The MORC family: New epigenetic regulators of transcription and DNA damage response

Epigenetics

Volumn 8, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 685-693

  Li, Da Qiang ^a   Nair, Sujit S ^a   Kumar, Rakesh ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Chromatin remodeling; DNA damage response; Epigenetic regulation; MORC; Transcription

Indexed keywords

ATM PROTEIN; ATR PROTEIN; DNA TOPOISOMERASE; DNA TOPOISOMERASE (ATP HYDROLYSING); HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 90; HELICASE; HISTONE DEACETYLASE; HISTONE H2AX; MITOMYCIN; NUCLEAR MATRIX PROTEIN; P21 ACTIVATED KINASE 1; PROTEIN HISTIDINE KINASE; PROTEIN MUTL; PROTEIN SWI; SUMO 2 PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SNF;

ARTICLE; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DNA BINDING; DNA DAMAGE; DNA METABOLISM; EPIGENETICS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE SILENCING; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; HOMEOSTASIS; HUMAN; MICRORCHIDIA; NONHUMAN; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN DNA INTERACTION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84879643610     PISSN: 15592294     EISSN: 15592308     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/epi.24976     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Iyer LM, Abhiman S, Aravind L. MutL homologs in restriction-modification systems and the origin of eukaryotic MORC ATPases. Biol Direct 2008; 3:8; PMID:18346280; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-3-8
2. Iyer LM, Anantharaman V, Wolf MY, Aravind L. Comparative genomics of transcription factors and chromatin proteins in parasitic protists and other eukaryotes. Int J Parasitol 2008; 38:1-31; PMID:17949725; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara. 2007. 07.018
3. Inoue N, Hess KD, Moreadith RW, Richardson LL, Handel MA, Watson ML, et al. New gene family defined by MORC, a nuclear protein required for mouse spermatogenesis. Hum Mol Genet 1999; 8:1201-7; PMID:10369865; http://dx.doi. org/10.1093/hmg/8.7.1201
4. Li DQ, Nair SS, Ohshiro K, Kumar A, Nair VS, Pakala SB, et al. MORC2 signaling integrates phosphorylation-dependent, ATPase-coupled chromatin remodeling during the DNA damage response. Cell Rep 2012; 2:1657-69; PMID:23260667; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2012.11.018
5. Kimura Y, Sakai F, Nakano O, Kisaki O, Sugimoto H, Sawamura T, et al. The newly identified human nuclear protein NXP-2 possesses three distinct domains, the nuclear matrix-binding, RNAbinding, and coiled-coil domains. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:20611-7; PMID:11927593; http://dx.doi. org/10.1074/jbc.M201440200
6. Watson ML, Zinn AR, Inoue N, Hess KD, Cobb J, Handel MA, et al. Identification of morc (microrchidia), a mutation that results in arrest of spermatogenesis at an early meiotic stage in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998; 95:14361-6; PMID:9826705; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.24.14361
7. Condomines M, Hose D, Raynaud P, Hundemer M, De Vos J, Baudard M, et al. Cancer/testis genes in multiple myeloma: expression patterns and prognosis value determined by microarray analysis. J Immunol 2007; 178:3307-15; PMID:17312182
8. Shah SP, Morin RD, Khattra J, Prentice L, Pugh T, Burleigh A, et al. Mutational evolution in a lobular breast tumour profiled at single nucleotide resolution. Nature 2009; 461:809-13; PMID:19812674; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08489
9. Tripathi A, King C, de la Morenas A, Perry VK, Burke B, Antoine GA, et al. Gene expression abnormalities in histologically normal breast epithelium of breast cancer patients. Int J Cancer 2008; 122:1557-66; PMID:18058819; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.23267
10. Chen LH, Kuo WH, Tsai MH, Chen PC, Hsiao CK, Chuang EY, et al. Identification of prognostic genes for recurrent risk prediction in triple negative breast cancer patients in Taiwan. PLoS One 2011; 6:e28222; PMID:22140552; http://dx.doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028222
