Identifying target groups for environmentally sustainable transport: Assessment of different segmentation approaches

Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 197-204

  Haustein, Sonja ^a   Hunecke, Marcel ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b TU DORTMUND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; MARKET DEVELOPMENT; PSYCHOLOGY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84879409983     PISSN: 18773435     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.04.009     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Geller E.S. Applied behavior analysis and social marketing: an integration for environmental preservation. J Soc Issues 1989, 45:17-36.
2. McKenzie-Mohr D. New ways to promote proenvironmental behavior: promoting sustainable behavior: an introduction to community-based social marketing. J Soc Issues 2000, 56:543-554.
3. Schahn J. Psychologische Forschung zu Mülltrennung und Müllvermeidung: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen psychologischer Ansätze zur Förderung umweltschonenden Verhaltens. Psychol Rundsch 1995, 46:104-114.
4. Schubert S., Kamphausen C. Multidimensionale Zielgruppen-Kundensegmentierung als Marketing-Instrument für einen Verkehrsverbund. Der Nahverkehr 2006, 24:56-58.
5. Hoenninger, P: "MobiHarz"-project: Integrated mobility management and services for visitors. Paper presented at the 7th European Conference on Mobility Management (ECOMM), 2003, May 21-23, Karlstad, Sweden.
6. Anderson, J, Marszalkowska, K, Langer, K, Kaczor, B: Segment-are we who we think we are? Presentation at the 16th European Conference on Mobility Management (ECOMM), 2012, 12-15 June, Frankfurt, Germany.
7. Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations 1998, Kluwer Academic Publisher. M. Wedel, W.A. Kamakura (Eds.).
8. Brög W., Erl E., Ker I., Ryle J., Wall R. Evaluation of voluntary travel behaviour change: experiences from three continents. Trans Policy 2009, 16:281-292.
9. Brög W, Erl E, Mense N: Individualised marketing. Changing travel behaviour for a better environment. Paper presented at the OECD Workshop: Environmentally Sustainable Transport, 2002, 5-6 December, Berlin.
10. INFAS, DLR Mobilität in Deutschland 2008, Ergebnisbericht im Auftrag des Bundeministeriums für Verkehr 2010, Bau und Stadtentwicklung.
11. Prillwitz J., Barr S. Moving towards sustainability? Mobility styles, attitudes and individual travel behaviour. J Trans Geogr 2011, 19:1590-1600.
12. Ohnmacht T., Götz K., Schad H. Leisure mobility styles in Swiss conurbations: construction and empirical analysis. Transportation 2009, 36:243-265.
13. Böhler S., Grischkat S., Haustein S., Hunecke M. Encouraging environmentally sustainable holiday travel. Transport Res A 2006, 40:652-670.
14. Aditjandra P.T., Cao X., Mulley C. Understanding neighbourhood design impact on travel behaviour: an application of structural equations model to a British metropolitan data. Transport Res A 2012, 46:22-32.
15. Scheiner J. Does the car make elderly people happy and mobile? Settlement structures, car availability and leisure mobility of the elderly. Eur J Trans Infrastruct Res 2006, 2:151-172.
16. Geurs K.T., van Wee B. Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. J Trans Geogr 2004, 12:127-140.
17. Madsen T., Schipperijn J.J., Troelsen J., Christiansen L.B.S., Duncan S., Nielsen T.A.S. Associations between neighbourhood walkability and cycling in Denmark. Cycl Res Int 2013, 3:154-170.
18. Haustein S. Mobility behavior of the elderly: an attitude-based segmentation approach for a heterogeneous target group. Transportation 2012, 39:1079-1103.
19. Jäger H. Zielgruppenmodell im Öffentlichen Personennahverkehr. Die Bundesbahn 1989, 65:665-668.
20. Hunecke M., Haustein S., Böhler S., Grischkat S An attitude based target group approach to reduce the ecological impact of daily mobility behavior. Environ Behav 2010, 42:3-43.
21. Ryley T. Use of non-motorised modes and life stage in Edinburgh. J Trans Geogr 2006, 14:367-375.
22. Salomon I., Ben-Akiva M. The use of the life-style concept in travel demand models. Environ Plan A 1983, 15:623-638.
23. Hildebrand E. Dimensions in elderly travel behaviour: a simplified activity-based model using lifestyle clusters. Transportation 2003, 30:285-306.
