Data-derived soft-sensors for biological wastewater treatment plants: An overview

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 47, Issue , 2013, Pages 88-107

  Haimi, Henri ^a   Mulas, Michela ^a   Corona, Francesco ^a   Vahala, Riku ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Data driven models; Soft sensors; Wastewater treatment; Water quality monitoring

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL WASTE WATER TREATMENT; BIOLOGICAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT; DATA-DRIVEN MODEL; PROCESS DIAGNOSTICS; PROCESS INFORMATION; SOFT SENSORS; SOFT-SENSING TECHNIQUE; WATER QUALITY MONITORING;

DIGITAL STORAGE; SEWAGE PUMPING PLANTS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT; WATER QUALITY; WATER TREATMENT PLANTS;

SENSORS;

OPTIMIZATION; SENSOR; WASTE TREATMENT; WASTEWATER; WATER QUALITY;

EID: 84879310945     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.05.009     Document Type: Review

References (195)

1. Aarnio P., Minkkinen P. Application of partial least-squares modelling in the optimization of a waste-water treatment plant. Anal. Chim. Acta 1986, 191:457-460.
2. Aguado D., Rosen C. Multivariate statistical monitoring of continuous wastewater treatment plants. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2008, 53:1080-1091.
3. Aguado D., Ferrer A., Seco A., Ferrer J. Comparison of different predictive models for nutrient estimation in a sequencing batch reactor for wastewater treatment. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 2006, 84:75-81.
4. Aguado D., Ferrer A., Ferrer J., Seco A. Multivariate SPC of a sequencing batch reactor for wastewater treatment. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 2007, 85:82-93.
5. Aguado D., Zarzo M., Seco A., Ferrer A. Process understanding of a wastewater batch reactor with block-wise PLS. Environmetrics 2007, 18:551-560.
6. Aguado D., Ribes J., Montoya T., Ferrer J., Seco A. Amethodology for sequencing batch reactor identification with artificial neural networks: a case study. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2009, 33:465-472.
7. Aguilar-Martin J., López de Mántaras R. The process of classification and learning the meaning of linguistic descriptors of concepts. Approximate Reasoning in Decision Analysis 1982, 165-175. North-Holland Publishing Company, New York. M. Gupta, E. Sanchez (Eds.).
8. Äijälä G., Lumley D. Integrated soft sensor model for flow control. Wat. Sci. Tech. 2006, 53:473-482.
9. Anderson T. An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis 2003, John Wiley & Sons. third ed.
10. Ansari A.A., Gill S.S., Lanza G.R., Rast W. Eutrophication: Causes, Consequences and Control 2010, Springer.
11. Atkeson C., Moore A., Schaal S. Locally weighted learning. Artif. Intell. Rev. 1997, 11:11-73.
12. Baffi G., Martin E., Morris A. Non-linear projection to latent structures revisited: the quadratic PLS algorithm. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1999, 23:395-411.
13. Baggiani F., Marsili-Libelli S. Real-time fault detection and isolation in biological wastewater treatment plants. Water Sci. Technol. 2009, 60:2949-2961.
14. Banadda N., Nhapi I., Kimwaga R. Areview of modeling approaches in activated sludge systems. Afr. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 5:397-408.
15. Bang Y., Yoo C., Lee I.B. Nonlinear PLS modeling with fuzzy inference system. Chem. Int. Lab. Sys. 2003, 64:137-155.
16. Baruch I.S., Mariaca-Gaspar C.R. ALevenberg-Marquardt learning applied for recurrent neural identification and control of a wastewater treatment bioprocess. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2009, 24:1094-1114.
17. Baruch I., Flores J., Thomas F., Garrido R. Adaptive neural control of nonlinear systems. Artificial Neural Networks - ICANN 2001 2001, 930-936. Springer, Berlin. G. Dorffner, H. Bischof, K. Hornik (Eds.).
18. Baruch I.S., Georgieva P., Barrera-Cortes J. Adaptive recurrent neural network control of biological wastewater treatment. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2005, 20:173-193.
19. Belanche L.A., Valdés J.J., Comas J., Roda I.R., Poch M. Towards a model of input-output behaviour of wastewater treatment plants using soft computing techniques. Environ. Model. Softw. 1999, 14:409-419.
20. Belanche L., Valdés J.J., Comas J., Roda I.R., Poch M. Prediction of the bulking phenomenon in wastewater treatment plants. Artif. Intell. Eng. 2000, 14:307-317.
