full.
80. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (vols. 1 and 2, edited by Gail Jefferson). Oxford: Blackwell.
81. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systemstics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735. doi:10.2307/412243.
82. Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511791208.
83. Schönfeldt, J., Golato, A. (2003). Repair in chats: A conversation analytic approach. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36(3), 241-284. doi:10.1207/S15327973RLSI3603_02.
84. Schulze, M. (2010). Electronic discourse and language learning and language teaching. Canadian Modern Language Review-Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes, 66(5), 765-768.
85. Sharf, B. F. (1999). Beyond netiquette: The ethics of doing naturalistic discourse research on the internet. In Jones, S. (Ed.), Doing internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the net (pp. 243-256). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452231471.n12.
86. Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation analysis: An introduction. Chichester, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
87. Simpson, J. (2005). Conversational floors in synchronous text-based CMC discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(3), 337-361. doi:10.1177/1461445605052190.
88. Smithson, J., Sharkey, S., Hewis, E., Jones, R., Emmens, T., Ford, T., Owens, C. (2011). Problem presentation and responses on an online forum for young people who self-harm. Discourse Studies, 13(4), 487-501. doi:10.1177/1461445611403356.
89. Speer, S. A. (2002). 'Natural' and 'contrived' data: A sustainable distinction? Discourse Studies, 4, 511-525.
90. Stokoe, E. (2009). Doing actions with identity categories: Complaints and denials in neighbour disputes. Text and Talk, 20(1), 75-97.
91. Stokoe, E. (2011). 'Girl - woman - sorry!': On the repair and non-repair of consecutive gender categories. In Speer, S. A., Stokoe, E. (Eds.), Conversation and gender (pp. 84-111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/ CBO9780511781032.006.
92. Stommel, W. (2007). Mein nick bin ich! Nicknames in a German forum on eating disorders. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 13(1), Article 8. Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/stommel.html
93. Stommel, W. (2008). Conversation analysis and community of practice as approaches to studying online community. Language@Internet, 5, [np]. Retrieved November 2, 2010, from www.languageatinternet.de
94. Stommel, W. (2009). Entering an online support group on eating disorders: A discourse analysis. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
95. Stommel, W., Koole, T. (2010). The online support group as a community: A micro-analysis of the interaction with a new member. Discourse Studies, 12(3), 357-378. doi:10.1177/1461445609358518.
96. Swan, D., McCarthy, J. C. (2003). Contesting animal rights on the internet: Discourse analysis of the social construction of argument. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22(3), 297-320. doi:10.1177/0261927X03252279.
97. Vayreda, A., Antaki, C. (2009). Social support and unsolicited advice in a bipolar disorder online forum. Qualitative Health Research, 19(7), 931-942. doi:10.1177/1049732309338952 PMID:19556400.
98. Wade, S. E., Fauske, J. R. (2004). Dialogue online: Prospective teachers' discourse strategies in computer-mediated discussions. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 134-160. doi:10.1598/ RRQ.39.2.1.
99. Werry, C. C. (1996). Linguistic and interactional features of internet relay chat. In Herring, S. C. (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 47-64). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
100. Antaki, C. (2004). Conversation analysis. In Becker, S., Bryman, A. (Eds.), Understanding research methods for social policy and practice (pp. 313-317). London: Policy Press.
101. Antaki, C. (Ed.). (2011). Applied conversation analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
102. Antaki, C., Billig, M., Edwards, D., Potter, J. (2003). Discourse analysis means doing analysis: A critique of six analytic shortcomings. Discourse Analysis Online, 1. Retrieved October 30, 2010, from http://www.shu.ac.uk/daol/articles/v1/n1/a1/antaki2002002-paper.html
103. Craven, A., Potter, J. (2010). Directives: Entitlement and contingency in action. Discourse Studies, 12(4), 419-442. doi:10.1177/1461445610370126.
104. Drew, P. (2005). Conversation analysis. In Fitch, K. L., Sanders, R. E. (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 71-102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
105. Drew, P., Raymond, G., Weinberg, D. (Eds.). (2006). Talk and interaction in social research methods. London: Sage Publications.
106. Edwards, D., Potter, J. (2005). Discursive psychology, mental states and descriptions. In te Molder, H. F. M., Potter, J. (Eds.), Conversation and cognition (pp. 241-259). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/ CBO9780511489990.012.
107. Hepburn, A. (2004). Crying: Notes on description, transcription and interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37, 251-290. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi3703_1.
108. Hepburn, A., Wiggins, S. (Eds.). (2007). Discursive research in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/ CBO9780511611216.
109. Heritage, J. (1989). Current developments in conversation analysis. In D. Roger & P. Bull (Eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp.21-47). Avon: Multilingual Matters.
110. Heritage, J. (2004). Conversation analysis and institutional talk. In Sanders, R., Fitch, K. (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 103-146). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
111. Heritage, J. (2010). Conversation analysis: Practices and methods. In Silverman, D. (Ed.), Qualitative sociology (3rd ed., pp. 208-230). London: Sage.
112. Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45, 1-29. do i:10.1080/08351813.2012.646684.
113. Potter, J., Hepburn, A. (2003). 'I'm a bit concerned': Call openings on a child protection helpline. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36, 197-240. doi:10.1207/S15327973RLSI3603_01.
114. Potter, J., Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
115. Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In Atkinson, J. M., Heritage, J. (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 21-27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
116. Sacks, H. (1987). On the preference for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In Button, G., Lee, J. R. E. (Eds.), Talk and social organisation (pp. 54-69). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
117. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In Psathas, G. (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 15-21). New York: Irvington Publishers, Inc.
118. Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 101-114. doi:10.2307/2786745.
119. Schegloff, E. A. (1990). On the organization of sequences as a source of 'coherence' in talk-ininteraction. In Dorval, B. (Ed.), Conversational organization and its development (pp. 51-77). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
120. Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361-382.
121. Sneiijder, P., te Molder, H. F. M. (2004). 'Health should not have to be a problem': Talking health and accountability in an internet forum on veganism. Journal of Health Psychology, 9(4), 599-616. doi:10.1177/1359105304044046 PMID:15231059.
122. Sneiijder, P., te Molder, H. F. M. (2005). Moral logic and logical morality: Attributions of responsibility and blame in online discourse on veganism. Discourse & Society, 16(5), 675-696. doi:10.1177/0957926505054941.
123. Sneijder, P., te Molder, H. F. M. (2009). Normalizing ideological food choice and eating practices. Identity work in online discussions on veganism. Appetite, 52(3), 621-630. doi:10.1016/j. appet.2009.02.012 PMID:19501759.
124. Stokoe, E. (2008). Dispreferred actions and other interactional breaches as devices for occasioning audience laughter in television 'sitcoms.'. Social Semiotics, 18(3), 289-307. doi:10.1080/10350330802217071.
125. Stokoe, E., Hepburn, A., Antaki, C. (2012). Beware the 'Loughborough school' of social psychology? Interaction and the politics of intervention. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(3), 486-496. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02088.x PMID:22404636.
126. ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
127. Wilkinson, S., Kitzinger, C. (2008). Using conversation analysis in feminist and critical research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(2), 555-573. doi:10.1111/j.1751- 9004.2007.00049.x.