Syntactic Parsing

Handbook of Psycholinguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 455-503

  Pickering, Martin J ^a   Gompel, Roger P G van ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882528156     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-012369374-7/50013-4     Document Type: Chapter

References (223)

1. S.P. Abney (1989) A computational model of human parsing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18 129-144.
2. B.C. Adams, C. Clifton and D.C. Mitchell (1998) Lexical guidance in sentence processing? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 5 265-270.
3. K. Ainsworth-Darnell, H.G. Shulman and J.E. Boland (1998) Dissociating brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language 38 112-130.
4. D.W. Allbritton, G. McKoon and R. Ratcliff (1996) Reliability of prosodic cues for resolving syntactic ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22 714-735.
5. G. Altmann and M. Steedman (1988) Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition 30 191-238.
6. G.T.M. Altmann, A. Garnham and Y. Dennis (1992) Avoiding the garden path: Eye movements in context. Journal of Memory and Language 31 685-712.
7. G.T.M. Altmann, A. Garnham and J.A. Henstra (1994) Effects of syntax in human sentence parsing: Evidence against a structure-based proposal mechanism. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20 209-216.
8. G.T.M. Altmann and Y. Kamide (1999) Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 73 247-264.
9. G.T.M. Altmann, K.Y. van Nice, A. Garnham and J.A. Henstra (1998) Late closure in context. Journal of Memory and Language 38 459-484.
10. M. Ariel (1990) Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge
11. J.E. Arnold, M.K. Tanenhaus, R.J. Altmann and M. Fagnano (2004) The old and thee, uh, new: Disfluency and reference resolution. Psychological Science 15 578-582.
12. M. Bader and M. Meng (1998) Subject-object ambiguities in German embedded clauses: An across-the-board comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28 121-143.
13. K.G.D. Bailey and F. Ferreira (2003) Disfluencies affect the parsing of garden-path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 49 183-200.
14. E. Bates and B. MacWhinney (1989) Functionalism and the competition model. B. MacWhinney, E. Bates (Eds) The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press
15. T.G. Bever (1970) The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. J.R. Hayes (Eds) Cognition and the development of language New York, NY: Wiley 279-352.
16. K.S. Binder, S.A. Duffy and K. Rayner (2001) The effects of thematic fit and discourse context on syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 44 297-324.
17. J.K. Bock (1986) Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology 18 355-387.
18. J.E. Boland and A. Blodgett (2001) Understanding the constraints on syntactic generation: Lexical bias and discourse congruency effects on eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 45 391-411.
19. J.E. Boland and H. Boehm-Jernigan (1998) Lexical constraints and prepositional phrase attachment. Journal of Memory and Language 39 684-719.
20. J.E. Boland, M.K. Tanenhaus, S.M. Garnsey and G.N. Carlson (1995) Verb argument structure in parsing and interpretation: Evidence from wh-questions. Journal of Memory and Language 34 774-806.
21. H.P. Branigan, M.J. Pickering and J.F. McLean (2005) Priming prepositional-phrase attachment during comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31 468-481.
22. S.E. Brennan and M. Williams (1995) The feeling of another's knowing: Prosody and filled pauses as cues to listeners about the metacognitive states of speakers. Journal of Memory and Language 34 383-398.
23. M.A. Britt (1994) The interaction of referential ambiguity and argument structure in the parsing of prepositional phrases. Journal of Memory and Language 33 251-283.
24. M.A. Britt, C.A. Perfetti, S. Garrod and K. Rayner (1992) Parsing in discourse: Context effects and their limits. Journal of Memory and Language 31 293-314.
25. S. Brown-Schmidt, E. Campana and M.K. Tanenhaus (2005) Real-time reference resolution by nave participants during a task-based unscripted conversation. J.C. Trueswell, M.K. Tanenhaus (Eds) World-situated language processing: Bridging the language as product and language as action traditions Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
26. M. Brysbaert and D.C. Mitchell (1996) Modifier attachment in sentence parsing: Evidence from Dutch. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 49A 664-695.
