Discursive psychology

Handbook of Language and Social Interaction

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 257-273

  Edwards, Derek ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85079474616     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (75)

1. Antaki, C. (1994). Explaining and arguing: The soaal organization of accounts. London and Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2. Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. C. (Eds.). (1984). Structures of soaal action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Beach, W. A., & Metzger, T. R. (1997). Claiming insufficient knowledge. Human Communication Research, 23, 562-588.
4. Bedford, E. (1986). Emotions and statements about them. In R. Harre (Ed.), The social construction of emotions (pp. 15-31). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
5. Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Billig, M. (1989). The argumentative nature of holding strong views: A case study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 203-23.
7. Button, G. (Ed.). (1991). Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Button, G., Coulter, J., Lee, J., & Sharrock, W. (1995). Computers, minds and conduct. Oxford, UK: Polity.
9. Coulter, J. (1989). Cognitive 'penetrability' and the emotions. In D. D. Franks & E. D. McCarthy (Eds.), The sociology of the emotions (pp. 35-50). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
10. Coulter, J. (1999). Discourse and mind. Human Studies, 22, 163-181.
11. Drew, P. (1984). Speakers' reportings in invitation sequences. In J. M. Atkinson & J. C. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 129-51). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Drew, P. (1990). Strategies in the contest between lawyers and witnesses. In J. N. Levi & A. G. Walker (Eds.), Language in the judicial process (pp. 39-64). New York: Plenum.
13. Dreyfus, H. L., & Rabinow, P. R. (1982). Michel Foucaidt: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Edwards, D. (1994). Script formulations: A study of event descriptions in conversation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 211-247.
15. Edwards, D. (1995a). Two to tango: Script formulations, dispositions, and rhetorical symmetry in relationship troubles talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 319-350.
16. Edwards, D. (1995b). Sacks and psychology. Theory and Psychology, 5, 579-597.
17. Edwards, D. (1997a). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.
18. Edwards, D. (1997b). Toward a discursive psychology of classroom education. In C. Coll & D. Edwards (Eds.), Teaching, learning and classroom discourse: Approaches to the study of educational discourse (pp. 33-48). Madrid: Fundación Infancia y Aprendizaje.
19. Edwards, D. (1999). Emotion discourse. Culture Psychology, 5, 271-291.
20. Edwards, D. (2000). Extreme case formulations: Softeners, investment, and doing nonliteral. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33, 347-373.
21. Edwards, D. (2003). Analyzing racial discourse: The discursive psychology of mind-world relationships. In H. van den Berg, M. Wethereil, Sí H. Houtkoop-Steenstra (Eds.), Analyzing race talk: Multidisciplinary approaches to the interview. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. M. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Roudedge.
23. Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
24. Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1993). Language and causation: A discursive action model of description and attribution. Psychological Review, 100, 23-41.
25. Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (2001). Discursive psychology. In A. McHoul & M. Rapley (Eds.), How to analyse talk in institutional settings: A casebook of methods (pp. 12-24). London and New York: Continuum International.
26. Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (In press). Discursive psychology, mental states and descriptions. In H. te Molder Potter (Eds.), Talk and cognition: Discourse, cognition and social interaction. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.
27. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
28. Foucault, M. (1971). Orders of discourse. Social Science Information, 10, 7-30.
29. Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge.
30. Gergen, K.J. (1994). Realities and relationships. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Gilbert, G. N., & Mulkay, M. (1984). Opening Pandora's box: A sociological analysis of scientists' discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. Gill, R. (1993). Justifying injustice: Broadcasters' accounts on inequality in radio. In E. Burman & I. Parker (Eds.), Discourse analytic research: Repertoires and readings of texts in action (pp. 75-93). London: Roudedge.
33. Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
34. Harré, R. (1988). Wittgenstein and artificial intelligence. Philosophical Psychology, 1, 105-115.
35. Harré, R., & Gillett, G. (1994). The discursive mind. London: Sage.
36. Harré, R., & Parrott, W G. (1996). The emotions: Social, cultural and biological dimensions. London: Sage.