21. Bezdek J., Ehrlich R., Full W. FCM: the fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. Comput. Geosci. 1984, 10:191-203.
22. Bisschops I., Spanjers H., Keesman K. Automatic detection of exogenous respiration end-point using artificial neural network. Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 53:273-281.
23. Blom H.A. Indirect measurement of key water quality parameters in sewage treatment plants. J.Chemometr. 1996, 10:697-706.
24. Boger Z. Application of neural networks to water and wastewater treatment plant operation. ISA T. 1992, 31:25-33.
25. Bongards M. Improving the efficiency of a wastewater treatment plant by fuzzy control and neural networks. Water Sci. Technol. 2001, 43:189-196.
26. Borowa A., Brdys M.A., Mazur K. Modelling of wastewater treatment plant for monitoring and control purposes by state - space wavelet networks. Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control 2007, 2:121-131.
27. Brault J.M., Labib R., Perrier M., Stuart P. Prediction of activated sludge filamentous bulking using ATP data and neural networks. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2010, 9999:1-13.
28. Breiman L. Bagging predictors. Mach. Learn. 1996, 24:123-140.
29. Bro R. PARAFAC: tutorial and applications. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 1997, 38:149-171.
30. Caccavale F., Digiulio P., Iamarino M., Masi S., Pierri F. Aneural network approach for on-line fault detection of nitrogen sensors in alternated active sludge treatment plants. Water Sci. Technol. 2010, 62:2760-2768.
31. Capodaglio A.G., Jones H.V., Novotny V., Feng X. Sludge bulking analysis and forecasting: application of system identification and artificial neural computing technologies. Water Res. 1991, 25:1217-1224.
32. Caraman S., Sbarciog M., Barbu M. Predictive control of a wastewater treatment process. Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control 2007, 2:132-142.
33. Cecil D., Kozlowska M. Software sensors are a real alternative to true sensors. Environ. Model. Softw. 2010, 25:622-625.
34. Choi D.J., Park H. Ahybrid artificial neural network as a software sensor for optimal control of a wastewater treatment process. Water Res. 2001, 35:3959-3967.
35. Çinar Ö. New tool for evaluation of performance of wastewater treatment plant: artificial neural network. Process. Biochem. 2005, 40:2980-2984.
36. Çinar Ö., Hasar H., Kinari C. Modeling of submerged membrane bioreactor treating cheese whey wastewater by artificial neural network. J.Biotech. 2006, 123:204-209.
37. Civelekoglu G., Perendeci A., Yigit N.O., Kitis M. Modeling carbon and nitrogen removal in an industrial wastewater treatment plant using an adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system. Clean - Soil, Air, Water 2007, 35:617-625.
38. Clara N. Neural networks complemented with genetic algorithms and fuzzy systems for predicting nitrogenous effluent variables in wastewater treatment plants. WSEAS Trans. Syst. 2008, 7:695-705.
39. Cohen A., Janssen G., Brewster S.D., Seeley R., Boogert A.A., Graham A.A., Mardani M.R., Clarke N., Kasabov N.K. Application of computational intelligence for on-line control of a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) at Morrinsville sewage treatment plant. Water Sci. Technol. 1997, 35:63-71.
40. Copp J. The COST Simulation Benchmark: Description and Simulator Manual 2002, Technical Report, Office for official publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
41. Corominas L., Villez K., Aguado D., Rosén C., Rieger L., Vanrolleghem P.A. Evaluation of fault-detection strategies performance in wastewater treatment processes. Proc. 10th IWA Conference on Instrumentation, Control and Automation, Cairns, Australia 2009.
42. Corona F., Mulas M., Haimi H., Sundell L., Heinonen M., Vahala R. Monitoring nitrate concentrations in the denitrifying post-filtration unit of a municipal wastewater treatment plant. J.Process. Contr. 2013, 23:158-170.
43. Côté M., Grandjean B.P.A., Lessard P., Thibault J. Dynamic modelling of the activated sludge process: improving prediction using neural networks. Water Res. 1995, 29:995-1004.
44. Cristianini N., Shawe-Taylor J. An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods 2000, Cambridge University Press.
45. de Vries B., Principe J. Atheory for neural networks with time delays. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 3 1991, 162-168. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Mateo. R. Lippmann, J. Moody, D. Touretzky (Eds.).
46. Dellana S.A., West D. Predictive modeling for wastewater applications: linear and nonlinear approaches. Environ. Model. Softw. 2009, 24:96-106.