27. D. Caplan and G.S. Waters (1999) Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 77-126.
28. K. Carlson, C. Clifton and L. Frazier (2001) Prosodic boundaries in adjunct attachment. Journal of Memory and Language 45 58-81.
29. M. Carreiras and C. Clifton (1993) Relative clause interpretation preferences in Spanish and English. Language and Speech 36 353-372.
30. M. Carreiras and C. Clifton (1999) Another word on parsing relative clauses: Eyetracking evidence from Spanish and English. Memory & Cognition 27 826-833.
31. C.G. Chambers, M.K. Tanenhaus and J.S. Magnuson (2004) Actions and affordances in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30 687-696.
32. E. Chen, E. Gibson and F. Wolf (2005) Online syntactic storage costs in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 52 144-169.
33. N. Chomsky (1981) Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris
34. N. Chomsky (1995) The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
35. N. Chomsky and G.A. Miller (1963) Introduction to the formal analysis of natural languages. R.D. Luce, R.R. Bush, E. Galanter (Eds) Handbook of mathematical psychology Vol. 2 New York: Wiley 269-321.
36. K. Christianson, A. Hollingworth, J.F. Halliwell and F. Ferreira (2001) Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology 42 368-407.
37. H.H. Clark (1996) Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
38. C. Clifton, L. Frazier and C. Connine (1984) Lexical expectations in sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23 696-708.
39. C. Clifton, S. Speer and S.P. Abney (1991) Parsing arguments: Phrase structure and argument structure as determinants of initial parsing decisions. Journal of Memory and Language 30 251-271.
40. C. Clifton, M.J. Traxler, M.T. Mohamed, R.S. Williams, R.K. Morris and K. Rayner (2003) The use of thematic role information in parsing: Syntactic processing autonomy revisited. Journal of Memory and Language 49 317-334.
41. S. Crain and M. Steedman (1985) On not being led up the garden path: The use of context by the psychological syntax processor. D.R. Dowty, L. Karttunen, A.M. Zwicky (Eds) Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational and theoretical perspectives Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press 320-358.
42. M.W. Crocker (1995) Computational psycholinguistics: An interdisciplinary approach to the study of language. Dordrecht: Kluwer
43. F. Cuetos and D.C. Mitchell (1988) Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the late closure strategy in Spanish. Cognition 30 73-105.
44. F. Cuetos, D.C. Mitchell and M.M.B. Corley (1996) Parsing in different languages. M. Carreiras, J.E. Garcia-Albea, N. Sebastian-Galles (Eds) Language processing in Spanish Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum 145-187.
45. M. Daneman and P.A. Carpenter (1980) Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19 450-466.
46. K.A. Delong, T.P. Urbach and M. Kutas (2005) Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience 8(8), 1117-1121.
47. T. Desmet, M. Brysbaert and C. De Baecke (2002) The correspondence between sentence production and corpus frequencies in modifier attachment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 55A 879-896.
48. T. Desmet and E. Gibson (2003) Disambiguation preferences and corpus frequencies in noun phrase conjunction. Journal of Memory and Language 49 353-374.
49. T. Desmet, C. De Baecke, D. Drieghe, M. Brysbaert and W. Vonk (2006) Relative clause attachment in Dutch: On-line comprehension corresponds to corpus frequencies when lexical variables are taken into account. Language and Cognitive Processes 21 453-485.
50. M. De Vincenzi (1991) Syntactic parsing strategies in Italian. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer
51. M. De Vincenzi and R. Job (1995) An investigation of late closure: The role of syntax, thematic structure, and pragmatics in initial interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21 1303-1321.
52. K.M. Eberhard, M.J. Spivey-Knowlton, J.C. Sedivy and M.K. Tanenhaus (1995) Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24 409-436.
