Contextual determinants of ambidextrous learning: Evidence from industrial firms in four industrialized countries

IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 529-540

  Lee, Cheng Yu ^a   Wu, Hsueh Liang ^b   Liu, Chia Yi ^b  

^a SOUTHERN TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Ambidextrous learning; configurational perspective; exploitative learning; exploratory learning; performance implication

Indexed keywords

AMBIDEXTROUS LEARNING; CONFIGURATIONAL PERSPECTIVE; EXPLOITATIVE LEARNING; EXPLORATORY LEARNING; PERFORMANCE IMPLICATION;

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING; ENGINEERING;

INDUSTRY;

EID: 84880918543     PISSN: 00189391     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2012.2228204     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. W. J. Abernathy and K. B. Clark, "Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction," Res. Policy, vol. 14, pp. 3-22, 1985.
2. P. Adler, B. Goldoftas, and D. Levine, "Flexibility versus efficiency: A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system," Organ. Sci. , vol. 10, pp. 43-68, 1999.
3. L. S. Aiken and S. G. West, Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1991.
4. D. G. Ancona, P. S. Goodman, B. S. Lawrence, and M. L. Tushman, "Time: A new research lens," Acad. Manage. Rev. , vol. 26, pp. 645-663, 2001.
5. P. Anderson andM. Tushman, "Organizational environments and industry exit: The effects of uncertainty, munificence and complexity," Ind. Corp. Change, vol. 10, pp. 675-711, 2001.
6. L. Argote, Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring. Norwell, MA: Kluwer, 1999.
7. C. Argyris and D. A. Schon, Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1978.
8. A. Arundel and I. Kabla, "What percentage of innovations are patented? Empirical estimates for European firms," Res. Policy, vol. 27, pp. 127-141, 1998. (Pubitemid 128431009)
9. K. Atuahene-Gima and Y. J. Murray, "Exploratory learning and exploitative learning in new product development: A social capital perspective on new technology ventures in China," J. Int. Market. , vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1-29, 2007.
10. D. D. Baker and J. B. Cullen, "Administrative reorganization and configurational context: The contingent effects of age, size, and change in size," Acad. Manage. J. , vol. 36, pp. 1251-1277, 1993.
11. V. L. Barker and G. C. Muller, "CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending," Manage. Sci. , vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 782-801, 2002. (Pubitemid 34799261)
12. M. J. Benner and M. L. Tushman, "Processmanagement and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries," Admin. Sci. Quart. , vol. 47, pp. 676-706, 2002.
13. M. J. Benner and M. L. Tushman, "Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited," Acad. Manage. Rev. , vol. 28, pp. 238-256, 2003. (Pubitemid 36446326)
14. J. Birkinshaw and C. B. Gibson, "Building ambidexterity into an organization," MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. , vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 47-55, 2004. (Pubitemid 39047110)
15. P. Blau and R. Schoenherr, The Structure of Organizations. NewYork: Basic Books, 1971.
16. L. J. Bourgeois, "Strategy and environment: A conceptual integration," Acad. Manage. Rev. , vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 25-39, 1980.
17. R. A. Burgelman, "Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in," Admin. Sci. Quart. , vol. 47, pp. 325-357, 2002.
18. R. A. Burgelman and A. S. Grove, "Let chaos reign, then reign in chaosrepeatedly: Managing strategic dynamics for corporate longevity," Strategic Manage. J. , vol. 28, pp. 965-979, 2007.
19. Q. Cao, E. Gedajlovic, and H. Zhang, "Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects," Organ Sci. , vol. 20, pp. 781-796, 2009.
20. A. D. Chandler, "The enduring logic of industrial success," Harvard Bus. Rev. , vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 130-140, 1990.
21. M. Chen and D. Hambrick, "Speed, stealth, and selective attack: How small firms differ from large firms in competitive behavior," Acad. Manage. J. , vol. 38, pp. 453-482, 1995.
