State space neural network. Properties and application

Neural Networks

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 1099-1112

  Zamarreño, Jesús M ^a   Vega, Pastora ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALLADOLID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALAMANCA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Dynamic behaviour; Empiric modelling; Linearization theory; Process industry; Recurrent neural networks; Stability theory; State space model; System identification

Indexed keywords

LINEARIZATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NONLINEAR EQUATIONS; STATE SPACE METHODS; SYSTEM STABILITY; THEOREM PROVING;

EMPIRIC MODELING; STABILITY THEORY;

RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORKS;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; LINEAR SYSTEM; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTOR; THEORY;

EID: 0032144732     PISSN: 08936080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0893-6080(98)00074-4     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Alvarez, T., Sanzo, M. and De Prada, C. (1995). Identification and constrained multivariable predictive control of chemical reactors. In 4th IEEE Conference on Control Applications, Albany, USA.
2. Baba N. A new approach for finding the global minimum of error function of neural networks. Neural Networks. 2:1989;367-373.
3. Barnett, S. (1971). Matrices in Control Theory. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
4. Bhat N., McAvoy T. J. Use of neural nets for dynamic modeling and control of chemical process systems. Computers and Chemical Engineering: An International Journal. 14(4/5):1990;573-583.
5. Delgado A., Kambhampati C., Warwick K. Dynamic recurrent neural networks for system identification and control. IEE Proc.-Control Theory Appl. 142(4):1995;307-314.
6. Elman J. L. Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science. 14:1990;179-211.
7. Hoekstra, J. and Kooijman, R. (1991). Recurrence with delayed links in multilayer networks for processing sequential data. In Proceedings of the 1991 International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Espoo, Finland, Vol. II (pp. 1149-1152).
8. Hornik K., Stinchcombe M., White H. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks. 2:1989;359-366.
9. Hunt K. J., Sbarbaro D., Zbikowski R., Gawthrop P. J. Neural networks for control systems. A survey. Automatica. 28(6):1992;1083-1112.
10. Kolk, W. R. and Lerman, R. A. (1992). Nonlinear System Dynamics. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
11. Kooijman, R. (1991). A General Algorithm for Serial Processing in Neural Networks and RNS. Users Documentation. Delft: T.U.
12. Kuschewski J. G., Hui S., Zak S. H. Application of feedforward neural networks to dynamical system identification and control. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology. 1(1):1993;37-49.
13. Narendra K. S., Parthasarathy K. Identification and control of dynamical systems using neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks. 1(1):1990;4-27.
14. Parlos A. G., Chong K. T., Atiya A. F. Application of the recurrent multilayer perceptron in modeling complex process dynamics. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks. 5(2):1994;255-266.
15. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E. and Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning Internal Representations by Error Propagation. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in The Microstructure of Cognition, Vol. I. Cambridge, MA: Bradford.
16. Slotine, J.-J. E. and Li, W. (1991). Applied Nonlinear Control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
17. Söderström, T. and Stoica, P. (1989). System Identification. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18. Van der Smagt P. P. Minimisation methods for training feedforward neural networks. Neural Networks. 7(1):1994;1-11.
19. Widrow B., Lehr M. A. 30 Years of adaptive neural networks: Perceptron, madaline, and backpropagation. Proceedings of the IEEE. 78(9):1990;1415-1439.
20. Williams, R. J. (1990). Adaptive state representation and estimation using recurrent connectionist networks. In Neural Networks for Control (pp. 97-115). London: MIT Press.