53. F. Ferreira (2003) The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology 47 164-203.
54. F. Ferreira and C. Clifton (1986) The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language 25 348-368.
55. F. Ferreira and J.M. Henderson (1990) Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: Evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16 555-568.
56. F. Ferreira and J.M. Henderson (1991) Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 30 725-745.
57. F. Ferreira and J.M. Henderson (1993) Reading processes during syntactic analysis and reanalysis. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 47 247-275.
58. T.R. Ferretti, C.L. Gagné and K. McRae (2003) Thematic role focusing by participle inflections: Evidence from conceptual combination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 29 118-127.
59. C.J. Fiebach, M. Schlesewsky and A.D. Friederici (2002) Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: The processing of German WH-questions. Journal of Memory and Language 47 250-272.
60. J.A. Fodor (1983) The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press
61. J.D. Fodor (1978) Parsing strategies and constraints on transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 9 427-473.
62. J.D. Fodor and L. Frazier (1980) Is the human sentence parsing mechanism an ATN? Cognition 8 417-459.
63. J.D. Fodor and A. Inoue (1998) Attach anyway. J.D. Fodor, F. Ferreira (Eds) Reanalysis in sentence processing Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer 101-141.
64. M. Ford, J.W. Bresnan and R.M. Kaplan (1982) A competence based theory of syntactic closure. J.W. Bresnan (Eds) The mental representation of grammatical relations Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 727-796.
65. K.I. Forster and I. Olbrei (1973) Semantic heuristics and syntactic analysis. Cognition 2 319-347.
66. J.E. Fox Tree (1995) The effects of false starts and repetitions on the processing of subsequent words in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language 34 709-738.
67. L. Frazier (1979) On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Ph.D. dissertation Indiana University Linguistics Club, University of Connecticut
68. L. Frazier (1987) Sentence processing: A tutorial review. M. Coltheart (Eds) Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum 559-586.
69. L. Frazier (1987) Syntactic Processing: Evidence from Dutch. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 5 519-559.
70. L. Frazier (1990) Parsing modifiers: Special purpose routines in the human sentence processing mechanism? D.A. Balota, G.B. Flores d Arcais, K. Rayner (Eds) Comprehension processes in reading Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum 303-330.
71. L. Frazier (1995) Constraint satisfaction as a theory of sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24 437-468.
72. L. Frazier and C. Clifton (1989) Successive cyclicity in the grammar and the parser. Language and Cognitive Processes 4 93-126.
73. L. Frazier and C. Clifton Jr. (1996) Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
74. L. Frazier and G.B. Flores D'Arcais (1989) Filter driven parsing: A study of gap filling in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language 28 331-344.
75. L. Frazier, A. Munn and C. Clifton (2000) Processing coordinate structures. Journal of Psychoinguistic Research 29 343-370.
76. L. Frazier and K. Rayner (1982) Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology 14 178-210.
77. L. Frazier, L. Taft, T. Roeper, C. Clifton and K. Ehrlich (1984) Parallel structure: A source of facilitation in sentence comprehension. Memory & Cognition 12 421-430.
78. C. Frenck-Mestre and J. Pynte (2000) Resolving syntactic ambiguity: Cross-linguistic differences? M.D. Vincenzi, R. Job (Eds) Cross-linguistic perspectives on language processing Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer
79. A.D. Friederici, A. Hahne and A. Mecklinger (1996) Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late event-related brain potential effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22 1219-1248.
80. S.M. Garnsey, N.J. Pearlmutter, E. Myers and M.A. Lotocky (1997) The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 37 58-93.
81. E. Gibson (1991) A computational theory of human linguistic processing: Memory limitations and processing breakdown. Pittsburg, Pennsylvania: Carnegie Mellon University Unpublished Ph.D. thesis
82. E. Gibson (1998) Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68 1-76.
83. E. Gibson and G. Hickok (1993) Sentence processing with empty categories. Language and Cognitive Processes 8 147-161.
84. E. Gibson, N. Pearlmutter, E. Canseco-Gonzalez and G. Hickok (1996) Recency preference in the human sentence processing mechanism. Cognition 59 23-59.
