Stabilizing selection, purifying selection, and mutational bias in finite populations

Genetics

Volumn 194, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 955-971

  Charlesworth, Brian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CODON USAGE; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC TRAIT; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NONHUMAN; POPULATION SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; DELETION MUTANT; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC STABILITY; HUMAN; MUTATION; MUTATION RATE; MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; PURIFYING SELECTION;

EID: 84881067085     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 19432631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.113.151555     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Agashe, D., N. C. Martinez-Gomez, D. A. Drummond, and C. J. Marx, 2013 Good codons, bad transcript: large reductions in gene expression and fitness arising from synonymous mutations in a key enzyme. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30: 549-560.
2. Akashi, H., 1995 Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA. Genetics 139: 1067-1076
3. Akashi, H., 1996 Molecular evolution between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: reduced codon bias, faster rates of amino-acid substitution, and larger proteins in D. melanogaster. Genetics 144: 1297-1307.
4. Akashi, H., 1999 Inferring the fitness effects of DNA polymorphisms and divergence data: statistical power to detect directional selection under stationarity and free recombination. Genetics 151: 221-238.
5. Barton, N. H., 1986 The maintenance of polygenic variation through a balance between mutation and stabilizing selection. Genet. Res. 47: 209-216.
6. Barton, N. H., 1989 The divergence of a polygenic system subject to stabilizing selection and drift. Genet. Res. 54: 59-77.
7. Bulmer, M. G., 1991 The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonomous codon usage. Genetics 129: 897-907.
8. Bumpus, H. C., 1899 The elimination of the unfit as illustrated by the introduced sparrow, Passer domesticus. Biol. Lectures Woods Hole Marine Biol. Station 6: 209-226.
9. Bürger, R., 2000 The Mathematical Theory of Selection, Recombination and Mutation, Wiley, Chichester, UK.
10. Bürger, R., and R. Lande, 1994 On the distribution of the mean and variance of a quantitative trait under mutation-selectiondrift balance. Genetics 138: 901-912.
11. Campbell, R. B., 1984 The manifestation of phenotypic evolution at constituent loci. I. Stabilizing selection. Evolution 38: 1033- 1038.
12. Cavalier-Smith, T., 1985 Eukaryote gene numbers, non-coding DNA and genome size, pp. 69-103 in The Evolution of Genome Size, edited by T. Cavalier-Smith. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
13. Charlesworth, B., 1990 Mutation-selection balance and the evolutionary advantage of sex and recombination. Genet. Res. 55: 199-221.
14. Charlesworth, B., 2013 Why we are not dead 100 times over. Evolution. (in press).
15. Charlesworth, B., and D. Charlesworth, 2010 Elements of Evolutionary Genetics. Roberts, Greenwood Village, CO.
16. Charlesworth, B., A. J. Betancourt, V. B. Kaiser, and I. Gordo, 2010 Genetic recombination and molecular evolution. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 74: 177-186.
17. Cherry, J. L., 1998 Should we expect substitution rate to depend on population size? Genetics 150: 911-919.
18. Comeron, J. M., and M. Kreitman, 2000 The correlation between intron length and recombination in Drosophila: equilibrium between mutational and selective forces. Genetics 156: 1175- 1190.
19. Comeron, J. M., and T. B. Guthrie, 2005 Intragenic Hill-Robertson interference influences selection on synonymous mutations in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22: 2519-2530.
20. Cutter, A. D., and B. Charlesworth, 2006 Selection intensity on preferred codons correlates with overall codon usage bias in Caenorhabitis remanei. Curr. Biol. 16: 2053-2057.
21. Di Cesnola, A. P., 1907 A first study of natural selection in Helix arbustorum (Helicogena). Biometrika 5: 387-399.
22. Dolgin, E. S., and B. Charlesworth, 2006 The fate of transposable elements in asexual populations. Genetics 174: 817-827.
23. Ewens, W. J., 2004 Mathematical Population Genetics. 1. Theoretical Introduction. Springer, New York.
24. Eyre-Walker, A., and P. D. Keightley, 2009 Estimating the rate of adaptive mutations in the presence of slightly deleterious mutations and population size change. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26: 2097- 2108.
25. Feldman, M. W., F. B. Christiansen, and L. D. Brooks, 1980 Evolution of recombination in a constant environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77: 4824-4827.
