Bicycle commuting market segmentation analysis using attitudinal factors

Dongnan Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition)

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 784-789

  Li, Zhibin ^a   Yang, Chen ^a   Wang, Wei ^a   Jiang, Guojun ^b  

^a SOUTHEAST UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b BEIJING JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Attitudinal factor; Bicycle commuting; K means clustering; Market segmentation; Structural equation model

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDINAL FACTORS; ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS; HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS; K-MEANS CLUSTERING; K-MEANS CLUSTERING METHOD; MARKET SEGMENTATION; MARKET SEGMENTATION ANALYSIS; NANJING; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; SUBMARKETS; TRAVEL ATTITUDES;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

BICYCLES;

EID: 84865822963     PISSN: 10010505     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2012.04.039     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. 2007.
2. Yang C, Wang W, Shan X F, et al. Effects of personal factors on bicycle commuting in developing countries [J]. Transportation Research Record, 2010, 2193: 96-104.
3. Deakin E A. Utilitarian bicycling: A case study of the bay area and assessment of the market for commute bicycling ITS Research Report [R]. Berkeley, USA: University of California, Berkeley, 1985.
4. Xing Y, Handy S L, Mokhtarian P L. Factors associated with proportions and miles of bicycling for transportation and recreation in six small US cities [J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2010, 15 (2): 73-81.
5. Anable J. Complacent car addicts' or 'aspiring environmentalists' identifying travel behavior segments using attitude theory [J]. Transport Policy, 2005, 12 (1): 65-78.
6. Outwater M L, Castleberry S, Shiftan Y, et al. Attitudinal market segmentation approach to mode choice and ridership forecasting: Structural equation modeling [J]. Transportation Research Record, 2003, 1854: 32-42.
7. Shiftan Y, Outwater M L, Zhou Y S. Transit market research using structural equation modeling and attitudinal market segmentation [J]. Transport Policy, 2008, 15 (3): 186-195.
8. Dill J, Voros K. Factors affecting bicycling demand: Initial survey findings from the Portland, Oregon region [J]. Transportation Research Record, 2007, 2031: 9-17.
9. Gatersleben B, Appleton K M. Contemplating cycling to work: Attitudes and perceptions in different stages of change [J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2007, 41 (4): 302-312.
10. Stinson M A, Bhat C A. A comparison of the route preferences of experienced and inexperienced bicycle commuters [C] //Proc of the 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC, 2005: 05-1434.
11. Garling T, Fujii S, Boe O. Empirical tests of a model of determinants of script-based driving choice [J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2001, 4 (2): 89-102.
12. Golob T F, Hensher D A. Greenhouse gas emissions and Australian commuters' attitudes and behavior concerning abatement policies and personal involvement [J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 1998, 3 (1): 1-18.
13. Golob T F. Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research [J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2003, 37 (1): 1-25.
14. Ryley T. Use of non-motorised modes and life stage in Edinburgh [J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2006, 14 (5): 367-375.