85. E. Gibson and N.J. Pearlmutter (1998) Constraints on sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2 262-268.
86. E. Gibson, N.J. Pearlmutter and V. Torrens (1999) Recency and lexical preferences in Spanish. Memory & Cognition 27 603-611.
87. E. Gibson and C.T. Schutze (1999) Disambiguation preferences in noun phrase conjunction do not mirror corpus frequency. Journal of Memory and Language 40 263-279.
88. E. Gibson and J. Thomas (1999) Memory limitations and structural forgetting: The perception of complex ungrammatical sentences as grammatical. Language and Cognitive Processes 14 225-248.
89. E. Gilboy, J.M. Sopena, C. Clifton and L. Frazier (1995) Argument structure and association preferences in Spanish and English complex NPs. Cognition 54 131-167.
90. T. Givón (1984) Syntax: A functional-typological approach Vol. 1 Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins
91. T. Givón (1990) Syntax: A functional-typological approach Vol. 2 Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins
92. P.C. Gordon, R. Hendrick and M. Johnson (2001) Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27 1411-1423.
93. P.C. Gordon, R. Hendrick and M. Johnson (2004) Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity. Journal of Memory and Language 51 97-114.
94. P.C. Gordon, R. Hendrick and W.H. Levine (2002) Memory-load interference in syntactic processing. Psychological Science 13 425-430.
95. P. Gorrell (1995) Syntax and parsing. Cambridge: Cambridge university press
96. D. Grodner and E. Gibson (2005) Consequences of the serial nature of linguistic input for sentential complexity. Cognitive Science 29 261-290.
97. P. Hagoort (2003) Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15 883-899.
98. P. Hagoort, C. Brown and J. Groothusen (1993) The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 8 439-483.
99. J.E. Hanna and M.K. Tanenhaus (2004) Pragmatic effects on reference resolution in a collaborative task: Evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Science 28 105-115.
100. M. Hare, K. McRae and J.L. Elman (2003) Sense and structure: Meaning as a determinant of verb subcategorization preferences. Journal of Memory and Language 48 281-303.
101. B. Hemforth (1993) Kognitives Parsing: Repräsentationen und Verarbeitung grammatischen Wissens. Sanct Augustin: Infix Verlag
102. B. Hemforth, L. Konieczny and C. Scheepers (2000) Syntactic attachment and anaphor resolution: Two sides of relative clause attachment. M.W. Crocker, M.J. Pickering, C. Clifton, Jr. (Eds) Architectures and mechanisms for language processing Cambridge, UK: Cambridge university press
103. P. Herriot (1969) The comprehension of active and passive sentences as a function of pragmatic expectations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 8 166-169.
104. Hoeks, J., Hendriks, P., Vonk, W., Brown, C., & Hagoort, P. (in press). Processing NP- versus S-coordination ambiguity: Thematic information does not completely eliminate processing difficulty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A.
105. J.C.J. Hoeks, L.A. Stowe and G. Doedens (2004) Seeing words in context: The interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. Cognitive Brain Research 19 59-73.
106. J.C.J. Hoeks, W. Vonk and H. Schriefers (2002) Processing coordinated structures in context: The effect of topic-structure on ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 46 99-119.
107. V.M. Holmes, L. Stowe and L. Cupples (1989) Lexical expectations in parsing complement-verb sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 28 668-689.
108. F. Hsiao and E. Gibson (2003) Processing relative clauses in Chinese. Cognition 90 3-27.
109. J. Hyönä and H. Hujanen (1997) Effects of case marking and word order on sentence parsing in Finnish An eye fixation analysis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 50 841-858.
110. M.A. Just and P.A. Carpenter (1980) A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review 87 329-354.
111. M.A. Just and P.A. Carpenter (1992) A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review 99 122-149.
112. E. Kaan (2001) Effects of NP type on the resolution of word-order ambiguities. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 30 529-547.