26. Fisher, R. A., 1930a The distribution of gene ratios for rare mutations. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. 50: 205-220.
27. Fisher, R. A., 1930b The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
28. Fretwell, S. D., and H. J. Lucas, 1970 On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheor. 19: 16-36.
29. Galtier, N., E. Bazin, and N. Bierne, 2006 GC-biased segregation of non-coding polymorphisms in Drosophila. Genetics 172: 221- 228.
30. Haag-Liautard, C., M. Dorris, X. Maside, S. Macaskill, D. L. Halligan et al., 2007 Direct estimation of per nucleotide and genomic deleterious mutation rates in Drosophila. Nature 445: 82-85.
31. Haldane, J. B. S., 1954 The measurement of natural selection. Caryologia 6 (Suppl.): 480-487.
32. Harrison, R. J., and B. Charlesworth, 2011 Biased gene conversion affects patterns of codon usage and amino acid usage in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto group of yeasts. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28: 117-129.
33. Hartl, D. L., E. N. Moriyama, and S. A. Sawyer, 1994 Selection intensity for codon bias. Genetics 138: 227-234.
34. Hershberg, R., and D. A. Petrov, 2008 Selection on codon bias. Annu. Rev. Genet. 42: 287-299.
35. Hu, T. T., P. Pattyn, E. G. Bakker, J. Cao, J.-F. Cheng et al., 2011 The Arabidopsis lyrata genome sequence and the basis of rapid genome size change. Nat. Genet. 43: 476-483.
36. Johnson, T., 1999 Beneficial mutations, hitchhiking and the evolution of mutation rates in sexual populations. Genetics 151: 1621-1631.
37. Keightley, P. D., and A. Eyre-Walker, 2007 Joint inference of the distribution of fitness effects of deleterious mutations and population demography based on nucleotide polymorphism frequencies. Genetics 177: 2251-2261.
38. Keightley, P. D., M. Trivedi, M. Thomson, F. Oliver, S. Kumar et al., 2009 Analysis of the genome sequences of three Drosophila melanogaster spontaneous mutation accumulation lines. Genome Res. 19: 1195-1201.
39. Kimura, M., 1981 Possibility of extensive neutral evolution under stabilizing selection with special reference to non-random usage of synonymous codons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78: 454-458.
40. Kimura, M., 1983 The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
41. Kimura, M., and T. Maruyama, 1966 The mutational load with epistatic gene interactions in fitness. Genetics 54: 1303-1312.
42. Kingsolver, J. G., H. E. Hoekstra, J. M. Hoekstra, D. Berrigan, S. N. Vignieri et al., 2001 The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157: 245-261.
43. Kondrashov, A. S., 1982 Selection against harmful mutations in large sexual and asexual populations. Genet. Res. 44: 325-332.
44. Kondrashov, A. S., 1984 Deleterious mutations as an evolutionary factor. 1. The advantage of recombination. Genet. Res. 44: 199- 217.
45. Kondrashov, A. S., 1988 Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction. Nature 336: 435-440.
46. Kondrashov, A. S., 1995 Contamination of the genome by very slightly deleterious mutations: Why have we not died 100 times over? J. Theor. Biol. 175: 583-594.
47. Kondrashov, F. A., A. Y. Ogurtsov, and A. S. Kondrashov, 2006 Selection in favor of nucleotides G and C diversifies evolution rates and levels of polymorphism at mammalian synonymous sites. J. Theor. Biol. 240: 616-626.
48. Lande, R., 1976 Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution 30: 314-334.
49. Leushkin, E. V., G. A. Bazykin, and A. S. Kondrashov, 2013 Strong mutational bias towards deletions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome is compensated by selection. Genome Biol. Evol. 5: 514-524.
50. Li, W.-H., 1987 Models of nearly neutral mutations with particular implications for non-random usage of synonymous codons. J. Mol. Evol. 24: 337-345.
51. Lynch, M., 2002 Intron evolution as a population-genetic process. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 6118-6123.
52. Lynch, M., 2007 The Origins of Genome Architecture. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
53. Lynch, M., 2011 The lower bound to the evolution of mutation rates. Genome Biol. Evol. 3: 1107-1118.
54. McVean, G. A. T., and B. Charlesworth, 1999 A population genetic model for the evolution of synonymous codon usage: patterns and predictions. Genet. Res. 74: 145-158.
