The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self- and collective efficacy: Evidence for discontinuity

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 87, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 549-556

  Chen, Gilad ^a   Bliese, Paul D ^b  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b WALTER REED ARMY INSTITUTE OF RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036626079     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.549     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
2. Bliese, P. D. (1998). Group size, ICC values, and group-level correlations: A simulation. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 355-373.
3. Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analyses. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349-381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Bliese. P. D. (2002). Multilevel random coefficient modeling in organizational research: Examples using SAS and S-PLUS. In F. Drasgow & N. Schmitt (Eds.), Measuring and analyzing behavior in organizations: Advances in measurement and data analysis (pp. 401-445). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Bliese, P. D., & Castro, C. A. (2000). Role clarity, work overload and organizational support: Multilevel evidence of the importance of support. Work and Stress, 14. 65-73.
6. Bliese, P. D., Thomas, J. L., Ritzer, D., & Jex, S. M. (2001, April). Supervisory support and stressor-commitment relations: A multi-level investigation. Paper presented at the 16th annual meeting of Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.
7. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, G. D., & Klesh, J. (1983). Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire. In S. E. Seashore, E. E. Lawler, P. H. Mirvis. & C. Cammann (Eds.), Assessing organizational change: A guide to methods, measures, and practice (pp. 71-138). New York: Wiley-Interscience.
9. Chen, G., Gully, S. M., Whiteman, J. A., & Kilcullen, R. N. (2000). Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 835-847.
10. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analyses for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Day. D. V., & Lord, R. G. (1988). Executive leadership and organizational performance: Suggestions for a new theory methodology. Journal of Management, 14, 453-464.
12. Derogatis. L. R. (1993). Brief Symptom Inventory administration, scoring and procedures manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
13. Derogatis. L. R., & Melisaratos, N. (1983). The Brief Symptom Inventory: An introductory report. Psychological Medicine, 13, 596-605.
14. Drazin, R., Glynn, M. A.. & Kazanjian, R. K. (1999). Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24, 286-307.
15. Eden, D. (1992). Leadership and expectations: Pygmalion effects and other self-fulfilling prophecies in organizations. Leadership Quarterly, 3, 271-305.
16. Griffin, M. A., & Mathieu, J. E. (1997). Modeling organizational processes across hierarchical levels: Climate, leadership and group processes in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 731-744.
17. Gully, S. M., Beaubien, J. M., Incalaterra, K. A., & Joshi, A. (in press). A meta-analytic investigation of team efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and levels of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology.
18. Guzzo, R. A., Yost, P. R., Campbell, R. J., & Shea, G. P. (1993). Polency in groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 87-106.
19. Hackman, J. R., & Walton, R. E. (1986). Leading groups in organizations. In P. S. Goodman & Associates (Eds.), Designing effective work groups (pp. 72-119). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20. House, R., Rousseau, D. M., & Thomas-Hunt, M. (1995). The meso paradigm: A framework for the integration of micro and macro organizational behavior. In L. L. Cummings, & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 17, pp. 71-114). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
21. Jacobs, T. O., & McGee, M. L. (2001). Competitive advantage: Conceptual imperatives for executives. In S. J. Zaccaro & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), The nature of organizational leadership: Understanding the performance imperatives confronting today's leaders (pp. 42-78). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22. James. L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology. 69, 85-98.
23. Jex, S. M., & Bliese, P. D. (1999). Efficacy beliefs as a moderator of the impact of work-related stressors: A multilevel study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 349-361.
24. Jones, G. R. (1986). Socialization tactics, self-efficacy, and newcomer adjustments to organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 262-279.
25. Katz. D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
26. Kenny. D. A., Kashy, D. A, & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 233-265). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
27. King, L. A., & King, D. W. (1990). Role conflict and role ambiguity: A critical assessment of construct validity. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 48-64.
28. Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 58-74.
29. Kirkpatrick, S. A., & Locke. E. A. (1996). Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 36-51.
30. Kozlowski, S. W. J, & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3-90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31. Lindsley. D. H., Brass, D. J., & Thomas, J. B. (1995). Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 20, 645-678.
32. Marlowe, D. H. (1986). New manning system field evaluation (Tech. Rep. No. 1, DTIC #ADA 162087). Washington, DC: Walter Reed Army Institute of Research.
33. Martocchio, J. J., & Judge, T. A. (1997). Relationships between conscientiousness and learning in employee training: Mediating influences of self-deception and self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 764-773.
34. Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS, New York: Springer-Verlag.
35. Prussia, G. E., & Kinicki, A. J. (1996). A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory. Journal of Applied Psychology. 81, 187-198.
36. Saks, A. M. (1995). Longitudinal field investigation of the moderating and mediating effects of self-efficacy on the relationship between training and newcomer adjustment. Journal of Applied Psychology; 80, 211 -225.
37. Settoon, R. P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R. C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 219-227.
38. Shamir, B., Zakay, E., Breinin, E., & Popper, M. (1998). Correlates of charismatic leader behavior in military units: Subordinates' attitudes, unit characteristics, and superior appraisals of leader performance. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 387-409.
39. Snijders. T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
40. Sosik, J. J., Avolio, B. J., & Kahai, S. S. (1997). Effects of leadership style and anonymity on group potency and effectiveness in a group decision support system environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 89-103.
41. Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240-261.
42. Tesluk. P. E., & Jacobs, R. R. (1998). Toward an integrated model of work experience. Personnel Psychology, 51, 321-355.
43. Yukl. G. (1994). Leadership in organizations (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
44. Zaccaro, S. J., Blair, V., Peterson, C., & Zazanis, M. (1995). Collective efficacy. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp. 305-328). New York: Plenum Press.
45. Zaccaro, S. J., & Marks, M. A. (1999). The roles of leaders in high-performance teams. In E. Sundstrom & Associates (Eds.), Supporting work team effectiveness: Best management practices for fostering high performance (pp. 95-125). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.