22. C. M. Christensen, The Innovators Dilemma: When New Technologies CauseGreat Firms to Fail. Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press, 1997.
23. CIA, The World Factbook. Washington, DC: CIA, 2003.
24. J. Cohen and P. Cohen, Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analyses for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1987.
25. L. Cronbach, "Statistical tests for moderator variables: Flaws in analyses recently proposed," Psychol. Bull. , vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 414-417, 1987.
26. F. Damanpour, "Organizational complexity and innovation: Developing and testing multiple contingency models," Manage. Sci. , vol. 42, pp. 693- 716, 1996. (Pubitemid 126611824)
27. A. L. Darrow and D. R. Kahl, "A comparison of moderated regression techniques considering strength of effect," J. Manage. , vol. 8, pp. 35-47, 1982.
28. M. De Visser, P. de Weerd-Nederhof, D. Faems, M. Song, B. van Looy, and K. Visscher, "Structural ambidexterity in NPD processes: A firm-level assessment of the impact of differentiated structures on innovation performance," Technovation, vol. 30, no. 5/6, pp. 291-299, 2010.
29. G. G. Dess and D. W. Beard, "Dimensions of organizational task environments," Admin. Sci. Quart. , vol. 29, pp. 52-73, 1984.
30. G. Dosi, "Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation," J. Econ. Lit. , vol. 26, pp. 1120-1171, 1988.
31. R. Duncan, "The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation," in TheManagement of Organizational Design, R. Kilman and L. Pondy, Eds. New York: North Holland, 1976, pp. 167-188.
32. J. J. Ebben and A. C. Johnson, "Efficiency, flexibility, or both? Evidence linking strategy to performance in small firms," Strategic Manage. J. , vol. 26, pp. 1249-1259, 2005. (Pubitemid 41655080)
33. L. Fleming and O. Sorenson, "Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data," Res. Policy, vol. 30, pp. 1019-1039, 2001. (Pubitemid 33678424)
34. S. Floyd and P. Lane, "Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal," Acad. Manage. Rev. , vol. 25, pp. 154- 177, 2000.
35. S. W. Geiger and M. Makri, "Exploration and exploitation innovation processes: The role of organizational slack in R&D intensive firms," J. High Technol. Manage. Res. , vol. 17, pp. 97-108, 2006. (Pubitemid 44026464)
36. A. Genus and A. Coles, "Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions," Res. Policy, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1436-1445, 2008.
37. G. George, R. Kotha, and Y. Zheng, "Entry into insular domains: A longitudinal study of knowledge structuration and innovation in biotechnology firms," J. Manage. Stud. , vol. 45, pp. 1448-1474, 2008.
38. S. Ghoshal and C. A. Bartlett, "Changing the role of top management: Beyond strategy to purpose," Harvard Bus. Rev. , vol. 72, pp. 79-88, 1994.
39. C. B. Gibson and B. J. Birkinshaw, "The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity," Acad. Manage. J. , vol. 47, pp. 209-226, 2004. (Pubitemid 38845937)
40. S. Gopalakrishnan and P. Bierly, "The impact of firm size and age on knowledge strategies during product development: A study of the drug delivery industry," IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. , vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 3-16, Feb. 2006. (Pubitemid 43174060)
41. V. Govindarajan and C. Trimble, The Other Side of Innovation: Solving the Execution Challenge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2010.
42. R. Greenwood and R. Suddaby, "Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms," Acad. Manage. J. , vol. 49, pp. 27- 48, 2006. (Pubitemid 43726577)
43. A. K. Gupta, K. G. Smith, and C. E. Shalley, "The interplay between exploration and exploitation," Acad. Manage. J. , vol. 49, pp. 693-706, 2006. (Pubitemid 44453114)
44. J. P. Guthrie and D. K. Datta, "Dumb and dumber: The impact of downsizing on firm performance as moderated by industry conditions," Organ. Sci. , vol. 19, pp. 108-123, 2008.
45. H. Haveman, "Organization size and change:Diversification in the savings and loan industry after deregulation," Admin. Sci. Quart. , vol. 38, pp. 20- 50, 1993.
46. Z. L. He and P. K. Wong, "Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis," Organ. Sci. , vol. 15, pp. 481-494, 2004.