47. Delnavaz M., Ayati B., Ganjidoust H. Prediction of moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) performance for the treatment of aniline using artificial neural networks (ANN). J.Hazard. Mater. 2010, 179:769-775.
48. Dochain D., Vanrolleghem P.A. Dynamical Modelling and Estimation in Wastewater Treatment Processes 2001, IWA Publishing.
49. Douglas J., Usländer T., Schimak G., Esteban J., Denzer R. An open distributed architecture for sensor networks for risk management. Sensors 2008, 8:1755-1773.
50. Duda R., Hart P., Stork D. Pattern Classification 2000, John Wiley & Sons. second ed.
51. Dürrenmatt D., Gujer W. Data-driven modeling approaches to support wastewater treatment plant operation. Environ. Model. Softw. 2012, 30:47-56.
52. Elman J. Finding structure in time. Cogn. Sci. 1990, 14:179-211.
53. Everitt B.S., Landau S., Leese M., Stahl D. Cluster Analysis. Wiley's Series in Probability and Statistics 2011, John Wiley & Sons. fifth ed.
54. Fernandez F.J., Seco A., Ferrer J., Rodrigo M.A. Use of neurofuzzy networks to improve wastewater flow-rate forecasting. Environ. Model. Softw. 2009, 24:686-693.
55. Fisher R. The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann. Eugen. 1936, 7:179-188.
56. Fortuna L., Graziani S., Rizzo A., Xibilia M.G. Soft Sensors for Monitoring and Control of Industrial Processes. Advances in Industrial Control 2007, Springer.
57. Freund Y., Schapire R. Adecision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. J.Comput. Syst. Sci. 1997, 55:119-139.
58. Fu C., Poch M. System identification and real-time pattern recognition by neural networks for an activated sludge process. Environ. Int. 1995, 21:57-69.
59. Fuente M.J., Vega P. Neural networks applied to fault detection of a biotechnological process. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 1999, 12:569-584.
60. Fujiwara K., Kano M., Hasebe S., Takinami A. Soft-sensor development using correlation-based just-in-time modeling. AIChE J. 2009, 55:1754-1765.
61. Fullér R. Introduction to Neuro-fuzzy Systems. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing 2000, vol. 2. Springer.
62. Gernaey K.V., van Loosdrecht M.C.M., Henze M., Lind M., JØrgensen S.B. Activated sludge wastewater treatment plant modelling and simulation: state of the art. Environ. Model. Softw. 2004, 19:763-783.
63. González I.M., López García H. End-point detection of the aerobic phase in a biological reactor using SOM and clustering algorithms. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2006, 19:19-28.
64. Grau P., Beltrán S., de Gracia M., Ayesa E. New mathematical procedure for the automatic estimation of influent characteristics in WWTPs. Water Sci. Technol. 2007, 56:95-106.
65. Grieu S., Thiery F., Traoré A., Nguyen T.P., Barreau M., Polit M. KSOM and MLP neural networks for on-line estimating the efficiency of an activated sludge process. Chem. Eng. J. 2006, 116:1-11.
66. Gustafson E., Kessel W. Fuzzy clustering with a fuzzy covariance matrix. Proc. of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, USA 1979.
67. Guyon I., Elisseeff A. An introduction to variable and feature selection. J.Mach. Learn. Res. 2003, 3:1157-1182.
68. Häck M., Köhne M. Estimation of wastewater process parameters using neural networks. Water Sci. Technol. 1996, 33:101-115.
69. Hamed M.M., Khalafallah M.G., Hassanien E.A. Prediction of wastewater treatment plant performance using artificial neural networks. Environ. Model. Softw. 2004, 19:919-928.
70. Hamoda M.F., Al-Ghusain I.A., Hassan A.H. Integrated wastewater treatment plant performance evaluation using artificial neural networks. Water Sci. Technol. 1999, 40:55-65.
71. Hanbay D., Turkoglu I., Demir Y. Prediction of chemical oxygen demand (COD) based on wavelet decomposition and neural networks. Clean - Soil, Air, Water 2007, 35:250-254.
72. Hartigan J., Wong M. Ak-means clustering algorithm. Appl. Stat. 1979, 28:100-108.
73. Hastie T., Tibshirani R., Friedman J. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Springer Series in Statistics 2009, Springer. second ed.