11. Takahashi K, Yoshida N, Murakami N, Kawata K, Ishizaki H, Tanaka-Okamoto M, et al. Dynamic regulation of p53 subnuclear localization and senescence by MORC3. Mol Biol Cell 2007; 18:1701-9; PMID:17332504; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc. E06-08-0747
12. Mimura Y, Takahashi K, Kawata K, Akazawa T, Inoue N. Two-step colocalization of MORC3 with PML nuclear bodies. J Cell Sci 2010; 123:2014-24; PMID:20501696; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.063586
13. Gonzalez-Fernandez R, Morales M, Avila J, Martin-Vasallo P. Changes in leukocyte gene expression profiles induced by antineoplastic chemotherapy. Oncol Lett 2012; 3:1341-9; PMID:22783446
14. Liggins AP, Cooper CD, Lawrie CH, Brown PJ, Collins GP, Hatton CS, et al. MORC4, a novel member of the MORC family, is highly expressed in a subset of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. Br J Haematol 2007; 138:479-86; PMID:17608765; http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06680.x
15. Lemmers RJ, Tawil R, Petek LM, Balog J, Block GJ, Santen GW, et al. Digenic inheritance of an SMCHD1 mutation and an FSHD-permissive D4Z4 allele causes facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 2. Nat Genet 2012; 44:1370-4; PMID:23143600; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.2454
16. Shao Y, Li Y, Zhang J, Liu D, Liu F, Zhao Y, et al. Involvement of histone deacetylation in MORC2-mediated down-regulation of carbonic anhydrase IX. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38:2813-24; PMID:20110259; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq006
17. Wang GL, Wang CY, Cai XZ, Chen W, Wang XH, Li F. Identification and expression analysis of a novel CW-type zinc finger protein MORC2 in cancer cells. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2010; 293:1002-9; PMID:20225202; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ar.21119
18. Bernardi R, Pandolfi PP. Structure, dynamics and functions of promyelocytic leukaemia nuclear bodies. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8:1006-16; PMID:17928811; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2277
19. Draskovic I, Arnoult N, Steiner V, Bacchetti S, Lomonte P, Londono-Vallejo A. Probing PML body function in ALT cells reveals spatiotemporal requirements for telomere recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:15726-31; PMID:19717459; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907689106
20. Lang M, Jegou T, Chung I, Richter K, Munch S, Udvarhelyi A, et al. Three-dimensional organization of promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies. J Cell Sci 2010; 123:392-400; PMID:20130140; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.053496
21. Torok D, Ching RW, Bazett-Jones DP. PML nuclear bodies as sites of epigenetic regulation. Front Biosci 2009; 14:1325-36; PMID:19273133; http://dx.doi. org/10.2741/3311
22. Blewitt ME, Gendrel AV, Pang Z, Sparrow DB, Whitelaw N, Craig JM, et al. SmcHD1, containing a structural-maintenance-of-chromosomes hinge domain, has a critical role in X inactivation. Nat Genet 2008; 40:663-9; PMID:18425126; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.142
23. Losada A, Hirano T. Dynamic molecular linkers of the genome: the first decade of SMC proteins. Genes Dev 2005; 19:1269-87; PMID:15937217; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1320505
24. Leong HS, Chen K, Hu Y, Lee S, Corbin J, Pakusch M, et al. Epigenetic regulator Smchd1 functions as a tumor suppressor. Cancer Res 2013; 73:1591-9; PMID:23269277; http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472. CAN-12-3019
25. Tirard M, Hsiao HH, Nikolov M, Urlaub H, Melchior F, Brose N. In vivo localization and identification of SUMOylated proteins in the brain of His6-HA-SUMO1 knock-in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109:21122-7; PMID:23213215; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1215366110
26. Moissiard G, Cokus SJ, Cary J, Feng S, Billi AC, Stroud H, et al. MORC family ATPases required for heterochromatin condensation and gene silencing. Science 2012; 336:1448-51; PMID:22555433; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1221472
