Uniform, optimal signal processing of mapped deep-sequencing data

Nature Biotechnology

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 615-622

  Kumar, Vibhor ^a   Muratani, Masafumi ^a   Rayan, Nirmala Arul ^a   Kraus, Petra ^a,b   Lufkin, Thomas ^a,b   Ng, Huck Hui ^a   Prabhakar, Shyam ^a  

^a GENOME INSTITUTE OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b CLARKSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ESTIMATION ALGORITHM; FUNCTIONAL ANNOTATION; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HISTONE MODIFICATION; INTEGRATIVE ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL FORMALISM; OPTIMAL SIGNAL PROCESSING; SIGNAL PROCESSING THEORY;

ALGORITHMS; SIGNAL DETECTION;

NUCLEIC ACIDS;

CIS ACTING ELEMENT; HISTONE; LYSINE; MESSENGER RNA;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; EMBRYO; FOREBRAIN; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC ALGORITHM; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HISTONE MODIFICATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN DETERMINATION; REGULATORY DNA SEQUENCE; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

ALGORITHMS; BASE SEQUENCE; GENOME; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO;

EID: 84880310432     PISSN: 10870156     EISSN: 15461696     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2596     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Hawkins, R.D., Hon, G.C. & Ren, B. Next-generation genomics: an integrative approach. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 476-486 (2010).
2. Hafner, M. et al. Transcriptome-wide identification of RNA-binding protein and microRNA target sites by PAR-CLIP. Cell 141, 129-141 (2010).
3. Song, L. et al. Open chromatin defined by DNaseI and FAIRE identifies regulatory elements that shape cell-type identity. Genome Res. 21, 1757-1767 (2011).
4. Valouev, A. et al. Genome-wide analysis of transcription factor binding sites based on ChIP-Seq data. Nat. Methods 5, 829-834 (2008).
5. Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).
6. Boyle, A.P., Guinney, J., Crawford, G.E. & Furey, T.S. F-Seq: a feature density estimator for high-throughput sequence tags. Bioinformatics 24, 2537-2538 (2008).
7. Rashid, N.U., Giresi, P.G., Ibrahim, J.G., Sun, W. & Lieb, J.D. ZINBA integrates local covariates with DNA-seq data to identify broad and narrow regions of enrichment, even within amplified genomic regions. Genome Biol. 12, R67 (2011).
8. Lun, D.S., Sherrid, A., Weiner, B., Sherman, D.R. & Galagan, J.E. A blind deconvolution approach to high-resolution mapping of transcription factor binding sites from ChIP-seq data. Genome Biol. 10, R142 (2009).
9. Wilbanks, E.G. & Facciotti, M.T. Evaluation of algorithm performance in ChIP-seq peak detection. PLoS ONE 5, e11471 (2010).
10. Han, Z. et al. A signal processing approach for enriched region detection in RNA polymerase II ChIP-seq data. BMC Bioinformatics 13 (suppl. 2), S2 (2012).
11. Hotelling, H. The generalization of student's ratio. Ann. Math. Stat. 2, 360-378 (1931).
12. Barski, A. et al. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell 129, 823-837 (2007).
13. Ernst, J. et al. Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types. Nature 473, 43-49 (2011).
14. Fejes, A.P. et al. FindPeaks 3.1: a tool for identifying areas of enrichment from massively parallel short-read sequencing technology. Bioinformatics 24, 1729-1730 (2008).
15. Zang, C. et al. A clustering approach for identification of enriched domains from histone modification ChIP-Seq data. Bioinformatics 25, 1952-1958 (2009).
16. Chepelev, I., Wei, G., Tang, Q. & Zhao, K. Detection of single nucleotide variations in expressed exons of the human genome using RNA-Seq. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, e106 (2009).
17. Djebali, S. et al. Landscape of transcription in human cells. Nature 489, 101-108 (2012).
18. Chen, X. et al. Integration of external signaling pathways with the core transcriptional network in embryonic stem cells. Cell 133, 1106-1117 (2008).
19. Johnson, D.S., Mortazavi, A., Myers, R.M. & Wold, B. Genome-wide mapping of in vivo protein-DNA interactions. Science 316, 1497-1502 (2007).
20. Karlic, R., Chung, H.R., Lasserre, J., Vlahovicek, K. & Vingron, M. Histone modification levels are predictive for gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 2926-2931 (2010).
21. Trapnell, C. et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 511-515 (2010).
22. Cheng, C. et al. A statistical framework for modeling gene expression using chromatin features and application to modENCODE datasets. Genome Biol. 12, R15 (2011).
23. Dong, X. et al. Modeling gene expression using chromatin features in various cellular contexts. Genome Biol. 13, R53 (2012).