74. Hauduc H., Gillot S., Rieger L., Ohtsuki T., Shaw A., Takács I., Winkler S. Activated sludge modelling in practice: an international survey. Water Sci. Technol. 2009, 60:1943-1951.
75. Hauduc H., Rieger L., Ohtsuki T., Shaw A., Takács I., Winkler S., Héduit A., Vanrolleghem P.A., Gillot S. Activated sludge modelling: development and potential use of a practical applications database. Water Sci. Technol. 2011, 63:2164-2182.
76. Haykin S. Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation 1999, Prentice Hall. second ed.
77. Heikkinen M., Poutiainen H., Liukkonen M., Heikkinen T., Hiltunen Y. Subtraction analysis based on self-organizing maps for an industrial wastewater treatment process. Math. Comput. Simulat. 2011, 82:450-459.
78. Henze M., Gujer W., Mino T., van Loosedrecht M. Activated Sludge Models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3 2000, Scientific and Technical Reports, No. 9, IWA Publishing.
79. Hill D., Minsker B. Anomaly detection in streaming environmental data: a data-driven modeling approach. Environ. Model. Softw. 2010, 25:1014-1022.
80. Hill D., Minsker B., Amir E. Real-time Bayesian anomaly detection in streaming environmental data. Water Resour. Res. 2009, 45. 10.1029/2008WR006956.
81. Hong Y.S.T., Rosen M.R., Bhamidimarri R. Analysis of a municipal wastewater treatment plant using a neural network-based pattern analysis. Water Res. 2003, 37:1608-1618.
82. Hong S.H., Lee M.W., Lee D.S., Park J.M. Monitoring of sequencing batch reactor for nitrogen and phosphorus removal using neural networks. Biochem. Eng. J. 2007, 35:365-370.
83. Hotelling H. Relations between two sets of variants. Biometrika 1936, 28:321-377.
84. Huang M.Z., Wan J.Q., Ma Y.W., Li W.J., Sun X.F., Wan Y. Afast predicting neural fuzzy model for on-line estimation of nutrient dynamics in an anoxic/oxic process. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:1642-1651.
85. Hubert M., Van Kerckhoven J., Verdonck T. Robust PARAFAC for incomplete data. J.Chemometr. 2012, 26:290-298.
86. Jang J.S.R. ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE T. Syst. Man. Cy 1993, 23:665-685.
87. Jeppsson U., Rosen C., Alex J., Copp J., Gerneay K.V., Pons M.N., Vanrolleghem P.A. Towards a benchmark simulation model for plantwide control strategy performance evaluation of WWTPs. Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 53:287-295.
88. Jolliffe I.T. Principal Component Analysis. Springer Series in Statistics 2002, Springer.
89. Kadlec P. On Robust and Adaptive Soft Sensors 2009, Ph.D. thesis, Bournemouth University, School of Design, Engineering & Computing, Bournemouth, UK.
90. Kadlec P., Gabrys B. Soft sensor based on adaptive local learning. Proc. of the 15th International Conference On Neural Information Processing, Auckland, New Zealand 2008, 1172-1179.
91. Kadlec P., Gabrys B., Strandt S. Data-driven soft sensors in the process industry. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2009, 33:795-814.
92. Kadlec P., Gabrys B., Grbić R. Review of adaptation mechanisms for data-driven soft sensors. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2011, 35:1-24.
93. Kariya T., Kurata H. Generalized Least Squares. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics 2004, John Wiley & Sons.
94. Khataee A.R., Kasiri M.B. Modeling of biological water and wastewater treatment processes using artificial neural networks. Clean - Soil, Air, Water 2011, 39:742-749.
95. Kim M.H., Kim Y.S., Prabu A.A., Yoo C.K. Asystematic approach to data-driven modeling and soft sensing in a full-scale plant. Water Sci. Technol. 2009, 60:363-370.
96. Kohavi R., John G. Wrappers for feature subset selection. Artif. Intell. 1997, 97:273-324.
97. Kohonen T. Self-organizing Maps. Springer Series in Information Sciences 2001, vol. 30. Springer.
98. Kraskov A., Stögbauer H., Grassberger P. Estimating mutual information. Phys. Rev. E 2004, 69. 066138-1-066138-16.
99. Krishnapuram R., Keller J. Apossibilistic approach to clustering. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Sys. 1993, 1:98-110.
100. Lee J., Verleysen M. Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction. Information Science and Statistics 2007, Springer.
101. Lee D.S., Jeon C.O., Park J.M., Chang K.S. Hybrid neural network modeling of a full-scale industrial wastewater treatment process. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2002, 78:670-682.
