Interference in Short-Term Memory: The Magical Number Two (or Three) in Sentence Processing

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 93-115

  Lewis, Richard L ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; REVIEW; SHORT TERM MEMORY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

COGNITION; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0029692818     PISSN: 00906905     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF01708421     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Abney, S. P. (1989). A computational model of human parsing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 129-144.
2. Abney, S. P., & Johnson, M. (1991). Memory requirements and local ambiguities of parsing strategies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 233-250.
3. Anderson, J. R., Kline, P. J., & Lewis, C. H. (1977). A production system model of language processing. In M. A. Just & P. A. Carpenter (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Baddeley, A. D. (1966). Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic, and formal similarity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 362-365.
5. Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Human memory: Theory and practice, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
6. Baker, C. L. (1989). English syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.
8. Blank, G. D. (1989). A finite and real-time processor for natural language. Communications of the ACM, 32, 1174-1189.
9. Blauberg, M. S., & Braine, M. D. S. (1974). Short-term memory limitations on decoding self-embedded sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 745-748.
10. Blumenthal, A. L. (1966). Observations with self-embedded sentences. Psychonomic Science, 6, 453-454.
11. Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A., & Shell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test. Psychological Review, 97, 404-431.
12. Chomsky, N. (1973). Conditions on transformations. In S. R. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (Eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
13. Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Church, K. W. (1980). On memory limitations in natural language processing (Tech. Rep. MIT/LCL/TR-245). Cambridge, MA: Laboratory for Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
15. Conrad, R. (1963). Acoustic confusions and memory span for words. Nature, 197, 1029-1030.
16. Cowper, E. A. (1976). Constraints on sentence complexity: A model for syntactic processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brown University.
17. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
18. De Roeck, A., Johnson, R., King, M., Rosner, M., Sampson, G., & Varile, N. (1982). A myth about center-embedding. Lingua, 58, 327-340.
19. Deutsch, D. (1970). Tones and numbers: Specificity of interference in immediate memory. Science, 168, 1604-1605.
20. Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1991). Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 725-745.
21. Ford, M. (1983). A method for obtaining measures of local parsing complexity throughout sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 203-218.
22. Frank, R. E. (1992). Syntactic locality and tree adjoining grammar: Grammatical, acquisition and processing perspectives. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
23. Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6, 291-325.
24. Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178-210.
25. Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Working memory and language. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
26. Gibson, E. A. (1991). A computational theory of human linguistic processing: Memory limitations and processing breakdown. Doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon. (Available Tech. Rep. CMU-CMT-91-125, from Center for Machine Translation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.)
27. Gibson, E. A., & Pearlmutter, N. (1994). A corpus-based analysis of psycholinguistic constraints on PP attachment. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier, & K. Rayner, (Eds.), Perspectives in sentence processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Gibson, E. A., Pearlmutter, N., Canseco-Gonzales, E., & Hickok, G. (1993). Crosslinguistic attachment preferences: Evidence from English and Spanish. Manuscript submitted for publication.
29. Gordon, R. (1982). The listener resolves an ambiguity. Unpublished paper for the Westinghouse science talent search.
30. Hakes, D. T., & Cairns, H. S. (1970). Sentence comprehension and relative pronouns. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 5-8.
31. Hakuta, K. (1981). Grammatical description versus configurational arrangement in language acquisition: The case of relative clauses in Japanese. Cognition, 9, 197-236.
32. Henderson, J. (1994). Description based parsing in a connectionist network. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania. (Available as Tech. Rep. IRCS-94-12 from The Institute for Research in Cognitive Science, University of Pennsylvania, 3401 Walnut St., Suite 400C, Philadelphia, PA 19104.)
33. Holmes, V. M., & O'Regan, J. K. (1981). Eye fixation patterns during the reading of relative clause sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 417-430.
34. Hudgins, J. C., & Cullinan, W. L. (1978). Effects of sentence structure on sentence elicited imitation responses. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 809-819.
35. Inoue, A., & Fodor, J. D. (1995). Information-paced parsing of Japanese. In R. Mazuka & N. Nagai, (Eds.), Japanese sentence processing (pp. 9-63). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
37. Kac, M. B. (1981). Center-embedding revisited. In Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 123-124). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Kempen, G., & Vosse, T. (1989). Incremental syntactic tree formation in human sentence processing: A cognitive architecture based on activation decay and simulated annealing. Connection Science, 1, 273-290.
39. Kimball, J. (1973). Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language. Cognition, 2, 15-47.