113. E. Kaan, A. Harris, E. Gibson and P. Holcomb (2000) The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes 15 159-201.
114. E. Kaiser and J.C. Trueswell (2004) The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language. Cognition 94 113-147.
115. Y. Kamide, G.T.M. Altmann and S.L. Haywood (2003) The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 49 133-156.
116. M.P. Kaschak and A.M. Glenberg (2004) This construction needs learned. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133 450-467.
117. R. Kayne (1984) Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris
118. S.M. Kennison (2001) Limitations on the use of verb information during sentence comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8 132-138.
119. A. Kim and L. Osterhout (2005) The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event- related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language 52 205-225.
120. J. Kimball (1973) Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language. Cognition 2 15-47.
121. J. King and M.A. Just (1991) Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language 30 580-602.
122. M.M. Kjelgaard and S.S. Speer (1999) Prosodic facilitation and interference in the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language 40 153-194.
123. P. Knoeferle, M.W. Crocker, C. Scheepers and M.J. Pickering (2005) The influence of the immediate visual context on incremental thematic role-assignment: Evidence from eye-movements in depicted events. Cognition 95 95-127.
124. H.H.J. Kolk, D.J. Chwilla, M. van Herten and P.J.W. Oor (2003) Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials. Brain and Language 85 1-36.
125. J. Koster (1975) Dutch as an SOV language. Linguistic Analysis 15 111-136.
126. M. Kutas and S.A. Hillyard (1980) Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 207 203-205.
127. M. Kutas and S.A. Hillyard (1984) Brain potentials during reading reflect word dependency and semantic association. Nature 307 161-163.
128. K. Lambrecht (1994) Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
129. E.F. Lau and F. Ferreira (2005) Lingering effects of disfluent material on comprehension of garden path sentences. Language and Cognitive Processes 20 633-666.
130. W.J.M. Levelt (1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, CA: MIT Press
131. R.L. Lewis (1996) Interference in short-term memory: The magical number two (or three) in sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 25 93-115.
132. S.P. Liversedge, M.J. Pickering, H.P. Branigan and R.P.G. Van Gompel (1998) Processing arguments and adjuncts in isolation and context: The case of by-phrase ambiguities in passives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24 461-475.
133. S.P. Liversedge, M.J. Pickering, E. Clayes and H.P. Branigan (2003) Thematic processing of adjuncts: Evidence from an eye-tracking experiment. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10 667-675.
134. M.C. MacDonald and M.H. Christiansen (2002) Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review 109 35-54.
135. M.C. MacDonald, M.A. Just and P.A. Carpenter (1992) Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity. Cognitive Psychology 24 56-98.
136. M.C. MacDonald, N.J. Pearlmutter and M.S. Seidenberg (1994) The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 101 676-703.
137. W.M. Mak, W. Vonk and H. Schriefers (2002) The influence of animacy on relative clause processing. Journal of Memory and Language 47 50-68.
138. W. Marslen-Wilson (1973) Linguistic structure and speech shadowing at very short latencies. Nature 244 522-523.
139. W. Marslen-Wilson (1975) Sentence perception as an interactive parallel process. Science 189 226-228.
140. W.D. Marslen-Wilson, L.K. Tyler, P. Warren, P. Grenier and C.S. Lee (1992) Prosodic effects in minimal attachment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 45A 73-87.
141. B. McElree and T. Griffith (1995) Syntactic and thematic processing in sentence comprehension: Evidence for a temporal dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21 134-157.
142. B. McElree and T. Griffith (1998) Structural and lexical constraints on filling gaps during sentence comprehension: A time-course analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24 432-460.
143. G. McKoon and R. Ratcliff (2003) Meaning through syntax: Language comprehension and the reduced relative clause construction. Psychological Review 110 490-525.
144. K. McRae, M. Hare and M.K. Tanenhaus (2005) Meaning through syntax is insufficient to explain comprehension with reduced relative clauses: Comment on McKoon and Ratcliff (2003). Psychological Review 112 1022-1031.
