Microfabricated polymeric vessel mimetics for 3-D cancer cell culture

Biomaterials

Volumn 34, Issue 33, 2013, Pages 8301-8313

  Jaeger, Ashley A ^a,b   Das, Chandan K ^a   Morgan, Nicole Y ^c   Pursley, Randall H ^b   McQueen, Philip G ^b   Hall, Matthew D ^a   Pohida, Thomas J ^b   Gottesman, Michael M ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioreactor; Carcinogenesis; Hydrogel; Microstructure; Oxygenation; Silicone

Indexed keywords

BASEMENT MEMBRANE; BIOREACTOR SYSTEM; CARCINOGENESIS; EXPERIMENTAL TESTING; MICRO-VASCULATURE; MONOLAYER CULTURE; SILICONE HYDROGELS; TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT;

BIOREACTORS; CELLS; DISEASES; DISSOLVED OXYGEN; HYDROGELS; LITHOGRAPHY; MICROSTRUCTURE; OXYGENATION; SILICONES; TUMORS;

CELL CULTURE;

DISSOLVED OXYGEN; ELEMENT; POLYMER; SILICONE;

ANOXIA; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; BIOREACTOR; CANCER CELL CULTURE; CANCER RESEARCH; CARCINOGENESIS; CELL CULTURE; FEMALE; GAS EXCHANGE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYDROGEL; MODEL; NEOPLASM; OXYGEN TRANSPORT; OXYGENATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR GROWTH; TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT;

BIOREACTOR; CARCINOGENESIS; HYDROGEL; MICROSTRUCTURE; OXYGENATION; SILICONE;

BIOREACTORS; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL LINE, TUMOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MICROTECHNOLOGY; POLYMERS;

