Parietal cortex and attention

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 212-217

  Behrmann, Marlene ^a   Geng, Joy J ^b   Shomstein, Sarah ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

aIPS; Anterior intraparietal sulcus; Cerebrovascular accident; CVA; Delayed match to sample; DMS; fMRI; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Inferior parietal lobule; IPL; SPL; Superior parietal lobule; Temporoparietal junction; TPJ

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN REGION; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COGNITION; DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS; DISTRACTIBILITY; HUMAN; NEUROANATOMY; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARIETAL LOBE; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SENSORY STIMULATION; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

ATTENTION; CUES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEURAL PATHWAYS; PARIETAL LOBE; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SENSATION;

EID: 1842684990     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.012     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Critchley M: The Parietal Lobes. London: Hafner Press; 1953.
2. Culham J.C. Parietal cortex. Encyc Cognit Sci. 3:2002;451-457.
3. Colby C. Action-oriented spatial reference frames in cortex. Neuron. 20:1998;15-24.
4. Yantis S., Monsell S., Driver J. Goal-directed and stimulus-driven determinants of attentional control. Attention Perform MIT Press. XVIII:2000;73-103.
5. Downar J., Crawley A.P., Mikulis D.J., Davis K.D. The effect of task relevance on the cortical response to changes in visual and auditory stimuli: An event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage. 14:2001;1256-1267.
6. Downar J., Crawley A.P., Mikulis D.J., Davis K.D. A cortical network sensitive to stimulus salience in a neutral behavioral context across multiple sensory modalities. J Neurophysiol. 87:2002;615-620 In this important event-related fMRI study the authors demonstrated that the temporoparietal junction (TPJ) is activated by novel and salient stimuli. In addition, it was demonstrated that the TPJ was sensitive not only to the novel and salient visual stimuli but also to novel and salient auditory and tactile stimulation. This finding suggests a more general involvement of the TPJ in goal-directed attentional orientation.
7. Yantis S., Schwarzbach J., Serences J.T., Carlson R.L., Steinmetz M.A., Pekar J.J., Courtney S.M. Transient neural activity in human parietal cortex during spatial attention shifts. Nat Neurosci. 5:2002;995-1002 In this important study, the authors demonstrated both the effects of attentional modulation and the sources of an attentional biasing signal. It was observed that when attention was re-directed to the contralateral visual field, activity in extrastriate cortex increased and remained high. In addition, they showed that the superior parietal cortex was probably the source of the attentional biasing signal given the transient increases in activation in this area following spatial shifts of attention.
8. Yantis S., Serences J.T. Cortical mechanisms of space-based and object-based attentional control. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 13:2003;187-193 An increase in the response of the parietal cortex following shifts of attention between two superimposed objects led the authors to conclude that superior parietal cortex (SPL) subserves both spatial and non-spatial attentional biasing signals.
9. Liu T., Slotnick S.D., Serences J.T., Yantis S. Cortical mechanisms of feature-based attentional control. Cereb Cortex. 13:2003;1334-1343 The authors examined the neural mechanisms of feature-based attentional control in human cortex. Subjects were asked to shift their attention from one feature of an object to another - color and its direction of motion (the stimulus consisted of an array of moving dots). It was observed that multiple areas within the fronto-parietal network exhibited transient and sustained responses following attentional shifts.
10. Giesbrecht B., Woldorff M.G., Song A.W., Mangun G.R. Neural mechanisms of top-down control during spatial and feature attention. Neuroimage. 19:2003;496-512 The purpose of this study was to compare directly the neural mechanisms of spatial and non-spatial control of attention. It was observed that even though both types of orienting recruited similar portions of the fronto-parietal network, under a direct comparison, spatial orienting appeared to activate regions within the fronto-parietal network to a greater extent than nonspatial orienting.
11. Moran J., Desimone R. Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science. 229:1985;782-784.
12. O'Craven K., Rosen B.R., Kwong K.K., Treisman A., Savoy R.L. Voluntary attention modulates fMRI activity in human MT-MST. Neuron. 18:1997;591-598.