24. Götz K., Jahn T., Schultz I. Mobilitätsstile in Freiburg und Schwerin, Ergebnisse eines sozialwissenschaftlichen Projekts zu ?Mobilitätsleitbildern und Verkehrsverhalten'. Internationales Verkehrswesen 1998, 50:256-261.
25. Lanzendorf M. Mobility styles and travel behavior-application of a lifestyle approach to leisure travel. Transport Res Rec J Transport Res Board 2002, 1807:163-173.
26. Jensen M. Passion and heart in transport: a sociological analysis on transport behavior. Trans Policy 1999, 6:19-33.
27. Anable J. 'Complacent car addicts' or 'aspiring environmentalists'? Identifying travel behaviour segments using attitude theory. Trans Policy 2005, 12:65-78.
28. Beirão G., Sarsfield Cabral J. Market segmentation analysis using attitudes toward transportation, exploring the differences between men and women. Transport Res Rec J Transport Res Board 2008, 2067:56-64.
29. Li Z., Yang C., Wang W., Jiang G. Bicycle commuting market segmentation analysis using attitudinal factors. J Southeast Univ (Nat Sci Ed) 2012, 42:784-789.
30. Pronello C., Camusso C. Travellers' profiles definition using statistical multivariate analysis of attitudinal variables. J Trans Geogr 2011, 19:1294-1308.
31. Ripplinger D., Mattson J., Peterson D. Travel Behavior of the Lone Rangers: An Application of Attitudinal Structural Equation Modeling to Intercity Transportation Market Segmentation. Report by the Small Urban & Rural Transit Center 2011, Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute, North Dakota State University.
32. Shiftan Y., Outwater M.L., Zhou Y. Transit market research using structural equation modeling and attitudinal market segmentation. Trans Policy 2008, 15:186-195.
33. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Some unresolved issues. Org Behav Hum Decis Process 1991, 50:179-211.
34. Bamberg S., Schmidt P. Theory-driven subgroup specific evaluation of an intervention to reduce private car use. J Appl Soc Psychol 2001, 31:1300-1329.
35. Bamberg S., Schmidt P. Incentives, morality, or habit? Predicting student's car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz, and Triandis. Environ Behavior 2003, 35:1-22.
36. Haustein S., Hunecke M. Reduced use of environmentally friendly modes of transportation caused by perceived mobility necessities-an extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol 2007, 37:1856-1883.
37. Heath Y., Gifford R. Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: predicting the use of public transportation. J Appl Soc Psychol 2002, 32:2154-2189.
38. Heinen E., Maat K., van Wee B. The role of attitudes toward characteristics of bicycle commuting on the choice to cycle to work over various distances. Transport Res D Trans Environ 2011, 16:102-109.
39. Harland P., Staats H., Wilke H.A.M. Explaining proenvironmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the Theory of Planned Behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol 1999, 29:2505-2528.
40. Schwartz S.H. Normative influence on altruism. Advances in experimental social psychology. 1977, 10:221-279. Academic.
41. Bamberg S., Hunecke M., Blöbaum A. Moral norm, social context and the use of public transportation results of two field studies. J Environ Psychol 2007, 27:190-203.
42. Hunecke M., Blöbaum A., Matthies E., Höger R. Responsibiliy and environment: ecological norm orientation and external factors in the domain of travel mode choice behavior. Environ Behav 2001, 33:845-867.
43. Nordlund A., Garvill J. Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willigness to reduce personal car us. J Environ Psychol 2003, 23:339-347.
44. Anable J., Gatersleben B. All work and no play? The role of instrumental and affective factors in work and leisure journeys by different travel modes. Transport Res A 2005, 39:163-181.
45. Ellaway A., Macintyre S., Hiscock R., Kearns A. In the driving seat: psychosocial benefits from private motor vehicle transport compared to public transport. Transport Res F 2003, 6:217-231.