102. Lee C., Choi S.W., Lee I.B. Sensor fault identification based on time-lagged PCA in dynamic processes. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 2004, 70:165-178.
103. Lee D.S., Vanrolleghem P.A., Park J.M. Parallel hybrid modeling methods for a full-scale cokes wastewater treatment plant. J.Biotechnol. 2005, 115:317-328.
104. Lee C., Choi S.W., Lee I.B. Sensor fault diagnosis in a wastewater treatment process. Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 53:251-257.
105. Lee H.W., Lee M.W., Park J.M. Robust adaptive partial least squares modeling of a full-scale industrial wastewater treatment process. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46:955-964.
106. Lee M.W., Hong S.H., Choi H., Kim J.H., Lee D.S., Park J.M. Real-time remote monitoring of small-scaled biological wastewater treatment plants by a multivariate statistical process control and neural network-based software sensors. Process. Biochem. 2008, 43:1107-1113.
107. Lee H.W., Lee M.W., Park J.M. Multi-scale extension of PLS algorithm for advanced on-line process monitoring. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 2009, 98:201-212.
108. Lee J.W., Hong Y.S.T., Suh C.W., Shin H.S. Performance prediction of the full-scale biological nutrient removal process using an artificial neural network. Proc. of Watermatex 2011, 8th IWA Symposium on Systems Analysis and Integrated Assessment, San Sebastián, Spain 2011.
109. Lennox J., Rosen C. Adaptive multiscale principal components analysis for online monitoring of wastewater treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 2002, 45:227-235.
110. Liitiäinen E., Verleysen M., Corona F., Lendasse A. Residual variance estimation in machine learning. Neurocomputing 2009, 72:3692-3703.
111. Little R.J.A., Rubin D.B. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics 2002, John Wiley & Sons. second ed.
112. Luccarini L., Porra E., Spagni A., Ratini P., Grilli S., Longhi S., Bortone G. Soft sensors for control of nitrogen and phosphorus removal from wastewaters by neural networks. Water Sci. Technol. 2002, 45:101-107.
113. Lumley D. On-line instrument confirmation: how can we check that our instruments are working?. Water Sci. Technol. 2002, 53:469-476.
114. Machón I., López H., Rodríguez-Iglesias J., Maranón E., Vázquez I. Simulation of a coke wastewater nitrification process using a feed-forward neuronal net. Environ. Model. Softw. 2007, 22:1382-1387.
115. Marsili-Libelli S. Adaptive estimation of bioactivities in the activated sludge process. IEE Proc-D 1990, 137:349-356.
116. Marsili-Libelli S. Control of SBR switching by fuzzy pattern recognitions. Water Res. 2006, 40:1095-1107.
117. Marsili-Libelli S., Müller A. Adaptive fuzzy pattern recognition in the anaerobic digestion process. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 1996, 17:651-659.
118. Masson M., Canu S., Grandvalet Y., Lynggaard-Jensen A. Software sensor design based on empirical data. Ecol. Model. 1999, 120:131-139.
119. Miettinen T., Hurse T.J., Connor M.A., Reinikainen S.P., Minkkinen Multivariate monitoring of a biological wastewater treatment process: a case study at Melbourne water's western treatment plant. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 2004, 73:131-138.
120. Mjalli F.S., Al-Asheh S., Alfadala H.E. Use of artificial neural network black-box modeling for the prediction of wastewater treatment plants performance. J.Environ. Manage. 2007, 83:329-338.
121. Molvar A.E., Roesler J.F., Babcock R.H. Instrumentation and Automation Experiences in Wastewater-treatment Facilities 1976, volume EPA-600/2-76-198 of Environmental Protection Technology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory.
122. Moon T.S., Kim Y.J., Kim J.R., Cha J.H., Kim D.H., Kim C.W. Identification of process operating state with operational map in municipal wastewater treatment plant. J.Environ. Manage. 2009, 90:772-778.
123. Moral H., Aksoy A., Gokcay C.F. Modeling of the activated sludge process by using artificial neural networks with automated architecture screening. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2008, 32:2471-2478.
124. Mujunen S.P. Multivariate Monitoring of Wastewater Treatment Processes in Pulp and Paper Industry 1999, Ph.D. thesis, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Department of Chemical Technology, Lappeenranta, Finland.