27. Dutta R, Inouye M. GHKL, an emergent ATPase/kinase superfamily. Trends Biochem Sci 2000; 25:24-8; PMID:10637609; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0004(99)01503-0
28. Hu X, Machius M, Yang W. Monovalent cation dependence and preference of GHKL ATPases and kinases. FEBS Lett 2003; 544:268-73; PMID:12782329; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(03)00519-2
29. Vignali M, Hassan AH, Neely KE, Workman JL. ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling complexes. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20:1899-910; PMID:10688638; ht tp://dx. doi.org/10.1128/MCB.20.6.1899-1910. 2000
30. Clapier CR, Cairns BR. The biology of chromatin remodeling complexes. Annu Rev Biochem 2009; 78:273-304; PMID:19355820; http://dx.doi. org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.062706.153223
31. Meyer P, Prodromou C, Hu B, Vaughan C, Roe SM, Panaretou B, et al. Structural and functional analysis of the middle segment of hsp90: implications for ATP hydrolysis and client protein and cochaperone interactions. Mol Cell 2003; 11:647-58; PMID:12667448; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00065-0
32. Ban C, Junop M, Yang W. Transformation of MutL by ATP binding and hydrolysis: a switch in DNA mismatch repair. Cell 1999; 97:85-97; PMID:10199405; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80717-5
33. Raschle M, Dufner P, Marra G, Jiricny J. Mutations within the hMLH1 and hPMS2 subunits of the human MutLalpha mismatch repair factor affect its ATPase activity, but not its ability to interact with hMutSalpha. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:21810-20; PMID:11948175; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M108787200
34. Corbett KD, Berger JM. Structural dissection of ATP turnover in the prototypical GHL ATPase TopoVI. Structure 2005; 13:873-82; PMID:15939019; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2005.03.013
35. Bohmdorfer G, Schleiffer A, Brunmeir R, Ferscha S, Nizhynska V, Kozak J, et al. GMI1, a structuralmaintenance-of-chromosomes-hinge domain-containing protein, is involved in somatic homologous recombination in Arabidopsis. Plant J 2011; 67:420-33; PMID:21481027; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04604.x
36. Lorković ZJ, Naumann U, Matzke AJ, Matzke M. Involvement of a GHKL ATPase in RNA-directed DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr Biol 2012; 22:933-8; PMID:22560611; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.061
37. He F, Umehara T, Saito K, Harada T, Watanabe S, Yabuki T, et al. Structural insight into the zinc finger CW domain as a histone modification reader. Structure 2010; 18:1127-39; PMID:20826339; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2010.06.012
38. Hoppmann V, Thorstensen T, Kristiansen PE, Veiseth SV, Rahman MA, Finne K, et al. The CW domain, a new histone recognition module in chromatin proteins. EMBO J 2011; 30:1939-52; PMID:21522130; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.108
39. Li X, Foley EA, Molloy KR, Li Y, Chait BT, Kapoor TM. Quantitative chemical proteomics approach to identify post-translational modification-mediated protein-protein interactions. J Am Chem Soc 2012; 134:1982-5; PMID:22239320; http://dx.doi. org/10.1021/ja210528v
40. Perry J, Zhao Y. The CW domain, a structural module shared amongst vertebrates, vertebrate-infecting parasites and higher plants. Trends Biochem Sci 2003; 28:576-80; PMID:14607086; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.tibs.2003.09.007
41. Aravind L, Abhiman S, Iyer LM. Natural history of the eukaryotic chromatin protein methylation system. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 2011; 101:105-76; PMID:21507350; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387685-0.00004-4
42. Zhao Z, Yu Y, Meyer D, Wu C, Shen WH. Prevention of early flowering by expression of FLOWERING LOCUS C requires methylation of histone H3 K36. Nat Cell Biol 2005; 7:1256-60; PMID:16299497; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1329