145. K. McRae, M.J. Spivey-Knowlton and M.K. Tanenhaus (1998) Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 38 283-312.
146. A. Mecklinger, H. Schriefers, K. Steinhauer and A.D. Friederici (1995) Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials. Memory & Cognition 23 477-494.
147. J. Mehler and P. Carey (1967) Role of surface and base structure in the perception of sentences. Journal of Verbal learning and Verbal Behavior 6 335-338.
148. G.A. Miller and N. Chomsky (1963) Finitary models of language users. R.D. Luce, R.R. Bush, E. Galanter (Eds) Handbook of mathematical psychology Vol. 2 New York: Wiley 419-491.
149. D.C. Mitchell (1987) Lexical guidance in human parsing: Locus and processing characteristics. M. Coltheart (Eds) Attention and performance XII: The psychology of language Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 601-618.
150. D.C. Mitchell and M. Brysbaert (1998) Challenges to recent theories of crosslinguistic variations in parsing: Evidence from Dutch. D. Hillert (Eds) Sentence processing: A crosslinguistic perspective Syntax and Semantic 31 San Diego: Academic Press 313-335.
151. D.C. Mitchell, M.M. Corley and A. Garnham (1992) Effects of context in human sentence parsing: Evidence against a discourse-based proposal mechanism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18 69-88.
152. D.C. Mitchell, F. Cuetos, M.M.B. Corley and M. Brysbaert (1995) Exposure-based models of human parsing: Evidence for the use of coarse-grained (nonlexical) statistical records. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24 469-488.
153. D.C. Mitchell and V.M. Holmes (1985) The role of specific information about the verb in parsing sentences with local structural ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language 24 542-559.
154. T.F. Münte, H.J. Heinze and G.R. Mangun (1993) Dissociation of brain activity related to syntactic and semantic aspects of language. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 5 335-344.
155. W.S. Murray and S.P. Liversedge (1994) Referential context effects on syntactic processing. C. Clifton, Jr.,L. Frazier, K. Rayner (Eds) Perspectives on sentence processing Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum 359-388.
156. U. Noppeney and C.J. Price (2004) An fMRI study of syntactic adaptation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16 702-713.
157. J.M. Novick, A. Kim and J.C. Trueswell (2003) Studying the grammatical aspects of word recognition: Lexical priming, parsing, and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32 57-75.
158. L. Osterhout and P.J. Holcomb (1993) Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly: Evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech. Language and Cognitive Processes 8 413-437.
159. L. Osterhout, P.J. Holcomb and D.A. Swinney (1994) Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20 786-803.
160. L. Osterhout and J. Nicol (1999) On the distinctiveness, independence, and time course of the brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies. Language and Cognitive Processes 14 283-317.
161. C. Phillips (2005) The real time status of island constraints. Unpublished manuscript
162. C. Phillips, N. Kazanina and S.H. Abada (2005) ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies. Cognitive Brain Research 22 407-428.
163. M. Pickering and G. Barry (1991) Sentence processing without empty categories. Language and Cognitive Processes 6 229-259.
164. M.J. Pickering and S. Garrod (2004) Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 169-225.
165. M.J. Pickering and M.J. Traxler (1998) Plausibility and recovery from garden paths: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24 940-961.
166. M.J. Pickering, M.J. Traxler and M.W. Crocker (2000) Ambiguity resolution in sentence processing: Evidence against frequency-based accounts. Journal of Memory and Language 43 447-475.
167. C. Pollard and I.A. Sag (1994) Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI and University of Chicago Press
168. B.L. Pritchett (1988) Garden path phenomena and the grammatical basis of language processing. Language 64 539-576.
169. B.L. Pritchett (1992) Grammatical competence and parsing performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
170. J. Pynte and B. Prieur (1996) Prosodic breaks and attachment decisions in sentence parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes 11 165-191.
