Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of class V resin composite restorations

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 303-308

  Owens, Barry M ^a   Johnson, William W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Adhesives; Class V restoration; Composite resin; Microleakage

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; COLORING AGENT; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; ESTHET X; ESTHET-X; IBOND; METHYLENE BLUE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASE;

COLORING AGENTS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); METHYLENE BLUE; RESIN CEMENTS; TOOTH CERVIX;

EID: 30044431643     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abdalla AL, Davidson CL. Comparison of the marginal and axial wall integrity of in-vivo and in-vitro made adhesive Class V restorations. J Oral Rehabil 1993;6:295-298.
2. Academy of Operative Dentistry: Recommendations for Clinical Practice. Non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent 2003;28:109-113.
3. Amarl CM, Hara AT, Pimenta LAF, Rodrigues AL. Microleakage of hydrophilic adhesive systems in Class V composite restorations. Am J Dent 2001;14:31-33.
4. Barnes DM, Thompson VP, Blank LW, McDonald NJ. Microleakage of Class 5 composite resin restorations: a comparison between in vivo and in vitro. Operative Dentistry 1993;18:237-245.
5. Bouschlicher MR, Vargas MA, Boyer DB. Effect of composite type, light intensity, configuration factor and laser polymerization on contraction forces. Am J Dent 1997;10:88-96.
6. Bullard H, Leinfelder KF, Russell M. Effect of coefficient of thermal expansion on microleakage. J Amer Dent Assoc 1988;116:871-874.
7. Crim GA. Microleakage of three placement techniques. Am J Dent 1991;4:69-72.
8. Crim GA, Chapman KW. Effect of placement techniques on microleakage of a dentin-bonded composite resin. Quintessence Int 1986;17:21-24.
9. Crim GA, Garcia-Godoy F. Microleakage: The effect of storage and cycling duration. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:574-576.
10. Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 1997;25:435-440.
11. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984;63:1396-1399.
12. Duke ES. The science and practice of dental adhesive systems. Compedium 2003;24:417-424.
13. Feilzer AJ, DeGee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987;66:1636-1639.
14. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Davidson CL. Resistance of cementum in Class II and V cavities to penetration by an adhesive system. Dent Mater 1997;13:157-162.
15. Ferrari M, Yamamoto K, Vichi A, Finger WL. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of adhesive restoration systems. Am J Dent 1994;7:217-219.
16. Freedman G, Leinfelder K. Seventh-generation adhesive systems. Dentistry Today 2002;21:106-111.
17. Fusayama T. Factors and prevention of pulp irritation by adhesive composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1987;18:633-641.
18. Gagliardi RM, Avelar RP. Evaluation of microleakage using different bonding agents. Oper Dent 2002;27:582-586.
19. Going RE. Microleakage around dental restorations; A summarizing review. J Am Dent Assoc 1972;84:1349-1357.
20. Goldman M. Polymerization shrinkage of resin-based restorative materials. Aust Dent J 1983;28:156-161.
21. Goracci C, Sadek FT, Monticelli F, Cardoso PE, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives to enamel and dentin. J Adhes Dent 2004;6:313-318.
22. Gordan VV, Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Denehy GE. Evaluation of acidic primers in microleakage of Class 5 composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 1998;23:244-249.
23. Kanemura N, Suno H, Tagami J. Tensile bond strength to and SEM evaluation of ground and intact enamel surfaces. J Dent 1999;27:523-530.
24. Kelsey WP, Latta MA, Vargas MA, Carroll LR, Armstrong SR. Microtensile bond strength of total-etch and self-etch adhesives to the enamel walls of Class V cavities. Am J Dent 2005;18:37-40.
25. LeClaire CC, Blank LW, Hargrave JW, Pelleu GB. Use of a two-stage composite resin fill to reduce microleakage below the cementoenamel junction. Oper Dent 1988;13:20-23.
26. Leinfelder KF, Kurdziolek SM. Self-etching bonding agents. Compendium 2003;24:447-456.
27. Mangrum FI, Berry EA, DeSchepper E, Riegger MR. Microleakage of incremental versus compression matrix bulk filling of cervical resin composite restorations. Gen Dent 1994;July/Aug:304-308.
28. Marshall GW, Marshall SJ, Kinney JH, Balooch M. The dentin substrate: Structure and properties related to bonding. J Dent 1997;25:441-458.
29. Martin FE, O'Rourke M. Marginal seal of cervical tooth-colored restorations. A laboratory investigation of placement techniques. Aust Dent J 1993;38:102-107.
30. Mullejans R, Lang H, Schuler N, Badawi MOF, Raab WHM. Increment technique for extended Class V restorations: an experimental study. Oper Dent 2003;28:352-356.
31. Nelson RJ, Wolcott RB, Paffenburger GC. Fluid exchange at the margins of dental restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1952;44:288-295.
32. Perdigao J, Geraldeli S, Hodges JS. Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive: Effect on postoperative sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:1621-1629.
33. Phair CB, Fuller JL. Microleakage of composite resin restorations with cementum margins. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:361-364.
34. Pilo R, Ben-Amar A. Comparison of microleakage for three one-bottle and three multiple-step dentin bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:209-213.
35. Poskus LT, Placido E, Cardoso PEC. Influence of adhesive system and placement technique on microleakage of resin-based composite restorations. J Adhes Dent 2004;6:227-232.
36. Puckett A, Fitchie J, Hembree J, Smith J. The effect of incremental versus bulk fill technique on the microlekage of composite resin using a glass-ionomer liner. Oper Dent 1992;17:186-191.
37. Retief DH, Mandras RS, Russel CM. Shear bond strength required to prevent microleakage at the dentin-restoration interface. Am J Dent 1994;7:43-46.
38. St-Georges AJ, Wilder AD, Perdigao J, Swift EJ. Microleakage of Class V composites using different placement and curing techniques: An in vitro study. Am J Dent 2002;15:244-247.
39. Santini A, Ivanovic V, Ibbetson R, Milia E. Influence of cavity configuration on microleakage around Class V restorations bonded with seven self-etching adhesives. J Esthet Rest Dent 2004;16:128-136.
40. Santini A, Mitchell S. Microleakage of composite restorations bonded with three new dentin bonding agents. J Esthet Dent 1998;10:296-304.
41. Sensi LG, Lopes GC, Monteiro S, Baratieri LN, Vieira LC. Dentin bond strength of self-etching primers/adhesives. Oper Dent 2005;30:63-68.
42. Sidhu SK. A comparative analysis of techniques of restoring cervical lesions. Quintessence Int 1993;24:553-559.
43. Tjan AHL, Glancy JF. Interfacial bond strength between layers of visible light-activated composites. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:25-29.
44. Trowbridge HO. Model systems for determining biological effects of microleakage. Oper Dent 1987;12:164-172.
45. Unterbrink GL, Liebenberg WH. Flowable resin composites as "filled adhesives": literature review and clinical recommendations. Quintessence Int 1990;30:249-257.
46. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future changes. Oper Dent 2003;28:215-235.
47. Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J Dent Res 1996;75:871-878.
48. Welsh EL, Hembree JH. Microleakage at the gingival wall with four Class V anterior restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:370-372.
49. Winkler MM, Katona TR, Paydar NH. Finite element stress analysis of three filling techniques for Class V light-cured composite restorations. J Dent Res 1996;75:1477-1483.