Posterior composite restoration update: Focus on factors influencing form and function

Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry

Volumn 5, Issue , 2013, Pages 33-42

  Bohaty, Brenda S ^a,b   Ye, Qiang ^c   Misra, Anil ^c,d   Sene, Fabio ^e   Spencer, Paulette ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b CHILDREN S MERCY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^d University of Kansas   (United States)

^e STATE UNIVERSITY OF LONDRINA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bonding; Composites; Dental restorations

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879248127     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11791357     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/ccide.s42044     Document Type: Article

References (116)

1. Beazoglou T, Eklund S, Heffley D, Meiers J, Brown LJ, Bailit H. Economic impact of regulating the use of amalgam restorations. Public Health Rep. 2007;122(5):657-663.
2. Murray PE, Windsor LJ, Smyth TW, Hafez AA, Cox CF. Analysis of pulpal reactions to restorative procedures, materials, pulp capping, and future therapies. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2002;13(6):509-520.
3. Palmer C. Good progress reported in mercury treaty talks. ADA News. 2011;42(21):1-2.
4. Simecek JW, Diefenderfer KE, Cohen ME. An evaluation of replacement rates for posterior resin-based composite and amalgam restorations in US. Navy and marine corps recruits. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009;140(2): 200-209.
5. Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, et al. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138(6):775-783.
6. Malhotra N, Mala K, Acharya S. Resin-based composite as a direct esthetic restorative material. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2011;32(5): 14-23.
7. Levin L, Coval M, Geiger SB. Cross-sectional radiographic survey of amalgam and resin-based composite posterior restorations. Quintessence Int. 2007;38(6):511-514.
8. Mjor IA, Dahl JE, Moorhead JE. Age of restorations at replacement in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand. 2000;58(3):97-101.
9. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BA, Huysmans MC. 12-year survival of composite vs amalgam restorations. J Dent Res. 2010;89(10): 1063-1067.
10. Soncini JA, Maserejian NN, Trachtenberg F, Tavares M, Hayes C. The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings From the New England Children's Amalgam Trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138(6): 763-772.
11. DeRouen TA, Martin MD, Leroux BG, et al. Neurobehavioral effects of dental amalgam in children: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006;295(15):1784-1792.
12. Van Nieuwenhuysen JP, D'Hoore W, Carvalho J, Qvist V. Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth. J Dent. 2003; 31(6):395-405.
13. Kohler B, Rasmusson CG, Odman P. A five-year clinical evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations. J Dent. 2000;28(2):111-116.
14. Trachtenberg F, Maserejian NN, Tavares M, Soncini JA, Hayes C. Extent of tooth decay in the mouth and increased need for replacement of dental restorations: the New England Children's Amalgam Trial. Pediatr Dent. 2008;30(5):388-392.
15. Hunt PR. A modified class II cavity preparation for glass ionomer restorative materials. Quintessence Int Dent Dig. 1984;15(10): 1011-1018.
16. Knight GM. The tunnel restoration - nine years of clinical experience using capsulated glass ionomer cements. Case report. Aust Dent J. 1992;37(4):245-251.
17. Wiegand A, Attin T. Treatment of proximal caries lesions by tunnel restorations. Dent Mater. 2007;23(12):1461-1467.
18. Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken JE, Mount GJ. Minimal intervention dentistry - a review. FDI Commission Project 1-97. Int Dent J. 2000; 50(1):1-12.
19. Lopes GC, Vieira LC, Araujo E. Direct composite resin restorations: a review of some clinical procedures to achieve predictable results in posterior teeth. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004;16(1):19-31.
20. Da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Donassollo TA, Cenci MS, et al. 22-Year clinical evaluation of the performance of two posterior composites with different filler characteristics. Dent Mater. 2011;27(10):955-963.
21. Da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Cenci MS, Donassollo TA, Loguercio AD, Demarco FF. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings. J Dent. 2006;34(7):427-435.