24. Cheng, C. et al. Understanding transcriptional regulation by integrative analysis of transcription factor binding data. Genome Res. 22, 1658-1667 (2012).
25. Wang, C. et al. Computational inference of mRNA stability from histone modification and transcriptome profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 6414-6423 (2012).
26. Segal, E., Friedman, N., Kaminski, N., Regev, A. & Koller, D. From signatures to models: understanding cancer using microarrays. Nat. Genet. 37, S38-S45 (2005).
27. Wingender, E., Dietze, P., Karas, H. & Knuppel, R. TRANSFAC: a database on transcription factors and their DNA binding sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 238-241 (1996).
28. Sandelin, A., Alkema, W., Engstrom, P., Wasserman, W.W. & Lenhard, B. JASPAR: an open-access database for eukaryotic transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D91-D94 (2004).
29. Shen, Y. et al. A map of the cis-regulatory sequences in the mouse genome. Nature 488, 116-120 (2012).
30. Kawaguchi, A. et al. Nestin-EGFP transgenic mice: visualization of the self-renewal and multipotency of CNS stem cells. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 17, 259-273 (2001).
31. Mikkelsen, T.S. et al. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature 448, 553-560 (2007).
32. Meissner, A. et al. Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated cells. Nature 454, 766-770 (2008).
33. Asp, P. et al. Genome-wide remodeling of the epigenetic landscape during myogenic differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, E149-E158 (2011).
34. Anthoni, H. et al. A locus on 2p12 containing the co-regulated MRPL19 and C2ORF3 genes is associated to dyslexia. Hum. Mol. Genet. 16, 667-677 (2007).
35. Need, A.C. et al. A genome-wide study of common SNPs and CNVs in cognitive performance in the CANTAB. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18, 4650-4661 (2009).
36. Daniel, J.A. et al. PTIP promotes chromatin changes critical for immunoglobulin class switch recombination. Science 329, 917-923 (2010).
37. Mikkelsen, T.S. et al. Comparative epigenomic analysis of murine and human adipogenesis. Cell 143, 156-169 (2010).
38. Wang, H. et al. Genome-wide analysis reveals conserved and divergent features of Notch1/RBPJ binding in human and murine T-lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 14908-14913 (2011).
39. Gammill, L.S. & Bronner-Fraser, M. Neural crest specification: migrating into genomics. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4, 795-805 (2003).
40. McLean, C.Y. et al. GREAT improves functional interpretation of cis-regulatory regions. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 495-501 (2010).
41. Su, X., Kameoka, S., Lentz, S. & Majumder, S. Activation of REST/NRSF target genes in neural stem cells is sufficient to cause neuronal differentiation. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 8018-8025 (2004).
42. Swiss, V.A. & Casaccia, P. Cell-context specific role of the E2F/Rb pathway in development and disease. Glia 58, 377-390 (2010).
43. Ferron, S.R. et al. Telomere shortening in neural stem cells disrupts neuronal differentiation and neuritogenesis. J. Neurosci. 29, 14394-14407 (2009).
44. Hitoshi, S. et al. Notch pathway molecules are essential for the maintenance, but not the generation, of mammalian neural stem cells. Genes Dev. 16, 846-858 (2002).
45. Auerbach, R.K. et al. Mapping accessible chromatin regions using Sono-Seq. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 14926-14931 (2009).
46. Rhee, H.S. & Pugh, B.F. Comprehensive genome-wide protein-DNA interactions detected at single-nucleotide resolution. Cell 147, 1408-1419 (2011).
47. Ochoa-Espinosa, A. & Small, S. Developmental mechanisms and cis-regulatory codes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 16, 165-170 (2006).
48. Caucci, L., Barrett, H.H. & Rodriguez, J.J. Spatio-temporal Hotelling observer for signal detection from image sequences. Opt. Express 17, 10946-10958 (2009).
49. Rissanen, J. Modeling by shortest data description. Automatica 14, 465-471 (1978).
50. Zhao, L.C., Krishnaiah, P.R. & Bai, Z.D. On detection of the number of signals in presence of white noise. J. Multivariate Anal. 20, 1-25 (1986).
51. Guttman, M. et al. Ab initio reconstruction of cell type-specific transcriptomes in mouse reveals the conserved multi-exonic structure of lincRNAs. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 503-510 (2010).
52. Korhonen, J., Martinmaki, P., Pizzi, C., Rastas, P. & Ukkonen, E. MOODS: fast search for position weight matrix matches in DNA sequences. Bioinformatics 25, 3181-3182 (2009).
53. Bailey, T.L. & Elkan, C. Fitting a mixture model by expectation maximization to discover motifs in biopolymers. in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology (AAAI Press, Menlo Park, California, 1994).