43. Zhou Y, Tan B, Luo M, Li Y, Liu C, Chen C, et al. HISTONE DEACETYLASE19 interacts with HSL1 and participates in the repression of seed maturation genes in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Cell 2013; 25:134-48; PMID:23362207; http://dx.doi. org/10.1105/tpc.112.096313
44. Suzuki M, Wang HH, McCarty DR. Repression of the LEAFY COTYLEDON 1/B3 regulatory network in plant embryo development by VP1/ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE 3-LIKE B3 genes. Plant Physiol 2007; 143:902-11; PMID:17158584; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.092320
45. Zemach A, Grafi G. Methyl-CpG-binding domain proteins in plants: interpreters of DNA methylation. Trends Plant Sci 2007; 12:80-5; PMID:17208509; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2006.12.004
46. Ito M, Koike A, Koizumi N, Sano H. Methylated DNA-binding proteins from Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2003; 133:1747-54; PMID:14605234; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.026708
47. Karytinos A, Forneris F, Profumo A, Ciossani G, Battaglioli E, Binda C, et al. A novel mammalian flavin-dependent histone demethylase. J Biol Chem 2009; 284:17775-82; PMID:19407342; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.003087
48. Ciccone DN, Su H, Hevi S, Gay F, Lei H, Bajko J, et al. KDM1B is a histone H3K4 demethylase required to establish maternal genomic imprints. Nature 2009; 461:415-8; PMID:19727073; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08315
49. Yang Z, Jiang J, Stewart DM, Qi S, Yamane K, Li J, et al. AOF1 is a histone H3K4 demethylase possessing demethylase activity-independent repression function. Cell Res 2010; 20:276-87; PMID:20101264; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cr.2010.12
50. Zhang Q, Qi S, Xu M, Yu L, Tao Y, Deng Z, et al. Structure-function analysis reveals a novel mechanism for regulation of histone demethylase LSD2/AOF1/KDM1b. Cell Res 2013; 23:225-41; PMID:23266887; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cr.2012.177
51. Cavalli G, Paro R. Chromo-domain proteins: linking chromatin structure to epigenetic regulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1998; 10:354-60; PMID:9640536; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0955-0674(98)80011-2
52. Tajul-Arifin K, Teasdale R, Ravasi T, Hume DA, Mattick JS; RIKEN GER Group; GSL Members. Identification and analysis of chromodomaincontaining proteins encoded in the mouse transcriptome. Genome Res 2003; 13(6B):1416-29; PMID:12819141; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.1015703
53. Jones DO, Cowell IG, Singh PB. Mammalian chromodomain proteins: their role in genome organisation and expression. Bioessays 2000; 22:124-37; PMID:10655032; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878 (200002)22:2<124::AIDBIES4> 3. 0.CO;2-E
54. Ceol CJ, Houvras Y, Jane-Valbuena J, Bilodeau S, Orlando DA, Battisti V, et al. The histone methyltransferase SETDB1 is recurrently amplified in melanoma and accelerates its onset. Nature 2011; 471:513-7; PMID:21430779; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09806
55. Mason JM, Arndt KM. Coiled coil domains: stability, specificity, and biological implications. Chembiochem 2004; 5:170-6; PMID:14760737; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cbic.200300781
56. McFarlane AA, Orriss GL, Stetefeld J. The use of coiled-coil proteins in drug delivery systems. Eur J Pharmacol 2009; 625:101-7; PMID:19835864; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.05.034
57. Lupas AN, Gruber M. The structure of α-helical coiled coils. Adv Protein Chem 2005; 70:37-78; PMID:15837513; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3233(05)70003-6
58. Li X, He L, Che KH, Funderburk SF, Pan L, Pan N, et al. Imperfect interface of Beclin1 coiled-coil domain regulates homodimer and heterodimer formation with Atg14L and UVRAG. Nat Commun 2012; 3:662; PMID:22314358; http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/ncomms1648
59. Burkhard P, Stetefeld J, Strelkov SV. Coiled coils: a highly versatile protein folding motif. Trends Cell Biol 2001; 11:82-8; PMID:11166216; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0962-8924(00)01898-5
