Online estimation of wastewater nitrifiable nitrogen, nitrification and denitrification rates, using ORP and DO dynamics

Water Science and Technology

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 31-38

  Sperandio M ^a   Queinnec, I ^b  

^a UMR792 INGÉNIERIE DES SYSTÈMES BIOLOGIQUES ET DES PROCÉDÉS   (France)

^b LAAS CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Activated sludge; Denitrification; Dissolved oxygen; Estimation; Nitrification; Oxidation reduction potential

Indexed keywords

AMMONIA; OXIDATION; REDUCTION; SENSORS; SEWAGE AERATION; SEWAGE SLUDGE; TOXIC MATERIALS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

SIGNAL DYNAMICS; WASTEWATER MODIFICATIONS;

NITRIFICATION;

AMMONIA; DISSOLVED OXYGEN; NITRATE; NITROGEN; OXYGEN;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; DENITRIFICATION; NITRIFICATION; ON-LINE TECHNIQUE; SENSOR; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

ACCURACY; ACTIVATED SLUDGE; AERATION; CALCULATION; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONFERENCE PAPER; DENITRIFICATION; DYNAMICS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NITRIFICATION; OXIDATION REDUCTION POTENTIAL; PHYSICAL MODEL; PREDICTION; REACTOR; SLUDGE; WASTE COMPONENT REMOVAL; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY;

EID: 1142279487     PISSN: 02731223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2004.0010     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Al-Ghusain, I.A., Huang, J., Hao, J.O. and Lim, B.S. (1994). Using pH as a real-time control parameter for wastewater treatment and sludge digestion processes. Wat. Sci. Tech., 30(4), 159-168.
2. Brouwer, H., Klapwijk, A. and Keesman, K. (1998). Identification of activated sludge and wastewater characteristics using respirometric batch-experiments. Wat. Res., 32(4), 1240-1254.
3. Demuynck, C., Vanrolleghem, P., Mingneau, C., Luessens, J. and Verstraete, W. (1994). NDBEPR process optimization in SBRs: Reduction of external carbon-source and oxygen supply. Wat. Sci. Tech., 30(4), 169-179.
4. Gómez-Quintero, C., Queinnec, I. and Babary, J.P. (2000). A reduced nonlinear model of an activated sludgep processes. Int. Symp. on Advanced Control of Chemical Processes, pp 1037-1042, Pisa, Italy.
5. Hao, O and Huang, J. (1996). Alternating aerobic-anoxic process for nitrogen removal: Process evaluation. Wat. Environ. Res., January/February, 68(1), 83-93.
6. Henze, M., Leslie Grady, Jr. C.P., Gujer, W., Marais, G.V.R. and Matsuo, T. (1987). Activated Sludge Model No. 1. IAWQ Scientific and Technical Report No. 1., London. UK. 33 pp.
7. Hoen, K., Schuhen, M. and Kohne, M. (1996). Control of nitrogen removal in wastewater treatment plants with predenitrification, depending on the actual purification capacity. Wat. Sci. Tech., (1), 223-236.
8. Jeppsson, U. (1995). A simplified control-oriented model of the activated sludge process. Math. Model. Syst., 1(1), 3-16.
9. Julien, S., Lessard, P. and Babary, J.P. (1999). A reduced-order model for control of a single reactor activated sludge process. Math. Comp. Mod. Dyn. Syst., 5(3), 337-350.
10. Kim, H., McAvoy, T., Anderson, J. and Hao, O. (2000). Control of an alternating aerobic-anoxic activated sludge system - Part 2: Optimization using a linearized model. Control Eng. Pract., 8, 279-289.
11. Klapwijk, A., Brouwer, H., Vrolijk, E. and Kujawa, K. (1998). Control of intermittently aerated nitrogen removal plants by detection endpoints of nitrification and denitrification using respirometry only. Wat. Res., 32(5), 1700-1703.
12. Paul, E., Plisson-Saune, S., Mauret, M. and Cantet, J. (1998). Process state evaluation of alternating oxicanoxic activated sludge using ORP, pH and DO. Wat. Sci. Tech., 299-306.
13. Plisson-Saune, S., Capdeville, B., Mauret, M., Deguin, A. and Baptiste, P. (1996). Real-time control of nitrogen removal using three ORP bending-points: Signification, control strategy and results. Wat. Sci. Tech., 33(1), 275-280.
14. Spanjers, H. and Vanrolleghem, P.A. (1995). Respirometry as a tool for rapid characterization of wastewater and activated sludge. Wat. Sci. Tech., 31(2), 105-114.
15. Spanjers, H., Vanrolleghem, P.A., Olsson, G. and Dold, P. (1998). Respirometry in control of the activated sludge process (principles). IAWQ Scientific and Technical Report.
16. Spérandio, M., Urbain, V., Audic, J.M. and Paul, E. (1998). Use of carbon dioxide evolution rate measurement for determining yield coefficient and characterising denitrifying heterotrophic biomass. Wat. Sci. Tech., 39(1), 139-146.
17. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (1995). 19th edn, American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Washington DC, USA.
18. Steffens, M.A., Lant, P.A. and Newell, R.B. (1997). A systematic approach for reducing complex biological wastewater treatment models. Wat. Res., 31(3), 590-606.
19. Vanrolleghem, P. and Coen, F. (1995). Optimal design of in-sensor experiments for on-line modelling of nitrogen removal processes. Wat. Sci. Tech., 31(2), 149-160.
20. Vanrolleghem, P., Spanjers, H., Petersen, B., Ginestet, P. and Takacs, I. (1999). Estimating (combinations of) Activated Sludge Model No. 1 parameters and components by respirometry. Wat. Sci. Tech., 39(1), 195-214.
21. Volcke, I.P., Gillot, S. and Vanrolleghem, P.A. (2002). Multi-criteria evaluation of control strategies for wastewater treatment processes. IFAC 15th Triennal World Congress, 26-29 July, Barcelona, Spain.
22. Yuan, Z. and Bogaert, H. (2001). A titrimetric respirometer measuring the nitrifiable nitrogen in wastewater using in-sensor experiment. Wat. Res., 35, 180-188.
23. Zhao, H., Isaacs, S.H., Soeberg, H. and Kümmel, M. (1994). A novel control strategy for improved nitrogen removal in an alternating activated sludge process - Part I. Wat. Res., 28(3), 521-534.