Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger

Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 368-407

  Christianson, Kiel ^a   Hollingworth, Andrew ^a   Halliwell, John F ^a   Ferreira, Fernanda ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; HUMAN; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS;

COGNITION; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS;

EID: 0035379727     PISSN: 00100285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0752     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Abney, S. (1988). A computational model of human parsing. Paper presented at the First Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing.
2. Anderson, C. A., Lepper, M. R., & Ross, L. (1980). Perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1037-1049.
3. Atkinson, K. (1995). Behind the scenes at the museum. New York: St. Martin's Press.
4. Barton, S. B., & Sanford, A. J. (1993). A case study of anomaly detection: Shallow semantic processing and cohesion establishment. Memory & Cognition, 21, 477-487.
5. Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1971). The abstraction of linguistic ideas. Cognitive Psychology, 2(4), 331-350.
6. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 717-726.
7. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1973). Considerations of some problems of comprehension. In W.G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 383-438). New York: Academic Press.
8. Broadwell, G. A. (1988). Multiple thematic role assignment in Choctaw. In W. Wilkins (Ed.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 21, pp. 113-128). San Diego: Academic Press.
9. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language. Dordrecht: Foris.
10. Clark, H. H., & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
11. Clifton, C., Jr. (1993). Thematic roles in sentence parsing. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 222-246.
12. Crain, S., & Steedman, M. (1985). On not being led up the garden path: The use of context by the psychological syntax processor. In D. R. Dowty, L. Karttunen, & A. M. Zwicky (Eds.), Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives (pp. 320-358). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
13. Dagenbach, D., & Carr, T. H. (1994). Inhibitory processes in memory, attention, and language. San Diego: Academic Press.
14. De Vincenzi, M., & Job, R. (1993). Some observations on the universality of the Late-Closure strategy. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 189-206.
15. Erickson, T. D., & Mattson, M. E. (1981). From words to meaning: A semantic illusion. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 540-551.
16. Feldman, J. A. (1985). Four frames suffice: A provisional model of vision and space. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 265-289.
17. Ferreira, F., & Stacey, J. (submitted). The misinterpretation of passive sentences.
18. Ferreira, F., & Clifton, C., Jr. (1986). The independence of syntactic parsing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 348-368.
19. Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1991). Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 725-745.
20. Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1998). Syntactic reanalysis, thematic processing, and sentence comprehension. In J. D. Fodor & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing (pp. 73-100). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
21. Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1999). Good enough representations in visual cognition and language. Paper presented at Architectures and Mechanisms of Language Processing Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland.
22. Fillenbaum, S. (1971). Processing and recall of compatible and incompatible question and answer pairs. Language and Speech, 14, 256-265.
23. Fillenbaum, S. (1974). Pragmatic normalization: Further results for some conjunctive and disjunctive sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 574-578.
24. Fodor, J. D., & Inoue, A. (1998). Attach anyway. In J. D. Fodor & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing (pp. 101-141). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
25. Fodor, J. D., & Ferreira, F. (1998). Reanalysis in sentence processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
26. Frazier, L. (1978). On comprehending sentences: syntactic parsing strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT. Distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, IN.
27. Frazier, L., & Clifton, C., Jr. (1996). Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Frazier, L., & Clifton, C., Jr. (1998). Sentence reanalysis and visibility. In J. D. Fodor & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing (pp. 143-176). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
29. Frazier, L., & Fodor, J.D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6, 1-34.
30. Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178-210.
31. Gernsbacher, M. A., & Faust, M. E. (1991). The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 245-262.
32. Gernsbacher, M. A., & Hargreaves, D.J. (1988). Accessing sentence participants: The advantage of first mention. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 699-717.
33. Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (Vol. III, pp. 41-58). New York: Seminar Press.
34. Grimes, J. (1996). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. In K. Akins (Ed.), Perception: Vancouver studies in cognitive science (Vol. 5, pp. 89-110). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35. Hasher, L., Quig, M. B., & May, C. P. (1997). Inhibitory control over no-longer-relevant information: Adult age differences. Memory & Cognition, 25, 286-295.
36. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1999a). High-level scene perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 243-271.
37. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1999b). The role of fixation position in detecting scene changes across saccades. Psychological Science, 10, 438-443.
38. Higginbotham, J. (1997). A plea of implicit anaphora. In H. Bennis, P. Pica, & J. Rooryck (Eds.), Atomism and binding (pp. 183-203). Dordrecht: Foris.
39. Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2000). Semantic informativeness affects the detection of changes in natural scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 213-235.
40. Irwin, D. E. (1996). Integrating information across saccadic eye movements. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 94-100.
41. Johnson, H. M., & Seifert, C. M. (1998). Updating accounts following a correction of misinformation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1483-1494.
42. Johnson, H. M., & Seifert, C. M. (1994). Sources of the continued influence effect: When misinformation in memory affects later inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1420-1436.
43. Kamas, E. N., Reder, L. M., & Ayers, M. S. (1996). Partial matching in the Moses illusion: Response bias not sensitivity. Memory & Cognition, 24, 687-699.
44. Lewis, R. (1998). Reanalysis and limited repair parsing: Leaping off the garden path. In J. D. Fodor and F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing (pp. 247-185). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
45. MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676-703.
46. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
47. Pickering, M. J., & Traxler, M. J. (1998). Plausibility and recovery from garden paths: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 940-961.
48. Pritchett, B. L. (1992). Grammatical competence and parsing performance. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
49. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
50. Rayner, K., Garrod, S., & Perfetti, C. A. (1992). Discourse influences during parsing are delayed. Cognition, 45, 109-139.
51. Ross, L., Lepper, M. A., & Hubbard, M. (1975). Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: Biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 880-892.
52. Schul, Y., & Bernstein, E. (1985). When discounting fails: Conditions under which individuals use discredited information in making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 894-903.
53. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 1, 261-267.
54. Spivey-Knowlton, M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints. Cognition, 55, 227-267.
55. Stevenson, S. (1998). Parsing as incremental restructuring. In J. D. Fodor & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing (pp. 327-363). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
56. Stowe, L. (1989). Thematic structures and sentence comprehension. In G. N. Carlson & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Linguistic structure in language processing (pp. 319-357) Dordrecht: Kluwer.
57. Thompson, W. C., Fong, G. T., & Rosenhan, D. L. (1981). Inadmissible evidence and juror verdicts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 453-463.
58. Trask, R. L. (1993). A dictionary of grammatical terms in linguistics. New York: Routledge.
59. Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Kello, C. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 528-553.
60. Wilkins, W. (1988). Thematic structure and reflexivization. In W. Wilkins (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics (Vol. 21, pp. 191-214). San Diego: Academic Press.
61. Wilkes, A. L., & Leatherbarrow, M. (1988). Editing episodic memory following the identification of error. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 361-387.