Viscoelastic and fatigue properties of model methacrylate-based dentin adhesives

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 95 B, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 283-290

  Singh, Viraj ^a   Misra, Anil ^a,b   Marangos, Orestes ^a   Park, Jonggu ^b   Ye, Qiang ^b   Kieweg, Sarah L ^a   Spencer, Paulette ^a,b  

^a University of Kansas   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

creep; dentin adhesive; dry and wet; fatigue; prony series; S N curves; viscoelastic

Indexed keywords

DENTIN ADHESIVES; DRY AND WET; FATIGUE; PRONY SERIES; S-N CURVE; VISCOELASTIC;

ADHESIVES; BENDING TESTS; CURING; ELASTIC MODULI; FATIGUE TESTING;

CREEP;

ADHESIVE AGENT; METHACRYLIC ACID; WATER;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; DENTIN; MEASUREMENT; MECHANICAL STRESS; VISCOELASTICITY; YOUNG MODULUS;

DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTIN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; MODELS, THEORETICAL; VISCOSITY;

EID: 78649661848     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31712     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Beazoglou T, Eklund S, Heffley D, Meiers J, Brown LJ, Bailit H,. Economic impact of regulating the use of amalgam restorations. Public Health Rep 2007; 122: 657-663.
2. Murray PE, Windsor LJ, Smyth TW, Hafez AA, Cox CF,. Analysis of pulpal reactions to restorative procedures, materials, pulp capping, and future therapies. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2002; 13: 509-520.
3. Simecek JW, Diefenderfer KE, Cohen ME,. An evaluation of replacement rates for posterior resin-based composite and amalgam restorations in US Navy and Marine Corps recruits. J Am Dental Assoc 2009; 140: 200-209.
4. Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Rue T, Leitao J, DeRouen TA,. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc 2007; 138: 775-783.
5. DeRouen TA, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Townes BD, Woods JS, Leitao J, Castro-Caldas A, Luis H, Bernardo M, Rosenbaum G, Martins IP,. Neurobehavioral effects of dental amalgam in children: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006; 295: 1784-1792.
6. Levin L, Coval M, Geiger SB,. Cross-sectional radiographic survey of amalgam and resin-based composite posterior restorations. Quintessence Int 2007; 38: 511-514.
7. Mjor IA, Dahl JE, Moorhead JE,. Age of restorations at replacement in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 2000; 58: 97-101.
8. Soncini JA, Maserejian NN, Trachtenberg F, Tavares M, Hayes C,. The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth-Findings from the new England children's amalgam trial. J Am Dental Assoc 2007; 138: 763-772.
9. Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ,. Polymerization shrinkage and contraction stress of dental resin composites. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 1150-1157.
10. Roulet JF,. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam. J Dent 1997; 25: 459-473.
11. Andersson-Wenckert IE, van Dijken JWV, Kieri C,. Durability of extensive Class 11 open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after 6 years. Am J Dentistry 2004; 17: 43-50.
12. Brannstrom M,. Communication between the oral cavity and the dental-pulp associated with restorative treatment. Operat Dent 1984; 9: 57-68.
13. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Endo K, Sano H, Oguchi H,. Resin-tooth adhesive interfaces after long-term function. Am J Dent 2001; 14: 211-215.
14. Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Hashimoto M, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Suzuki K,. Technique-sensitivity of contemporary adhesives. Dent Mater J 2005; 24: 1-13.
15. Misra A, Spencer P, Marangos O, Wang Y, Katz JL,. Micromechanical analysis of dentin/adhesive interface by the finite element method. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater B 2004; 70: 56-65.
16. Misra A, Spencer P, Marangos O, Wang Y, Katz JL,. Parametric study of the effect of phase anisotropy on the micromechanical behavior of dentin-adhesive interface. J Roy Soc Interface 2005; 2: 145-157.
17. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A,. Fatigue behavior of different dentin adhesives. Clin Oral Invest 1999; 3: 11-17.
18. Frankenberger R, Strobel WO, Kramer N, Lohbauer U, Winterscheidt J, Winterscheidt B, Petschelt A,. Evaluation of the fatigue behavior of the resin-dentin bond with the use of different methods. J Biomed Mater Res Part B 2003; 67: 712-721.
19. Staninec M, Kim P, Marshall GW, Ritchie RO, Marshall SJ,. Fatigue of dentin-composite interface with four-point bend. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 799-803.
20. Park jG, Ye Q, Topp EM, Misra A, Spencer P,. Water sorption and dynamic mechanical properties of dentin adhesives with a urethane-based multifunctional methacrylate monomer. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 1569-1575.
21. Wineman AS, Rajagopal KR,. Mechanical Response of Polymers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
22. Chen T,. Determining a Prony Series for a Viscoelastic Material from Time Varying Strain Data. U.S Army Research Laboratory; 2000.
23. Dooling PJ, Buckley CP, Hinduja S,. An intermediate model method for obtaining a discrete relaxation spectrum from creep data. Rheological Acta 1997; 36: 472-482.
24. Baumgaertel M, Winter HH,. Determination of discrete relaxation and retardation time spectra from dynamic mechanical data. Rheological Acta 1989; 28: 511-519.
25. Tschoegl NW, Emri I,. Generating line spectra from experimental response. III. Interconversion between relaxation and retardation behavior. Int J Polymerica Mater 1992; 18: 117-127.
26. Park SW, Kim YR,. Fitting prony-series viscoelastic models with power-law presmoothing. J Mater Civil Eng 2001; 13: 26-32.
27. Nalla RK, Kinney JH, Marshall SJ, Ritchie RO,. On the in vitro fatigue behavior of human dentin: Effect of mean stress. J Dent Res 2004; 83.
28. Myllytie P, Salmen L, Haimi E, Laine J,. Viscoelasticity and water plasticization of polymer-cellulose composite films and paper sheets. Cellulose 2010; 17: 375-385.