Interventions supporting children's mathematics school success: A meta-analytic review

European Psychologist

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 89-113

  Fischer, Ursula ^a,b   Moeller, Korbinian ^a   Cress, Ulrike ^a   Nuerk, Hans Christoph ^a,b  

^a KNOWLEDGE MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Intervention; Mathematics; Meta analysis; Review

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881164405     PISSN: 10169040     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000141     Document Type: Review

References (77)

1. An, S. A., Kulm, G. O., & Ma, T. (2008). The effects of a music composition activity on Chinese students' attitudes and beliefs towards mathematics: An exploratory study. Journal of Mathematics Education, 1, 96-113.
2. Axtell, P. K., McCallum, R. S., Bell, S. M., & Poncy, B. (2009). Developing math automaticity using a classwide fluency building procedure for middle school students: A preliminary study. Psychology in the Schools, 46, 526-538.
3. Badian, N. A. (1983). Dyscalculia and nonverbal disorders of learning. In H. R. Myklebust (Ed.), Progress in learning disabilities (Vol. 5, pp. 235-264). New York, NY: Stratton.
4. Booth, J. L., & Siegler, R. S. (2008). Numerical magnitude representations influence arithmetic learning. Child Development, 79, 1016-1031.
5. Butterworth, B., Varma, S., & Laurillard, D. (2011). Dyscalculia: From brain to education. Science, 332, 1049-1053.
6. Bynner, J., & Parsons, S. (1997). Does numeracy matter? Evidence from the National Child Development Study on the impact of poor numeracy on adult life. London, UK: Basic Skills Agency.
7. Calhoon, M. B., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). The effects of peerassisted learning strategies and curriculum-basedmeasurement on the mathematics performance of secondary students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 235-244.
8. Chiesa, M., & Robertson, A. (2000). Precision teaching and fluency training: Making maths easier for pupils and teachers. Educational Psychology in Practice, 16, 297-310.
9. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2008). Experimental evaluation of the effects of a research-based preschool mathematics curriculum. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 443-494.
10. Codding, R. S., Burns, M. K., & Lukito, G. (2011). Meta-Analysis of mathematic Basic-Fact Fluency Interventions: A component analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26, 36-47.
11. Donovan, H. S., Kwekkeboom, K. L., Rosenzweig, M. Q., & Ward, S. E. (2009). Nonspecific effects in psychoeducational intervention research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 31, 983-998.
12. Dowker, A. (2004). What Works for Children with Mathematical Difficulties? London, UK: Department for Education and Skills.
13. Durkin, K., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2012). The effectiveness of using incorrect examples to support learning about decimal magnitude. Learning and Instruction, 22, 206-214.
14. Elbourne, D. R., Altman, D. G., Higgins, J. P., Curtin, F., Worthington, H. V., & Vaile, A. (2002). Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: Methodological issues. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31, 140-149. (Pubitemid 34284916)
15. Fede, J. L. (2010). The effects of Go Solve Word Problems math intervention on applied problem solving skills of low performing fifth grade students. (Open Access Dissertations. Paper 236). Retrieved from http://scholarworks.umass.edu/ open-access-dissertations/236
16. Fischer, J.-P. (2010). Numerical performance increased by finger training: a fallacy due to regression toward the mean? Cortex, 46, 272-273.
17. Fischer, U., Moeller, K., Bientzle, M., Cress, U., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2011). Sensori-motor spatial training of number magnitude representation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 177-183.
18. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2001). Principles for the prevention and intervention of mathematics difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16, 85-95.
19. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlet, C. L., Powell, S. R., Capizzi, A. M., & Seethaler, P. M. (2006). The effects of computerassisted instruction on number combination skill in at-risk first graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 467-475. (Pubitemid 44482633)
20. Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2009). Dyslexia: A new synergy between education and cognitive neuroscience. Science, 325, 280-283.
21. Gamo, S., Sander, E., & Richard, J.-F. (2010). Transfer of strategy use by semantic recoding in arithmetic problem solving. Learning and Instruction, 20, 400-410.
22. Gerhard, S. (2009). Problem solving without numbers. An early approach to algebra (pp. 499-508) Proceedings of the Sixth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 6), Lyon, France, 2009.
23. Gersten, R., Chard, D. J., Jayanthi, M., Baker, S. K., Morphy, P., & Flojo, J. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1202-1242.
24. Gersten, R., Jordan, N. C., & Flojo, J. R. (2005). Early identification and interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 293-304. (Pubitemid 41095919)
25. Glass, G., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26. Griffin, S. (2003). Number worlds: A research-based mathematics program for young children. In D. H. Clements & A. DiBiase (Eds.), Engaging young children in mathematics: Findings of the 2000 National Conference on Standards for Preschool and Kindergarten Mathematics Education (pp. 325-342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Hager, W., & Hasselhorn, M. (2000). Psychologische Interventionsmaßnahmen: Was sollen sie bewirken können? [Psychological interventions: What should they be able to effectuate?]. In W. Hager, J. L. Patry, & H. Brezing (Eds.), Evaluation psychologischer Interventionsmaßnahmen (pp. S73-S85). Bern, Switzerland: Huber.
28. Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass's estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 107-128.
29. Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (2011, March). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 5.1.0). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Retrieved from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
30. Ivory, T. S. (2007). Improving mathematics achievement of exceptional learners through differentiated and peer-mediated instruction (Unpublished dissertation). Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL.
31. Javed, S. H. (2008). Online facilitated mathematics learning in vocational education (Unpublished dissertation), Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
32. Kaufmann, L., Handl, P., & Thöny, B. (2003). Evaluation of a numeracy intervention program focusing on basic numerical knowledge and conceptual knowledge: A pilot study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 564-573. (Pubitemid 37424421)
33. Kaufmann, L., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2006). Die Entwicklung des Rechnens und dessen Störungen: Genese,Modelle, Diagnostik und Intervention [On the development of calculation and its impairments: Genesis, models, diagnostics, and intervention]. Zeitschrift für Legasthenie und Dyskalkulie (BVL), 2, 11-16.
34. Kaufmann, L., Wood, G., Rubinsten, O., & Henik, A. (2011). Meta-analysis of developmental fMRI studies investigating typical and atypical trajectories of number processing and calculation. Developmental Neuropsychology, 36, 763-787.
35. Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., Chard, D. J., & Fien, H. (2008). Making connections in mathematics: Conceptual mathematics intervention for low-performing students. Remedial and Special Education, 29, 33-45.
36. Klein, A., Starkey, P., Clements, D., Sarama, J., & Iyer, R. (2008). Effects of a pre-kindergarten mathematics intervention: A randomized experiment. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1, 155-178.
37. Krajewski, K., Nieding, G., & Schneider, W. (2008). Kurz-und langfristige Effekte mathematischer Fr-hförderung im Kindergarten durch das Programm,Mengen, Z-hlen, Zahlen'' [Short-term and long-term effects of early math education in kindergarten]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und P-dagogische Psychologie, 40, 135-146.
38. Kroesbergen, E. H., & van Luit, J. E. H. (2002). Teaching multiplication to low math performers: Guided versus structured instruction. Instructional Science, 30, 361-378. (Pubitemid 37132896)
39. Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2003). Mathematics interventions for children with special educational needs. A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 97-114. (Pubitemid 36412580)
40. Kucian, K., Grond, U., Rotzer, S., Henzi, B., Schönmann, C., Plangger, F., . . . von Aster, M. (2011). Mental number line training in children with developmental dyscalculia. Neuro-Image, 57, 782-795.
41. Lai, M.-L., Baroody, A. J., & Johnson, A. R. (2008). Fostering Taiwanese preschoolers' understanding of the additionsubtraction inverse principle. Cognitive Development, 23, 216-235.
42. Lenhard, A., Lenhard, W., Schug, M., & Kowalski, A. (2011). Computerbasierte Mathematikförderung mit den ''Rechenspielen mit Elfe und Mathis I'': Vorstellung und Evaluation eines Computerprogramms für Erst-bis Drittkl-ssler [Computer-based math training with ''Math Games with Elfe and Mathis I'': Presentation and evaluation of a computer program for first to third graders]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und P-dagogische Psychologie, 43, 79-88.
43. Mazzocco, M. M. M., & Myers, G. F. (2003). Complexities in identifying and defining mathematics learning disability in the primary school age years. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 218-253. (Pubitemid 38148525)
44. Melhuish, E. C., Phan, M. B., Sylva, K., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B. (2008). Effects of the home learning environment and preschool center experience upon literacy and numeracy development in early primary school. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 95-114.
45. Metzenleitner, N., Pircher, C., & M-ller, S. (2007, 2010). Wirksamkeit eines multikomponentiellen Interventionsprogramms für rechenschwache Kinder [Effectiveness of a multi-component intervention program for children with dyscalculia] (Unpublished diploma theses). University of Salzburg, Austria.
46. Miller, S. P., & Mercer, C. D. (1997). Educational aspects of mathematical disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 47-56.
47. Moeller, K., Fischer, U., Cress, U., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2012). Diagnostics and intervention in dyscalculia: Current issues and novel perspectives. In Z. Breznitz, O. Rubinsten, V. Molfese, & D. L. Molfese (Eds.), Reading, writing, mathematics and the developing brain: Listening to many voices (pp. 233-276). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
48. Morton, V., & Torgerson, D. J. (2005). Regression to the mean: Treatment effect without the intervention. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 11, 59-65. (Pubitemid 40204141)
49. Nowak, C., & Heinrichs, N. (2008). A comprehensive metaanalysis of triple p-positive parenting program using hierarchical linear modeling: Effectiveness and moderating variables. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11, 114-144.