EID: 84881665292     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.013     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Elsdale T., Bard J. Collagen substrata for studies on cell behavior. JCell Biol 1972, 54:626-637.
2. Pampaloni F., Reynaud E.G., Stelzer E.H.K. The third dimension bridges the gap between cell culture and live tissue. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007, 8:839-845.
3. Debnath J., Brugge J.S. Modelling glandular epithelial cancers in three-dimensional cultures. Nat Rev Cancer 2005, 5:675-688.
4. Weigelt B., Bissell M.J. Unraveling the microenvironmental influences on the normal mammary gland and breast cancer. Semin Cancer Biol 2008, 18:311-321.
5. Gillet J.P., Calcagno A.M., Varma S., Marino M., Green L.J., Vora M.I., et al. Redefining the relevance of established cancer cell lines to the study of mechanisms of clinical anti-cancer drug resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:18708-18713.
6. Zhang S. Beyond the petri dish. Nat Biotechnol 2004, 22:151-152.
7. Mehta J.P., O'Driscoll L., Barron N., Clynes M., Doolan P. Amicroarray approach to translational medicine in breast cancer: how representative are cell line models of clinical conditions?. Anticancer Res 2007, 27:1295-1300.
8. Gillet J.P., Varma S., Gottesman M.M. The clinical relevance of cancer cell lines. JNatl Cancer Inst 2013, 105:452-458.
9. Yamada K.M., Cukierman E. Modeling tissue morphogenesis and cancer in 3D. Cell. 2007, 130:601-610.
10. Hanahan D., Coussens L.M. Accessories to the crime: functions of cells recruited to the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell. 2012, 21:309-322.
11. Fischbach C., Chen R., Matsumoto T., Schmelzle T., Brugge J.S., Polverini P.J., et al. Engineering tumors with 3D scaffolds. Nat Methods 2007, 4:855-860.
12. Griffith L.G., Swartz M.A. Capturing complex 3D tissue physiology invitro. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio 2006, 7:211-224.
13. Kenny P.A., Lee G.Y., Myers C.A., Neve R.M., Semeiks J.R., Spellman P.T., et al. The morphologies of breast cancer cell lines in three-dimensional assays correlate with their profiles of gene expression. Mol Oncol 2007, 1:84-96.
14. Bissell M.J., Hall H.G., Parry G. How does the extracellular-matrix direct gene-expression. JTheor Biol 1982, 99:31-68.
15. Nelson C.M., Bissell M.J. Of extracellular matrix, scaffolds, and signaling: tissue architecture regulates development, homeostasis, and cancer. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2006, 22:287-309.
16. Kleinman H.K., Philp D., Hoffman M.P. Role of the extracellular matrix in morphogenesis. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2003, 14:526-532.
17. Weaver V.M., Petersen O.W., Wang F., Larabell C.A., Briand P., Damsky C., et al. Reversion of the malignant phenotype of human breast cells in three-dimensional culture and invivo by integrin blocking antibodies. JCell Biol 1997, 137:231-245.
18. Hutmacher D.W. Biomaterials offer cancer research the third dimension. Nat Mater 2010, 9:90-93.
19. Hovinga K.E., Shimizu F., Wang R., Panagiotakos G., Van Der Heijden M., Moayedpardazi H., et al. Inhibition of notch signaling in glioblastoma targets cancer stem cells via an endothelial cell intermediate. Stem Cells 2010, 28:1019-1029.
20. Stoppini L., Buchs P.A., Muller D. Asimple method for organotypic cultures of nervous tissue. JNeurosci Methods 1991, 37:173-182.
21. Loessner D., Stok K.S., Lutolf M.P., Hutmacher D.W., Clements J.A., Rizzi S.C. Bioengineered 3D platform to explore cell-ECM interactions and drug resistance of epithelial ovarian cancer cells. Biomaterials 2010, 31:8494-8506.
22. Loessner D., Flegg J.A., Byrne H.M., Clements J.A., Hutmacher D.W. Growth of confined cancer spheroids: a combined experimental and mathematical modelling approach. Integr Biol (Camb) 2013, 5:597-605.
23. Miller B.E., Miller F.R., Heppner G.H. Factors affecting growth and drug sensitivity of mouse mammary tumor lines in collagen gel cultures. Cancer Res 1985, 45:4200-4205.