125. Mujunen S.P., Minkkinen P., Teppola P., Wirkkala R.S. Modeling of activated sludge plants treatment efficiency with PLSR: a process analytical case study. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 1998, 41:83-94.
126. Olsson G. State of the Art in Sewage Treatment Control. American Inst. of Chemical Engineers, Symp Series 159 1977, 52-76.
127. Olsson G. ICA and me - a subjective review. Water Res. 2012, 46:1585-1626.
128. Olsson G., Newell B., Rosen C., Ingildsen P. Application of information technology to decision support in treatment plant operation. Water Sci. Technol. 2003, 47:35-42.
129. Olsson G., Nielsen M., Yuan Z., Lynggaard-Jensen A., Steyer J.P. Instrumentation, Control and Automation in Wastewater Systems 2005, Scientific and Technical Reports, No. 15, IWA Publishing.
130. Pai T.Y., Tsai Y.P., Lo H.M., Tsai C.H., Lin C.Y. Grey and neural network prediction of suspended solids and chemical oxygen demand in hospital wastewater treatment plant effluent. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2007, 31:1272-1281.
131. Pai T.Y., Chuang S.H., Wan T.J., Lo H.M., Tsai Y.P., Su H.C., Yu L.F., Hu H.C., Sung P.J. Comparisons of grey and neural network prediction of industrial park wastewater effluent using influent quality and online monitoring parameters. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2008, 146:51-66.
132. Pai T.Y., Yang P.Y., Wang S.C., Lo M.H., Chiang C.F., Kuo J.L., Chu H.H., Su H.C., Yu L.F., Hu H.C., Chang Y.H. Predicting effluent from the wastewater treatment plant of industrial park based on fuzzy network and influent quality. Appl. Math. Model. 2011, 35:3674-3684.
133. Petersen B., Gernaey K., Henze M., Vanrolleghem P.A. Calibration of activated sludge models: a critical review of experimental designs. Biotechnology for the Environment: Wastewater Treatment and Modeling, Waste Gas Handling 2003, Kluwer Academic Publishers. S.N. Agathos, W. Reineke (Eds.).
134. Phillips H.M., Sahlstedt K.E., Frank K., Bratby J., Brennan W., Rogowski S., Pier D., Anderson W., Mulas M., Copp J.B., Shirodkar N. Wastewater treatment modelling in practice: a collaborative discussion of the state of the art. Water Sci. Technol. 2009, 59:695-704.
135. Pokhrel D., Viraraghavan T. Treatment of pulp and paper mill wastewater - a review. Sci. Total Environ. 2004, 333:37-58.
136. Poutiainen H., Niska H., Heinonen-Tanski H., Kolehmainen M. Use of sewer on-line total solids data in wastewater treatment plant modelling. Water Sci. Technol. 2010, 62:743-750.
137. Pu H.C., Hung Y.T. Use of artificial neural networks: predicting trickling filter performance in a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Environ. Manage. Health 1995, 6:16-27.
138. Puig S., Corominas L., Vives M., Balaguer M., Colprim J., Colomer J. Development and implementation of a real-time control system for nitrogen removal using OUR and ORP as end points. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44:3367-3373.
139. Qiao J., Chen Q., Han H. The chemical oxygen demand modelling based on a dynamic structure neural network. Waste Water - Evaluation and Management 2011, InTech. F.S.G. Einschlag (Ed.).
140. Qin S., McAvoy T. Nonlinear PLS modeling using neural networks. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1992, 16:379-391.
141. Ráduly B., Gernaey K.V., Capodaglio A.G., Mikkelsen P.S., Henze M. Artificial neural networks for rapid WWTP performance evaluation: methodology and case study. Environ. Model. Softw. 2007, 22:1208-1216.
142. Rieger L., Takács I., Villez K., Siegrist H., Lessard P., Vanrolleghem P.A., Comeau Y. Data reconciliation for wastewater treatment plant simulation studies - planning for high-quality data and typical sources of errors. Water Environ. Res. 2010, 82:426-433.
143. Rieger L., Gillot S., Langergraber G., Ohtsuki T., Shaw A., Takacs I., Winkler S. Guidelines for Using Activated Sludge Models 2012, Scientific and Technical Reports, No. 22, IWA Publishing.
144. Robinson R.B., Cox C.D., Odom K. Identifying outliers in correlated water quality data. J.Environ. Eng. 2005, 131:651-657.
