In vivo versus in vitro microtensile bond strength of axial versus gingival cavity preparation walls in Class II resin-based composite restorations

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 135, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 185-193

  Purk, John H ^a   Dusevich, Vladimir ^a   Glaros, Alan ^a   Spencer, Paulette ^a   Eick, J David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; RESIN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTIN; GINGIVA; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; PREMOLAR TOOTH; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH FILLING;

EID: 1342285466     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0150     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Eliades G, Palaghias G, Vougiouklakis G. Surface reactions of adhesives on dentin. Dent Mater 1990;6(3):208-16.
2. Spencer P, Byerley TJ, Eick JD, Witt JD. Chemical characterization of the dentin/adhesive interface by Fourier transform infrared photoacoustic spectroscopy. Dent Mater 1992;8(1):10-5.
3. Eick JD, Robinson SJ, Byerley TJ, Chappelow CC. Adhesives and nonshrinking dental resins of the future. Quintessence Int 1993;24(9):632-40.
4. Eick JD, Gwinnett AJ, Pashley DH, Robinson SJ. Current concepts on adhesion to dentin. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997;8(3):306-35.
5. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1982;16(3):265-73.
6. Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of dental hard tissues. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 1998.
7. Cagidiaco MC, Ferrari M, Vichi A, Davidson CL. Mapping of tubule and intertubule surface areas available for bonding in Class V and Class II preparations. J Dent 1997;25:379-89.
8. Walshaw PR, McComb D. Clinical considerations for optimal dentinal bonding. Quintessence Int 1996;27(9):619-25.
9. Mjor IA. The location of clinically diagnosed secondary caries. Quintessence Int 1998;29(5):313-7.
10. Mjor IA, Toffenetti F. Placement and replacement of resin-based composite restorations in Italy. Oper Dent 1992;17(3):82-5.
11. Kohler B, Rasmusson CG, Odman P. A five-year clinical evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations. J Dent 2000;28(2):111-6.
12. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001;3(1):45-64.
13. Opdam NJ, Roeters JJ, Kuijs R, Burgersdijk RC. Necessity of bevels for box only Class II composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80(3):274-9.
14. Spencer P, Swafford JR. Unprotected protein at the dentin-adhesive interface. Quintessence Int 1999;30(7):501-7.
15. Roulet JF. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam. J Dent 1997;25(6):459-73.
16. Eick JD, Welch FH. Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on postoperative sensitivity. Quintessence Int 1986;17(2):103-11.
17. Wilson NH. Conference report. Direct adhesive materials: current perceptions and evidence - future solutions. J Dent 2001;29(5):307-16.
18. Spencer P, Wang Y, Walker MP, Wieliczka DM, Swafford JR. Interfacial chemistry of the dentin/adhesive bond. J Dent Res 2000;79(7):1458-63.
19. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Endo K, Kaga M, Sano H, Oguchi H. The effect of hybrid layer thickness on bond strength: demineralized dentin zone of the hybrid layer. Dent Mater 2000;16(6):406-11.
20. Garberoglio P. The ratio of the densities of dentinal tubules on the cervical and axial walls in cavities. Quintessence Int 1994;25(1):49-52.
21. Maroli S, Khera SC, Krell KV. Regional variation in permeability of young dentin. Oper Dent 1992;17(3):93-100.
22. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SH. The overwet phenomenon: a scanning electron microscopic study of surface moisture in the acid-conditioned, resin-dentin interface. Am J Dent 1996;9(3):109-14.
23. Feilzer AJ, DeGee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987;66(11):1636-9.
24. Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Effects of dentin depth and cavity configuration on bond strength. J Dent Res 1999;78(4):898-905.
25. Bouillaguet S, Ciucchi B, Jacoby T, Wataha JC, Pashley D. Bonding characteristics to dentin walls of Class II cavities, in vitro. Dent Mater 2001;17(4):316-21.
26. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984;63(12):1396-9.
27. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SH. The overwet phenomenon: an optical, micromorphological study of surface moisture in the acid-conditioned, resin-dentin interface. Am J Dent 1996;9(1):43-8.
28. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SH. The overwet phenomenon: a transmission electron microscopic study of surface moisture in the acid-conditioned, resin-dentin interface. Am J Dent 1996;9(4):161-6.
29. Tay FR, Gwinnett JA, Wei SH. Micromorphological spectrum from overdrying to overwetting acid-conditioned dentin in water-free acetone-based, single-bottle primer/adhesives. Dent Mater 1996;12(4):236-44.
30. Jacobsen T, Soderhold KJ. Some effects of water on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 1995;11(2):132-6.
31. SamplePower. Version 1.0. Chicago: SPSS; 1997.
32. SPSS for Windows. Version 7.0. Chicago: SPSS; 1995.
33. Nakajima M, Sano H, Zheng L, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Effect of moist vs. dry bonding to normal vs. caries-affected dentin with Scotch-bond Multi-Purpose Plus. J Dent Res 1999;78(7):1298-303.
34. Cardoso PE, Braga RR, Carrilho MR. Evaluation of micro-tensile, shear and tensile tests determining the bond strength of three adhesive systems. Dent Mater 1998;14(6):394-8.
35. Bouillaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha JC, et al. Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional, one-step, and self-etching adhesive systems. J Dent 2001;29(1):55-61.
36. Lutz F, Krejci I. Resin composites in the post-amalgam age. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999;20(12):1138-48.
37. Barkmeier WW, Shaffer SE, Gwinnett AJ. Effects of 15 vs. 60 second enamel acid conditioning on adhesion and morphology. Oper Dent 1986;11(3):111-6.
38. Perdigao J, Denehy GE, Swift EJ Jr. Silica contamination of etched dentin and enamel surfaces: a scanning electron microscopic and bond strength study. Quintessence Int 1994;25(5):327-33.
39. van der Vyver PJ, de Wet FA, Jansen van Rensburg JM. Bonding of composite resin using different enamel etchants. J Dent Assoc S Afr 1997;52(3):169-72.
40. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res 1984;63(2):146-8.
41. Purk JH, Krenkel DC, Glaros A, Spencer P, Eick JD. Microtensile strength of gingival vs. axial walls in in vitro premolars (abstract 1700). J Dent Res 2001;80(special issue):248.
42. Finger WJ, Balkenhol M. Practitioner variability effects on dentin bonding with an acetone-based one-bottle adhesive. J Adhes Dent 1999;1(4):311-4.
43. Pereira G, Paulillo LA, De Goes MF, Dias CT. How wet should dentin be? Comparison of methods to remove excess water during moist bonding. J Adhes Dent 2001;3(3):257-64.
44. Perdigao J, Lopes M. Dentin bonding: questions for the new millennium. J Adhes Dent 1999;1(3):191-209.
45. Spencer P, Wang Y. Adhesive phase separation at the dentin interface under wet bonding conditions. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;62(3):447-56.
46. Xie J, Powers JM, McGuckin RS. In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions. Dent Mater 1993;9(5):295-9.
47. Van Meerbeek B, Vargas MA, Inoue S, et al. Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry. Oper Dent 2001;(supplement 6):119-44.
48. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, Wei SH. Variability in microleakage observed in a total-etch wet-bonding technique under different handling conditions. J Dent Res 1995;74(5):1168-78.
49. Perdigao J, Geraldeli S, Carmo AR, Dutra HR. In vivo influence of residual moisture on microtensile bond strengths of one-bottle adhesives. J Esthet Restor Dent 2002;14(1):31-8.
50. Hannig M, Friedrichs C. Comparative in vivo and in vitro investigation of interfacial bond variability. Oper Dent 2001;26(1):3-11.
51. Paul SJ, Leach M, Rueggeberg FA, Pashley DH. Effect of water content on the physical properties of model dentine primer and bonding resins. J Dent 1999;27(3):209-14.
52. Tay FR, Gwinnett JA, Wei SH. Relation between water content in acetone/alcohol-based primer and interfacial ultrastructure. J Dent 1998;26(2):147-56.
53. Ogata M, Okuda M, Nakajima M, Pereira PN, Sano H, Tagami J. Influence of the direction of tubules on bond strength to dentin. Oper Dent 2001;26(1):27-35.
54. Yoshiyama M, Sano H, Ebisu S, et al. Regional strengths of bonding agents to cervical sclerotic root dentin. J Dent Res 1996;75(6):1404-13.
55. Pashley DH. In vitro simulations of in vivo bonding conditions. Am J Dent 1991;4(5):237-40.