60. Cheng P, Yang Y, Heintzen C, Liu Y. Coiled-coil domain-mediated FRQ-FRQ interaction is essential for its circadian clock function in Neurospora. EMBO J 2001; 20:101-8; PMID:11226160; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/20.1.101
61. Peng H, Begg GE, Schultz DC, Friedman JR, Jensen DE, Speicher DW, et al. Reconstitution of the KRABKAP-1 repressor complex: a model system for defining the molecular anatomy of RING-B box-coiledcoil domain-mediated protein-protein interactions. J Mol Biol 2000; 295:1139-62; PMID:10653693; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1999.3402
62. Hurme R, Berndt KD, Namork E, Rhen M. DNA binding exerted by a bacterial gene regulator with an extensive coiled-coil domain. J Biol Chem 1996; 271:12626-31; PMID:8647874; http://dx.doi. org/10.1074/jbc.271.21.12626
63. Nikolay R, Wiederkehr T, Rist W, Kramer G, Mayer MP, Bukau B. Dimerization of the human E3 ligase CHIP via a coiled-coil domain is essential for its activity. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:2673-8; PMID:14610072; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M311112200
64. Parachoniak CA, Park M. Distinct recruitment of Eps15 via Its coiled-coil domain is required for efficient down-regulation of the met receptor tyrosine kinase. J Biol Chem 2009; 284:8382-94; PMID:19109251; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M807607200
65. Tanner MJ, Hanel W, Gaffen SL, Lin X. CARMA1 coiled-coil domain is involved in the oligomerization and subcellular localization of CARMA1 and is required for T cell receptor-induced NF-kappaB activation. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:17141-7; PMID:17428801; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M700169200
66. Tao W, Malone CL, Ault AD, Deschenes RJ, Fassler JS. A cytoplasmic coiled-coil domain is required for histidine kinase activity of the yeast osmosensor, SLN1. Mol Microbiol 2002; 43:459-73; PMID:11985722; http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958. 2002.02757.x
67. Fanelli M, Fantozzi A, De Luca P, Caprodossi S, Matsuzawa S, Lazar MA, et al. The coiled-coil domain is the structural determinant for mammalian homologues of Drosophila Sina-mediated degradation of promyelocytic leukemia protein and other tripartite motif proteins by the proteasome. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:5374-9; PMID:14645235; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M306407200
68. Yang K, Zhu J, Sun S, Tang Y, Zhang B, Diao L, et al. The coiled-coil domain of TRAF6 is essential for its auto-ubiquitination. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004; 324:432-9; PMID:15465037; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.09.070
69. Zhang T, Kee WH, Seow KT, Fung W, Cao X. The coiled-coil domain of Stat3 is essential for its SH2 domain-mediated receptor binding and subsequent activation induced by epidermal growth factor and interleukin-6. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20:7132-9; PMID:10982829; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.20.19.7132-7139.2000
70. Ma J, Zhang T, Novotny-Diermayr V, Tan AL, Cao X. A novel sequence in the coiled-coil domain of Stat3 essential for its nuclear translocation. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:29252-60; PMID:12746441; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M304196200
71. Raiborg C, Bremnes B, Mehlum A, Gillooly DJ, D'Arrigo A, Stang E, et al. FYVE and coiled-coil domains determine the specific localisation of Hrs to early endosomes. J Cell Sci 2001; 114:2255-63; PMID:11493665
72. Begitt A, Meyer T, van Rossum M, Vinkemeier U. Nucleocytoplasmic translocation of Stat1 is regulated by a leucine-rich export signal in the coiled-coil domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97:10418-23; PMID:10973496; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.190318397
73. Blazek D, Barboric M, Kohoutek J, Oven I, Peterlin BM. Oligomerization of HEXIM1 via 7SK snRNA and coiled-coil region directs the inhibition of P-TEFb. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33:7000-10; PMID:16377779; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki997