46. Gatersleben B., Steg L Affective and symbolic aspects of environmental behaviour. Environmental Psychology an Introduction 2002, 166-174. BPS Blackwell. L. Steg, A.E. Van den Berg, J.I.M. de Groot (Eds.).
47. Hunecke M., Haustein S., Grischkat S., Böhler S. Psychological, sociodemographic, and infrastructural factors as determinants of ecological impact caused by mobility behavior. J Environ Psychol 2007, 27:277-292.
48. Hunecke M. Ökologische Verantwortung, Lebensstile und Umweltverhalten 2000, Asanger.
49. Line T., Chatterjee K., Lyons G. The travel behaviour intentions of young people in the context of climate change. J Trans Geogr 2010, 18:238-246.
50. Lois D., López-Sáez M. The relationship between instrumental, symbolic and affective factors as predictors of car use: a structural equation modeling approach. Transport Res A 2009, 43:790-799.
51. Steg L. Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use. Transport Res A 2005, 39:147-162.
52. Cools M., Moons E., Janssens B., Wets G. Shifting towards environment-friendly modes: profiling travelers using Q-methodology. Transportation 2009, 36:437-453.
53. van Exel N.J.A., de Graaf G., Rietveld P. "I can do perfectly well without a car!" An exploration of stated preferences for middle-distance travel. Transportation 2011, 38:383-407.
54. Watts S., Stenner P. Doing Q methodology: theory, method and interpretation. Qual Res Psychol 2005, 2:67-91.
55. Haustein S., Hunecke M., Kemming H. Mobilität von Senioren, Ein Segmentierungsansatz als Grundlage zielgruppenspezifischer Angebote. Internationales Verkehrswesen 2008, 60:181-187.
56. Prochaska J.O., DiClemente C.C. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol 1983, 51:390-395.
57. Bamberg S. Applying the stage model of self-regulated behavioral change in a car use reduction intervention. J Environ Psychol 2013, 33:68-75.
58. Gatersleben B., Appleton K.M. Contemplating cycling to work: attitudes and perceptions in different stages of change. Transport Res A Policy Pract 2007, 41:302-312.
59. Bamberg S., Fujii S., Friman M., Gärling T. Behaviour theory and soft transport policy measures. Trans Policy 2011, 18:228-235.
60. Dibb S. Criteria guiding segmentation implementation: reviewing the evidence. J Strateg Market 1999, 7:107-129.
61. Meffert H., Bruhn M. Dienstleistungsmarketing: Grundlagen, Konzepte Methoden 2003, Gabler.
62. Hunecke M., Schweer I. Einflussfaktoren der Alltagsmobilität-Das Zusammenwirken von Raum, Verkehrsinfrastruktur Lebensstil und Mobilitätseinstellungen. StadtLeben-Wohnen, Mobilität und Lebensstil 2006, 148-166. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. K.J. Beckmann, M. Hesse, C. Holz-Rau, M. Hunecke (Eds.).
63. Roy J., Pal S. Lifestyle and climate change: link awaiting activation. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2009, 1:192-200.
64. Lang A., Beckmann K. Marketing im Mobilitätsbereich. Symbolisch-emotionales Marketing für den ÖPNV 2007, 27-54. Alba. M. Hunecke, K. Beckmann, A. Langweg (Eds.).
65. Redmond L: Identifying and analyzing travel-related attitudinal, personality, and lifestyle clusters in the San Francisco Bay Area. Paper UCD-ITS-RR-00-08, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California; 2002.
66. Hunecke M., Haustein S. Einstellungsbasierte Mobilitätstypen: Eine integrierte Anwendung von multivariaten und inhaltsanalytischen Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung zur Identifikation von Zielgruppen für eine nachhaltige Mobilität. Umweltpsychologie 2007, 11:38-68.
67. Barr S., Prillwitz J. Green travellers? Exploring the spatial context of sustainable mobility styles. Appl Geogr 2012, 32:798-809.
68. Handy S., Cao X., Mokhtarian P. Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California. Transport Res D 2005, 10:427-444.
69. Scheiner J., Holz-Rau C. Travel mode choice: affected by objective or subjective determinants?. Transportation 2007, 34:487-511.
70. Beck S., Plöger W. Lebensstile und Mobilität. vhw FW 2005, 1:48-51.