22. Plasmans PJ, Creugers NH, Mulder J. Long-term survival of extensive amalgam restorations. J Dent Res. 1998;77(3):453-460.
23. Demarco FF, Correa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater. 2012;28(1):87-101.
24. El-Sahn NA, El-Kassas DW, El-Damanhoury HM, Fahmy OM, Gomaa H, Platt JA. Effect of C-factor on microtensile bond strengths of low-shrinkage composites. Oper Dent. 2011;36(3):281-292.
25. Shirai K, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, et al. Effect of cavity configuration and aging on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater. 2005;21(2):110-124.
26. Van Ende A, Mine A, De Munck J, Poitevin A, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of low-shrinking composites in high C-factor cavities. J Dent. 2012;40(4):295-303.
27. Kuijs RH, Fennis WM, Kreulen CM, Barink M, Verdonschot N. Does layering minimize shrinkage stresses in composite restorations? J Dent Res. 2003;82(12):967-971.
28. Abbas G, Fleming GJ, Harrington E, Shortall AC, Burke FJ. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with a packable composite cured in bulk or in increments. J Dent. 2003;31(6): 437-444.
29. Lee MR, Cho BH, Son HH, Um CM, Lee IB. Influence of cavity dimension and restoration methods on the cusp deflection of premolars in composite restoration. Dent Mater. 2007;23(3):288-295.
30. Park J, Chang J, Ferracane J, Lee IB. How should composite be layered to reduce shrinkage stress: incremental or bulk filling? Dent Mater. 2008;24(11):1501-1505.
31. Kwon Y, Ferracane J, Lee IB. Effect of layering methods, composite type, and flowable liner on the polymerization shrinkage stress of light cured composites. Dent Mater. 2012;28(7):801-809.
32. Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Pereira CL, Lund RG, de Carvalho RM. One-year comparison of metallic and translucent matrices in Class II composite resin restorations. Am J Dent. 2007;20(1):41-45.
33. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Do dental composites always shrink toward the light? J Dent Res. 1998;77(6):1435-1445.
34. Cenci MS, Lund RG, Pereira CL, de Carvalho RM, Demarco FF. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations with different matrix systems. J Adhes Dent. 2006;8(2):127-132.
35. Kampouropoulos D, Paximada C, Loukidis M, Kakaboura A. The influence of matrix type on the proximal contact in Class II resin composite restorations. Oper Dent J. 2010;35(4):454-462.
36. Collins CJ, BR, Hodge KLV. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings. J Dent. 1998;26:311-317.
37. Mair LH. Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams. Quintessence Int. 1998;29(8):483-490.
38. Mjor IA, Dahl JE, Moorhead JE. Placement and replacement of restorations in primary teeth. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2002;60:25-28.
39. Nordbo H, LJ, von der Fehr FR. Saucer-shaped cavity preparations for posterior aproximal resin composite restorations: Observations up to 10 years. Quintessence Int. 1988;29(1):5-11.
40. Owens BM, Johnson WW. Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7:303-308.
41. Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, et al. Technique-sensitivity of contemporary adhesives. Dent Mater J. 2005;24(1):1-13.
42. Anusavice KJ. Management of dental caries as a chronic infectious disease. J Dent Educ. 1998;62:791-802.
43. Dunne SM, Gainsford ID, Wilson NHF. Current materials and techniques for direct restorations in posterior teeth. Part 1: silver amalgam. Int Dent J. 1997;47:123-136.
44. Hansel C, Leyhausen G, Mai UE, Geurtsen W. Effects of various resin composite (co)monomers and extracts on two caries-associated micro-organisms in vitro. J Dent Res. 1998;77:60-67.
45. Santerre JP, Shajii L, Leung BW. Relation of dental composite formulations to their degradation and the release of hydrolyzed polymeric-resin-derived products. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2001;12:136-151.
46. Svanberg M, Mjor IA, Orstavik D. Mutans Streptococci in plaque from margins of Amalgam composite, and glass-ionomer restorations. J Dent Res. 1990;69(3):861-864.
47. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Endo K, Sano H, Oguchi H. Resin-tooth adhesive interfaces after long-term function. Am J Dent. 2001;14(4):211-215.
48. Meiers JC, Kresin J. Cavity disinfectants and dentin bonding. Oper Dent. 1996;21:153-159.
49. Spencer P, Wang Y, Bohaty B. Interfacial chemistry of moisture-aged class II composite restorations. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006;77(2):234-240.
50. Wang Y, Spencer P. Interfacial chemistry of class II composite restoration: structure analysis. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005;75(3): 580-587.
51. Gallo LM, Nickel JC, Iwasaki LR, Palla S. Stress-field translation in the healthy human temporomandibular joint. J Dent Res. 2000;79(10): 1740-1746.
52. Andersson-Wenckert IE, van Dijken JW, Kieri C. Durability of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after 6 years. Am J Dent. 2004;17:43-50.
53. Brannstrom M. Communication between the oral cavity and the dental pulp associated with restorative treatment. Oper Dent. 1984;9:57-68.
54. Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, De Stefano Dorigo E. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater. 2008;24(1):90-101.
55. Roulet JF. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam. J Dent. 1997;25:459-473.
56. Van Dijken JW. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up. J Dent. 2000;28:299-306.
57. Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and contraction stress of dental resin composites. Dent Mater. 2005;21:1150-1157.
58. Bouillaguet S, Ciucchi B, Jacoby T, Wataha JC, Pashley D. Bonding characteristics to dentin walls of class II cavities, in vitro. Dent Mater. 2001;17:316-321.
59. Purk JH, Dusevich V, Glaros AG, Spencer P, Eick JD. In vivo versus in vitro microtensile bond strength of axial versus gingival cavity preparation walls in class II resin-based composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135:185-193.
60. Garberoglio P. The ratio of the densities of dentinal tubules on the cervical and axial wall in cavities. Quintessence Int. 1994;25: 49-52.
61. Yoshiyama M, Carvalho R, Sano H, Horner J, Brewer PD, Pashley DH. Interfacial morphology and strength of bonds made to superficial versus deep dentin. Am J Dent. 1995;8:297-302.
62. Pashley DH. Clinical correlations of dentin structure and function. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66:777-781.
63. Gwinnett AJ. Chemically conditioned dentin: a comparison of conventional and environmental scanning electron microscopy findings. Dent Mater. 1994;10:150-155.
64. Gwinnett AJ. Dentin bond strength after air drying and rewetting. Am J Dent. 1994;7:144-148.
65. Gwinnett AJ. Altered tissue contribution to interfacial bond strength with acid conditioned dentin. Am J Dent. 1994;7:243-246.
66. Kanca J. Improved bond strength through acid etching of dentin and bonding to wet dentin surfaces. J Am Dent Assoc. 1992;123:235-243.
67. Pashley DH, Ciucchi B, Sano H, Horner JA. Permeability of dentin to adhesive agents. Quintessence Int. 1993;24:618-631.
68. Nakabayashi N, Watanabe A, Arao T. A tensile test to facilitate identification of defects in resin-bonded dentin specimens. J Dent. 1998;26:379-385.
69. Pashley EL, Zhang Y, Lockwood PE, Rueggeberg FA, Pashley DH. Effects of HEMA on water evaporation from water-HEMA mixtures. Dent Mater. 1998;14(1):6-10.
70. Wang Y, Spencer P. Hybridization efficiency of the adhesive dentin interface with wet bonding. J Dent Res. 2003;82:141-145.
71. Spencer P, Wang Y. Adhesive phase separation at the dentin interface under wet Bonding conditions. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;62(3):447-456.
72. Spencer P, Wang Y, Walker MP, Wieliczka DM, Swafford Jr. Interfacial chemistry of the dentin/adhesive bond. J Dent Res. 2000; 79(7):1458-1463.