145. Rosen C. AChemometric Approach to Process Monitoring and Control - with Applications to Wastewater Treatment Operation 2001, Ph.D. thesis, Lund University of Technology, Department of Industrial Electrical Engineering and Automation, Lund, Sweden.
146. Rosen C., Lennox J.A. Multivariate and multiscale monitoring of wastewater treatment operation. Water Res. 2001, 35:3402-3410.
147. Rosen C., Olsson G. Disturbance detection in wastewater treatment plants. Water Sci. Technol. 1998, 37:197-205.
148. Rosen C., Yuan Z. Supervisory control of wastewater treatment plants by combining principal component analysis and fuzzy c-means clustering. Water Sci. Technol. 2001, 43:147-156.
149. Rosen C., Larsson M., Jeppsson U., Yuan Z. Aframework for extreme-event control in wastewater treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 2002, 45:299-308.
150. Rosen C., Röttorp J., Jeppsson U. Multivariate on-line monitoring: challenges and solutions for modern wastewater treatment operation. Water Sci. Technol. 2003, 47:171-179.
151. Rosen C., Jeppsson U., Vanrolleghem P.A. Towards a common benchmark for long-term process control and monitoring performance evaluation. Water Sci. Technol. 2004, 50:41-49.
152. Rosipal R., Trejo L.J. Kernel partial least squares regression in reproducing kernel hilbert space. J.Mach. Learn. Res. 2001, 2:97-123.
153. Rousseeuw P.J., Hubert M. Robust statistics for outlier detection. WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov. 2011, 1:73-79.
154. Ruiz M., Villez K., Sin G., Colomer J., Vanrrolleghem P. Influence of scaling and unfolding in PCA based monitoring of nutrient removing batch process. Proc. of the 6th IFAC Symposium on Fault Detection, Supervision and Safety of Technical Processes, Beijing, China 2006, 114-119.
155. Rustum R. Modelling Activated Sludge Wastewater Treatment Plants Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques (Fuzzy Logic and Neural Networks) 2009, Ph.D. thesis, Heriot-Watt University, School of the Built Environment, Edinburgh, Scotland.
156. Rustum R., Adeloye A.J. Replacing outliers and missing values from activated sludge data using Kohonen self-organizing map. J.Environ. Eng. 2007, 133:909-916.
157. Rustum R., Adeloye A.J., Scholz M. Applying Kohonen self-organizing map as a software sensor to predict biochemical oxygen demand. Water Environ. Res. 2008, 80:32-40.
158. Sin G. Systematic Calibration of Activated Sludge Models 2004, Ph.D. thesis, Ghent University, Faculty of Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences, Ghent, Belgium.
159. Smilde A., Bro R., Geladi P. Multi-way Analysis: Applications in the Chemical Sciences 2004, John Wiley & Sons.
160. Spérandio M., Queinnec I. Online estimation of wastewater nitrifiable nitrogen, nitrification and denitrification rates, using ORP and DO dynamics. Water Sci. Technol. 2004, 49:31-38.
161. Stone C. Consistent nonparametric regression. Ann. Stat. 1977, 5:595-620.
162. Strang G. Wavelets. Am. Sci. 1994, 82:250-255.
163. Tay J.H., Zhang X. Neural fuzzy modeling of anaerobic biological wastewater treatment systems. J.Environ. Eng. ASCE 1999, 125:1149-1159.
164. Tay J.H., Zhang X. Afast predicting neural fuzzy model for high-rate anaerobic wastewater treatment systems. Water Res. 2000, 34:2849-2860.
165. Teppola P. Multivariate Process Monitoring of Sequential Process Data - a Chemometric Approach 1999, Ph.D. thesis, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Department of Chemical Technology, Lappeenranta, Finland.
166. Teppola P., Minkkinen P. Possibilistic and fuzzy c-means clustering for process monitoring in an activated sludge waste-water treatment plant. J.Chemometr. 1999, 13:445-459.
167. Teppola P., Mujunen S.P., Minkkinen P. Partial least squares modeling of an activated sludge plant: a case study. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 1997, 38:197-208.
168. Teppola P., Mujunen S.P., Minkkinen P. Acombined approach of partial least squares and fuzzy c-means clustering for the monitoring of an activated-sludge waste-water treatment plant. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 1998, 41:95-103.
169. Teppola P., Mujunen S.P., Minkkinen P. Adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering in process monitoring. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 1999, 45:23-38.
170. Teppola P., Mujunen S.P., Minkkinen P. Kalman filter for updating the coefficients of regression models. A case study from an activated sludge waste-water treatment plant. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 1999, 45:371-384.