37. Harré, R., & Stearns, P. (Eds.). (1995). Discursive psychology in practice. London: Sage.
38. Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (Eds.). (1999). Positioning theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
39. Henriques, J., Hollway, W, Urwin, C, Venn, C, & Walkerdine, V. (1984). Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. London: Methuen.
40. Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkeland ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
41. Hollway, W. (1989). Subjectivity and method in psychology: Gender, meaning and science. London: Sage.
42. Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications. Oxford, UK: Polity.
43. Kress, G, & Hodge, B. (1979). Language as ideology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
44. Lawes, R. (1999). Marriage: n analysis of discourse. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1-20.
45. Locke, A., & Edwards, D. (2003). Bill and Monica: Memory, emotion and normativity in Clinton's Grand Jury testimony. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 239-256.
46. Lutz, C. A. (1988). Unnatural emotions: Everyday sentiments on a Micronesian atoll and their challenge to Western theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47. McHoul, A. W, & Grace, W. (1993). A foucaultprimer: Discourse, power, and the subject. Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne University Press.
48. McHoul, A., & Rapley, M. (2003). What can psychological terms actually do? (Or: If Sigmund calls, tell him it didn't work). Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 507-522.
49. Middleton, D., & Edwards, D. (Eds.). (1990). Collective remembering. London: Sage.
50. Ochs, E., Pontecorvo, C, & Fasulo, A. (1996). Socializing taste. Ethnos, 61, 7-46.
51. Parker, I. (1992). Discourse dynamics: Critical analysis for social and individual psychology. London: Roudedge.
52. Pomerantz, A. M. (1978). Compliment responses: Notes on the co-operation of multiple constraints. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 79-112). New York: Academic Press.
53. Pomerantz, A.M. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features ofpreferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57-101). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54. Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9, 219-229.
55. Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric, and social construction. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56. Potter, J. (1997). Discourse analysis as a way of analysing naturally occurring talk. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method andpractice (pp. 144-160). London: Sage.
57. Potter, J. (1998a). Discursive social psychology: From attitudes to evaluations. European Review of Social Psychology, 9, 233-266.
58. Potter, J. (1998b). Beyond cognitivism. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32, 119-128.
59. Potter, J., & Edwards, D. (2001a). Discursive social psychology. In W P. Robinson & H. Giles (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 103-118). Chichester, UK Wiley.
60. Potter, J., & Edwards, D. (2001b). Sociolinguistics, cognitivism, and discursive psychology. In N. Coupland, S. Sarangi, & C. N Candlin (Eds), Sociolinguistics and social theory (pp. 88-103). London: Pearson Education Ltd.
61. Potter, J., & Edwards, D. (2003). Rethinking cognition: On Coulter on discourse and mind. Human Studies, 26, 165-181.
62. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes andbehaviour. London: Sage.
63. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1988). Accomplishing attitudes: Fact and evaluation in racist discourse. Text, 8, 51-68.
64. Schank, R. C, & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
65. Schegloff, E. A. (1999). Discourse, pragmatics, conversation, analysis. Discourse Studies, 1, 405-435.
66. Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
67. Stearns, P. N. (1989). Jealousy: The evolution of an emotion in American history. New York: New York University Press.
68. Stich, S. (1983). From folk psychology to cognitive science: The case against belief. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
69. Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
70. Van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.). (1985). Handbook of discourse analysis. Vols. 1-4. London: Academic Press.
71. Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A muhidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.
72. Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (1992). Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. Brighton, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
73. Wiggins, S., & Potter, J. (2003). Attitudes and evaluative practices: Category vs. item and subjective vs. objective constructions in everyday food assessments.British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 513-531.
74. Wodak, R. (1998). Critical discourse analysis at the end of the 20th century. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32, 185-194.
75. Wood, L. A., & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.