Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use

Journal of Environmental Psychology

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 339-347

  Nordlund, Annika M ^a   Garvill, Jörgen ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345015394     PISSN: 02724944     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00037-9     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Arbuckle, J. L. (1997). Amos user's guide version 3.6. Chicago: Small Waters Corporation.
2. Brown, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen, J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.
3. Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169-193.
4. Eckersley, R. (1992). Environmentalism and political theory: Toward an ecocentric approach. London: UCL Press.
5. Garvill, J. (1999). Choice of transportation mode: Factors influencing drivers' willingness to reduce personal car use and support car regulations. In M. Foddy, M. Smithson, S. Schneider, & M. Hogg (Eds.), Resolving social dilemmas: Dynamics, structural, and intergroup aspects (pp. 263-280). Hove: Psychological Press.
6. Garvill, J., Laitila, T., & Brydsten, M. (1994). Livsvärden och val av transportmedel. [Life values and choice of mode of transport]. Tech. Rep. No. 1, Transportation Research Unit, Umeå University.
7. Grendstad, G., & Wollebaek, D. (1998). Greener still? An empirical examination of Eckersley's ecocentric approach. Environment and Behavior, 30, 653-675.
8. Grob, A. (1995). A structural model of environmental attitudes and behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 209-220.
9. Grunert, S. C., & Juhl, H. J. (1995). Values, environmental attitudes, and buying of organic foods. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16, 39-62.
10. Gärling, T. (1999). Value priorities, social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 397-408.
11. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248.
12. Hopper, J. R., & Nielsen, J. M. (1991). Recycling as altruistic behavior: Normative and behavioral strategies to expand participation in a community recycling program. Environment and Behavior, 23, 195-220.
13. Karp, D. G. (1996). Values and their effect on pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 28, 111-133.
14. Kerr, N. L. (1995). Norms in social dilemmas. In D. A. Schroeder (Ed.), Social dilemmas. Perspectives on individuals and groups (pp. 31-48). London: Praeger.
15. Klandermans, B. (1992). Persuasive communication: Measures to overcome real-life social dilemmas. In W. B. G. Liebrand, D. M. Messick, & H. A. M. Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 307-318). Oxford: Pergamon.
16. Komorita, S. S., & Parks, C. D. (1994). Social dilemmas. Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark.
17. Kuhlman, D. M., & Marshello, A. (1975). Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategic effects in prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 922-931.
18. Van Lange, P. A. M. (1992). Rationality and morality in social dilemmas: The influence of social value orientations. In W. B. G. Liebrand, D. M. Messick, & H. A. M. Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 133-146). Oxford: Pergamon.
19. Van Lange, P. A. M., & Kuhlman, D. M. (1994). Social value orientations and impressions of partner's honesty and intelligence: A test of the might versus morality effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 126-141.
20. Van Lange, P. A. M., Liebrand, W. B. G., Messick, D. M., Wilke, H. A. M. (1992). Introduction and literature review. In W. B. G. Liebrand, D. M. Messick, & H. A. M. Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 3-27). Oxford: Pergamon.
21. Liebrand, W. B. G., Jansen, R. W. T. L., Rijken, V. M., & Suhre, C. J. M. (1986). Might over morality: Social values and the perception of other players in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 203-215.
22. Liebrand, W. B. G., & McClintock, C. G. (1988). The ring measure of social values: A computerized procedure for assessing individual differences in information processing and social value orientation. European Journal of Personality, 2, 217-230.
23. McKenzie-Mohr, D. (2000). Promoting sustainable behavior: An introduction to community-based social marketing. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 543-554.
24. Merchant, C. (1992). Radical ecology: The search for a livable world. New York: Routledge.
25. Messick, D. M., & McClintock, C. G. (1968). Motivational basis of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1-25.
26. Newhouse, N. (1990). Implications of attitude and behavior research for environmental conservation. Journal of Environmental Education, 22, 26-32.
27. Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2002). Value structures behind pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34, 740-756.
28. Schmitt, M. J., Schwartz, S. H., Steyer, R., & Schmitt, T. (1993). Measurement models for the Schwartz values inventory. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 9, 107-121.
29. Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. (1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 255 265.
30. Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 221-279.
31. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65.
32. Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407-424.
33. Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 65-84.
34. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Black, J. S. (1985-86). Support for environmental protection: The role of moral norms. Population and Environment, 8, 204-222.
35. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995a). The new ecological paradigm in social-psychological context. Environment and Behavior, 27, 723-753.
36. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environmental and Behavior, 25, 322-348.
37. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Kalof, L., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995b). Values, beliefs and pro-environmental action: Attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1611-1636.
38. Thøgersen, J. (1996). Recycling and morality. A critical review of the literature. Environment and Behavior, 28, 536-558.
39. Thompson, S. C. G., & Barton, M. A. (1994). Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14, 149-157.
40. Vining, J., & Ebreo, A. (1992). Predicting recycling behavior from global specific environmental attitudes and changes in recycling opportunities. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1580-1607.
41. Van Vugt, M., Van Lange, P. A. M., & Meertens, R. M. (1996). Commuting by car or public transportation? A social dilemma analysis of travel mode judgments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 373-379.
42. Van Vugt, M., Meertens, R. M., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (1995). Car versus public transportation? The role of social value orientations in a real-life social dilemma. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 258-278.
43. Widegren, Ö. (1998). The new environmental paradigm and personal norms. Environment and Behavior, 30, 75-100.