Lexical guidance in sentence processing?

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 265-270

  Adams, Beverly Colwell ^a,d   Clifton Jr , Charles ^b   Mitchell, Don C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^d RANDOLPH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009588814     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03212949     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. ABNEY, S. (1987). Licensing and parsing. In J. McDonough & B. Plunkett (Eds.), Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society 17 (pp. 1-15). Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Graduate Linguistics Student Association.
2. ABNEY, S. (1989). A computational model of human parsing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 129-144.
3. ADAMS, B. C., CLIFTON, C. E., JR., & MITCHELL, D. C. (1992, November). Syntactic guidance in sentence processing. Poster presented at the 33rd annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis.
4. BOLAND, J., & TANENHAUS, M. K. (1991). The role of lexical representations in sentence processing. In G. B. Simpson (Ed.), Understanding word and sentence (pp. 331-366). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
5. BOLAND, J. E., TANENHAUS, M. K., & GARNSEY, S. M. (1990). Evidence for the immediate use of verb control information in sentence processing. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 413-432.
6. FERREIRA, F., & HENDERSON, J. M. (1991). Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 725-745.
7. FODOR, J. D. (1988). On modularity in grammar. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17, 125-168.
8. FODOR, J. D. (1989). Empty categories in sentence processing. Language & Cognitive Processes, 4, SI155-SI210.
9. FORD, M., BRESNAN, J., & KAPLAN, R. (1982). A competence-based theory of syntactic closure. In J. Bresnan (Ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations (pp. 727-796). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. FRAZIER, L. (1985). Modularity and the representational hypothesis. In Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society 12 (pp. 131-144). Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Graduate Linguistics Student Association.
11. FRAZIER, L. (1987a). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII (pp. 559-586). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. FRAZIER, L. (1987b). Syntactic processing: Evidence from Dutch. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 5, 519-559.
13. FRAZIER, L. (1989). Against lexical generation of syntax. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 505-528). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. FRAZIER, L. (1990). Exploring the architecture of the language system. In G. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 409-433). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. FRAZIER, L., & RAYNER, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178-210.
16. GIBSON, E. (1990). Recency preference and garden-path effects. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 372-379). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. HEMFORTH, B., KONIECZNY, L., SCHEEPERS, C., & STRUBE, G. (EDS.) (1994). First analysis, reanalysis, and repair. Freiburg, Germany: Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Institut für Informatik und Gesellschaft.
18. MACDONALD, M. C., PEARLMUTTER, N. J., & SEIDENBERG, M. S. (1994). Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Pyschological Review, 101, 676-703.
19. MITCHELL, D. C. (1987). Lexical guidance in human parsing: Locus and processing characteristics. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII (pp. 601-618). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. MITCHELL, D. C. (1989). Verb-guidance and other lexical effects in parsing. Language & Cognitive Processes, 4, SI123-SI154.
21. MITCHELL, D. C. (1994). Sentence parsing. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 375-409). New York: Academic Press.
22. PRITCHETT, B. L. (1988). Garden path phenomena and the grammatical basis of language processing. Language, 64, 539-576.
23. PRITCHETT, B. L. (1992). Grammatical competence and parsing performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. STEVENSON, S. (1993, June). A competition-based explanation of syntactic attachment preferences and garden path phenomena. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics (pp. 266-273). Columbus, OH: Association for Computational Linguistics.
25. TANENHAUS, M. K., BOLAND, J. E., MAUNER, G., & CARLSON, G. N. (1993). More on combinatory lexical information: Thematic structure in parsing and interpretation. In G. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech and processing: Vol. 2. Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 297-319). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. TANENHAUS, M. K., CARLSON, G., & TRUESWELL, J. C. (1989). The role of thematic structures in interpretation and parsing. Language & Cognitive Processes, 4, SI211-SI234.
27. TANENHAUS, M. K., GARNSEY, S., & BOLAND, J. (1990). Combinatory lexical information and language comprehension. In G. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing (pp. 383-408). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. TRUESWELL, J. C., TANENHAUS, M. K., & KELLO, C. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 528-553.
29. WADE, M. M., & ADAMS, B. C. (1998). The role of verb transitivity information in sentence processing. Unpublished manuscript, University of Virginia.
30. WEINBERG, A. (1995). Licensing constraints and the theory of language processing. In R. Mazuka & N. Nagai (Eds.), Japanese sentence processing (pp. 235-256). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.