171. K. Rayner, M. Carlson and L. Frazier (1983) The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: Eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22 358-374.
172. K. Rayner and L. Frazier (1987) Parsing temporarily ambiguous complements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 39A 657-673.
173. K. Rayner, S. Garrod and C.A. Perfetti (1992) Discourse influences during parsing are delayed. Cognition 45 109-139.
174. D. Schneider and C. Phillips (2001) Grammatical search and reanalysis. Journal of Memory and Language 45 308-336.
175. H. Schriefers, A.D. Friederici and K. Kuhn (1995) The processing of locally ambiguous relative clauses in German. Journal of Memory and Language 34 499-520.
176. C.T. Schütze and E. Gibson (1999) Argumenthood and English prepositional phrase attachment. Journal of Memory and Language 40 409-431.
177. D.I. Slobin (1966) Grammatical transformations and sentence comprehension in childhood and adulthood. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 5 219-227.
178. J. Snedeker and J. Trueswell (2003) Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context. Journal of Memory and Language 48 103-130.
179. J. Snedeker and J.C. Trueswell (2004) The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing. Cognitive Psychology 49 238-299.
180. M.J. Spivey and M.K. Tanenhaus (1998) Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: Modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24 1521-1543.
181. M.J. Spivey, M.K. Tanenhaus, K.M. Eberhard and J.C. Sedivy (2002) Eye movements and spoken language comprehension: Effects of visual context on syntactic ambiguity resolution. Cognitive Psychology 45 447-481.
182. M. Spivey-Knowlton and J.C. Sedivy (1995) Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints. Cognition 55 227-267.
183. E.P. Stabler (1994) The finite connectivity of linguistic structures. C. Clifton, Jr.,L. Frazier, K. Rayner (Eds) Perspectives on sentence processing Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
184. M.J. Steedman (2000) The syntactic process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
185. K. Steinhauer, K. Alter and A.D. Friederici (1999) Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing. Nature Neuroscience 2 191-196.
186. S. Stevenson (1994) Competition and recency in a hybrid network model of syntactic disambiguation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 23 295-322.
187. L.A. Stowe (1986) Parsing WH-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location. Language and Cognitive Processes 1 227-245.
188. L.A. Stowe, M.K. Tanenhaus and G.N. Carlson (1991) Filling gaps on-line: Use of lexical and semantic information in sentence processing. Language and Speech 34 319-340.
189. P. Sturt and M.W. Crocker (1996) Monotonic syntactic processing: A cross-linguistic study of attachment and reanalysis. Language and Cognitive Processes 11 449-494.
190. P. Sturt, M.J. Pickering and M.W. Crocker (1999) Structural change and reanalysis difficulty in language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 40 136-150.
191. P. Sturt, M.J. Pickering, C. Scheepers and M.W. Crocker (2001) The preservation of structure in language comprehension: Is reanalysis the last resort? Journal of Memory and Language 45 283-307.
192. P. Sturt, C. Scheepers and M. Pickering (2002) Syntactic ambiguity resolution after initial misanalysis: The role of recency. Journal of Memory and Language 46 371-390.
193. W. Tabor, B. Galantucci and D. Richardson (2004) Effects of merely local syntactic coherence on sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language 50 355-370.
194. W. Tabor and S. Hutchins (2004) Evidence for self-organized sentence processing: Digging-in effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30 431-450.
195. W. Tabor, C. Juliano and M.K. Tanenhaus (1997) Parsing in a dynamical system: An attractor-based account of the interaction of lexical and structural constraints in sentence processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 12 211-271.
196. W. Tabor and M.K. Tanenhaus (1999) Dynamical models of sentence processing. Cognitive Science 23 491-515.
197. P. Tabossi, M.J. Spivey-Knowlton, K. McRae and M.K. Tanenhaus (1994) Semantic effects on syntactic ambiguity resolution: Evidence for a constraint-based resolution process. C. Umilta, M. Moscovitch (Eds) Attention and performance 15: Conscious and nonconscious information processing Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 589-615.