47. G. Hedlund and J. Ridderstrale, "Toward a theory of the self-renewing MNC," in International Business: An Emerging Vision, B. Toyne and D. Nigh, Eds. Columbia, SC:Univ. SouthCarolina Press, 1997, pp. 329- 353.
48. K. M. Hmieleski and R. A. Baron, "Entrepreneurs' optimism and new venture performance: A social cognitive perspective," Acad. Manage. J. , vol. 52, pp. 473-488, 2009.
49. J. Henderson and K. Cool, "Corporate governance, investment bandwagons and overcapacity: An analysis of the worldwide petrochemical industry 1975-95," Strategic Manage. J. , vol. 24, pp. 349-373, 2003.
50. Y. Inoue and S. Lee, "Effects of different dimensions of corporate social responsibility on corporate financial performance in tourism-related industries," Tourism Manage. , vol. 32, pp. 790-804, 2011.
51. R. D. Ireland and J. W. Webb, "Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating competitive advantage through streams of innovation," Bus. Horiz. , vol. 50, pp. 49-59, 2007. (Pubitemid 44932847)
52. J. Jansen, F. van den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda, "Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators," Manage. Sci. , vol. 52, pp. 1661-1674, 2006. (Pubitemid 44706074)
53. R. Katila, "New product search over time: Past ideas in their prime?" Acad. Manage. J. , vol. 45, pp. 995-1010, 2002.
54. R. Katila and G. Ahuja, "Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction," Acad. Manage. J. , vol. 45, pp. 1183-1194, 2002. (Pubitemid 36116692)
55. D. J. Ketchen, J. B. Thomas, and C. C. Snow, "Organizational configurations and performance: A comparison of theoretical approaches," Acad. Manage. J. , vol. 36, pp. 1278-1313, 1993.
56. K. Kuwada, "Strategic learning: The continuous side of discontinuous strategic change," Organ. Sci. , vol. 9, pp. 719-736, 1998. (Pubitemid 128501000)
57. K. Kyriakopoulos and C. Moorman, "Tradeoffs in marketing exploitation strategies: The overlooked role of market orientation," Int. J. Res. Market. , vol. 21, pp. 219-240, 2004. (Pubitemid 40350412)
58. K. Laursen, M. Leone, and S. Torrisi, "Technological exploration through licensing: New insights from the licensee's point of view," Ind. Corp. Change, vol. 19, pp. 871-897, 2010.
59. C. Y. Lee, M. C. Wang, and J. C. Lin, "The effects of a focal firm's internal and external boundary conditions on the performance implication of R&D alliance participation," in Proc. IEEE Int. Technol. Manage. Conf. , 2011, pp. 575-586.
60. D. Leonard-Barton, "Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development," Strategic Manage. J. , vol. 13, pp. 111-125, 1992.
61. D. A. Levinthal and J. G. March, "The myopia of learning," Strategic Manage. J. , vol. 14, pp. 95-112, 1993.
62. A. Y. Lewin, C. P. Long, and T. N. Carroll, "The coevolution of new organizational forms," Organ. Sci. , vol. 10, pp. 535-550, 1999.
63. S. Liao and T. Hu, "Knowledge transfer and competitive advantage on environmental uncertainty: An empirical study of the Taiwan semiconductor industry," Technovation, vol. 27, pp. 402-411, 2007. (Pubitemid 46710164)
64. Z. Lin, H. Yang, and I. Demirkan, "The performance consequences of ambidexterity in strategic alliance formations: Empirical investigation and computational theorizing," Manage. Sci. , vol. 53, pp. 1645-1658, 2007. (Pubitemid 351159587)
65. M. H. Lubatkin, Z. Simsek, Y. Ling, and J. F. Veiga, "Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration," J. Manage. , vol. 32, pp. 646-672, 2006. (Pubitemid 44349935)
66. J. March, "Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning," Organ. Sci. , vol. 2, pp. 71-87, 1991.
67. D. Miller, "The generic strategy trap," J. Bus. Strategy, vol. 13, pp. 37-41, 1992.
68. H. Mintzberg, B. Ahlstrand, and J. Lampel, Strategy Safari. NewYork: Free Press, 1998.
69. R. Morck and M. Nakamura, "Banks and corporate control in Japan," J. Finance, vol. 54, pp. 319-339, 1999.
70. N. Nohria and R. Gulati, "Is slack good or bad for innovation?" Acad. Manage. J. , vol. 38, pp. 1245-1264, 1996.
71. C. A. O'Reilly, J. B. Harreld, and M. L. Tushman, "Organizational ambidexterity: IBM and emerging business opportunities," Calif. Manage. Rev. , vol. 50, pp. 75-99, 2009.
72. C. C. Phelps, "A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation," Acad. Manage. J. , vol. 53, pp. 890-913, 2010.
