Online versus face-to-face conversations: An examination of relational and discourse variables

Psychotherapy

Volumn 40, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 155-163

  Mallen, Michael J ^a   Day, Susan X ^a   Green, Melinda A ^a  

^a Iowa State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFFECT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPREHENSION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFLICT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERSATION; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EMOTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTIMACY; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NORMAL HUMAN; ONLINE SYSTEM; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT COUNSELING; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SEX DIFFERENCE; STUDENT; TELEPHONE;

EID: 0141596197     PISSN: 00333204     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0033-3204.40.1-2.155     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. ARON, A., ARON, E. N., & SMOLLAN, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596-612.
2. ARON, A., MELINAT, E., ARON, E. N., VALLONE, R. D., & BATOR, R. J. (1997). The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness: A procedure and some preliminary findings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 363-377.
3. BRADLEY, G., & RUSSELL, G. (1997). Computer experience, school support and computer anxieties. Educational Psychology, 17(3), 267-284.
4. CHILDRESS, C. A., & ASAMEN, J. K. (1998). The emerging relationship of psychology and the Internet: Proposed guidelines for conducting Internet intervention research. Ethics and Behavior, 8(1), 19-35.
5. COLEMAN, L. H., PATERNITE, C. E., & SHERMAN, R. C. (1999). A reexamination of deindividuation in synchronous computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(1), 51-65.
6. DAY, S., X, & SCHNEIDER, P. L. (2002). Psychotherapy using distance technology: A comparison of face-to-face, video, and audio treatment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 499-503.
7. HUANG, M. P., & ALESSI, N. E. (1996). The Internet and the future of psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry, 153(7), 861-869.
8. HILTZ, S. R. (1992). The virtual classroom: Software for collaborative leaming. In E. Barrett (Ed.), Sociomedia: Multimedia, hypermedia, and the social construction of knowledge. Technical communication and information systems (pp. 347-368). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. KIESLER, S. B., SIEGAL, J., & MCGUIRE, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
10. KRAUT, R. E., LEWIS, S. H., & SWEZEY, L. W. (1982). Listener responsiveness and the coordination of conversation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 718-731.
11. KUIPER, N. A., MCKEE, M., KAZARIAN, S. S., & OLINGER, J. L. (2000). Social perceptions in psychiatric inpatients: Relation to positive and negative affect labels. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 479-493.
12. MELVIN, G., & MOLLOY, G. N. (2000). Some psychometric properties of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule among Australian youth. Psychological Reports, 86, 1209-1212.
13. MILLIS, K. K., & KING, A. (2001). Rereading strategically: The influences of comprehension ability and a prior reading on the memory for expository text. Reading Psychology, 22(1), 41-65.
14. NORCROSS, J. C., HEDGES, M., & PROCHASKA, J. O. (2002). The face of 2010: A Delphi poll on the future of psychotherapy. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 316-322.
15. RICHMAN, W. L., KIESLER, S., WEISBAND, S., & DRASGOW, F. (1999). A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 754-775.
16. ROBERTSON, M. F. (1988). Differential use by male and female students of the counseling service of an Australian tertiary college: Implications for service design and counseling models. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, II, 231-240.
17. ROSENFIELD, M., & SMILLIE, E. (1998). Group counselling by telephone. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 26, 11-19.
18. RUTTER, D. R., & STEPHENSON, G. M. (1977). The role of visual communication in synchronizing conversation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 7(1), 29-37.
19. SAMPSON, J. P., KOLODINSKY, R. W., & GREENO, B. P. (1997). Counseling on the information highway: Future possibilities and potential problems. Journal of Counseling and Development, 75, 203-212.
20. SHAPIRO, D. E., & SCHULMAN, C. E. (1996). Ethical and legal issues in e-mail therapy. Ethics and Behavior, 6(2), 107-124.
21. STAFFORD, L., KLINE, S. L., & DIMMICK, J. (1999). Home e-mail: Relational maintenance and gratification opportunities. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 43(4), 659-669.
22. WALTHER, J. B. (1997). Group and interpersonal effects in international computer-mediated collaboration. Human Communication Research, 23(3), 342-369.
23. WALTHER, J. B., & BURGOON, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19(1), 50-88.
24. WATSON, D., CLARK, L. A., & TELLEGEN, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.
25. WILLS, T. A., & DEPAULO, B. M. (1991). Interpersonal analysis of the help-seeking process. In C. Synder & D. Forsyth (Eds.), Handbook of social and clinical psychology: The health perspective (pp. 350-375). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
26. WINZELBERG, A. (1997). The analysis of an electronic support group for individuals with eating disorders. Computers in Human Behavior, 13(3), 393-407.