13. Shomstein S., Yantis S. Control of attention shifts between vision and audition in human cortex. Soc Neurosci Abstr. 29:2003;873-877 In this study, the authors examined human brain activity during attention shifts between vision and audition. Attention shifts from vision to audition caused increased activity in auditory cortex and decreased activity in visual cortex, and vice versa, reflecting the effects of attention on sensory strength. Posterior parietal and superior prefrontal cortex exhibited transient increases in activity that were time-locked to the initiation of voluntary attention shifts between vision and audition. These findings show that posterior parietal and superior prefrontal cortex mediate the control of crossmodal shifts of attention.
14. Donner T.H., Kettermann A., Diesch E., Villringer A., Brandt S.A. Parietal activation during visual search in the absence of multiple distractors. Neuroreport. 14:2003;2257-2261 One role attributed to parietal cortex is the inhibition of distractors during visual search. In this study, cortical activation was measured during visual search in the absence of distractors. Anterior and inferior parts of the intraparietal sulcus were activated, showing that the contribution of parietal cortex is not restricted to counteracting the effects of distractors.
15. Shulman J.D., d'Avossa G., Tansy A.P., Corbetta M. Two attentional processes in the parietal lobe. Cereb Cortex. 12:2002;1124-1131.
16. Corbetta M. Frontoparietal cortical networks for directing attention and the eye to visual locations; identical, independent, or overlapping neural systems? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 95:1998;831-838.
17. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 3:2002;201-215 The authors outline a functional model of attention involving a dorsal stream concerned with endogenous shifts of attention and an interconnected ventral system concerned primarily with the detection of salient information.
18. Andersen R.A., Buneo C.A. Sensorimotor integration in posterior parietal cortex. Adv Neurol. 93:2003;159-177.
19. Nobre A.C. The attentive homunculus: now you see it, now you don't. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 25:2001;477-496.
20. Driver J., Spence C. Attention and the crossmodal construction of space. Trends Cogn Sci. 2:1998;254-262.
21. Kennett S., Spence C., Driver J. Visuo-tactile links in covert exogenous spatial attention remap across changes in unseen hand posture. Percept Psychophys. 64:2002;1083-1094.
22. Macaluso E., Eimer M., Frith C.D., Driver J. Preparatory states in crossmodal spatial attention: spatial specificity and possible control mechanisms. Exp Brain Res. 149:2003;62-74 The authors presented bilateral and bimodal (visual, tactile) stimuli following a spatial auditory cue. Target modality was blocked. Preparatory activation was found following the spatial cue and before stimulus onset for both visual and tactile targets in the contralateral anterior intraparietal sulcus and lateral occipital gyrus. Modality specific activation was also found in primary visual and somatosensory cortex.
23. Grefkes C., Weiss P.H., Zilles K., Fink G.R. Crossmodal processing of object features in human anterior intraparietal cortex: an fMRI study implies equivalencies between humans and monkeys. Neuron. 35:2002;173-184 The authors employed a delayed match to sample task with visuo-tactile stimuli. Visual stimuli were presented centrally and tactile stimuli to the right hand. Left anterior intraparietal activation was found in the crossmodal conditions in which either a visual or a tactile stimulus was compared with a subsequent tactile or visual stimulus, respectively.
24. Amedi A., Jacobson G., Hendler T., Malach R., Zohary E. Convergence of visual and tactile shape processing in the human lateral occipital complex. Cereb Cortex. 12:2002;1202-1212.
25. Macaluso E., Driver J. Multimodal spatial representations in the human parietal cortex: evidence from functional imaging. Adv Neurol. 93:2003;219-233.
26. Stoeckel M.C., Weder B., Binkofski F., Buccino G., Shah N.J., Seitz R.J. A fronto-parietal circuit for tactile object discrimination: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage. 19:2003;1103-1114.
27. Shikata E., Hamzei F., Glauche V., Koch M., Weiller C., Binkofski F., Buchel C. Functional properties and interaction of the anterior and posterior intraparietal areas in humans. Eur J Neurosci. 17:2003;1105-1110.
28. Astafiev S.V., Shulman G.L., Stanley C.M., Snyder A.Z., Van Essen D.C., Corbetta M. Functional organization of human intraparietal and frontal cortex for attending, looking, and pointing. J Neurosci. 23:2003;4689-4699.
29. Macaluso E., Driver J., Frith C.D. Multimodal spatial representations engaged in human parietal cortex during both saccadic and manual spatial orienting. Curr Biol. 13:2003;990-999.
