Disfluencies affect the parsing of garden-path sentences

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 183-200

  Bailey, Karl G D ^a   Ferreira, Fernanda ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042156899     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00027-5     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73, 247-264.
2. Bortfeld, H., Leon, S. D., Bloom, J. E., Schober, M. F., Brennan, S. E. (1999). Which speakers are most disfluent in conversation and when? Paper presented at the Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech ICPhS Satellite Meeting, Berkeley, CA, July.
3. Brennan, S. E., & Schober, M. F. (2001). How listeners compensate for disfluencies in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 274-296.
4. Brennan, S. E., & Williams, M. (1995). The feeling of another's knowing: Prosody and filled pauses as cues to listeners about the metacognitive states of speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 383-398.
5. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Clark, H. H. (1997). Dogmas of understanding. Discourse Processes, 23, 567-598.
7. Clark, H. H., & Clark, E. (1977). Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace.
8. Clark, H. H., & Wasow, T. (1998). Repeating words in spontaneous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 37, 201-242.
9. Christianson, K., Hollingworth, A., Haliwell, J. F., & Ferreira, F. (2001). Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 368-407.
10. Dollaghan, C., & Campbell, T. (1992). A procedure for classifying disruptions in spontaneous language samples. Topics in Language Disorders, 12, 56-68.
11. Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1991). Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 725-745.
12. Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1998). Syntactic reanalysis, thematic processing, and sentence comprehension. In J. D. Fodor, & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing (pp. 73-100). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
13. Fodor, J. D., & Inoue, A. (1998). Attach anyway. In J. D. Fodor, & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing (pp. 101-141). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
14. Ford, M. (1982). Sentence planning units: Implications for the speaker's representation of meaningful relations underlying sentences. In J. Bresnan (Ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations (pp. 798-827). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Fox Tree, J. E. (1995). The effects of false starts and repetitions on the processing of subsequent words in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 709-738.
16. Fox Tree, J. E. (2001). Listeners' uses of "um" and "uh" in speech comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 29, 320-326.
17. Hawkins, P. R. (1971). The syntactic location of hesitation pauses. Language and Speech, 14, 277-288.
18. Kjelgaard, M. M., & Speer, S. R. (1999). Prosodic facilitation and interference in the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 153-194.
19. Levelt, W. J. M. (1984). Spontaneous self-repairs in speech: Processes and representations. In M. P. R. van den Broecke, & A. Cohen (Eds.), Proceedings of the tenth international congress of phonetic science (pp. 105-117). Foris: Dordrecht.
20. Lickley, R. J. (1995). Missing disfluencies. In Proceedings of international congress of phonetic sciences (Vol. 4, pp. 192-195). Stockholm.
21. Lickley, R. J., & Bard, E. G. (1998). When can listeners detect disfluency in spontaneous speech? Language and Speech, 41, 203-226.
22. Lickley, R. J., & Bard, E. G. (1996). On not recognizing disfluencies in dialogue. In Proceedings of the international conference on spoken language processing 1876-1880. Philadelphia.
23. MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676-703.
24. Martin, J., & Strange, W. (1968). The perception of hesitation in spontaneous speech. Perception and Psychophysics, 53, 1-15.
25. Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29-63.
26. Nakatani, C. H., & Hirschberg, J. (1994). A corpus-based study of repair cues in spontaneous speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 1603-1616.
27. Reiger, C. (2001). Idiosyncratic fillers in the speech of bilinguals. Paper presented at the Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop, Edinburgh, Scotland, August.
28. Schacter, S., Christenfeld, N., Ravina, B., & Bilous, F. (1991). Speech disfluency and the structure of knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 362-367.
29. Sedivy, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., Chambers, C. G., & Carlson, G. N. (1999). Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation. Cognition, 71, 109-147.
30. Shriberg, E. E., Bear, J., & Dowding, J. (1992). Automatic detection and correction of repairs in human-computer dialog. In M. Marcus (Ed.), Proc. DARPA Speech and Natural Language Workshop (pp. 419-424). Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
31. Smith, V. L., & Clark, H. H. (1993). On the course of answering questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 25-38.
32. Traxler, M. J., Bybee, M. D., & Pickering, M. J. (1997). Influence of connectives on language comprehension: Eye-tracking evidence for incremental interpretation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 50A, 481-497.
33. Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.