198. M.K. Tanenhaus, M.J. Spivey-Knowlton, K.M. Eberhard and J.C. Sedivy (1995) Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268 1632-1634.
199. R. Taraban and J.L. McClelland (1988) Constituent attachment and thematic role assignment in sentence processing: Influences of content-based expectations. Journal of Memory and Language 27 597-632.
200. D.J. Townsend and T.G. Beyer (2001) Sentence comprehension: The integration of habits and rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
201. M.J. Traxler, R.K. Morris and R.E. Seely (2002) Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 47 69-90.
202. M.J. Traxler and M.J. Pickering (1996) Plausibility and the processing of unbounded dependencies: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Memory and Language 35 454-475.
203. M.J. Traxler, M.J. Pickering and C. Clifton (1998) Adjunct attachment is not a form of lexical ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 39 558-592.
204. M.J. Traxler, R.S. Williams, S.A. Blozis and R.K. Morris (2005) Working memory, animacy, and verb class in the processing of relative clauses. Journal of Memory and Language 53 204-224.
205. J.C. Trueswell (1996) The role of lexical frequency in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 35 566-585.
206. J.C. Trueswell and A.E. Kim (1998) How to prune a garden path by nipping it in the bud: Fast priming of verb argument structure. Journal of Memory and Language 39 102-123.
207. J.C. Trueswell, M.K. Tanenhaus and S.M. Garnsey (1994) Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 33 285-318.
208. J.C. Trueswell, M.K. Tanenhaus and C. Kello (1993) Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19 528-553.
209. L.K. Tyler and W.D. Marslen-Wilson (1977) The on-line effects of sematic context on syntactic processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16 683-692.
210. J.J.A. Van Berkum, C.M. Brown and P. Hagoort (1999) Early referential context effects in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language 41 147-182.
211. J.J.A. Van Berkum, C.M. Brown, P. Zwitserlood, V. Kooijman and P. Hagoort (2005) Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31 443-467.
212. R.P.G. Van Gompel and M.J. Pickering (1998) Lexical guidance in sentence processing: A note on Adams, Clifton, and Mitchell. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8 851-857.
213. Van Gompel, R. P. G., Pickering, M. J., Pearson, J., & Jacob, G. (in press). The activation of inappropriate analyses in garden-path sentences: Evidence from structural priming. Journal of Memory and Language.
214. R.P.G. Van Gompel, M.J. Pickering, J. Pearson and S.P. Liversedge (2005) Evidence against competition during syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 52 284-307.
215. R.P.G. Van Gompel, M.J. Pickering and M.J. Traxler (2001) Reanalysis in sentence processing: Evidence against current constraint-based and two-stage models. Journal of Memory and Language 45 225-258.
216. M. Van Herten, H.H. Kolk and D.J. Chwilla (2005) An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. Cognitive Brain Research 22 241-255.
217. T. Vosse and G. Kempen (2000) Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: A computational model based on competitive inhibition and a lexicalist grammar. Cognition 75 105-143.
218. E. Wanner and M. Maratsos (1978) An ATN approach to comprehension. M. Halle, J. Bresnan, G.A. Miller (Eds) Linguistic theory and psychological reality Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 119-161.
219. J. Warner and A.L. Glass (1987) Context and distance-to-disambiguation effects in ambiguity resolution: Evidence from grammaticality judgments of garden path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 26 714-738.
220. T. Warren and E. Gibson (2002) The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity. Cognition 85 79-112.
221. G.S. Waters and D. Caplan (1996) The capacity theory of sentence comprehension: Critique of Just and Carpenter (1992). Psychological Review 103 761-772.
222. V.H. Yngve (1960) A model and an hypothesis for language structure. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 104 444-466.
223. D. Zagar, J. Pynte and S. Rativeau (1997) Evidence for early-closure attachment on first-pass reading times in French. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 50A 421-438.