The role of attitudes toward characteristics of bicycle commuting on the choice to cycle to work over various distances

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 102-109

  Heinen, Eva ^a   Maat, Kees ^a,b   Van Wee, Bert ^b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Commuter cycling; Cycling and the environment; Part time cycling; Travel attitudes

Indexed keywords

BICYCLES; TRANSPORTATION;

ATTITUDINAL FACTORS; COMMUTER CYCLING; CYCLING AND THE ENVIRONMENT; HEALTH BENEFITS; HIGHER FREQUENCIES; PART-TIME CYCLING; PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS; TRAVEL ATTITUDES;

SAFETY FACTOR;

COMMUTING; CYCLE TRANSPORT; DECISION ANALYSIS; FACTOR ANALYSIS; JOURNEY TO WORK; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; TRANSPORTATION SAFETY;

EID: 78650304365     PISSN: 13619209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2010.08.010     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991, 50:179-211.
2. Costello A.B., Osborne J.W. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 2005, 10:1-9.
3. Distefano C., Zhu M., Mîndrilǎ D. Understanding and using factor scores: considerations for the applied researcher. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 2009, 14:1-11.
4. Fietsberaad (Center of expertise on bicycle policy), 2010. Cycling Percentages in Dutch Municipalities (data from 2004-2008), http://www.fietsberaad.nl/library/repository/bestanden/Kenniscentrum_Fietsberaad_fietsgebruik_per_gemeente_download.xls.
5. Gatersleben B., Appleton K.M. Contemplating cycling to work: attitudes and perceptions in different stages of change. Transportation Research A 2007, 4:302-312.
6. Gatersleben B., Uzzell D. Affective appraisals of the daily commute. Comparing perceptions of drivers, cyclist, and users of public transport. Environment and Behavior 2007, 39:416-431.
7. Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L. Multivariate Data Analysis 2006, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River. sixth ed.
8. Handy, S., 2005. Critical assessment of the literature on the relationships among transportation, land use, and physical activity. Transportation Research Board and the Institute of Medicine Committee on Physical Activity, Health, Transportation, and Land Use, Washington, DC.
9. Heinen E., van Wee B., Maat K. Commuting by bicycle, an overview of literature. Transport Reviews 2010, 30:59-96.
10. Keijer M.J.N., Rietveld P. How do people get to the railway station? The Dutch experience. Transportation Planning and Technology 2000, 23:215-235.
11. Scott Long J., Freese J. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata 2006, Stata Press, College Station.
12. van Wee B., Rietveld P., Meurs H. Is average daily travel time expenditure constant? In search of explanations for an increase in average travel time. Journal of Transport Geography 2006, 14:109-122.