50. Nunes, T., Bryant, P., Hallett, D., Bell, D., & Evans, D. (2009). Teaching children about the inverse relation between addition and subtraction. Mathematical Thinking and Learning: An International Journal, 11, 61-78.
51. Opel, A., Zaman, S. S., Khanom, F., & Aboud, F. E. (2012). Evaluation of a mathematics program for preprimary children in rural Bangladesh. International Journal of Educational Development, 32, 104-110.
52. Parsons, S., & Bynner, J. (2005). Does numeracy matter more? London, UK: National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy.
53. Ramani, G. B., & Siegler, R. S. (2008). Promoting broad and stable improvements in low-income children's numerical knowledge through playing number board Games. Child Development, 79, 375-394.
54. Ramani, G. B., & Siegler, R. S. (2011). Reducing the gap in numerical knowledge between low-and middle-income preschoolers. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 146-159.
55. R-s-nen, P., Salminen, J., Wilson, A. J., Aunio, P., & Dehaene, S. (2009). Computer-assisted intervention for children with low numeracy skills. Cognitive Development, 24, 450-472.
56. Rock, J. L., Courtney, R., & Handwerk, P. G. (2009). Supplementing a traditional math curriculum with an inquiry-based program:Apilot ofMathOut of theBox. [ETSResearchReport RR-09-17]. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
57. Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1986). Meta-analytic procedures for combining studies with multiple effects sizes. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 400-406.
58. Rutter, C. M., & Gatsonis, C. A. (2001). A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations. Statistics in Medicine, 20, 2865-2884. (Pubitemid 32923212)
59. Schoppek, W., & Tulis, M. (2010). Enhancing arithmetic and word-problem solving skills efficiently by individualized computer-assisted practice. Journal of Educational Research, 103, 239-252.
60. Shin, N., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2006). Effects of handheld games on students learning in mathematics. In S. A. Barab, K. E. Hay, & D. T. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Bloomington 2006 (pp. 702-708). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. Siegler, R. S.,&Ramani, G. B. (2008). Playing linear numerical board games promotes low-income children's numerical development. Developmental Science, 11, 655-661.
62. Siegler, R. S., & Ramani, G. B. (2009). Playing linear number board games -but not circular ones -improves low-income preschoolers' numerical understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 545-560.
63. Slavin, R. E. (1986). Best-evidence synthesis: An alternative to meta-analytic and traditional reviews. Educational Researcher, 15, 5-11.
64. Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., & Groff, C. (2009). Effective programs in middle and high school mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 79, 839-911.
65. Tournaki, N. (2003). The differential effects of teaching addition through strategy instruction versus drill and practice to students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 449-458. (Pubitemid 37180479)
66. van Luit, J. E. H., & Schopman, E. A. M. (2000). Improving early numeracy of young children with special educational needs. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 27-40.
67. von Aster, M., Schweiter, M., & Weinhold-Zulauf, M. (2007). Rechenstörungen bei Kindern: Vorl-ufer, Pr-valenz und psychische Symptome [Developmental dyscalculia: Precursors, prevalence, and comorbidity]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und P-dagogische Psychologie, 39, 85-96.
68. What Works Clearinghouse. (September 2011). WWC Procedures and Standards Handbook (Version 2.1). Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/reference- resources/ wwc-procedures-v2-1-standards-handbook.pdf
69. Wijekumar, K., Hitchcock, J., Turner, H., Lei, P., & Peck, K. (2009). A multisite cluster randomized trial of the effects of CompassLearning Odyssey-Math on the math achievement of selected grade 4 students in the mid-Atlantic region (NCEE 2009-4068). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.
70. Wilson, A. J., Dehaene, S., Dubois, O., & Fayol, M. (2009). Effects of an adaptive game intervention on accessing number sense in low-socioeconomic-status kindergarten children. Mind, Brain, and Education, 3, 224-234.
71. Witzel, B. S., Mercer, C. D., & Millder, M. D. (2003). Teaching algebra to students with learning difficulties: An investigation of an explicit instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 121-131. (Pubitemid 37555656)
72. Woodward, J.,&Brown, C. (2006). Meeting the curricular needs of academically low-achieving students in middle grade mathematics. The Journal of Special Education, 40, 151-159. (Pubitemid 44747089)
73. World Health Organization. (1992/2007). International statistical classification of disease and related health problems. Tenth Revision (ICD-10, Version 2007). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
74. Wortman, P. M., & Bryant, F. B. (1985). School desegregation and Black achievement: An integrative review. Sociological Methods and Research, 13, 289-324.
75. Xin, P. X., & Jitendra, A. K. (1999). The effects of instruction in solving mathematical word problems for students with learning problems: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Special Education, 32, 207-225.
76. Yang, D.-C., & Wu, W.-R. (2010). The study of number sense: Realistic activities integrated into third-grade math classes in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Research, 103, 379-392.
77. Ysseldyke, J., & Tardrew, S. (2007). Use of a progress monitoring system to enable teachers to differentiate mathematics instruction. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 24, 1-28.