73. Ye Q, Park J, Laurence JS, Parthasarathy R, Misra A, Spencer P. Ternary phase diagram of model dentin adhesive exposed to over-wet environments. J Dent Res. 2011;90(12):1434-1438.
74. Ye Q, Park JG, Parthasarathy R, et al. Quantitative analysis of aqueous phase composition of model dentin adhesives experiencing phase separation. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomaterials. 2012;100B:1086-1092.
75. Ito S, Hashimoto M, Wadgaonkar B, et al. Effects of resin hydrophilicity on water sorption and changes in modulus of elasticity. Biomaterials. 2005;26(33):6449-6459.
76. Marshall GW, Marshall SJ, Kinney JH, Balooch M. The dentin substrate:structure and properties related to bonding. J Dent. 1997;25: 441-458.
77. Pereira PNR, Okuda M, Sano H, Yoshikawa T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. Effect of intrinsic wetness and regional difference on dentin bond strength. Dent Mater. 1999;15:46-53.
78. Roulet JF, Degrange M, editors. Adhesion: The Silent Revolution in Dentistry, 1st ed: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc; Berlin, Germany; 1999:263.
79. Wang Y, Spencer P, Hager C, Bohaty B. Comparison of interfacial characteristics of adhesive bonding to superficial versus deep dentin using SEM and staining techniques. J Dent. 2006;34:26-34.
80. Pashley DH. Dentin: A dynamic substrate in dentistry. Scanning Microsc. 1989;3:161-176.
81. Spencer P, Wang Y, Katz JL, Misra A. Physicochemical interactions at the dentin/adhesive interface using FTIR chemical imaging. J Biomed Opt. 2005;10(3):031104.
82. Wang Y, Spencer P. Continuing etching of an all-in-one adhesive in wet dentin tubules. J Dent Res. 2005;84:350-354.
83. Wang Y, Spencer P, Yao X, Brenda B. Effect of solvent content on resin hybridization in wet dentin bonding. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007;82(4): 975-983.
84. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, Wei SHY. An optical, micromorphological study of surface moisture in the total etched resin-dentin interface. Am J Dent. 1996;9:43-48.
85. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SHY. The overwet phenomenon: a transmission electron microscopic study of surface moisture in the acid-conditioned, resin-dentin interface. Am J Dent. 1996;9:161-166.
86. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SHY. Micromophological spectrum from overdrying to overwetting acid-conditioned dentin in water-free, acetone-based, single-bottle primer/adhesives. Dent Mater. 1996;12:236-244.
87. Gwinnett AJ, Tay FR, Pang KM, Wei SHY. Quantitative Contribution of the Collagen Network in Dentin Hybridization. Am J Dent. 1996;9: 140-144.
88. Wang Y, Spencer P, Yao X. Micro-raman imaging analysis of monomer/mineral distribution in intertubular region of adhesive/dentin interfaces. J Biomed Optics. 2006;11:024005-1-024005-7.
89. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Water treeing - a potential mechanism for degradation of dentin adhesives. Am J Dent. 2003;16(1):6-12.
90. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Have dentin adhesives become too hydrophilic? J Can Dent Assoc. 2003;69(11):726-731.
91. Hebling J, Pashley DH, Tjaderhane L, Tay FR. Chlorhexidine arrests subclinical degradation of dentin hydbrid layers in vivo. J Dent Res. 2005;84(8):741-746.
92. Parthasarathy R, Misra A, Park J, Ye Q, Spencer P. Diffusion coefficients of water and leachables in methacrylate-based crosslinked polymers using absorption experiments. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012;23(5):1157-1172.
93. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater. 2005;21(9):864-881.
94. Donmez N, Belli S, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Ultrastructural correlates of in vivo/in vitro bond degradation in self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res. 2005;84(4):355-359.
95. Staninec M, Kim P, Marshall GW, Ritchie RO, Marshall SJ. Fatigue of dentin-composite interfaces with four-point bend. Dent Mater. 2008;24(6):799-803.