171. Tharrault Y., Mourot G., Ragot J. WWTP diagnosis based on robust principal component analysis. Proc. of the 7th IFAC Symposium on Fault Detection, Supervision and Safety of Technical Processes, Barcelona, Spain 2009, 1342-1347.
172. Thompson G., Swain J., Kay M., Forster C.F. The treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 2001, 77:275-286.
173. Timmerman M. Multilevel component analysis. Brit. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 2006, 59:301-320.
174. Tomita R.K., Park S.W., Sotomayor O.A.Z. Analysis of activated sludge process using multivariate statistical tools - a PCA approach. Chem. Eng. J. 2002, 90:283-290.
175. Tyagi R.D., Du Y.G. Kinetic model for the effects of heavy metals on activated sludge process using neural networks. Environ. Technol. 1992, 13:883-890.
176. Vanrolleghem P.A., Lee D.S. On-line monitoring equipment for wastewater treatment processes: state of the art. Water Sci. Technol. 2003, 47:1-34.
177. Villez K., Ruiz M., Sin G., Colomer J., Rosen C., Vanrolleghem P.A. Combining multiway principal component analysis (MPCA) and clustering for efficient data mining of historical data sets of SBR processes. Water Sci. Technol. 2008, 57:1659-1666.
178. 2 statistic. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49:180-188.
179. Walczak B., Massart D. Dealing with missing data: part I. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 2001, 58:15-27.
180. Walczak B., Massart D. Dealing with missing data: part II. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 2001, 58:29-42.
181. Wan J., Huang M., Ma Y., Guo W., Wang Y., Zhang H., Li W., Sun X. Prediction of effluent quality of a paper mill wastewater treatment using an adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system. Appl. Softw. Comput. 2011, 11:3238-3246.
182. Industrial Wastewater Management, Treatment and Disposal 2008, Water Environment Federation, WEF Manual of Practice No. FD-3, WEF Press. third ed.
183. West D., Mangiameli P. Identifying process conditions in an urban wastewater treatment plant. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Man. 2000, 20:573-590.
184. Wold S., Sjöström M., Eriksson L. PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 2001, 58:109-130.
185. Woo S.H., Jeon C.O., Yun Y.S., Choi H., Lee C.S., Lee D.S. On-line estimation of key process variables based on kernel partial least squares in an industrial cokes wastewater treatment plant. J.Hazard. Mater. 2009, 161:538-544.
186. Industrial Waste Treatment Handbook 2006, Woodard & Curran, Inc., Butterworth-Heinemann. second ed.
187. Yetilmezsoy K., Ozkaya B., Cakmakci M. Artificial intelligence-based prediction models for environmental engineering. Neural Netw. World 2011, 21:193-218.
188. Yoo C.K., Kim D.S., Cho J.H., Choi S.W., Lee I.B. Process system engineering in wastewater treatment process. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2001, 18:408-421.
189. Yoo C.K., Vanrolleghem P.A., Lee I.B. Nonlinear modeling and adaptive monitoring with fuzzy and multivariate statistical methods in biological wastewater treatment plants. J.Biotechnol. 2003, 105:135-163.
190. Yoo C.K., Bang Y.H., Lee I.B., Vanrolleghem P.A., Rosen C. Application of fuzzy partial least squares (FPLS) modeling nonlinear biological processes. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2004, 21:1087-1097.
191. Yoo C.K., Villez K., Van Hulle S.W.H., Vanrolleghem P.A. Enhanced process monitoring for wastewater treatment systems. Environmetrics 2008, 19:602-617.
192. Zamarrenoa J., Vega P. State space neural network. Properties and applications. Neural Netw. 1998, 11:1099-1112.
193. Zhao L., Chai T. Wastewater BOD forecasting model for optimal operation using robust time-delay neural network. Proc. ISNN 2005, Second International Symposium on Neural Networks, Part III, Chongqing, China 2005, 1028-1033.
194. Zhao L., Chai T., Cong Q. Operating condition recognition of pre-denitrification bioprocess using robust EMPCA and FCM. Proc. WCICA 2006, The 6th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, Dalian, China 2006, 9386-9390.
195. Zhu Z., Corona F., Lendasse A., Baratti R., Romagnoli J. Local linear regression for soft-sensor design with application to an industrial deethanizer. Proc. of The18th IFAC World Congress, Milano, Italy 2011, 6212-6217.