74. Watanabe M, Yanagi Y, Masuhiro Y, Yano T, Yoshikawa H, Yanagisawa J, et al. A putative tumor suppressor, TSG101, acts as a transcriptional suppressor through its coiled-coil domain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1998; 245:900-5; PMID:9588212; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1998.8547
75. Buisson R, Masson JY. PALB2 self-interaction controls homologous recombination. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:10312-23; PMID:22941656; http://dx.doi. org/10.1093/nar/gks807
76. Hohl M, Kwon Y, Galvan SM, Xue X, Tous C, Aguilera A, et al. The Rad50 coiled-coil domain is indispensable for Mre11 complex functions. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2011; 18:1124-31; PMID:21892167; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2116
77. Itakura E, Sawada I, Matsuura A. Dimerization of the ATRIP protein through the coiled-coil motif and its implication to the maintenance of stalled replication forks. Mol Biol Cell 2005; 16:5551-62; PMID:16176973; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc. E05-05-0427
78. Ball HL, Cortez D. ATRIP oligomerization is required for ATR-dependent checkpoint signaling. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:31390-6; PMID:16027118; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M504961200
79. Bar M, Sharfman M, Schuster S, Avni A. The coiledcoil domain of EHD2 mediates inhibition of LeEix2 endocytosis and signaling. PLoS One 2009; 4:e7973; PMID:19936242; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0007973
80. Rairdan GJ, Collier SM, Sacco MA, Baldwin TT, Boettrich T, Moffett P. The coiled-coil and nucleotide binding domains of the Potato Rx disease resistance protein function in pathogen recognition and signaling. Plant Cell 2008; 20:739-51; PMID:18344282; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.107.056036
81. He Y, Wertheim JA, Xu L, Miller JP, Karnell FG, Choi JK, et al. The coiled-coil domain and Tyr177 of bcr are required to induce a murine chronic myelogenous leukemia-like disease by bcr/abl. Blood 2002; 99:2957-68; PMID:11929787; http://dx.doi. org/10.1182/blood.V99.8.2957
82. Cheng HY, Schiavone AP, Smithgall TE. A point mutation in the N-terminal coiled-coil domain releases c-Fes tyrosine kinase activity and survival signaling in myeloid leukemia cells. Mol Cell Biol 2001; 21:6170-80; PMID:11509660; http://dx.doi. org/10.1128/MCB.21.18.6170-6180.2001
83. Zhang X, Subrahmanyam R, Wong R, Gross AW, Ren R. The NH(2)-terminal coiled-coil domain and tyrosine 177 play important roles in induction of a myeloproliferative disease in mice by Bcr-Abl. Mol Cell Biol 2001; 21:840-53; PMID:11154271; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.21.3.840-853.2001
84. Watson AA, Mahajan P, Mertens HD, Deery MJ, Zhang W, Pham P, et al. The PHD and chromo domains regulate the ATPase activity of the human chromatin remodeler CHD4. J Mol Biol 2012; 422:3-17; PMID:22575888; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.jmb.2012.04.031
85. Rosendorff A, Sakakibara S, Lu S, Kieff E, Xuan Y, DiBacco A, et al. NXP-2 association with SUMO-2 depends on lysines required for transcriptional repression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:5308-13; PMID:16567619; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601066103
86. Gendrel AV, Apedaile A, Coker H, Termanis A, Zvetkova I, Godwin J, et al. Smchd1-dependent and-independent pathways determine developmental dynamics of CpG island methylation on the inactive X chromosome. Dev Cell 2012; 23:265-79; PMID:22841499; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. devcel.2012.06.011
87. Kanno T, Bucher E, Daxinger L, Huettel B, Bohmdorfer G, Gregor W, et al. A structural-maintenance-of-chromosomes hinge domain-containing protein is required for RNA-directed DNA methylation. Nat Genet 2008; 40:670-5; PMID:18425128; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.119