40. Laird, J. E., Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1987). Soar: An architecture for general intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 33, 1-64.
41. Larkin, W., & Burns, D. (1977). Sentence comprehension and memory for embedded structure. Memory & Cognition, 5, 17-22.
42. Lewis, R. L. (1993). An architecturally-based theory of human sentence comprehension. Doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University. (Available as Tech. Rep. CMU-CS-93-226 from Computer Science Dept., Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15213, or reports@cs.cmu.edu.)
43. Lewis, R. L. (1995). A theory of grammatical but unacceptable embeddings. Submitted manuscript, Cognitive Science Laboratory, Princeton University.
44. Lewis, R. L., & Lehman, J. F. (1994). A theory of the computational architecture of sentence comprehension. Submitted manuscript, Cognitive Science Laboratory, Princeton University.
45. Logic, R. H., Zucco, G. M., & Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Interference with visual short-term memory. Acta Psychologica, 75, 55-74.
46. Magnussen, S., Greenlee, M. W., Asplund, R., & Dyrnes, S. (1991). Stimulus-specific mechanisms of visual short-term memory. Vision Research, 31, 1213-1219.
47. Marcus, M. P. (1980). A theory of syntactic recognition for natural language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Marks, L. E. (1968). Scaling of grammaticalness of self-embedded English sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 965-967.
49. Martin, R. C. (1993). Short-term memory and sentence processing: Evidence from neuropsychology. Memory & Cognition, 21, 176-183.
50. Mazuka, R., Itoh, K., Kiritani, S., Niwa, S., Ikejiru, K., & Naitoh, K. (1989). Processing of Japanese garden path, center-embedded, and multiply left-embedded sentences. Annual Bulletin of the Research Institute of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (Tokyo), 23, 187-212.
51. McCawley, J. D. (1988). The syntactic phenomena of English, volume 2. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
52. McGeoch, J. A., & McDonald, W. T. (1931). Meaningful relation and retroactive inhibition. American Journal of Psychology, 43, 579-588.
53. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
54. Miller, G. A. (1962). Some psychological studies of grammar. American Psychologist, 17, 748-762.
55. Miller, G. A., & Chomsky, N. (1963). Finitary models of language users. In D. R. Luce, R. R. Bush & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (vol. II). New York: John Wiley.
56. Miller, G. A., & Isard, S. (1964). Free recall of self-embedded English sentences. Information and Control, 7, 292-303.
57. Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58. Poizner, H., Bellugi, U., & Tweney, R. D. (1981). Processing of formational, semantic, and iconic information in American Sign Language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1146-1159.
59. Potter, M. C. (1976). Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 509-522.
60. Potter, M. C. (1982). Very short-term memory: In one eye and out the other. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Minneapolis.
61. Pritchett, B. L. (1991). Head position and parsing ambiguity. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 251-270.
62. Pritchett, B. L. (1992). Grammatical competence and parsing performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63. Reich, P. (1969). The finiteness of natural language. Language, 45, 831-843.
64. Rosenbloom, P. S., Lehman, J. F., & Laird, J. E. (1993). Overview of Soar as a unified theory of cognition: Spring 1993. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 98-101). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
65. Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
66. Shiffrin, R. M. (1973). Information persistence in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 100, 39-49.
67. Shulman, H. G. (1970). Similarity effects in short-term memory. Psychological Bulletin, 75, 399-414.
68. Simon, H. A. (1974). How big is a chunk? Science, 183, 482-488.
69. Simon, H. A., & Zhang, G. (1985). STM capacity for Chinese words and idioms: Chunking and the acoustical loop hypotheses. Memory & Cognition, 13, 193-201.
70. Stabler, E. P. (1994). The finite connectivity of linguistic structure. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles.
71. Stevenson, S. (1994). Competition and recency in a hybrid network model of syntactic disambiguation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 295-322.
72. Tambe, M., Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1990). The problem of expensive chunks and its solution by restricting expressiveness. Machine Learning, 5, 299-348.
73. Walk, H. A., & Johns, E. E. (1984). Interference and facilitation in short-term memory for odors. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 508-514.
74. Wang, M. D. (1970). The role of syntactic complexity as a determiner of comprehensibility. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 398-404.
75. Warner, J., & Glass, A. L. (1987). Context and distance-to-disambiguation effects in ambiguity resolution: Evidence from grammatically judgments of garden path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 714-738.
76. Waugh, N. C., & Norman, D. A. (1965). Primary memory. Psychological Review, 72, 89-104.
77. Whittemore, G., & Ferrara, K. (1990). Empirical study of predictive powers of simple attachment schemes for post-modifier prepositional phrases. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 23-30) Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics.
78. Wickelgren, W. A. (1965). Acoustic similarity and retroactive interference in short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 53-61.
79. Williams, H. L., Beaver, W. S., Spence, M. T., & Rundell, O. H. (1969). Digital and kinesthetic memory with interpolated information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 530-536.
80. Yngve, V. H. (1960). A model and an hypothesis for language structure. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 104, 444-466.