A nexus model of the temporal-parietal junction

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 17, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 328-336

  Carter, R McKell ^a   Huettel, Scott A ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HIGHER-ORDER; SOCIAL CONTEXT; SOCIAL FUNCTION;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; BRAIN REGION; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MEMORY; META ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL STATUS; TEMPORAL PARIETAL JUNCTION; TIGHT JUNCTION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PARIETAL LOBE; PHYSIOLOGY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TEMPORAL LOBE;

COGNITION; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVE NET; PARIETAL LOBE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TEMPORAL LOBE;

EID: 84879783096     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.05.007     Document Type: Review

References (92)

1. Wagner A.D., et al. Parietal lobe contributions to episodic memory retrieval. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2005, 9:445-453.
2. Cabeza R., et al. The parietal cortex and episodic memory: an attentional account. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2008, 9:613-625.
3. Vilberg K.L., Rugg M.D. Memory retrieval and the parietal cortex: a review of evidence from a dual-process perspective. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:1787-1799.
4. Arrington C.M., et al. Neural mechanisms of visual attention: object-based selection of a region in space. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2000, 12(Suppl. 2):106-117.
5. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 3:201-215.
6. Serences J.T., et al. Coordination of voluntary and stimulus-driven attentional control in human cortex. Psychol. Sci. 2005, 16:114-122.
7. Kobayashi C., et al. Cultural and linguistic effects on neural bases of 'Theory of Mind' in American and Japanese children. Brain Res. 2007, 1164:95-107.
8. Binder J.R., et al. Where is the semantic system?. A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cereb. Cortex 2009, 19:2767-2796.
9. Goel V., et al. Modeling other minds. Neuroreport 1995, 6:1741-1746.
10. Happé F., et al. 'Theory of mind' in the brain. Evidence from a PET scan study of Asperger syndrome. Neuroreport 1996, 8:197-201.
11. Gallagher H.L., et al. Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of 'theory of mind' in verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38:11-21.
12. Saxe R., Kanwisher N. People thinking about thinking people: the role of the temporo-parietal junction in 'theory of mind'. Neuroimage 2003, 19:1835-1842.
13. Van Overwalle F. Social cognition and the brain: a meta-analysis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2009, 30:829-858.
14. Aichhorn M., et al. Do visual perspective tasks need theory of mind?. Neuroimage 2006, 30:1059-1068.
15. Schultz J., et al. Activation in posterior superior temporal sulcus parallels parameter inducing the percept of animacy. Neuron 2005, 45:625-635.
16. Tankersley D., et al. Altruism is associated with an increased neural response to agency. Nat. Neurosci. 2007, 10:150-151.
17. Mar R.A., et al. Detecting agency from the biological motion of veridical vs animated agents. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2007, 2:199-205.
18. Sabbagh M.A., Taylor M. Neural correlates of theory-of-mind reasoning: an event-related potential study. Psychol. Sci. 2000, 11:46-50.
19. Liu D., et al. Decoupling beliefs from reality in the brain: an ERP study of theory of mind. Neuroreport 2004, 15:991-995.
20. Samson D., et al. Left temporoparietal junction is necessary for representing someone else's belief. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7:499-500.
21. Apperly I.A., et al. Testing the domain-specificity of a theory of mind deficit in brain-injured patients: evidence for consistent performance on non-verbal, 'reality-unknown' false belief and false photograph tasks. Cognition 2007, 103:300-321.
22. Morishima Y., et al. Linking brain structure and activation in temporoparietal junction to explain the neurobiology of human altruism. Neuron 2012, 75:73-79.
23. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Spatial neglect and attention networks. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2011, 34:569-599.
24. Karnath H.-O., Rorden C. The anatomy of spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50:1010-1017.
25. Corbetta M., et al. The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind. Neuron 2008, 58:306-324.
26. Mitchell J.P. Activity in right temporo-parietal junction is not selective for theory-of-mind. Cereb. Cortex 2008, 18:262-271.