24. Szot C.S., Buchanan C.F., Freeman J.W., Rylander M.N. 3D invitro bioengineered tumors based on collagen I hydrogels. Biomaterials 2011, 32:7905-7912.
25. Lin R.Z., Chang H.Y. Recent advances in three-dimensional multicellular spheroid culture for biomedical research. Biotechnol J 2008, 3:1172-1184.
26. Sutherland R.M. Cell and environment interactions in tumor microregions: the multicell spheroid model. Science 1988, 240:177-184.
27. Hirschhaeuser F., Menne H., Dittfeld C., West J., Mueller-Klieser W., Kunz-Schughart L.A. Multicellular tumor spheroids: an underestimated tool is catching up again. JBiotechnol 2010, 148:3-15.
28. Serebriiskii I., Castello-Cros R., Lamb A., Golemis E.A., Cukierman E. Fibroblast-derived 3D matrix differentially regulates the growth and drug-responsiveness of human cancer cells. Matrix Biol 2008, 27:573-585.
29. Kleinman H.K., Martin G.R. Matrigel: basement membrane matrix with biological activity. Semin Cancer Biol 2005, 15:378-386.
30. Benton G., George J., Kleinman H.K., Arnaoutova I.P. Advancing science and technology via 3D culture on basement membrane matrix. JCell Physiol 2009, 221:18-25.
31. Kleinman H.K., McGarvey M.L., Liotta L.A., Robey P.G., Tryggvason K., Martin G.R. Isolation and characterization of type IV procollagen, laminin, and heparan sulfate proteoglycan from the EHS sarcoma. Biochemistry 1982, 21:6188-6193.
32. Leight J.L., Liu W.D.F., Chaturvedi R.R., Chen S., Yang M.T., Raghavan S., et al. Manipulation of 3D cluster size and geometry by release from 2D micropatterns. Cell Mol Bioeng 2012, 5:299-306.
33. Kunz-Schughart L.A. Multicellular tumor spheroids: intermediates between monolayer culture and invivo tumor. Cell Biol Int 1999, 23:157-161.
34. Friedrich J., Ebner R., Kunz-Schughart L.A. Experimental anti-tumor therapy in 3-D: spheroids-old hat or new challenge?. Int J Radiat Biol 2007, 83:849-871.
35. Minchinton A.I., Tannock I.F. Drug penetration in solid tumours. Nat Rev Cancer 2006, 6:583-592.
36. Kim J., Conway A., Chauhan A. Extended delivery of ophthalmic drugs by silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Biomaterials 2008, 29:2259-2269.
37. Lai Y.C. Novel polyurethane silicone hydrogels. JAppl Polym Sci 1995, 56:301-310.
38. Nicolson P.C., Vogt J. Soft contact lens polymers: an evolution. Biomaterials 2001, 22:3273-3283.
39. Brimacombe K.R., Hall M.D., Auld D.S., Inglese J., Austin C.P., Gottesman M.M., et al. Adual-fluorescence high-throughput cell line system for probing multidrug resistance. Assay Drug Dev Technol 2009, 7:233-249.
40. Lee J.N., Park C., Whitesides G.M. Solvent compatibility of poly(dimethylsiloxane)-based microfluidic devices. Anal Chem 2003, 75:6544-6554.
41. St-Denis C.E., Fell C.J.D. Diffusivity of oxygen in water. Can J Chem Eng 1971, 49:885.
42. Downing A.L., Truesdale G.A. Some factors affecting the rate of solution of oxygen in water. JAppl Chem 1955, 5:570-581.
43. Nishikawa M., Yamamoto T., Kojima N., Kikuo K., Fujii T., Sakai Y. Stable immobilization of rat hepatocytes as hemispheroids onto collagen-conjugated poly-dimethylsiloxane (PDMS) surfaces: Importance of direct oxygenation through PDMS for both formation and function. Biotechnol Bioeng 2008, 99:1472-1481.
44. Buchwald P. FEM-based oxygen consumption and cell viability models for avascular pancreatic islets. Theor Biol Med Model 2009, 6.
45. Casciari J.J., Sotirchos S.V., Sutherland R.M. Variations in tumor cell growth rates and metabolism with oxygen concentration, glucose concentration, and extracellular pH. JCell Physiol 1992, 151:386-394.
46. Mehta G., Mehta K., Sud D., Song J.W., Bersano-Begey T., Futai N., et al. Quantitative measurement and control of oxygen levels in microfluidic poly(dimethylsiloxane) bioreactors during cell culture. Biomed Microdevices 2007, 9:123-134.
47. Tannock I.F. The relation between cell proliferation and the vascular system in a transplanted mouse mammary tumour. Br J Cancer 1968, 22:258-273.
48. Goldman's Cecil medicine 2012, Elsevier/Saunders, Philadelphia, PA. 24th ed. L. Goldman, A.I. Schafer (Eds.).