96. Misra A, Spencer P, Marangos O, Wang Y, Katz JL. Micromechanical analysis of dentin/adhesive interface by the finite element method. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004;70(1):56-65.
97. Misra A, Spencer P, Marangos O, Wang Y, Katz JL. Parametric study of the effect of phase anisotropy on the micromechanical behaviour of dentin-adhesive interfaces. J R Soc Interface. 2005;2(3):145-157.
98. Singh V, Misra A, Marangos O, et al. Fatigue life prediction of dentin-adhesive interface using micromechanical stress analysis. Dent Mater. 2011;27(9):e187-e195.
99. Katz JL, Misra A, Spencer P, et al. Multiscale mechanics of hierarchical structure/property relationships in calcified tissues and tissue/material interfaces. Mater Sci Eng A Struct Mater. 2007;27(3):450-468.
100. Singh V, Misra A, Marangos O, et al. Viscoelastic and fatigue properties of model methacrylate-based dentin adhesives. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010;95(2):283-290.
101. Belli R, Baratieri LN, Braem M, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. Tensile and bending fatigue of the adhesive interface to dentin. Dent Mater. 2010;26(12):1157-1165.
102. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Yiu C, et al. Collagen degradation by host-derived enzymes during aging. J Dent Res. 2004;83(3):216-221.
103. Sano H. Microtensile testing, nanoleakage, and biodegradation of resin-dentin bonds. J Dent Res. 2006;85(1):11-14.
104. Mazzoni A, Pashley DH, Nishitani Y, et al. Reactivation of quenched endogenous proteolytic activities in phosphoric acid-etched dentine by etch-and-rinse adhesives. Biomaterials. 2006;27(25):4470-4476.
105. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Monticelli F, Osorio R. Self-etching adhesives increase collagenolytic activity in radicular dentin. J Endodo. 2006;32(9):862-868.
106. Spencer P, Swafford Jr. Unprotected protein at the dentin-adhesive interface. Quintessence Int. 1999;30(7):501-507.
107. Spencer P, Ye Q, Park J, Topp EM, et al. Adhesive/dentin interface: the weak link in the composite restoration. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010;38(6): 1989-2003.
108. Ye Q, Spencer P, Wang Y, Misra A. Relationship of solvent to the photopolymerization process, properties and structure in model dentin adhesives. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007;80(2):342-350.
109. Guo X, Spencer P, Wang Y, Ye Q, Yao X, Williams K. Effects of a solubility enhancer on penetration of hydrophobic component in model adhesives into wet demineralized dentin. Dent Mater. 2007;23: 1473-1481.
110. Kostoryz EL, Dharmala K, Ye Q, et al. Enzymatic biodegradation of HEMA/BisGMA adhesives formulated with different water content. J Biomed Mater Res B: Appl Biomater. 2009;88B:394-401.
111. Guo X, Wang Y, Spencer P, Ye Q, Yao X. Effects of water content and initiator composition on photopolymerization of a model BisGMA/HEMA resin. Dent Mater. 2008;24(6):824-831.
112. Ye Q, Wang Y, Spencer P. Nanophase separation of polymers exposed to simulated bonding conditions. J Biomed Mater Res B: Appl Biomater. 2009;88B:339-348.
113. Park JG, Ye Q, Topp EM, Spencer P. Enzyme-catalyzed hydrolysis of dentin adhesives containing a new urethane-based trimethacrylate monomer. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater. 2009;91B: 562-571.
114. Park J, Ye Q, Topp EM, Kieweg SL, Spencer P. Effect of photo initiator system and water content on dynamic mechanical properties of a light-cured bisGMA/HEMA dental resin. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2010;93(4):1245-1251.
115. Park JG, Ye Q, Topp EM, Misra A, Spencer P. Water sorption and dynamic mechanical properties of dentin adhesives with a urethane-based multifunctional methacrylate monomer. Dent Mater. 2009;25: 1569-1575.
116. Drummond JL. Degradation, fatigue, and failure of resin dental composite materials. J Dent Res. 2008;87(8):710-719.