Reduced use of environmentally friendly modes of transportation caused by perceived mobility necessities: An extension of the theory of planned behavior

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 37, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1856-1883

  Haustein, Sonja ^a   Hunecke, Marcel ^a  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547475642     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: 15591816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00241.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179 211.
2. Ajzen, I. Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice Hall.
3. Anable, J. Gatersleben, B. (2005). All work and no play? The role of instrumental and affective factors in work and leisure journeys by different travel modes. Transportation Research, Part A, 39, 163 181.
4. Armitage, C. J. Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471 499.
5. Aschpurwis + Behrens GmbH 2001). BIK Regionen: Ballungsräume, Stadtregionen, Mittel-/Unterzentrengebiete - Methodenbeschreibung zur Aktualisierung 2000 [BIK regions: metropolitan areas, city regions, middle and low order centers - Description of method of the last update]. Retrieved May 9, 2005, from http://www.bik-gmbh.de/texte/BIK-Regionen2000.pdf
6. Bamberg, S. (1996). Habituierte Pkw-Nutzung: Integration des Konstrukts "Habit" in die Theorie des geplanten Verhaltens[Habitualized car use: Integration of habit into the theory of planned behavior Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 27, 295 310.
7. Bamberg, S. (1999). Umweltschonendes Verhalten - eine Frage der Moral oder der richtigen Anreize?[Proenvironmental behavior: A question of moral or right incentives? Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 30, 57 76.
8. Bamberg, S., Hunecke, M. Blöbaum, A. (in press). Moral norm, social context, and the use of public transport: Results of two field studies. Journal of Environmental Psychology.
9. Bamberg, S. Schmidt, P. (1993). Verkehrsmittelwahl: Eine Anwendung der Theorie des geplanten Verhaltens[Travel mode choice: An application of the TPB Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 24, 25 37.
10. Bamberg. S. Schmidt, P. (2001). Theory-driven subgroup-specific evaluation of an intervention to reduce private car use. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 1300 1329.
11. Bamberg. S. Schmidt, P. (2003). Incentives, morality, or habit? Predicting students' car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz, and Triandis. Environment and Behavior, 35, 1 22.
12. Baron, R. M. Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173 1182.
13. Gatersleben, B., Steg, L. Vlek, C. (2002). Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34, 335 362.
14. Goodwin, P. B. (1997). Mobility and car dependence. In T. Rothengatter E. C. Vaya (Eds Traffic and transport psychology: Theory and application (pp. 449 464). Amsterdam : Pergamon.
15. Harland, P., Staats, H. Wilke, H. A. M. (1999). Explaining proenvironmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2505 2528.
16. Heath, Y. Gifford, R. (2002). Extending the theory of planned behavior: Predicting the use of public transportation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 2154 2189.
17. Hillman, M., Adams, J. Whitelegg, J. (1990). One false move: A study of children's independent mobility. London : Policy Studies Institute.
18. Hu, L. Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluation model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76 99). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
19. Hu, L. Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1 55.
20. Hunecke, M. (2000). Ökologische Verantwortung, Lebensstile und Umweltverhalten [Ecological responsibility, lifestyles, and ecological behavior]. Heidelberg, Germany : Asanger.
21. Jöreskog, K. Sörbom, D. (1993). New features in LISREL 8. Chicago : Scientific Software International.
22. Marsh, H. W. Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis in the study of self-concept: First- and higher-order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 562 582.
23. Poortinga, W., Steg, L. Vlek, C. (2004). Values, environmental concern, and environmental behavior: A study into household energy use. Environment and Behavior, 36, 70 93.
24. Steg, L. (2005). Car use: Lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic, and affective motives for car use. Transportation Research, Part A, 39, 147 162.
25. Steg, L., Vlek, C. Slotegraaf, G. (2001). Instrumental-reasoned and symbolic-affective motives for using a motor car. Transportation Research, Part F, 4, 151 169.
26. Tanner, C., Kaiser, F. Wölfling Kast, S. (2004). Contextual conditions of ecological consumerism: A food-purchasing survey. Environment and Behavior, 36, 94 111.
27. Verplanken, B., Aarts, H., Van Kippenberg, A. Van Kippenberg, C. (1994). Attitude versus general habit: Antecedents of travel mode choice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 285 300.