55. Misra, S., M. A. Crosby, C. J. Mungall, B. B. Matthews, K. S. Campbell et al., 2002 AnnotationoftheDrosophila melanogaster euchromatic genome: a systematic review. Gen. Biol. 3: Research0083.
56. Ohta, T., and M. Kimura, 1973 A model of mutation appropriate to estimate the number of electrophoretically detectable alleles in a finite population. Genet. Res. 22: 201-204.
57. Ometto, L., W. Stephan, and D. De Lorenzo, 2005 Insertion/deletion and nucleotide polymorphism reveal constraints in Drosophila melanogaster introns and intergenic regions. Genetics 169: 1521-1527.
58. Pagel, M., and R. A. Johnstone, 1992 Variation across species in the size of the nuclear genome supports the junk-DNA explanation for the C-value paradox. Proc. Biol. Sci. 249: 119-124.
59. Parsch, J., 2003 Selective constraints on intron evolution in Drosophila. Genetics 165: 1843-1851.
60. Petrov, D. A., and D. L. Hartl, 1998 High rate of DNA loss in the Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis species groups. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15: 1562-1567.
61. Petrov, D. A., E. R. Lozovskaya, and D. L. Hartl, 1996 High rate of DNA loss in Drosophila. Nature 384: 346-349.
62. Plotkin, J. B., and G. Kudla, 2011 Synonymous but not the same: the causes and consequencs of codon bias. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12: 33-42.
63. Presgraves, D., 2006 Intron length evolution in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23: 2203-2213.
64. Press, W. H., S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, 1992 Numerical Recipes in Fortran: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
65. Ptak, S. E., and D. A. Petrov, 2002 How intron splicing affects the deletion and insertion profile in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 162: 1233-1244.
66. Qian, W., J.-R. Yang, N. M. Pearson, C. Maclean, and J. Zhang, 2012 Balanced codon usage optimizes translational efficiency. PLoS Genet. 8: e1002603.
67. Qiu, S., K. Zeng, T. Slotte, S. I. Wright, and D. Charlesworth, 2011 Reduced efficacy of natural selection on codon usage bias in selfing Arabidopsis and Capsella species. Genome Biol. Evol. 3: 868-880.
68. Schaeffer, S. W., 2002 Molecular population genetics of sequence length diversity in the Adh region of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genet. Res. 80: 163-175.
69. Sharp, P. M., E. Bailes, R. J. Grocock, J. F. Peden, and R. E. Sockett, 2005 Variation in the strength of selected codon usage bias among bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 33: 1141-1153.
70. Sharp, P. M., L. R. Emery, and K. Zeng, 2010 Forces that influence the evolution of codon bias. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 365: 1203-1212.
71. Slatkin, M., 1995 A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 139: 457-462.
72. Sung, W., M. S. Ackerman, S. F. Miller, T. G. Doag, and M. Lynch, 2012 Drift-barrier hypothesis and mutation-rate evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: 18488-18492.
73. Turelli, M., 1984 Heritable variation via mutation-selection balance: Lerch's zeta meets the abdominal bristle. Theor. Popul. Biol. 25: 138-193.
74. Wang, D. P., and J. Yu, 2011 Both size and GC-content of mimimal introns are selected in human populations. PLoS ONE 6: e17945.
75. Waxman, D., and J. R. Peck, 2003 The anomalous effects of biased mutation. Genetics 164: 1615-1626.
76. Weldon, W. F. R., 1901 A first study of natural selection in Clausilia laminata (Montagu). Biometrika 1: 109-124.
77. Wright, S., 1931 Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97-159.
78. Wright, S., 1935 Evolution in populations in approximate equilibrium. J. Genet. 30: 257-266.
79. Zeng, K., 2010 A simple multiallele model and its application to identifying preferred-unpreferred codons using polymorphism data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27: 1327-1337.
80. Zeng, K., and B. Charlesworth, 2009 Estimating selection intensity on synonymous codon usage in a non-equilibrium population. Genetics 183: 651-662.
81. Zhang, X.-S., and W. G. Hill, 2008 The anomalous effects of biased mutation: mean-optimum deviation and apparent directional selection under stabilizing selection. Genetics 179: 1135-1141.
82. Tajima, F., 1983. Evolutionary relationship of DNA equences in a finite population. Genetics 23 28-64.