30. Simon O., Mangin J.F., Cohen L., Le Bihan D., Dehaene S. Topographical layout of hand, eye, calculation, and language-related areas in the human parietal lobe. Neuron. 33:2002;475-487.
31. Mesulam M.M. Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 354:1999;1325-1346.
32. Parton A., Malhotra P., Husain M. Hemispatial neglect. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 75:2004;13-21.
33. Vallar G. Spatial hemineglect in humans. Trends Cogn Sci. 2:1998;87-96.
34. Friedrich F.J., Egly R., Rafal R.D., Beck D. Spatial attention deficits in humans: a comparison of superior parietal and temporal-parietal junction lesions. Neuropsychology. 12:1998;193-207.
35. Karnath H-O., Ferber S., Himmelbach M. Spatial awareness is a function of the temporal not the posterior parietal lobe. Nature. 411:2001;950-953.
36. Karnath H.O., Himmelbach M., Rorden C. The subcortical anatomy of human spatial neglect: putamen, caudate nucleus and pulvinar. Brain. 125:2002;350-360 Using a similar technique to their previous study [35], the authors identified the subcortical regions involved in neglect. The identified regions have reciprocal connections with the superior temporal gyrus, which they previously identified as the crucial cortical substrate that underlies neglect.
37. Mort D.J., Malhotra P., Mannan S.K., Rorden C., Pambakian A., Kennard C., Husain M. The anatomy of visual neglect. Brain. 126:2003;1986-1997 The authors used high-resolution anatomical MRI images of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) and the posterior cerebral artery (PCA) in neglect patients to determine the crucial anatomical locations underlying neglect. All patients with lesions of MCA suffered damage to the angular gyrus, whereas PCA patients had all suffered damage to the parahippocampal gyrus. The authors also outlined anatomical markers for defining the temporal parietal junction, which has previously been implicated in neglect, but not defined anatomically.
38. Doricchi F., Tomaiuolo F. The anatomy of neglect without hemianopia: a key role for parietal-frontal disconnection? Neuroreport. 14:2003;2239-2243 The focus of this study was defining the region of maximum overlap in a group of 10 individuals with hemispatial neglect and no visual field defect. The region of maximum overlap was in the superior longitudinal fasciculus. In those patients without subcortical lesions, an additional maximum overlap region was in the rostral part of the supramarginal gyrus. The crucial point made in this paper is the fronto-parietal disconnection and its central role in hemispatial neglect.
39. Leibovitch F.S., Black S.E., Caldwell C.B., Ebert P.L., Ehrlich L.E., Szalai J.P. Brain-behavior correlations in left hemispatial neglect using CT and SPECT imaging: the Sunnybrook stroke study. Neurology. 50:1998;901-908.
40. Maguire A.M., Ogden J.A. MRI brain scan analyses and neuropsychological profiles of nine patients with persisting unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia. 40:2002;879-887 The authors examined the anatomical scans of patients with persisting neglect and concluded that chronic neglect was correlated with the extent of the lesion. All patients involved in their study suffered damage to at least three major cortical lobes and subcortical structures. The only area of overlap in all patients involved the basal ganglia.
41. Shapiro K., Hillstrom A.P., Husain M. Control of visuotemporal attention by inferior parietal and superior temporal cortex. Curr Biol. 12:2002;1320-1325.
42. Duncan J., Bundesen C., Olson A., Humphreys G.W., Ward R., Kyllinsbaeck S., van Raamsdonk M., Rorden C., Chavda S. Attentional functions in dorsal and ventral simultanagnosia. Cogn Neuropsychology. 20:2003;675-702 To analyse the deficit in individuals with dorsal and ventral lesions more formally, this study employed a whole report of brief letter arrays in order to assess various performance parameters. The two patients showed neither an attentional deficit per se nor a reduction in short-term memory, but both showed reduced speed of processing especially under conditions of competition.
43. Bricolo E., Gianesini T., Fanini A., Bundesen C., Chelazzi L. Serial attention mechanisms in visual search: A direct behavioral demonstration. J Cogn Neurosci. 14:2002;980-993.
44. Müller N.G., Kleinschmidt A. Dynamic interaction of object- and space-based attention in retinotopic visual areas. J Neurosci. 23:2003;9812-9816 The authors showed that areas in early visual cortex were activated when subjects attended to a part of an object and that retinotopic locations representing other parts of the same object were also enhanced. This result enabled the authors to elucidate the psychological and neural substrate of object-based attention.
45. Schoenfeld M.A., Tempelmann C., Martinez A., Hopf J.M., Sattler C., Heinze H.J., Hillyard S.A. Dynamics of feature binding during object-selective attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 100:2003;11806-11811.