Short communication a social identity approach to trust: Interpersonal perception, group membership and trusting behaviour

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 413-424

  Tanis, Martin ^a   Postmes, Tom ^b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 20444475443     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.256     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
2. Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 122-142.
3. Brewer, M. B. (1981). Ethnocentrism and its role in interpersonal trust. In M. B. Brewer, & B. E. Collins (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and the social sciences (pp. 214-231). San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Cook, K. S. (Ed.). (2001). Trust in society. New York: Russel Sage foundation.
5. Culnan, M. J., & Markus, M. L. (1987). Information technologies. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Proter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 420-443). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6. Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410-436.
7. Granovetter, M. S. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 97(3), 481-510.
8. Hancock, J. T., & Dunham, P. J. (2001). Impression formation in computer mediated communication revisited: An analysis of the breadth and intensity of impressions. Communication Research, 28(3), 325-347.
9. Handy, C. (1995). Trust and the virtual organization. Harvard Business Review, 73(3), 40-50.
10. Hosmer, L. T. (1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. The Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 379-403.
11. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
12. Kramer, R. M., & Wei, J. (1999). Social uncertainty and the problem of trust in social groups: The social self in doubt. In T. R. Tyler, R. M. Kramer, & O. P. John (Eds.), The psychology of the social self (pp. 145-168). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlboum Associates.
13. Lea, M., Spears, R., & de Groot, D. (2001). Knowing me, knowing you: Anonymity effects on social identity processes within groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(5), 526-537.
14. Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1995). Trust in relationships: A model of trust development and decline. In B. Bunker, & J. Rubins (Eds.), Conflict, cooperation and justice (pp. 133-173). San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In R. M. Kramer, & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 114-139). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
16. Mellinger, G. D. (1956). Interpersonal trust as a factor in communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 304-309.
17. Messick, D. M., & Kramer, R. M. (2001). Trust as a form of shallow morality. In K. S. Cook (Ed.), Trust in society (pp. 89-117). New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
18. Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1998). Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effect of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 25(6), 689-715.
19. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Lee, T., & Novak, R. J. (in press). Individuality and social influence in groups: Inductive and deductive routes to group identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
20. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Sakhel, K., & de Groot, D. (2001). Social influence in computer-mediated communication: The effects of anonymity on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1243-1254.
21. Reicher, S. (1996). 'The Battle of Westminster:' Developing the social identity model of crowd behaviour in order to explain the initiation and development of collective conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(1), 115-134.
22. Reicher, S., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. In W. Stroebe, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 6). Chichester, England: Wiley.
23. Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R. L., & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35, 615-665.
25. Rutter, D. R. (1987). Communicating by telephone. Oxford: Pergamon.
26. Sassenberg, K., & Postmes, T. (2002). Cognitive and strategic processes in small groups: Effects of anonymity of the self and anonymity of the group on social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 463-480.
27. Short, J. A., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
28. Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1992). Social influence and the influence of the 'social' in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 30-65). Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
29. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
30. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3 ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
31. Tanis, M., & Postmes, T. (2003). Social cues and impression formation in CMC. Journal of Communication, 53(4), 676-693.
32. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
33. Walther, J. B., Slovacek, C. L., & Tidwell, L. C. (2001). Is a picture worth a thousand words? Photographic images in long-term and short-term computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 28(1), 105-134.
34. Yamagishi, T., & Kiyonari, T. (2000). The group as the container of generalized reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(2), 116-132.