27. Cosmides L. Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty. Cognition 1996, 58:1-73.
28. Sanfey A.G., et al. The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. Science 2003, 300:1755-1758.
29. Haley K.J., Fessler D.M. Nobody's watching?. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2005, 26:245-256.
30. Lepper M.R., et al. Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: a test of the 'overjustification' hypothesis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1973, 28:129-137.
31. Deci E.L. Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1971, 18:105-115.
32. Titmuss R.M. The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy 1970, George Allen and Unwin.
33. Mellström C., Johannesson M. Crowding out in blood donation: was Titmuss right?. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 2008, 6:845-863.
34. Gneezy U., Rustichini A. A fine is a price. J. Legal Stud. 2000, 29:1-17.
35. Frey B.S. The cost of price incentives: an empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. Am. Econ. Rev. 1997, 87:746-755.
36. Deci E.L., et al. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychol. Bull. 1999, 125:627-668. discussion 692-700.
37. Frey B.S., Jegen R. Motivation crowding theory. J. Econ. Surv 2001, 15:589-611.
38. Murayama K., et al. Neural basis of the undermining effect of monetary reward on intrinsic motivation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:20911-20916.
39. Dunham Y., et al. Consequences of 'minimal' group affiliations in children. Child Dev. 2011, 82:793-811.
40. Chen Y., Li S.X. Group identity and social preferences. Am. Econ. Rev. 2009, 99:431-457.
41. Bernhard H., et al. Parochial altruism in humans. Nature 2006, 442:912-915.
42. De Dreu C.K.W., et al. The neuropeptide oxytocin regulates parochial altruism in intergroup conflict among humans. Science 2010, 328:1408-1411.
43. Tanis M., Postmes T. A social identity approach to trust: interpersonal perception, group membership and trusting behaviour. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 2005, 35:413-424.
44. Smith D.V., et al. Decoding the anatomical network of spatial attention. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 10.1073/pnas.1210126110.
45. Young L., et al. Disruption of the right temporoparietal junction with transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces the role of beliefs in moral judgments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:6753-6758.
46. Santiesteban I., et al. Enhancing social ability by stimulating right temporoparietal junction. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22:2274-2277.
47. Gallagher H.L., Frith C.D. Functional imaging of 'theory of mind'. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2003, 7:77-83.
48. Carrington S.J., Bailey A.J. Are there theory of mind regions in the brain?. A review of the neuroimaging literature. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2009, 30:2313-2335.
49. Poldrack R.A. Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006, 10:59-63.
50. Poldrack R.A. Inferring mental states from neuroimaging data: from reverse inference to large-scale decoding. Neuron 2011, 72:692-697.
51. Yarkoni T., et al. Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data. Nat. Methods 2011, 8:665-670.
52. Pinsk M.A., et al. Neural representations of faces and body parts in macaque and human cortex: a comparative FMRI study. J. Neurophysiol. 2009, 101:2581-2600.
53. Hasson U., et al. Large-scale mirror-symmetry organization of human occipito-temporal object areas. Neuron 2003, 37:1027-1041.
54. Tsao D.Y., et al. Comparing face patch systems in macaques and humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:19514-19519.
55. Downing P.E., et al. A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science 2001, 293:2470-2473.
56. Howard R., et al. A direct demonstration of functional specialization within motion-related visual and auditory cortex of the human brain. Curr. Biol. 1996, 6:1015-1019.
57. Puce A., et al. Temporal cortex activation in humans viewing eye and mouth movements. J. Neurosci. 1998, 18:2188-2199.
58. Grossman E., et al. Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2000, 12:711-720.
59. Langton S., et al. Do the eyes have it? Cues to the direction of social attention. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2000, 4:50-59.
60. Adolphs R., et al. Cortical systems for the recognition of emotion in facial expressions. J. Neurosci. 1996, 16:7678-7687.
61. Kesler-West M.L., et al. Neural substrates of facial emotion processing using fMRI. Cogn. Brain Res. 2001, 11:213-226.