73. M. E. Porter, Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press, 1980.
74. M. E. Porter, Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press, 1985.
75. W. W. Powell, K. W. Koput, and L. Smith-Doerr, "Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology," Admin. Sci. Quart. , vol. 41, pp. 116-145, 1996.
76. C. K. Prahalad and G. Hamel, "The core competence of the corporation," Harvard Bus. Rev. , vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 79-91, 1990.
77. S. Raisch and J. Birkinshaw, "Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators," J. Manage. , vol. 34, pp. 375-409, 2008.
78. P. Roberts and C. Berry, "Entering new businesses: Selecting strategies for success," MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. , vol. 26, pp. 3-17, 1985. (Pubitemid 15547117)
79. F. T. Rothaermel and M. T. Alexandre, "Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: Themoderating role of absorptive capacity," Organ. Sci. , vol. 20, pp. 759-780, 2009.
80. S. Samila and O. Sorenson, "Venture capital as a catalyst to commercialization," Res. Policy, vol. 39, pp. 1348-1360, 2010.
81. J. A. Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. NewYork: Harper, 1942.
82. C. Shapiro and H. R. Varian, Information Rules. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1998.
83. M. P. Sharfman and J. W. Dean, "Conceptualizing and measuring the organizational environment: A multidimensional approach," J. Manage. , vol. 17, pp. 681-700, 1991.
84. R. Simerly and M. Li, "Environmental dynamism, capital structure and performance: A theoretical integration and an empirical test," Strategic Manage. J. , vol. 21, pp. 141-154, 2000.
85. B. L. Simonin, "The importance of collaborative know-how: An empirical test of the learning organization," Acad. Manage. J. , vol. 40, pp. 1150- 1174, 1997.
86. J. V. Singh, "Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making," Acad. Manage. J. , vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 562-585, 1986.
87. J. Tan and M. W. Peng, "Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: Two studies from an emerging economy," Strategic Manage. J. , vol. 24, pp. 1249-1263, 2003.
88. D. Teece, G. Pisano, and A. Shuen, "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Manage. J. , vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 509-533, 1997. (Pubitemid 127467809)
89. M. L. Tushman and C. O'Reilly, "Ambidextrous organizations:Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change," Calif. Manage. Rev. , vol. 38, pp. 8-30, 1996.
90. J. Uotila, M. Maula, T. Keil, and S. Zahra, "Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: Analysis of S&P 500 corporations," Strategic Manage. J. , vol. 30, pp. 221-231, 2009.
91. N. Venkatraman and E. P. John, "Environment strategy coalignment: An empirical test of its performance implications," Strategic Manage. J. , vol. 11, pp. 1-23, 1990.
92. N. Venkatraman, C. H. Lee, and B. Iyer, "Strategic ambidexterity and sales growth: A longitudinal test in the software sector," presented at the Annu. Meet. Academy Manage. , Honolulu, HI, 2007.
93. R. Walker, Patents as Scientific and Technical Literature. New Brunswick, NJ: Scarecrow Press, 1995.
94. B. A. Walters and S. N. Bhuian, "Complexity absorption and performance: A structural analysis of acute-care hospitals," J. Manage. , vol. 30, pp. 97- 121, 2004. (Pubitemid 38148245)
95. H. Wang andW. Chen, "Is firm-specific innovation associated with greater value appropriation? The roles of environmental dynamism and technological diversity," Res. Policy, vol. 39, pp. 141-154, 2010.
96. B. Wernerfelt and C. A. Montgomery, "Tobin's Q and the importance of focus in firm performance," Amer. Econ. Rev. , vol. 78, pp. 246-250, 1988.
97. J. Wiklund and D. Shepherd, "Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach," J. Bus. Venturing, vol. 20, pp. 71-91, 2005. (Pubitemid 39473700)
98. H. L. Wu and C. Y. Lee, "The effects of board competence on operational innovation: Tests of universal, contingency, and configurational models," Int. J. Technol. Manage. , vol. 39, no. 3/4, pp. 330-345, 2007.
99. J. Wu and R. Tu, "CEO stock option pay and R&D spending: A behavioral agency explanation," J. Bus. Res. , vol. 60, pp. 482-492, 2007.