88. Kang HG, Hyong WC, von Einem S, Manosalva P, Ehlers K, Liu PP, et al. CRT1 is a nucleartranslocated MORC endonuclease that participates in multiple levels of plant immunity. Nat Commun 2012; 3:1297; PMID:23250427; http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/ncomms2279
89. Kang HG, Kuhl JC, Kachroo P, Klessig DF. CRT1, an Arabidopsis ATPase that interacts with diverse resistance proteins and modulates disease resistance to turnip crinkle virus. Cell Host Microbe 2008; 3:48-57; PMID:18191794; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.chom.2007.11.006
90. Roberts AR, Blewitt ME, Youngson NA, Whitelaw E, Chong S. Reduced dosage of the modifiers of epigenetic reprogramming Dnmt1, Dnmt3L, SmcHD1 and Foxo3a has no detectable effect on mouse telomere length in vivo. Chromosoma 2011; 120:377-85; PMID:21553025; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412-011-0318-9
91. Stiff T, O'Driscoll M, Rief N, Iwabuchi K, Lobrich M, Jeggo PA. ATM and DNA-PK function redundantly to phosphorylate H2AX after exposure to ionizing radiation. Cancer Res 2004; 64:2390-6; PMID:15059890; http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472. CAN-03-3207
92. Ward IM, Chen J. Histone H2AX is phosphorylated in an ATR-dependent manner in response to replicational stress. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:47759-62; PMID:11673449
93. Kinner A, Wu W, Staudt C, Iliakis G. Gamma-H2AX in recognition and signaling of DNA doublestrand breaks in the context of chromatin. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36:5678-94; PMID:18772227; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn550
94. Rogakou EP, Pilch DR, Orr AH, Ivanova VS, Bonner WM. DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J Biol Chem 1998; 273:5858-68; PMID:9488723; http://dx.doi. org/10.1074/jbc.273.10.5858
95. Park JH, Park EJ, Lee HS, Kim SJ, Hur SK, Imbalzano AN, et al. Mammalian SWI/SNF complexes facilitate DNA double-strand break repair by promoting gamma-H2AX induction. EMBO J 2006; 25:3986-97; PMID:16932743; http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601291
96. van Attikum H, Fritsch O, Hohn B, Gasser SM. Recruitment of the INO80 complex by H2A phosphorylation links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling with DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 2004; 119:777-88; PMID:15607975; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.033
97. Morrison AJ, Highland J, Krogan NJ, Arbel-Eden A, Greenblatt JF, Haber JE, et al. INO80 and gamma-H2AX interaction links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling to DNA damage repair. Cell 2004; 119:767-75; PMID:15607974; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.037
98. Xu Y, Ayrapetov MK, Xu C, Gursoy-Yuzugullu O, Hu Y, Price BD. Histone H2A. Z controls a critical chromatin remodeling step required for DNA double-strand break repair. Mol Cell 2012; 48:723-33; PMID:23122415; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. molcel.2012.09.026
99. Papamichos-Chronakis M, Watanabe S, Rando OJ, Peterson CL. Global regulation of H2A. Z localization by the INO80 chromatin-remodeling enzyme is essential for genome integrity. Cell 2011; 144:200-13; PMID:21241891; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cell.2010.12.021
100. Mizuguchi G, Shen X, Landry J, Wu WH, Sen S, Wu C. ATP-driven exchange of histone H2AZ variant catalyzed by SWR1 chromatin remodeling complex. Science 2004; 303:343-8; PMID:14645854; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1090701
101. Morillo-Huesca M, Clemente-Ruiz M, Andujar E, Prado F. The SWR1 histone replacement complex causes genetic instability and genome-wide transcription misregulation in the absence of H2A.Z. PLoS One 2010; 5:e12143; PMID:20711347; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012143
102. Dellaire G, Ching RW, Ahmed K, Jalali F, Tse KC, Bristow RG, et al. Promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies behave as DNA damage sensors whose response to DNA double-strand breaks is regulated by NBS1 and the kinases ATM, Chk2, and ATR. J Cell Biol 2006; 175:55-66; PMID:17030982; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200604009