62. Felleman D.J., Van Essen D.C. Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 1991, 1:1-47.
63. Kaiser M.D., et al. Neural signatures of autism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:21223-21228.
64. Lombardo M.V., et al. Specialization of right temporo-parietal junction for mentalizing and its relation to social impairments in autism. Neuroimage 2011, 56:1832-1838.
65. Saxe R. The right temporo-parietal junction: a specific brain region for thinking about thoughts. Handbook of Theory of Mind 2010, 1-35. Psychology Press. A. Leslie, T. German (Eds.).
66. Decety J., Lamm C. The role of the right temporoparietal junction in social interaction: how low-level computational processes contribute to meta-cognition. Neuroscientist 2007, 13:580.
67. Cabeza R., et al. Cognitive contributions of the ventral parietal cortex: an integrative theoretical account. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2012, 16:338-352.
68. Ferstl E.C., et al. The extended language network: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2008, 29:581-593.
69. Perner J., Aichhorn M. Theory of mind, language and the temporoparietal junction mystery. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2008, 12:123-126.
70. Behrmann M., et al. Parietal cortex and attention. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2004, 14:212-217.
71. Gallese V. The shared manifold hypothesis. J. Conscious. Stud. 2001, 8:33-50.
72. Mitchell J.P., et al. The link between social cognition and self-referential thought in the medial prefrontal cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2005, 17:1306-1315.
73. Oberman L.M., Ramachandran V.S. The simulating social mind: the role of the mirror neuron system and simulation in the social and communicative deficits of autism spectrum disorders. Psychol. Bull. 2007, 133:310-327.
74. Scholz J., et al. Distinct regions of right temporo-parietal junction are selective for theory of mind and exogenous attention. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e4869.
75. Uddin L.Q., et al. Dissociable connectivity within human angular gyrus and intraparietal sulcus: evidence from functional and structural connectivity. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:2636-2646.
76. Mars R.B., et al. Connectivity-based subdivisions of the human right 'temporoparietal junction area': evidence for different areas participating in different cortical networks. Cereb. Cortex 2012, 22:1894-1903.
77. Goodale M.A., Milner A.D. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci. 1992, 15:20-25.
78. Waytz A., et al. Response of dorsomedial prefrontal cortex predicts altruistic behavior. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:7646-7650.
79. Bhatt M.A., et al. Neural signatures of strategic types in a two-person bargaining game. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:19720-19725.
80. Bartz J.A., et al. Social effects of oxytocin in humans: context and person matter. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2011, 15:301-309.
81. Smith D.V., et al. Distinct value signals in anterior and posterior ventromedial prefrontal cortex. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:2490-2495.
82. Carter R.M., et al. A distinct role of the temporal-parietal junction in predicting socially guided decisions. Science 2012, 337:109-111.
83. Castelli F., et al. Movement and mind: a functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns. Neuroimage 2000, 325:314-325.
84. Bateman A., Fonagy P. Psychotherapy for Borderline Personality Disorder 2004, Oxford University Press.
85. Desikan R.S., et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage 2006, 31:968-980.
86. Laird A.R., et al. BrainMap: the social evolution of a human brain mapping database. Neuroinformatics 2005, 3:65-78.
87. Van Essen D.C., Dierker D.L. Surface-based and probabilistic atlases of primate cerebral cortex. Neuron 2007, 56:209-225.
88. Lancaster J.L., et al. Automated Talairach atlas labels for functional brain mapping. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2000, 10:120-131.
89. Yarkoni T., et al. Cognitive neuroscience 2.0: building a cumulative science of human brain function. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2010, 14:489-496.
90. Rapoport A., et al. Randomization and adaptive learning in a simplified poker game. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1997, 69:31-49.
91. Fiske S.T., et al. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2002, 82:878-902.
92. Harris L.T., Fiske S.T. Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: neuroimaging responses to extreme out-groups. Psychol. Sci. 2006, 17:847-853.