"for she who Knows who she is:" Managing accountability in online forum messages

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 114-132

  Antaki, Charles ^a   Ardévol, Elisenda ^b,c   Núñez, Francesc ^b,c,d   Vayreda, Agnès ^b  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITAT OBERTA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^c Estudis d'Humanitats   (Spain)

^d Digithum E zine

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CASE-STUDIES; CONVERSATION ANALYSIS; INTERNAL DESIGN; ONLINE BEHAVIOURS; ONLINE FORUMS; USER-ORIENTATION;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 27744558819     PISSN: 10836101     EISSN: 10836101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.tb00306.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Antaki, C. (1994). Explaining and Arguing: The Social Organisation of Accounts. London: Sage.
2. Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, W. (1998). Identities in Talk. London: Sage.
3. Billig, M. (1999). Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse and Society, 10(4), 543-558.
4. Baym, N. (1999). Tune In, Log On: Soaps, Fandom, and Online Community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Baym, N., Zhang, Y.B., & Lin, M. (2004). Social interactions across media. New Media and Society, 6(3), 41-60.
6. Drew, P. (1989). Recalling someone from the past. In D. Roger & P. Bull (Eds), Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (96-115). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
7. Drew, P., & Holt, E. (1998). Figures of speech: Figurative expressions and the management of topic transition in conversation. Language in Society, 27(4), 495-523.
8. Edwards, D. (1991). Categories are for talking-On the cognitive and discursive bases of categorization. Theory and Psychology, 1 (4), 515-542.
9. Edwards, D. (1994). Script formulations: A study of event descriptions in conversation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13(3), 211-247.
10. Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage.
11. Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.
12. Frohlich, D. M., Drew, P., & Monk, A. (1994). The management of repair in human-computer interaction. Human Computer Interaction, 9(3-4), 385-426.
13. Garcia, A. C., & Jacobs, J. B. (1999). The eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn-taking system in quasisynchronous computer-mediated communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32(4), 337-367.
14. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15. Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J. C. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical Sociology (pp. 337-366). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
16. Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
17. Herring, S. C. (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4). Retrieved March 1, 2003 from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue4/herrinq.html
18. Herring, S. C. (2001). Computer-mediated discourse. In D. Tannen, D. Schiffin, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 612-634). Oxford: Blackwell.
19. Herring, S. C. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, & J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning (pp. 338-376). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Holt, E., & Clift, R. (Eds.). (Forthcoming). Voicing: Reported Speech and Footing in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Holt, L. (1996). Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29(3), 219-45.
22. Holt, L., & Drew, P. (1988). Complainable matters: The use of idiomatic expressions in making complaints. Social Problems, 35(4), 398-417.
23. Hopper, R. (1992). Telephone Conversation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
24. Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications. Cambridge: Polity Press.
25. Lamerichs, J., & te Holder, H. (2003). Computer-mediated communication: From a cognitive to a discursive model. New Media & Society, 5(4), 451-473.
26. Miller, D., & Slater, D. (2000). The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach. Oxford: Berg.
27. Nevile, M. (2004). Beyond the Black Box: Talk-In-Interaction in the Airline Cockpit. Aldershot: Ashgate.
28. Núñez, F., Gálvez, A., & Vayreda, A. (2002). La participación en un foro electrónico: Motivos, auditorios y posicionamientos. Redcientífica. Retreived January 20, 2004 from http://www.redcientifica.com/cqi-bin/index/index.pl
29. Paccagnella, L. (1997). Getting the seats of your pants dirty: Strategies for ethnographic research on virtual communities. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(1). Retrieved March 30, 2004 http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/ issue1/paccagnella.html
30. Potter, J. (2003). Discursive psychology: Between method and paradigm. Discourse & Society, 14(6), 783-794.
31. Potter, J., & Edwards, D. (2003). Rethinking cognition: On Coulter, discourse and mind. Human Studies, 26(2), 165-181.
32. Puchta, C., & Potter, J. (2004). Focus Group Practice. London: Sage
33. Preece, J. (2000). Online Communities. Designing, Usability and Supporting Sociability. London: Wiley.
34. Reed, D. (2001). 'Making Conversation:' Sequential integrity and the local management of interaction on Internet newsgroups. Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences-2001. Retrieved February 18, 2004 from http://csdl.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2001/0981/04/ 09814035abs.htm
35. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation (Vols. 1 & 2). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
36. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735.
37. Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Analyzing single episodes of conversation: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 101-114.
38. Schegloff, E. A. (1988). Goffman and the analysis of conversation. In P. Drew & A. Wootton (Eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order (pp. 89-135). Cambridge: Polity Press.
39. Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse & Society, 8(2), 165-187.
40. Schegloff, E. A. (1999). 'Schegloff's texts as 'Billig's data: A critical reply. Discourse & Society, 10(4), 558-572.
41. Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1967). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 7, 289-327.
42. Reprinted in R. Turner (Ed.), Ethnomethodology (pp. 233-264). Harmondsworth, London: Penguin.
43. ten Have, P. (1999) Doing Conversation Analysis. London: Sage.
44. ten Have, P. (2004) Understanding Qualitative Research and Ethnomethodology. London: Sage Publications.
45. Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society, 9(3), 387-412.
46. Wooffitt, R. (2005). Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis. London and New York: Sage.