Data reconciliation for wastewater treatment plant simulation studies - Planning for high-quality data and typical sources of errors

Water Environment Research

Volumn 82, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 426-433

  Rieger, Leiv ^a,c,d   Takács, Imre ^b   Villez, Kris ^a,e   Siegrist, Hansruedi ^d   Lessard, Paul ^a   Vanrolleghem, Peter A ^a   Comeau, Yves ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^b EnviroSim Europe   (France)

^c ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^d SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF AQUATIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

^e PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Activated sludge model; Data quality; Data reconciliation; Diagnosis; Fault detection; Measuring campaigns; Modeling; Sources of measuring errors

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS; DIAGNOSIS; ERRORS; FAULT DETECTION; MODELS; SYSTEMATIC ERRORS;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE MODEL; DATA QUALITY; DATA RECONCILIATION; MEASURING CAMPAIGNS; MEASURING ERRORS;

WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; CALIBRATION; DATA SET; ERROR ANALYSIS; MASS BALANCE; WASTEWATER; WATER TREATMENT;

ARTICLE; ERRORS, ARTIFACTS AND QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES; INFORMATION PROCESSING; ONLINE SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; METHODOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEWAGE; STANDARD; THEORETICAL MODEL;

CALIBRATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, THEORETICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID;

EID: 77953151580     PISSN: 10614303     EISSN: 15547531     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2175/106143009X12529484815511     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. American Public Health Association; American Water Works Association; Water Environment Federation (2005) Standards Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st ed.; American Public Health Association: Washington, D.C.
2. Barker, P. S.; Dold, P. L. (1995) COD and Nitrogen Mass Balances in Activated Sludge Systems. Water Res., 29 (2), 633-643.
3. Haider, R.; Haider, S. (1998) Overestimated COD Values for Raw Wastewaters Extracted by Vacuum Sampling Devices Due to Sedimentation Effects. Water Sci. Technol., 37 (12), 293-300.
4. Hauduc, H.; Gillot, S.; Rieger, L.; Ohtsuki, T.; Shaw, A.; Takács, I.; Winkler, S. (2009) Activated Sludge Modelling in Practice - An International Survey. Water Sci. Technol., 60 (8), 1943-1951.
5. Isermann, R.; Ballé, P. (1997) Trends in the Application of Model-Based Fault Detection and Diagnosis of Technical Processes. Control Eng. Pract., 5 (5), 709-719.
6. Kurgan, L. A.; Musilek, P. (2006) A Survey of Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining Process Models. Knowl. Eng. Rev., 21 (1), 1-24.
7. Lindtner, S.; Kroiss, H.; Nowak, O. (2004) Benchmarking of Municipal Waste Water Treatment Plants (An Austrian Project). Water Sci. Technol., 50 (7), 265-271.
8. Meijer, S. C. F.; van der Spoel, H.; Susanti, S.; Heijnen, J. J.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. (2002) Error Diagnostics and Data Reconciliation for Activated Sludge Modelling Using Mass Balances. Water Sci. Technol., 45 (6), 145-156.
9. Metcalf & Eddy (2003) Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse, Tchobanoglous, G., Burton, F. L., Stensel, H. D. (Eds.); McGraw- Hill: New York.
10. Montgomery, D. C. (2005) Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, 5th ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York.
11. Nowak, O.; Franz, A.; Svardal, K.; Mueller, V.; Kuehn, V. (1999) Parameter Estimation for Activated Sludge Models with the Help of Mass Balances. Water Sci. Technol., 39 (4), 113-120.
12. Puig, S.; van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.; Colprim, J.; Meijer, S. C. F. (2008) Data Evaluation of Full-Scale Wastewater Treatment Plants by Mass Balance. Water Res., 42 (18), 4645-4655.
13. Rieger, L.; Alex, J.; Winkler, S.; Böhler, M.; Thomann, M.; Siegrist, H. (2003) Progress in Sensor Technology - Progress in Process Control? Part I: Sensor Property Investigation and Classification. Water Sci. Technol., 47 (2), 103-112.
14. Rieger, L.; Thomann, M.; Gujer, W.; Siegrist, H. (2005) Quantifying the Uncertainty of On-Line Sensors at WWTPs During Field Operation. Water Res., 39 (20), 5162-5174.
15. Rieger, L.; Vanrolleghem, P. A.; Takács, I.; Johnson, B. R. (2008) Wastewater Treatment Modelling: Quo Vadis? Water21, Oct., 59-60.
16. Thomann, M. (2003) Data Quality Control at WWTPs Using Mass Balances, Experiments and Statistical Methods. Ph.D. Thesis, ETH Zurich, Schriftenreihe des Instituts für Hydromechanik und Wasser-wirtschaft (IHW) Bd.15: Zurich, Switzerland [in German], http:// e-collection.ethbib.ethz.ch/cgi-bin/show.pl? type=diss&nr=14824.
17. Thomann, M. (2008) Quality Evaluation Methods for Wastewater Treatment Plant Data. Water Sci. Technol., 57 (10), 1601-1609.
18. Thomann, M.; Rieger, L.; Frommhold, S.; Siegrist, H.; Gujer, W. (2002) An Efficient Monitoring Concept with Control Charts for On-Line Sensors. Water Sci. Technol., 46 (4-5), 107-116.
19. van Griensven, A.; Vandenberghe, V.; Bols, J.; De Pauw, N.; Goethals, P.; Meirlaen, J.; Vanrolleghem, P. A.; Van Vooren, L.; Bauwens, W. (2000) Experience and Organisation of Automated Measuring Stations for River Water Quality Monitoring. Proceedings of the 1st IWA World Water Congress [CD-ROM], Paris, France, July 3-7; International Water Association: London, United Kingdom.
20. Winkler, S.; Bertrand-Krajewski, J. L.; Torres, A.; Saracevic, E. (2008) Benefits, Limitations and Uncertainty of In Situ Spectrometry. Water Sci. Technol., 57 (10), 1651-1658.