49. Tredan O., Galmarini C.M., Patel K., Tannock I.F. Drug resistance and the solid tumor microenvironment. JNatl Cancer Inst 2007, 99:1441-1454.
50. Thomlinson R.H., Gray L.H. The histological structure of some human lung cancers and the possible implications for radiotherapy. Br J Cancer 1955, 9:539-549.
51. Yoshii Y., Waki A., Yoshida K., Kakezuka A., Kobayashi M., Namiki H., et al. The use of nanoimprinted scaffolds as 3D culture models to facilitate spontaneous tumor cell migration and well-regulated spheroid formation. Biomaterials 2011, 32:6052-6058.
52. Ainslie K.M., Kraning C.M., Desai T.A. Microfabrication of an asymmetric, multi-layered microdevice for controlled release of orally delivered therapeutics. PSoc Photo-Opt Ins 2008, 8:1042-1047.
53. Geckil H., Xu F., Zhang X.H., Moon S., Demirci U. Engineering hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics. Nanomedicine-Uk 2010, 5:469-484.
54. Khattak S.F., Chin K.S., Bhatia S.R., Roberts S.C. Enhancing oxygen tension and cellular function in alginate cell encapsulation devices through the use of perfluorocarbons. Biotechnol Bioeng 2007, 96:156-166.
55. Nahmias Y., Kramvis Y., Barbe L., Casali M., Berthiaume F., Yarmush M.L. Anovel formulation of oxygen-carrying matrix enhances liver-specific function of cultured hepatocytes. FASEB J 2006, 20:2531-2533.
56. Anada T., Fukuda J., Sai Y., Suzuki O. An oxygen-permeable spheroid culture system for the prevention of central hypoxia and necrosis of spheroids. Biomaterials 2012, 33:8430-8441.
57. Curcio E., Salerno S., Barbieri G., De Bartolo L., Drioli E., Bader A. Mass transfer and metabolic reactions in hepatocyte spheroids cultured in rotating wall gas-permeable membrane system. Biomaterials 2007, 28:5487-5497.
58. Evenou F., Couderc S., Kim B., Fujii T., Sakai Y. Microfibrillated cellulose sheets coating oxygen-permeable PDMS membranes induce rat hepatocytes 3D aggregation into stably-attached 3D hemispheroids. JBiomat Sci-Polym E 2011, 22:1509-1522.
59. Evenou F., Fujii T., Sakai Y. Spontaneous formation of stably-attached and 3D-organized hepatocyte aggregates on oxygen-permeable polydimethylsiloxane membranes having 3D microstructures. Biomed Microdevices 2010, 12:465-475.
60. Martin I., Wendt D., Heberer M. The role of bioreactors in tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol 2004, 22:80-86.
61. Wendt D., Riboldi S.A., Cioffi M., Martin I. Bioreactors in tissue engineering: scientific challenges and clinical perspectives. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 2009, 112:1-27.
62. Eniwumide J.O., Lee D.A., Bader D.L. The development of a bioreactor to perfuse radially-confined hydrogel constructs: design and characterization of mass transport properties. Biorheology 2009, 46:417-437.
63. Hollingshead M.G., Alley M.C., Camalier R.F., Abbott B.J., Mayo J.G., Malspeis L., et al. Invivo cultivation of tumor cells in hollow fibers. Life Sci 1995, 57:131-141.
64. Casciari J.J., Hollingshead M.G., Alley M.C., Mayo J.G., Malspeis L., Miyauchi S., et al. Growth and chemotherapeutic response of cells in a hollow-fiber invitro solid tumor model. JNatl Cancer Inst 1994, 86:1846-1852.
65. Bettahalli N.M., Vicente J., Moroni L., Higuera G.A., van Blitterswijk C.A., Wessling M., et al. Integration of hollow fiber membranes improves nutrient supply in three-dimensional tissue constructs. Acta Biomaterialia 2011, 7:3312-3324.
66. Gerlach J.C., Lin Y.C., Brayfield C.A., Minteer D.M., Li H., Rubin J.P., et al. Adipogenesis of human adipose-derived stem cells within three-dimensional hollow fiber-based bioreactors. Tissue Eng Part C Meth 2012, 18:54-61.
67. Hay P.D., Veitch A.R., Smith M.D., Cousins R.B., Gaylor J.D. Oxygen transfer in a diffusion-limited hollow fiber bioartificial liver. Artif Organs 2000, 24:278-288.
68. Shatford R.A., Nyberg S.L., Meier S.J., White J.G., Payne W.D., Hu W.S., et al. Hepatocyte function in a hollow fiber bioreactor: a potential bioartificial liver. JSurg Res 1992, 53:549-557.